| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-01-19 | |||
| 15:11:21 | reedip_ | anywhere I can help you with ? | |
| 15:12:20 | briancurtin | reedip_: i’m going to go through and do an audit so i know where we’re at (which i need to do anyway), and i’ll create a bunch of issues on https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstacksdk for each service we need to port | |
| 15:12:39 | reedip_ | braincurtin : Okay , I will look out on it | |
| 15:12:43 | briancurtin | reedip_: i’ll send you a couple of them shortly and you can pick whatever you’d like | |
| 15:12:54 | reedip_ | briancurtin : okay great :) | |
| 15:13:15 | reedip_ | thanks a lot briancurtin :) | |
| 15:13:26 | briancurtin | reedip_: you’re welcome, and thanks for all of your work | |
| 15:13:40 | reedip_ | braincurtin : dont thank me yet if there is work to be done :) | |
| 15:26:07 | stevemar | briancurtin: just tag 1.0, problem solved (reading scroll up) | |
| 15:26:25 | stevemar | err scroll back | |
| 15:30:55 | briancurtin | reedip_: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstacksdk/+bugs?field.tag=resource2-port is a list of them. i’ve already done work locally on database and object_store so i assigned those and will push them soon. the rest are open! | |
| 15:31:22 | reedip_ | briancurtin : okay | |
| 15:31:29 | reedip_ | briancurtin : looking | |
| 15:31:50 | reedip_ | stevemar : I knew you would have an innovative answer :D | |
| 15:32:03 | briancurtin | stevemar: i’ll do that and then go on vacation for a month | |
| 15:32:08 | stevemar | briancurtin: hehe | |
| 15:32:09 | reedip_ | hahahahaha | |
| 15:32:39 | stevemar | briancurtin: you've got to be getting close to a 1.0 by now? i think? | |
| 15:33:03 | stevemar | in terms of breadth anyway, lots of resources and APIs are covered | |
| 15:33:40 | reedip_ | briancurtin : you mentioned a document in the Bug report | |
| 15:33:57 | reedip_ | " | |
| 15:33:57 | reedip_ | When porting, do a walkthrough of the documentation to see if anything has changed so that we can keep the service updated." | |
| 15:34:05 | reedip_ | Link to the document ??? | |
| 15:34:09 | briancurtin | stevemar: yeah pretty close. just need to get 8 services moved over to the newer base classes so everything is on the same API, and most of those are pretty small services | |
| 15:34:36 | stevemar | briancurtin: then we can deprecate all the python-*clients, yesss | |
| 15:34:55 | briancurtin | reedip_: oh i meant the REST API docs, like on docs.openstack.org. meaning when you’re porting over a particular resource, just check that it still offers the same fields or if it has more, perhaps add them | |
| 15:35:10 | reedip_ | briancurtin : oohhhh ! | |
| 15:35:11 | reedip_ | ok | |
| 15:35:59 | briancurtin | stevemar: some of those smaller services are pretty light in terms of depth, but now that we’ll be locked down on the API, just expanding things to keep up with what a REST API provides borders on trivial | |
| 15:36:10 | briancurtin | and adding new ones is pretty easy | |
| 16:07:57 | dtroyer | waj334: There is quite a bit that needs attention in that review, not the least of which is the resource name 'message', that's _very_ generic and we even have a project with a very sinilar type tag 'messaging' | |
| 16:08:26 | dtroyer | Right now we are in a pre-Ocata release freeze prep and new things like this simply are not getting much (if any) attention | |
| 16:08:58 | dtroyer | None of the volume v3 is merging before the stable/ocata branch is cut either way, we talked about this in the meetings the last couple of weeks | |
| 16:10:06 | waj334 | dtroyer: I'm aware of the freeze. I'm just completing the tasks I was given so I pay my bills every month lol | |
| 16:11:33 | waj334 | dtroyer: Shall I change that resource name to something or just put it under another resource? | |
| 16:11:56 | dtroyer | sure, and I am aware of how the supplier if said pay tends to operate | |
| 16:13:00 | dtroyer | I need to digest that new thing, this is the first I've even heard of it, and we have a nice history of pissing off Cider folk by changing their names for things, which sometimes are unfortunate choices in the bigger scheme of things | |
| 16:14:15 | waj334 | dtroyer: As long as I can say it's been implemented, I'm cool with however it gets done | |
| 16:18:28 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-client-config: Fix typo for baremetal_service_type https://review.openstack.org/422381 | |
| 16:49:29 | openstackgerrit | Justin A Wilson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Refactor volume service tests https://review.openstack.org/422757 | |
| 16:52:06 | edleafe | elmiko: If you could review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-wg-newsletter and make any changes you think are needed, that would be awesome | |
| 16:52:51 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/api-wg: Removes unnecessary utf-8 encoding https://review.openstack.org/414782 | |
| 17:04:19 | elmiko | edleafe: ack, looking now | |
| 17:05:01 | elmiko | edleafe: lgtm +1 | |
| 17:05:09 | elmiko | thanks =) | |
