| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-03-27 | |||
| 17:57:18 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add flavor value options https://review.openstack.org/302795 | |
| 18:56:19 | dtroyer | mordred, stevemar: I'm adding the osc-functional-tips job to osc-lib (https://review.openstack.org/450419), should we add it to os-client-config too? | |
| 18:57:55 | mordred | dtroyer: I'm a fan of any functional testing that's good | |
| 18:58:35 | mordred | dtroyer: I'm assuming that's running OSC's functional tests with the tips of the things? | |
| 18:59:51 | dtroyer | yes | |
| 19:00:18 | dtroyer | it's broken at the moment due to the removing-ksc review in o-c-c | |
| 19:00:39 | dtroyer | which is next up for me to sort out. Time to squash that instead of always going backward | |
| 19:02:05 | dtroyer | ok, added to occ too | |
| 20:04:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Nit: Reorder some util methods in alphabetic order https://review.openstack.org/444086 | |
| 20:59:27 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Change noauth strategy for plugin loading https://review.openstack.org/450452 | |
| 21:01:01 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Change noauth strategy for plugin loading https://review.openstack.org/450453 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-03-28 | |||
| 00:58:55 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Change noauth strategy for plugin loading https://review.openstack.org/450453 | |
| 01:47:28 | openstackgerrit | Akira Yoshiyama proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Add allow_identity_admin to CloudConfig.get_session_endpoint() https://review.openstack.org/450500 | |
| 03:54:44 | openstackgerrit | Jamie Lennox proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Stop special-casing idenity catalog lookups https://review.openstack.org/450259 | |
| 07:10:32 | openstackgerrit | Rui Chen proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Find floating ip by ip address https://review.openstack.org/449879 | |
| 07:30:30 | rabel | good mornin! | |
| 07:51:40 | RuiChen | morning rabel :-) | |
| 07:52:34 | rabel | hi RuiChen :) | |
| 07:52:43 | rabel | how are you? | |
| 07:54:22 | RuiChen | yeah, have a pretty sunshine day, what about you? | |
| 07:59:08 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: List/Show all server migration types https://review.openstack.org/450119 | |
| 08:14:09 | rabel | RuiChen: here too. :( | |
| 08:14:12 | rabel | :) | |
| 08:14:51 | rabel | reedip, reedip_: i have a question about a note from you in the openstackclient source. | |
| 08:14:56 | rabel | :q | |
| 08:15:09 | reedip | fire away | |
| 08:15:44 | rabel | in common/quota.py there is a check if network_quota_info is dict or not | |
| 08:15:54 | rabel | at ShowQuota | |
| 08:16:22 | rabel | the node says this will not be necessary when using sdk 0.9.12 or above | |
| 08:16:39 | reedip | rabel ; I made a patch for that | |
| 08:16:51 | reedip | rabel : but its in failed state, I will push it again | |
| 08:18:10 | reedip | rabel :https://review.openstack.org/#/c/439299/ | |
| 08:19:09 | rabel | reedip: i tried this, but it does not seem to work | |
| 08:19:26 | reedip | rabel : yes, I need to relook into this | |
| 08:20:32 | rabel | ok. feel free to add me to reviewers, if you upload more patches. :) | |
| 08:20:35 | reedip | I will take it today .. | |
| 08:20:46 | reedip | sure thing rabel ... | |
| 08:21:05 | rabel | since you already worked on the quota thing, maybe you can answer me another question | |
| 08:21:30 | reedip | rabel ... yessss | |
| 08:21:55 | rabel | the help text of argument "--default" says "Show default quotas for <project>". but isn't it the idea behind default quotas, that they don't belong to a certain project? | |
| 08:23:28 | reedip | rabel : IIUC , we can change the default quotas of a project | |
| 08:25:20 | rabel | reedip: i thought the default quotas are the quotas that are applied to a new project. what are default quotas for a project then? | |
| 08:26:17 | reedip | rabel : https://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide/cli-networking-advanced-quotas.html#configure-per-project-quotas | |
| 08:26:29 | reedip | neutron quota-default-show | |
| 08:28:49 | rabel | reedip: "neutron quota-default-show" as well as "openstack quota show --default" do work without providing a project | |
| 08:29:05 | reedip | rabel : they take the current user as the project | |
| 08:29:39 | rabel | reedip: ah, ok. | |
