| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-01-28 | |||
| 01:56:53 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix address scope list --share https://review.openstack.org/426452 | |
| 01:57:24 | dtroyer | stevemar: ^^^ is an SDK refactor field problem, I'll bet so is https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/1659878 | |
| 01:57:24 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1659878 in python-openstackclient "Network creation ignores --project option" [High,New] | |
| 02:07:11 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix network create --project https://review.openstack.org/426454 | |
| 02:07:35 | dtroyer | stevemar: Try ^^^ for network create | |
| 02:56:01 | stevemar | dtroyer: want me to punt https://review.openstack.org/#/c/426454/ through or wait for a functional test? | |
| 02:56:25 | stevemar | i think its correct, it worked before and and the fix looks 100% correct | |
| 02:56:30 | stevemar | just thinking about regressions | |
| 02:58:23 | stevemar | dtroyer: i punted both through, but i just realized they didn't have release notes, i'll let you make that call | |
| 03:24:05 | dtroyer | I'll add notes and a func test for network tomorrow. This isn't blocking CI jobs, is it? | |
| 03:26:47 | dtroyer | I'm not seeing consistent failures for the reviews that are red in status/zuul | |
| 03:28:29 | dtroyer | stevemar: thanks for pushing those in, I'm calling it a night, will check in in the morning | |
| 03:44:13 | stevemar | dtroyer: ack | |
| 04:16:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix address scope list --share https://review.openstack.org/426452 | |
| 04:16:46 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk: Add cluster_operation and node_operation https://review.openstack.org/419783 | |
| 04:17:07 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk: Add params to ClusterDelNodes action https://review.openstack.org/416125 | |
| 04:43:41 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix network create --project https://review.openstack.org/426454 | |
| 13:46:21 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Add relnotes for the two recent bug fixes https://review.openstack.org/426504 | |
| 13:46:52 | dtroyer | stevemar: when you're around ^^^ | |
| 13:47:46 | dtroyer | If there's a hurry on the network create bug we can release with that as the 3.8.1 commit, otherwise I'd like to wait a couple more days to see if other bugs show up | |
| 17:42:29 | reedip_ | ankur-gupta-f1, there ? | |
| 17:45:13 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Overwrite/Clear Flavor property https://review.openstack.org/415369 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-01-29 | |||
| 00:54:05 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient: Add relnotes for the two recent bug fixes https://review.openstack.org/426504 | |
| 11:22:50 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Add extra dhcp option to 'port create/set/unset' https://review.openstack.org/356263 | |
| 17:24:00 | EmilienM | dtroyer, stevemar: hey! do you know when do we release osc with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/426454/ included? | |
| 17:24:35 | EmilienM | tripleo is currently having a bug, that I think is related to ^ https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1660168 | |
| 17:24:35 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1660168 in tripleo "neutron/undercloud: Unable to find subnet with name or id" [Critical,Triaged] | |
| 17:24:41 | EmilienM | it sounds related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/1659878 | |
| 17:24:41 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1659878 in python-openstackclient "Network creation ignores --project option" [High,Fix released] - Assigned to Dean Troyer (dtroyer) | |
| 17:48:57 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Add extra dhcp option to 'port create/set/unset' https://review.openstack.org/356263 | |
| 19:58:18 | stevemar | EmilienM: probably monday morning :) | |
| 20:23:42 | dtroyer | EmilienM: I'll prep the release tonight so it's ready bright-n-early | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-01-30 | |||
| 02:23:23 | dtroyer | stevemar: I submitted https://review.openstack.org/426635 for a osc 3.8.1 release, but that's not what EmilienM's report is about. that seems to be from neutronclient? | |
| 02:53:51 | EmilienM | dtroyer, stevemar: awesome! thanks guys | |
| 02:54:18 | EmilienM | dtroyer: I'm not sure but I think the bug I found was fixed in osc | |
| 02:54:24 | EmilienM | I'll keep investigating tomorrow | |
| 03:58:00 | stevemar | dtroyer: we still haven't created the stable/ocata branach for osc yet eh | |
| 03:58:24 | stevemar | dtroyer: thats to be done by the project teams now btw | |
| 14:32:34 | openstackgerrit | Qiming Teng proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Add 'tags' property to orchestration stack https://review.openstack.org/426780 | |
| 14:57:07 | reedip_ | stevemar : awake ? | |
| 16:12:00 | knikolla | need some help figuring out _cli_options. where are they declared and loaded? | |
| 16:14:40 | JayF | /win 21 | |
| 16:14:43 | JayF | whoops, sorry | |
| 16:19:31 | ankur-gupta-f1 | reedip: reedip_: you pinged the other day. Sorry I missed it | |
| 16:30:20 | reedip_ | bow I dont remember ankur-gupta-f1 :) | |
| 16:30:25 | reedip_ | now* | |
| 16:30:34 | ankur-gupta-f1 | haha no worries. Hope you had a good weekend | |
| 16:31:37 | reedip_ | Naah, had a bad one actually :( | |
| 16:34:31 | ankur-gupta-f1 | reedip_: Ah bummer. Hope everything gets better. :) | |
| 16:35:29 | dtroyer | knikolla: that looks like an OSC var name, need a bit more context | |
