| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-01-18 | |||
| 15:49:25 | dtroyer | need another? | |
| 15:49:41 | mordred | well - we got this submitted: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421668/ which seems both easy and friendly - but also not _super_ important | |
| 15:51:28 | dtroyer | +A, the deadline is tomorrow if we want that in stable | |
| 15:51:30 | dtroyer | wait | |
| 15:51:36 | dtroyer | o-c-c- doesn't do stable | |
| 15:52:09 | dtroyer | so its just a matter of when it would be released, today/tomorrow or next month | |
| 15:54:42 | mordred | oh - neat. cool - no rush then | |
| 15:59:26 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/golang-client: Revert "Add crud operation of volume API v3" https://review.openstack.org/422055 | |
| 16:01:12 | ankur-gupta-f2 | dtroyer: similar note. Does OSC do a feature freeze? | |
| 16:02:59 | dtroyer | ankur-gupta-f: yes, next week. we will have one more release before then, early next week | |
| 16:03:24 | dtroyer | osc-lib freezes tomorrow, its to-become-stable-brans is the current release | |
| 16:03:33 | dtroyer | s/brans/branch/ | |
| 16:03:52 | stevemar | dtroyer: we'll have to get more strict about feature freeze and such soon | |
| 16:04:26 | dtroyer | stevemar: soon == now for the new bits (volume v3, etc). | |
| 16:08:45 | rosmaita | cdent: would be interested in your opinion of the discussion happening on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/420038/ , especially in light of your email this morning about the new tag proposal | |
| 16:09:02 | rosmaita | elmiko: ^^ etoews: ^^ | |
| 16:09:25 | ankur-gupta-f2 | dtroyer: Okay. I have told our team that any reviews coming in on any of these https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osc-transition-priorities to be addressed ASAP. Thanks | |
| 16:09:30 | cdent | rosmaita: thanks, will look. I'm experiencing "stability" fatigue | |
| 16:09:52 | rosmaita | cdent: ha! well, i will warn you in advance, that this will not help :) | |
| 16:11:38 | elmiko | rosmaita: i'll try to take a look, i'm putting out fires at the moment :/ | |
| 16:11:50 | dtroyer | ankur-gupta-f: at this point new commands (not already in-flight) are probably doubtful | |
| 16:13:00 | ankur-gupta-f2 | dtroyer: most have been in flight and are nearing completion. Just waiting for the final few reviews | |
| 16:13:00 | rosmaita | elmiko: best wishes for your firefighting! | |
| 16:13:41 | cdent | dtroyer: yeah, I have labeling fatigue too | |
| 16:13:56 | elmiko | rosmaita: cheers! | |
| 16:15:39 | cdent | dtroyer: I tend to think of consistency on the spatial (amongst apis) dimension and some term (maybe stability) is need for the time (within an api) dimension | |
| 16:17:48 | dtroyer | cdent: they both make me tired and make me wonder why in the world this is all so hard | |
| 16:21:41 | cdent | my eyes are fuzzy enough that I ready dtroyer as saying "makes me wonder why I'm in this world" | |
| 16:22:42 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/golang-client: Fix unit tests https://review.openstack.org/422080 | |
| 16:23:20 | cdent | I've withheld my opinion on this topic because at least for the time being it is probably too poorly informed to be useful, but yeah it all makes me pretty tired | |
| 16:26:26 | dtroyer | here is mine: one place that a BDFL is useful is in keeping at least some of the cats in the same order everywhere. I've had to say no so many times to OSC command stuff just to be as close to consistent as we are (still a ways to go). There is no way in h3ll that we'd have accomplished that with teams doing their own thing, even if they agreed on the idea. Even now, many of the OSC plugins slide past the guidelines (I d | |
| 16:26:36 | dtroyer | That is just the CLI, and "CLI's are easy" | |
| 16:27:46 | dtroyer | the only way we will get a clean, consistent REST API for OpenStack is to have a single unit (team, working group, whatever) build it <cough>oaktree</cough> | |
| 16:28:08 | dtroyer | </rant> | |
| 16:28:49 | cdent | I can get behind that (modulo corporate enterprisey nonsense) | |
| 16:30:05 | dtroyer | I think it would take a corporate-type sponsor without an API to defend/enhance to sponsor it to ever get anywhere | |
