| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-08 | |||
| 18:49:39 | gtema | Well, now it does | |
| 18:50:01 | gtema | But because of that I doubt nova ever wanted to use cloud layer | |
| 18:50:34 | gtema | Hard to say without seeing real usage | |
| 18:56:49 | jm1 | gtema: hmm.. searching on opendev reveals several uses of openstacksdk, not only in nova, so in theory we would have to check that code as well https://codesearch.opendev.org/?q=import%20openstack | |
| 18:57:48 | jm1 | gtema: unpinning openstacksdk and aoc would definitely cause some breakage, e.g. we will have to port tripleo-ansible etc. to new aoc and sdk | |
| 18:58:24 | gtema | Uuuu, so much usage. That's cool | |
| 18:58:44 | jm1 | gtema: yes and no... | |
| 18:59:05 | jm1 | gtema: sdk 0.99.0 in zed is really causing us a headache.. | |
| 19:00:08 | gtema | Tja, I guess you can really try it out in rdo | |
| 19:03:22 | jm1 | gtema: we have quite a bit of ci coverage for tripleo deployments and since they are passing i guess pinning is not a huge issue for now | |
| 19:03:45 | gtema | Yupp | |
| 19:04:19 | jm1 | gtema: anyway, thanks for your take on this. good to see that openstacksdk is actually used more than we thought :) | |
| 19:04:53 | jm1 | gtema: with that search i found another interesting thing: https://opendev.org/openstack/metalsmith/src/commit/cc8fe24d40e64e874bc3d4308cd76e50379729d3/metalsmith_ansible/ansible_plugins/modules/metalsmith_instances.py#L22 | |
| 19:04:55 | gtema | Yeah, right. it's a positive surprise for me as well | |
| 19:05:57 | gtema | 😌 | |
| 19:12:20 | jm1 | gtema: so from skimming through the results it looks like openstacksdk is used in ironic (and related repos), tripleo-ansible, aoc, bifrost, tripleo-heat-templates, zuul nodepool, zuul-registry, networking-baremetal, neutron, openstack-virtual-baremetal | |
| 19:13:39 | jm1 | .., various tripleo related repos and other probably less rdo relevant repos. | |
| 19:14:23 | jm1 | any volunteers to check whether a pinning of openstacksdk affects the zed releases of those repos? | |
| 19:14:30 | jm1 | ;) | |
| 19:24:53 | jm1 | gtema: for nova i cannot see how they use openstacksdk | |
| 19:25:47 | jm1 | gtema: oh.. now i see | |
| 19:26:15 | gtema | Jm1, me neither. It seems to be deep as adapter | |
| 19:29:36 | jm1 | gtema: oh with "from openstack import" i found a couple of more usages: heat, metalsmith, nova, octavia-dashboard, ... | |
| 19:30:37 | jm1 | gtema: lets hope they do not use cloud layer.. | |
| 19:31:25 | gtema | ;-) | |
| 19:31:54 | jm1 | gtema: not to be solved today. /me out for today, have a nice evening! | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-09 | |||
| 05:40:10 | opendevreview | Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Use Python 3.10 for Ansible's devel branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/852526 | |
| 07:25:05 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add address-scope to NDP proxy tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/856521 | |
| 09:27:34 | opendevreview | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/os-service-types master: Add venus service-type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-service-types/+/856384 | |
| 09:29:24 | opendevreview | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/os-service-types master: Add venus service-type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-service-types/+/856384 | |
| 09:54:11 | frickler | gtema: 856521 is needed to unblock OSC gate, not sure if you'd still want to wait for haleyb to re-review | |
| 09:54:23 | gtema | yeah, will do in few minutes | |
| 10:05:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Unify resource list filtering https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853052 | |
| 11:21:04 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/856725 | |
| 11:21:06 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/856726 | |
| 11:21:07 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff master: Add Python3 antelope unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/856727 | |
| 11:21:22 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856728 | |
| 11:21:24 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856729 | |
| 11:21:25 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Update master for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856730 | |
| 11:21:27 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Python3 antelope unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856731 | |
| 11:21:36 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/856732 | |
| 11:21:37 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/856733 | |
| 11:21:39 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Update master for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/856734 | |
| 11:21:40 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Add Python3 antelope unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/856735 | |
| 11:24:13 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: volume: Trivial docstring fixes to 'wait_for_status' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/822315 | |
| 11:24:15 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add address-scope to NDP proxy tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/856521 | |
| 11:35:03 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Update api_ref for Cyborg project https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-service-types/+/856373 | |
| 14:14:35 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement project cleanup for object-store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853015 | |
| 14:42:00 | gtema | stephenfin frickler: did you ever completely understood all the different networking models in openstack? When I see some comments in the SDK code (for networks handling) my hairs are raising up. This is code is not manageable | |
| 14:42:39 | stephenfin | gtema: I leave networking to other people with more time than me 😇 It's madness | |
| 14:43:21 | gtema | just read that: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/cloud/meta.py#L160 | |
| 14:44:51 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/cliff stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/856725 | |
| 14:45:34 | stephenfin | gtema: Like I said, madness :) | |
| 14:46:21 | gtema | yeah, but we need to manage it somehow. ansible guys are now struggling that their improved tests are failing under certain conditions. No surprise with logic like that | |
| 14:46:56 | gtema | and I wanted to streamline this for R1.0 also. But don't even have idea from which side to touch it - insane | |
| 14:47:27 | gtema | that also proves to me why InterOp as such does not work (and will never work) | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-11 | |||