| 16:36:54 | knikolla | dtroyer: regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/371709 | |
| 16:37:35 | knikolla | dtroyer: it adds the service_provider and remote_project_* options | |
| 16:40:17 | dtroyer | ok. _cli_options is passed to ClientManager.__init__() when the ClientManager is created in OpenStackShell.initialize_app() | |
| 16:40:45 | dtroyer | it comes from the os-client-config cloud configuration stuff that is the combination of env vars, CLI options and clouds.yaml | |
| 16:41:19 | dtroyer | I think Steve's question is how are you expecting the new values to be set? | |
| 16:41:27 | dtroyer | ie, what does the user do here? | |
| 16:42:54 | knikolla | dtroyer: either put the values in clouds.yaml, which is the preferred option, or commandline in the form —os-service-provider | |
| 16:43:50 | knikolla | dtroyer: i'm currently trying the patch with clouds.yaml and when i try to put the service-provider value in it, it fails on load_auth_plugin() in the clientmanager | |
| 16:47:03 | knikolla | dtroyer: wait, my mistake, it goes through. | |
| 16:50:01 | dtroyer | I don't see —os-service-provider being defined in the shell. That shouldn't prevent it from working in clouds.yaml, but may have other effects such as it not being defined in the Namespace object | |
| 17:17:57 | knikolla | dtroyer: through clouds.yaml it works! | |
| 17:19:02 | dtroyer | knikolla: coolness | |
| 17:20:28 | knikolla | dtroyer: i was missing identity_api_version: 3, adding that fixed it in clouds.yaml | |
| 17:28:22 | reedip_ | dtroyer, ankur-gupta-f1 : any review comments for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356263/ ? | |
| 17:34:51 | ankur-gupta-f1 | reedip_: looking. But off the bat I don't like that the user has many options of what to put in for dhcp-option-name. Feel it should be something like name=<dhcp-option-name>[,value=<value>][,ip-version={4,6}] or something along those lines. Especially if it is possible to repeat the option. | |
| 17:35:36 | ankur-gupta-f1 | I guess its past that point. but it is confusing | |
| 17:39:04 | reedip_ | ankur-gupta-f1 : the dhcp name is user defined, so I guess it would be difficult to limit it to a specific set ( thats what I understood by what u wrote ) | |
| 20:08:14 | openstackgerrit | Sindhu Devale proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: "floating ip set/unset port" for OSC https://review.openstack.org/383025 | |
| 20:09:35 | openstackgerrit | Shashank Kumar Shankar proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Add network flavor associate, disassociate to SDK https://review.openstack.org/403904 | |
| 21:03:56 | xwu_ | what's the major difference between python openstackclient and openstacksdk? | |
| 21:04:43 | dtroyer | xwu_: OpenStackclient (OSC) is a command-line client, OpenStackSDK is a Python library, which is used by portions of OSC for the REST comunication | |
| 21:05:52 | xwu_ | thanks dtroyer. I was looking at online doc, http://docs.openstack.org/user-guide/sdk-install.html | |
| 21:06:02 | stevemar | dtroyer: we should rename osc to OpensStackCLIent | |
| 21:06:04 | stevemar | :D | |
| 21:06:16 | xwu_ | it asked to install command line client | |
| 21:06:45 | xwu_ | http://developer.openstack.org/sdks/python/openstacksdk/users/ | |
| 21:06:59 | xwu_ | this URL says we need openstacksdk, this is confusing | |
| 21:07:27 | xwu_ | so in short, when I write a quick utility using Python API, I should be using openstacksdk, right? not openstackclient, | |
| 21:08:26 | dtroyer | xwu_: yes. OSC has portions that can be used as a library (the separate osc-lib package) but itself is just the CLI | |
| 21:10:46 | xwu_ | thx, dtroyer, this helps. the fact that osc can be used as a lib confused me. | |
| 21:11:19 | dtroyer | only the stuff in osc-lib _should_ be used that way, that's why we split it out. | |
| 21:13:27 | xwu_ | assume osc-lib/sdk both support python v2/v3. | |
| 21:13:39 | dtroyer | yes | |
| 21:14:36 | xwu_ | for new user, I probably should forget osc-lib, only focus on sdk instead | |
| 21:15:27 | dtroyer | they do different things | |
| 21:15:39 | dtroyer | osc-lib is focused on things that CLIs commonly need | |
| 21:15:48 | dtroyer | and to support OSc plugins | |
| 21:16:01 | dtroyer | The SDK is mostly a Python REST library | |
| 21:19:50 | xwu_ | so, which one do you suggest if I just need to automate some openstack operations? | |
| 21:20:12 | xwu_ | like image management, HOT | |
| 21:21:03 | xwu_ | sdk seems to have a better documentation compared to osc-lib | |
| 21:24:32 | xwu_ | will try sdk first. thx for answers | |
| 21:24:57 | dtroyer | it is not a choice between osc-lib and sdk, they do not do the same thing | |
| 22:59:25 | openstackgerrit | Sindhu Devale proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: "floating ip set/unset port" for OSC https://review.openstack.org/383025 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-01-31 | |||
| 03:26:28 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk: Add 'tags' property to orchestration stack https://review.openstack.org/426780 | |
| 04:16:58 | reedip | stevemar : ping ? | |
| 04:21:53 | stevemar | reedip: yep, for a few more minutes :) | |
| 04:22:25 | reedip | stevemar : oh, I needed some review comments but if you are about to sleep , then I wouldnt want to give you nightmares :) | |
| 04:22:32 | reedip | you can check them tomorrow :D | |
| 04:24:15 | reedip | If you can check these in the morning, it would be very helpful to openstackclient :D https://review.openstack.org/415369 , https://review.openstack.org/423612 , https://review.openstack.org/356263 | |