| 18:02:44 | stevemar | waj334: dtroyer pay dem bills | |
| 19:24:40 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk: Network L3 Router Commands https://review.openstack.org/385728 | |
| 19:58:18 | openstackgerrit | Nikita Gerasimov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Switch server create to block_device_mapping_v2 https://review.openstack.org/407111 | |
| 20:24:26 | ankur-gupta-f1 | did I miss the IRC meeting again :| | |
| 20:56:59 | openstackgerrit | Justin A Wilson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Refactor volume service v2 tests https://review.openstack.org/422757 | |
| 20:58:22 | stevemar | oh no, i think i did too | |
| 20:58:42 | stevemar | dtroyer: looks like we all missed the meetign | |
| 20:58:44 | stevemar | :) | |
| 22:14:04 | stevemar | dtroyer: heads down work is fun | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-01-20 | |||
| 00:38:07 | openstackgerrit | Corentin Ardeois proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib: Update supported keystone version https://review.openstack.org/422936 | |
| 01:36:08 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/js-openstack-lib: Update supported keystone version https://review.openstack.org/422936 | |
| 04:28:05 | huanxuan | dtroyer, stevemar: Sorry for missing the meeting, a bit busy at the end of the school term :( | |
| 04:28:33 | huanxuan | dtroyer, stevemar: I have some questions about the freeze... | |
| 04:28:54 | huanxuan | I don't quite sure about that, what cann't we do during the freeze? we cann't merge new features, or bug fixed, right? | |
| 04:48:51 | stevemar | huanxuan: o/ | |
| 04:49:14 | huanxuan | stevemar: :) | |
| 04:49:29 | stevemar | huanxuan: you are in school! let me know when you graduate and are looking for a job :P | |
| 04:50:32 | stevemar | huanxuan: so, for feature freeze... we try to minimize the major changes doing into OSC this week and next | |
| 04:50:42 | huanxuan | stevemar: Yes... One year left, Will graduate in next year | |
| 04:51:03 | stevemar | huanxuan: if there is a major bug that needs fixing, we should fix it. But we shouldn't be introducing anything big, like a new feature | |
| 04:51:14 | stevemar | huanxuan: so a new command probably shouldn't merge | |
| 04:51:39 | stevemar | huanxuan: i am very impressed that you are doing this while in school, thats amazing | |
| 04:52:30 | huanxuan | stevemar: hehe! half time for study, half time for job :) | |
| 04:52:42 | stevemar | huanxuan: still very impressive! | |
| 04:53:13 | stevemar | huanxuan: the reason we have the freeze is because once we do our next release, it'll be the final release for the Ocata cycle | |
| 04:54:00 | stevemar | and we don't want to merge something that can be 1) incomplete or 2) possibly introduce bugs | |
| 04:54:43 | stevemar | huanxuan: other projects like tripleo and rally use OSC, so we can't have a broken CLI at the end of the release :) | |
| 04:54:57 | huanxuan | stevemar: OK! Get it, Thank you for your explanation | |
| 04:55:27 | huanxuan | stevemar: I need to learn more from you, dtroyer and others | |
| 04:56:23 | stevemar | huanxuan: ask away :) | |
| 04:56:50 | huanxuan | stevemar: Thanks :) | |
| 05:03:58 | reedip | stevemar : Do you wish to be back in school ??? :P | |
| 05:04:11 | stevemar | reedip: tempting offer :P | |
| 05:04:35 | reedip | o really ?? I think you will go back to school soon, for someone else though :) | |
| 05:07:24 | stevemar | reedip: few more years til that happens :D | |
| 05:07:33 | reedip | stevemar :D | |
| 05:18:50 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Fix Setting Quotas in Neutron https://review.openstack.org/419911 | |
| 05:22:46 | reedip | stevemar : ^^ ?? | |
| 05:24:15 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Add project ID in QuotaDefault requests https://review.openstack.org/420301 | |
| 05:26:12 | stevemar | lgtm, but i don't know the sdk very well :( | |
| 05:43:54 | reedip | stevemar : hmm, okay | |
| 05:43:56 | reedip | no issues | |
| 05:44:10 | reedip | would wait for braincurtin's viewpoint | |
| 05:46:57 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Fix Setting Quotas in Neutron https://review.openstack.org/419911 | |
| 06:28:48 | openstackgerrit | jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Functional test for volume qos https://review.openstack.org/421066 | |
| 06:44:46 | openstackgerrit | Rui Chen proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Replace "Display Name" by "Name" in volume list https://review.openstack.org/423081 | |
| 07:48:11 | reedip | RuiChen : Is there tabination support for OpenstackClients ?? | |
| 07:48:17 | reedip | Just a query | |
| 07:58:30 | RuiChen | reedip: you means tagging support ? | |
| 08:00:03 | reedip | No , If I press a tab, then would the command be auto-complete ? | |
| 08:08:59 | RuiChen | reedip: openstack complete? | |
| 08:09:25 | reedip | ? | |
| 08:10:39 | reedip | oh ok let me try | |
| 08:11:15 | RuiChen | I saw the command "openstack complete" in help message, but i'm not sure which you want | |
| 08:13:15 | reedip | Okay, there is a bug in it :) | |