| 00:43:44 | opendevreview | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/os-service-types master: Add venus service-type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-service-types/+/856384 | |
| 09:59:23 | frickler | stephenfin: gtema: after digging a bit, it seems that ^^ as well as the earlier change for cyborg are wrong, instead https://opendev.org/openstack/service-types-authority/src/branch/master/service-types.yaml needs to be patched. then a bot should do the other update including the sha and timestamp bump | |
| 10:02:28 | gtema | Service-types-authority, cool, another new repo. For me it conflicts with os-service-types repo | |
| 10:47:19 | frickler | seems the latter is meant to be the python-consumable copy of data in the former. not sure why one couldn't do that in a single repo. I can't remember ever having seen this setup before, either | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-12 | |||
| 06:24:50 | opendevreview | Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run Ansible devel branch job on Python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/856987 | |
| 08:39:03 | opendevreview | Ulrich Schwickerath proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Added "openstack image metadefs namespace list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/854557 | |
| 11:30:22 | opendevreview | Kristian Kucerak proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Change subnets_info modules to work with new SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/857041 | |
| 12:25:28 | opendevreview | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: add missing function to identity resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857045 | |
| 12:29:48 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix wrong assertion methods https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/857046 | |
| 12:48:02 | opendevreview | Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes stack module compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/848266 | |
| 13:21:15 | opendevreview | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fixes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857159 | |
| 13:26:28 | opendevreview | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: add missing function to identity resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857045 | |
| 14:00:59 | dtantsur | folks, looking for a 2nd +2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/849564 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/849402 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856549 please | |
| 14:01:06 | dtantsur | I think it's important for 1.0 and for the collections | |
| 14:26:23 | opendevreview | Kristian Kucerak proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Change subnets_info module to work with new SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/857041 | |
| 15:14:34 | opendevreview | Eunyoung Kim proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add metadef schema resource to v2 metadefs api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857200 | |
| 15:23:11 | opendevreview | Eunyoung Kim proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add metadef schema resource to v2 metadefs api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857200 | |
| 15:33:33 | gmann | gtema: reminder for PTL planning for 2023.1 cycle, I have added sdks in the leaderless project list https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2023.1-leaderless | |
| 15:33:56 | gmann | gtema: please let us know if you are planning to continue or anyone else volunteering ? | |
| 16:04:53 | frickler | gmann: I thought that that was settled with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/856526 | |
| 16:06:41 | gmann | frickler: ohk, I think there is wrong data in election email. where barbican and OpenStackSDK are also listed. thanks. noted in etherpad | |
| 17:49:46 | gtema | Gmann, yeah, I ruled this with Amy directly | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-13 | |||
| 06:39:43 | opendevreview | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Add Venus as log-management service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857080 | |
| 06:47:54 | frickler | dtantsur: ^^ seems you might be the only remaining active api-sig-core. is that group still active anyway? | |
| 06:50:13 | frickler | seems nobody touched the jobs in a long time, I will look into fixing those later today | |
| 07:08:09 | gtema | frickler: do you mean service-types-authority? BTW, do you know which team is responsible for the project? I see irc is mapped into the sdk room, but it is not official delivery of our team | |
| 07:09:57 | gtema | ah, and in gerrit it group is related somehow to api-sig-core | |
| 07:11:01 | gtema | right: api-sig is not active anymore, we had last meeting more then a year ago. iirc it was agreed to stay in standby until required, since anyway all the docs were already written | |
| 07:11:20 | frickler | yes, api-sig is what I came up with, too | |
| 07:11:37 | frickler | seems now action is required with a new project, at least in getting zuul to work again | |
| 07:13:35 | frickler | also lots of cores are no longer active from what I know, maybe some cleanup would be good | |
| 07:14:24 | frickler | I thinking whether this should better move under TC umbrella nowadays | |
| 07:14:25 | gtema | tja, let's wait wat dtantsur responds and eventually consider adoption. I was part of the team, but by that time there was already no reason for cores to exist | |
| 07:15:23 | gtema | since it relates to os-service-types repo I would rather think to merge those 2 and leave them under sdk, since we are the main consumer of this type of data | |
| 07:16:33 | frickler | not sure about that, it is currently blocking api-ref publishing for venus, so at least some wider impact. | |
| 07:17:00 | gtema | hmm, maybe right | |
| 09:14:18 | dtantsur | frickler: the API SIG is no longer active, but I do still have core rights | |
| 09:15:09 | dtantsur | somebody needs to fix the CI there.. | |
| 10:35:51 | opendevreview | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: add missing function to identity resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857045 | |
| 11:45:59 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Set py_modules to an empty list in setup.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857349 | |
| 11:48:30 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Add Venus as log-management service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857080 | |
| 12:05:06 | frickler | dtantsur: ^^ seems like that was an easy fix, stolen from other projects which had the same issue some time ago. | |
| 12:05:15 | frickler | brinzhang: added a comment in the venus patch | |
| 12:06:13 | gtema | yeah, this "fix" is slowly spreading across other projects | |