Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2017-02-28
20:58:33 ankur-gupta-f1 it should be there
20:59:11 reedip ok goit it
20:59:14 ankur-gupta-f1 reedip: note glance CLI for image-tag-delete
20:59:30 ankur-gupta-f1 going to implemented similarly. once i figure out the best way to do it :)
20:59:37 reedip lol
20:59:42 reedip U will sooner !
21:04:04 openstackgerrit Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: add neutron CLI to decoder https://review.openstack.org/439148
21:04:33 ankur-gupta-f1 stevemar: looks good just added reedips tapflow commands
21:20:15 briancurtin Qiming: fyi i just released https://pypi.python.org/pypi/openstacksdk/0.9.14
21:42:39 openstackgerrit Justin A Wilson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for Cinder API 3.3/3.5 into OSC https://review.openstack.org/421585
21:45:08 reedip stevemar : any suggestions on https://review.openstack.org/383025 if u r not busy ?
21:47:20 openstackgerrit Justin A Wilson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for Cinder API 3.3/3.5 into OSC https://review.openstack.org/421585
22:14:33 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Simplify logic around option lists in port set https://review.openstack.org/439048
22:25:31 dtroyer thingee: FWIW huanxuan and I both left responses to your comments in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/434094/ about OSC plurals and the —no-XXXX options, in case the history is useful.
23:03:13 thingee mordred: can you update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/434372/ before a dependency merges?
23:04:22 thingee dtroyer: ack I'll remember this in the future
23:04:38 ankur-gupta-f4 +1
23:05:48 thingee dtroyer: still don't agree with it, but I'll let it go.
23:05:51 mordred thingee: the file that you reference is actually in a different repo
23:06:00 thingee mordred: doh
23:06:08 thingee mordred: sorry
23:06:33 thingee mordred: +1
23:41:54 jamielennox dtroyer: quick request, would like to be able to do openstack server delete my-prefix-*
#openstack-sdks - 2017-03-01
00:01:49 thingee jamielennox: sounds dangerous
00:03:33 jamielennox thingee: yea, i can see that, and i can always put it into a shell loop - just in the current case it would have made my operation 2 commands instead of 10
00:04:07 jamielennox anyway, it's not a something i'm super passionate about, just was dropping it here so its mentally a thing that has been requested at some point
01:05:29 dtroyer jamielennox: I've thought about that, and like thingee sez, caution has been the order… I think it might be interesting to have a setting somewhere to unlock things like that (especially on a delete) for people who are "this high" and can drive a cloud responsibly
01:06:27 dtroyer really what I want to do is take the output of a filtered list and be able to use it somewhere else…and now I'm creeping into interactive mode becoming a DSL…thats why the stray thoughts about Lua for those purposes
01:06:40 thingee dtroyer: --i-really-mean-it
01:06:59 dtroyer 'zactly!
01:07:15 dtroyer except plural!
01:07:29 thingee dtroyer: we put that in one of the ceph commands back in the day.
01:07:54 dtroyer —dwim has been in more than one of my previous projects (do what I mean)
01:08:06 thingee don't shoot the messenger
01:55:22 openstackgerrit Qiming Teng proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize cluster docs https://review.openstack.org/439110
02:01:14 openstackgerrit jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Functional test for subnet https://review.openstack.org/435914
02:22:21 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update doc/source/command-objects/image.rst https://review.openstack.org/439142
02:33:24 reedip ankur-gupta-f1 : anything to do ?? :P
02:34:07 ankur-gupta-f4 well I'm hoping you have slept since the last time we talked haha
02:34:30 reedip 2.5 hours ... enough to clear the cache !
02:34:44 ankur-gupta-f4 :|
02:35:10 ankur-gupta-f4 you can address amotoki's comments on the set/unset for FIP on floating IP :P
02:36:18 ankur-gupta-f4 reedip: you also got a nit -1 on the TaaS patchsets
02:37:21 reedip I will do the TaaS after I reach office :) Will update the FIP one for now
02:38:45 ankur-gupta-f4 and quota unset. So much to do so little time haha.
02:39:08 reedip amotoki : I also faced the same issue with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383025/ . After confirmation from sindhu , it was informed that the devstack needed to be updated.
02:39:42 reedip sindhu : care to explain the sdk_connection error in http://paste.openstack.org/show/600865/ for the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383025
02:39:45 amotoki reedip: what needs to be updated?
02:40:30 amotoki reedip: I used the version specified in upper-constraitnt.txt of openstacksdk, i.e., 0.9.13. what's the prbolem?
02:40:57 ankur-gupta-f4 amotoki: Will try recreating now
02:41:18 amotoki in addition to the above, it seems Ocata released versions of SDK and OSC have problems due to SDK API change.