| 16:30:29 | dtroyer | and those are hard to find that also have $$$ to spend "for the good of OpenStack users" | |
| 16:30:51 | dtroyer | dang, Wednesday isn't supposed to be "grumpy day" | |
| 16:31:18 | openstackgerrit | zhiyong.dai proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Support "--no-property" option in volume snapshot set https://review.openstack.org/416182 | |
| 16:45:53 | openstackgerrit | Shashank Kumar Shankar proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: OSC Network Flavor https://review.openstack.org/382530 | |
| 16:45:54 | openstackgerrit | Shashank Kumar Shankar proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Introduce neutron flavor associate, disassociate to OSC https://review.openstack.org/403907 | |
| 16:52:51 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/golang-client: Fix unit tests https://review.openstack.org/422080 | |
| 17:08:25 | openstackgerrit | Shashank Kumar Shankar proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: OSC Network Flavor https://review.openstack.org/382530 | |
| 17:31:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/golang-client: Fix unit tests https://review.openstack.org/422080 | |
| 17:32:53 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-client-config: Add support for Murano https://review.openstack.org/421668 | |
| 17:34:13 | stevemar | dtroyer: are we waiting for anything in particular before releasing 3.8.0? | |
| 17:34:23 | stevemar | oh i guess we have til next week | |
| 17:34:25 | stevemar | ignore me | |
| 17:35:53 | dtroyer | stevemar: even so, the only release blocker is the broken quota set command, once that is covered the rest is nice to have | |
| 17:36:24 | dtroyer | that gets us in a position for SDK 0.9.13 to be released when it is ready and not be rushed | |
| 17:36:42 | dtroyer | (not that it would be, it just doesn't add any pressure) | |
| 17:37:54 | stevemar | dtroyer: mm, ok, the quota set command is fixed though? | |
| 17:38:14 | stevemar | dtroyer: why not release it sooner and give andrey a chance to review it? we can let the dust settle a bit | |
| 17:38:20 | dtroyer | maybe? I saw conversation in the overnight scrollback that I haven't followed up on yet… I'll be back to OSc this afternoon | |
| 17:38:24 | stevemar | (random thoughts, you can tell me to buzz off) | |
| 17:38:45 | dtroyer | then we'll release twice more | |
| 17:39:02 | dtroyer | I want SDK 0.9.12 to be what we use for stable | |
| 17:39:41 | openstackgerrit | Sindhu Devale proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: OSC Extension Show https://review.openstack.org/382023 | |
| 17:45:43 | openstackgerrit | Sindhu Devale proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: OSC Extension Show https://review.openstack.org/382023 | |
| 18:49:13 | cdent | elmiko, edleafe, etoews : reminder that I won't be around tomorrow to run api-wg meeting. I added the compatibility/stability thing to the agenda, just as a marker | |
| 18:53:06 | edleafe | cdent: cool, I can handle running the meeting | |
| 18:53:31 | cdent | sweet^wsolid^wthanks | |
| 19:10:56 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: DNM: OSC+SDK check https://review.openstack.org/422173 | |
| 19:33:10 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix functional test for creating subnet https://review.openstack.org/421310 | |
| 19:35:51 | openstackgerrit | Justin A Wilson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Add support for Cinder API 3.3 into OSC https://review.openstack.org/421585 | |
| 19:37:22 | openstackgerrit | Sindhu Devale proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: OSC Extension Show https://review.openstack.org/382023 | |
| 19:58:23 | openstackgerrit | Justin A Wilson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Add support for Cinder API 3.3 into OSC https://review.openstack.org/421585 | |
| 20:06:48 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/keystoneauth: Update reno for stable/ocata https://review.openstack.org/422208 | |
| 20:17:29 | briancurtin | stevemar: if (when, rather) sdk raised DeprecationWarning when certain calls were used, would you catch them in any tests? | |
| 20:17:41 | briancurtin | dtroyer: ^ | |