| 08:29:50 | rabel | reedip: but what are default quotas then? | |
| 08:30:20 | reedip | rabel : and the interesting thing may be here | |
| 08:30:21 | reedip | Configure Networking to show per-project quotas | |
| 08:30:21 | reedip | Set the quota_driver option in the /etc/neutron/neutron.conf file. | |
| 08:30:21 | reedip | quota_driver = neutron.db.quota_db.DbQuotaDriver | |
| 08:31:11 | reedip | this is the default quota driver, but any variant ( like RHOS, Canonical Openstack ) can create their own Quota drivers as well | |
| 08:32:04 | reedip | the neutron/db/quota_db.py DbQuotaDriver will have the default quotas which you want | |
| 08:33:32 | reedip | rabel as you see in the file ( neutron/db/quota/driver.py ) which is loaded up by neutron/db/quota_db.py | |
| 08:34:00 | reedip | they have created a --tenant for now, as it is possible to change default quotas per tenant in the future | |
| 08:34:20 | reedip | and that can be done by any third party in their own variant of the code :) | |
| 08:36:15 | rabel | reedip: i see the comment in the file. but i don't understand the idea behind default quotas for a project. | |
| 08:37:24 | reedip | Its like differentiating the quality of service of a cloud | |
| 08:38:17 | reedip | if a user wants to have a Gold Standard QoS, then they may have a specific default quota | |
| 08:38:40 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add "qos-policy" option to "port create" & "port set" https://review.openstack.org/419236 | |
| 08:38:59 | reedip | If they have platinum , then .... you can have better number of resources in default | |
| 08:40:15 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add "qos-policy" option to "port create" & "port set" https://review.openstack.org/419236 | |
| 08:40:28 | reedip | ralonsoh : you forgot to add yourself as the author ^^ | |
| 08:40:40 | ralonsoh | No, no problem | |
| 08:41:07 | ralonsoh | reedip: it was just a forgotten patch I wanted to be fixed | |
| 08:41:13 | reedip | I added you as well ralonsoh ... you are working on it right now | |
| 08:41:29 | reedip | yeah, you are working on it.... so I added you :) | |
| 08:41:46 | ralonsoh | reedip: okidoki!! | |
| 08:42:04 | rabel | reedip: in this case the customer would have one openstack-project, not? so you could just adjust the quotas for the project. | |
| 08:42:16 | rabel | i still don't understand. sorry ;) | |
| 08:42:27 | reedip | rabel : see it from a Public cloud perspective | |
| 08:42:37 | reedip | where multiple users can request for quotas | |
| 08:42:43 | reedip | something like AWS ? | |
| 08:43:04 | rabel | never worked with aws. | |
| 08:43:32 | rabel | but quotas in openstack are always project-based, right? | |
| 08:43:42 | reedip | rabel : neither did I , but I checked their business model | |
| 08:43:47 | reedip | rabel : yes | |
| 08:44:24 | rabel | reedip: so one project has one set of quotas. | |
| 08:44:29 | reedip | rabel : yes | |
| 08:44:54 | rabel | reedip: and additionally you have one cloud-wide default set of quotas, which is applied when a new project is created. | |
| 08:45:40 | rabel | reedip: or wait | |
| 08:45:55 | reedip | rabel : thats the thing ... you can also have a default quota for a tenant | |
| 08:46:43 | rabel | reedip: and when this is used? when i create a new tenant with --parent to that other tenant? | |
| 08:50:45 | RuiChen | dtroyer: stevemar hi, I'm drafting new commands to add network interface for a server, I have two object name "interface" and "nic" now, which one you favor? the command looks like: server add interface <server> [--network | --port] | |
| 09:00:11 | rabel | reedip: and also in this context: i do not understand, what a quota class is :D | |
| 09:00:39 | reedip | sorry , in another meeting rabel :) | |
| 09:00:46 | reedip | will be back in sometime | |
| 09:00:53 | rabel | reedip: np | |
| 09:00:57 | rabel | reedip: and thank you! | |
| 09:18:53 | reedip | rabel : hi | |
| 09:19:29 | rabel | reedip: welcome back :) | |
| 09:19:36 | reedip | currently there is no discrimination between tenants for default quotas in vanilla flavor of Openstack | |
| 09:19:52 | reedip | but it can be done..... | |
| 09:19:57 | reedip | quota class in SDK ? | |
| 09:22:16 | rabel | yes, i think so | |
| 09:22:35 | rabel | reedip: i have seen it in the openstackclient | |
| 09:22:44 | rabel | p.e. openstack quota set --class | |
| 09:23:00 | reedip | ohh that ? its similar to the project attribute | |
| 09:23:17 | reedip | but I am also confused a bit about its implementation, IMHO | |