02:41:33 amotoki for example, osc floating ip show <id> does not work.
02:41:50 reedip amotoki : ?? really ???
02:42:25 amotoki reedip: http://paste.openstack.org/show/600867/
02:42:56 amotoki I haven't checked all commands, but we have at least one :-(
02:43:14 reedip amotoki : As per what sindhu discussed with dtroyer, the sdk_connection error occurred due to devstack not being updated. I am waiting for sindhu's explanation for your question as I was also facing this issue in my local machine ( my devstack is older) but this issue is not occurring on the Gate
02:44:16 amotoki reedip: I created a new virtualenv and installed SDK and OSC, so i believe it does not apply to my case.
02:44:48 amotoki another strange behavior http://paste.openstack.org/show/600868/
02:44:51 ankur-gupta-f4 well I'm getting "ImportError: No module named deprecation"
02:45:02 amotoki network list --external does not work. it lists non-external networks too.
02:45:07 ankur-gupta-f4 so i guess my env is broken
02:46:23 reedip amotoki : TL;DR , a lot of issues are now coming :) Let me try out the latest SDK and OSC and get back to you. ankur-gupta-f4 ; too little time is right :)
02:46:41 amotoki reedip: no problem
02:46:48 reedip amotoki: thanks
02:47:11 ankur-gupta-f4 rebuilding. but this seems like it may be a tomorrow (for me) issue. Thanks amotoki for bringing it to attention. And also good morning :)
02:47:44 reedip good ???? not for the CLI
02:48:53 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Introduce quota unset command https://review.openstack.org/376311
02:50:47 sindhu reedip: amotoki : ok I finally found the conversation 12:16 PM sindhu: make sure you have https://review.openstack.org/#/c/435735/ in your git history.  rebase your patchset on master if you have not done that since 435735 merged.
02:51:34 reedip sindhu : is this the part of Openstack SDK 0.13 release?
02:52:58 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Introduce quota unset command https://review.openstack.org/376311
02:59:31 sindhu reedip: I am not sure abt that. Should ask dtroyer :)
03:00:06 reedip Or check the latest 0.13 code and see if it exists :F
03:00:07 reedip :D
03:00:15 reedip thats the longer way
03:00:18 ankur-gupta-f4 check the release notes and it wud show whether patch 435735 merged
03:00:51 ankur-gupta-f4 wait its an OSC patch. SDK doesn't matter
03:01:29 reedip oops
03:09:49 reedip ankur-gupta-f4 : there are some issues with OSC as the upgrade to 0.9.13 didnt remove the workarounds for 0.9.12
03:09:54 reedip sindhu : ^^
03:10:33 ankur-gupta-f4 excellent
03:16:11 reedip ankur-gupta-f4 : vv This is under works
03:16:25 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove workarounds for 0.9.12 SDK version https://review.openstack.org/439299
03:33:24 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize cluster docs https://review.openstack.org/439110
03:34:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize workflow docs https://review.openstack.org/439028
04:16:16 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/439362
07:40:02 openstackgerrit Akihiro Motoki proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: "floating ip set/unset port" for OSC https://review.openstack.org/383025
08:37:45 openstackgerrit Rikimaru Honjo proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add a validation about options for server migrate command https://review.openstack.org/439451
09:11:00 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: WIP Bulk Create support in OpenstackSDK https://review.openstack.org/439477
09:23:54 reedip_ ankur-gupta-f4 , ankur-gupta-f4 : You need to update devstack , openstack-sdk installed deprecation as a requirement 14 days ago
09:24:03 reedip_ ankur-gupta-f1 ^^
09:25:00 reedip_ amotoki : I am not facing any issue with floating ip show <id>
09:25:53 reedip_ checking the External Network issue ( I have updated my branch to master for SDK and OSC )
09:27:46 amotoki reedip_: what versions (SDK/OSC) do you use?
09:28:00 reedip_ amotoki: 0.9.13, 3.8.1
09:28:05 reedip_ thats as per pip freeze
09:29:13 reedip_ I am redeploying the devstack . And will retry the CLIs just to be doubly sure
09:37:51 openstackgerrit Qiming Teng proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Add wait_for_xxx methods to cluster proxy https://review.openstack.org/439490
09:48:31 amotoki reedip_: I checked the latest patch set locally and confirmed it works.
09:48:41 amotoki reedip_: one question remaining on the class name.
09:49:17 amotoki reedip_: currently SetFloatingIP is used for the class name. I wonder what class name is used when we have 'floating ip set' command in the future.

Earlier   Later