| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-02-02 | |||
| 20:02:35 | ankur-gupta-f1 | dtroyer: sindhu who has done quite a bit of Neutron command migration will be at PTG. | |
| 20:03:53 | dtroyer | ok, good | |
| 20:05:35 | ankur-gupta-f1 | dtroyer: nvm. I was wrong. None of us :'( | |
| 20:05:43 | ankur-gupta-f1 | we are all quite bitter about it | |
| 20:08:14 | stevemar | ankur-gupta-f1: grrr | |
| 20:08:15 | dtroyer | I know there has been some question about how to decide between PTG and Forum, I've tried to help clear that up as I find it | |
| 20:08:29 | stevemar | dtroyer: so i *think* reno will support renaming files too | |
| 20:09:22 | stevemar | but the changes may have to be backported? i'm not sure | |
| 20:09:48 | stevemar | changing locations | |
| 20:10:07 | dtroyer | to have the changes show up both in 'unreleased' and 'ocata' (for example) I think you are right | |
| 20:10:39 | dtroyer | all-in-all much easier to get them clean before releasing | |
| 20:17:38 | filow | hi there, i need some help with the openstackclient. I'm trying to run the example but it seems there is something not updated with the last commit. Does anyone try to run the example from the git? | |
| 20:19:38 | dtroyer | filow: the examples are likely out of date (why stevemar did not want me to merge them in the first place) | |
| 20:19:47 | dtroyer | what were you trying to accomplish with them? | |
| 20:20:10 | filow | well i'm trying to run the command openstack user list --project <id or name> | |
| 20:20:30 | filow | i saw there is still the key verify that is not anymore supported | |
| 20:21:36 | filow | but then i can't go ahead debugging, i got from debug "'OpenStackConfig' object has no attribute 'load_auth_plugin'" | |
| 20:22:56 | dtroyer | I am not sure what you mean by "key verify" | |
| 20:23:45 | filow | the constructor clientmanager.ClientManager doesn't require verify as parameter, while it is still there in the example | |
| 20:24:09 | dtroyer | ah, yes. that is what I men by out of date | |
| 20:24:32 | filow | i'm talking about osc-lib.py filew in example | |
| 20:24:39 | filow | yep i got it indeed | |
| 20:24:40 | dtroyer | I was using those as a place to work out some of the changes we made to osc around 3.0 and the osc-lib split, and also with os-client-config | |
| 20:25:10 | filow | infact the second error comes from osc-lib | |
| 20:26:20 | filow | from what i see the usage once you have the clientManager is straight forward, but it is not clear how to set it up (if the flow is still up to date) | |
| 20:26:47 | filow | i got that in common the parser get the environment vars you usually set up with your project-openrc.sh | |
| 20:35:51 | filow | does anyone know an example of how to configure the clientManager that actually works? | |
| 20:43:06 | openstackgerrit | Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce Base for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/428414 | |
| 20:49:12 | dtroyer | filow: besides OSC itself, I doubt it. but those examples were created with a lot of copy-n-paste from the OSC code, fixing them shouldn't be too hard | |
| 20:52:20 | filow | dtroyer: ok, coz first i tried with keystone client and i have some unexpected behaviour, indeed i wanted to use the same approach of python-openstack. Thanks anyway | |
| 21:43:04 | openstackgerrit | Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce Base for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/428414 | |
| 22:06:14 | ankur-gupta-f1 | briancurtin: ping you still around? how does the sdk know the endpoints to hit...? | |
| 22:10:00 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update reno for stable/ocata https://review.openstack.org/427513 | |
| 22:14:42 | openstackgerrit | Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce Base for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/428414 | |
| 22:16:55 | openstackgerrit | Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce Base for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/428414 | |
| 22:23:14 | briancurtin | ankur-gupta-f1: we look in the service catalog for the service_name you set on the ServiceFilter for that service, which in your case you set load_balancingv2 in load_balancer_service.py, and then we make a request to the root of that service to find the versions it supports and see that they match up with ones that we have in the library. if it finds a v2, | |
| 22:23:14 | briancurtin | we have a v2 in the SDK, so it takes that as the endpoint | |
| 22:24:02 | briancurtin | ankur-gupta-f1: i’m about to leave for the day, but if you need to know more about endpoint selection, it happens in openstack/session.py | |
| 22:25:00 | ankur-gupta-f1 | briancurtin: okay will take a look. Currently octavia only has v1 but in middle of implementing v2.0 so thats probably the way to go. Will dig in. Thanks for your help. Enjoy the rest of your evening | |
| 22:25:38 | briancurtin | oh yeah, if they only have v1 out then we’ll have to just support that to start with, and then adding in v2 once it’s out will be pretty easy | |
| 22:26:09 | ankur-gupta-f1 | running 'openstack service list' i see octavia. so thats a good sign :D | |
| 22:27:58 | dtroyer | ankur-gupta-f1: one side note, if you have any ability to suggest it, let's try to keep octavia from adding a new service catalog entry with 'v2' in the name/type. Since they haven't shipped it yet, they really should do proper version discovery up front. | |
| 22:29:18 | ankur-gupta-f1 | dtroyer: no problem. Im working on their v2 implementation. will make sure it happens | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-02-03 | |||