| 20:18:50 | dtroyer | briancurtin: I don't see that we catch that exception specifically anywhere | |
| 20:19:06 | briancurtin | currently nothing on the docket for deprecation would even affect you as there are only two things in network that are being changed, and you don’t use them, but it made me wonder if the process would work. obviously we’d try to find users and let them know and/or work on replacement | |
| 20:19:51 | briancurtin | dtroyer: it’s actually a warning, and I’m guessing you don’t have tox setup to run python with warnings enabled (few people ever do, sdk doesn’t so you can shame me too) | |
| 20:20:34 | briancurtin | dtroyer: as i’m doing this change on SDK i might poke around in OSC to see if you’d catch this stuff and if not, prepare you to catch it | |
| 20:21:20 | dtroyer | ok, cool. prepartions for stuff is good :) | |
| 20:21:23 | briancurtin | the warnings are generally outputted at call-time, and I’m sure they get swallowed up by the ostestr or something | |
| 20:26:38 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/os-client-config: Revert "Fix interface_key for identity clients" https://review.openstack.org/422222 | |
| 20:27:45 | waj334 | Is there any sort of instructions for adding new commands to the OSC? I can't seem to get it to pick up on the ones that I added. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421585/ | |
| 20:28:09 | waj334 | I added a new .rst for these commands | |
| 20:34:44 | ankur-gupta-f2 | waj334: after pulling that patch into the osc dir. run a python setup.py install , or pip install -e . | |
| 20:35:30 | waj334 | that's exactly what I'm doing, but nada | |
| 20:35:47 | mordred | dtroyer: we discovered a lovely thing that the occ release broke - specifically, connecting identity CRUD on v2 only keystone on openstack (it's a REALLY specific break) - but the patch I just submitted fixes the issue | |
| 20:37:44 | ankur-gupta-f2 | waj334: bah. not in office today. See if you can grab Shashank or Sindhu | |
| 20:39:50 | mordred | dtroyer, Shrews: I'm torn on whether or not I thikn it's worth having an occ gate job with that config or not - we're adding a shade job that should at least inform us when it happens | |
| 20:41:18 | openstackgerrit | Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/keystoneauth: Update reno for stable/ocata https://review.openstack.org/422208 | |
| 20:41:47 | dtroyer | mordred: I'm going to lean toward yes… as occ grown more stuff it needs to handle the edge cases for a wide variety of configurations. If I ever get down my list far enough I have a pile-o-tests to add to it so OSC doesn't break in more fun areas… | |
| 20:43:23 | mordred | dtroyer: cool. I'll get the test job added and then trigger it on occ changes too | |
| 20:51:25 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk: Corrections in DHCP Agent Resource listing. https://review.openstack.org/421568 | |
| 20:51:58 | Shrews | shade is the client "canary in a coal mine" :) | |
| 21:10:19 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient: Fill the missing colon https://review.openstack.org/421705 | |
| 21:53:48 | openstackgerrit | Ken'ichi Ohmichi proposed openstack/api-wg: Accurate status code vs. Backwards compatibility https://review.openstack.org/422264 | |
| 23:13:12 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/keystoneauth: Update reno for stable/ocata https://review.openstack.org/422208 | |
| 23:19:48 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-client-config: Revert "Fix interface_key for identity clients" https://review.openstack.org/422222 | |
| 23:22:45 | dtroyer | mordred: https://review.openstack.org/422308 releases o-c-c 1.26.0 | |
| 23:23:03 | dtroyer | so murano is in too | |
| 23:23:11 | mordred | dtroyer: woot! thank you | |
| 23:23:15 | openstackgerrit | Ed Leafe proposed openstack/api-wg: Add guidelines for boolean names https://review.openstack.org/411529 | |
| 23:23:41 | openstackgerrit | Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Network L3 Router Commands https://review.openstack.org/385728 | |
| 23:24:15 | mordred | edleafe: soo ... not that it matters, because shade != openstack rest apis ... | |
| 23:24:42 | mordred | edleafe: but shade went the oppposite way on booleans - prefixing them all with is_ or has_ | |