| 02:31:35 | openstackgerrit | Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: mention the final ocata osc version in releasenotes https://review.openstack.org/428545 | |
| 03:37:39 | openstackgerrit | Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce Base for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/428414 | |
| 04:37:53 | reedip | sindhu : Just came to office, have a bad hangover without being drunk ! :P ( Lack of sleep evidently ) . Will look into it :) | |
| 04:42:50 | sindhu | reedip: can you check if router set command is working for setting the external_gateway_info | |
| 04:43:00 | sindhu | reedip: thanks! | |
| 04:43:14 | reedip | sindhu : in your patch ? Just wait :) | |
| 04:43:51 | sindhu | reedip: no it's not there in my patch. I was trying it locally | |
| 04:44:00 | reedip | Okay , just wait | |
| 04:50:24 | reedip | sindhu : u awake ? | |
| 04:50:39 | reedip | I dont know but m guessing your TZ is opposite of mine :) | |
| 04:51:33 | reedip | sindhu : the external-gateway-info works well | |
| 04:51:37 | sindhu | reedip: I m in US | |
| 04:52:21 | sindhu | reedip: can u send the command ur testing | |
| 04:52:33 | reedip | sindhu : doing just that | |
| 04:53:15 | stevemar | huanxuan: dtroyer i've updated the cinder vs osc spreadsheet -- but extended it to all projects: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ZtWC75BNCwFqLfFpCGGJ9uPVBvUXX0xuXP1yYG0NDA/edit?usp=sharing | |
| 04:53:21 | reedip | sindhu : there you go : http://paste.openstack.org/show/597483/ | |
| 04:55:05 | reedip | sindhu : whats failing in your patch, havent seen it yet | |
| 04:58:14 | sindhu | reedip: I tried doing the same, but with different external network that I created | |
| 04:58:21 | sindhu | reedip: it didn't work | |
| 04:58:58 | reedip | sindhu : did your network have Subnets? | |
| 04:59:08 | sindhu | reedip: yes | |
| 04:59:22 | sindhu | reedip: I did those 8 steps I mentioned earlier | |
| 04:59:32 | reedip | sindhu : ok, send me the paste of the commands , and the error which you saw | |
| 04:59:52 | openstackgerrit | Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: OSC Extension Show https://review.openstack.org/382023 | |
| 05:00:25 | sindhu | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/wb9EARvJ/ | |
| 05:01:43 | reedip | sindhu : what was the Subnet associated with the port created in step 6 ? | |
| 05:02:43 | sindhu | reedip: ^^^ | |
| 05:03:10 | sindhu | reedip: the private network's subnet | |
| 05:09:57 | reedip | sindhu : checking | |
| 05:12:57 | reedip | sindhu : you created a port with internal Fixed IP , and then you tried to attach the port to the router using external subnet, right ? | |
| 05:15:24 | sindhu | reedip: http://paste.openstack.org/show/597485/ | |
| 05:15:36 | reedip | sindhu : checking | |
| 05:25:55 | reedip | sindhu : did you run it using --debug ? | |
| 05:25:59 | reedip | the last CLI | |
| 05:26:26 | reedip | I am attempting to replicate the issue at my end, but meanwhile you can try it using --0debug | |
| 05:26:30 | reedip | I am attempting to replicate the issue at my end, but meanwhile you can try it using --debug * | |
| 05:26:51 | sindhu | reedip: will do | |
| 05:27:28 | reedip | sindhu : when I ran the CLI, I got the response HttpException: Bad Request, Bad router request: Router already has a port on subnet 3f9ccf79-de05-4caf-8b1e-2d6f80f42561. | |
| 05:28:33 | sindhu | reedip: yeah.. even I am getting the same | |
| 05:30:03 | reedip | sindhu : oops, you already added the subnet in step 7 | |
| 05:30:20 | reedip | so the router would already have a port for that subnet | |
| 05:37:48 | reedip | sindhu : you can run "openstack port list --router" to see if the router already has a port | |
| 05:38:28 | reedip | and then run port show for the ports connected to the router and you will see that the router already has a port connected to the external subnet, so you cannot set the gateway to that port | |
| 05:40:49 | sindhu | reedip: oh ok ... but if I create a floating ip in the external_net and try to set that to the port it says: External network e01d4875-68dd-44bf-a871-cba53519d20f is not reachable from subnet 9154650e-aa76-44bd-9135-1c7d8ff4534d. | |
| 05:41:53 | reedip | Thats bcz its the Subnet ID of the Pvt network | |
| 05:42:31 | reedip | do one thing, remove the port which is connected to the external network | |
| 05:42:39 | reedip | and execute step 8 once again | |
| 05:43:35 | sindhu | reedip: you are right ... the router has two ports connected to it now. One in private network and one in external network | |
| 05:43:55 | reedip | sindhu : and your router currently has the gateway set at the Pvt network | |
| 05:44:04 | reedip | IIRC | |
| 05:44:48 | sindhu | reedip: correct | |
| 05:44:58 | reedip | the floating IP basically lies on one side of the router's gateway, and the ports of the router lie on the other side of the gateway | |
| 05:45:49 | reedip | so if the gateway is incorrectly directed, it should not be able to route, so try to remove the port which is connected to the external network, try setting the external gateway and then associate floating IP | |
| 05:46:26 | sindhu | reedip: so I went wrong in doing: openstack router add subnet <external_subnet> ?? | |
| 05:46:42 | reedip | sindhu : seems so , | |
| 05:47:16 | sindhu | reedip: ok will try removing the port connected to external net | |
| 07:25:52 | openstackgerrit | Huanxuan Ao proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix properties format for volume qos in volume v1 https://review.openstack.org/428610 | |