Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-22
15:49:14 gtema well, and if check will fail now I would be even more confused ;-)
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-23
12:39:30 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
12:45:03 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-25
08:18:01 thomasb06 gtema: Hello. The lines are two long, would you any guidelines in this case: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814395
08:18:14 thomasb06 sometimes the class name is huge
10:59:31 gtema thomasb06 - pushed update to this change
11:32:25 opendevreview Jiří Stránský proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add documentation links to README.md https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/814782
15:02:37 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
16:00:45 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
16:45:10 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
18:55:00 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
20:41:49 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
22:34:38 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
23:40:28 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-26
07:15:12 thomasb06 gtema: Hello. There's only one commit to check, maybe I can send another bunch of docstring reformats?
07:15:33 gtema sure, shoot it
08:25:07 opendevreview Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add documentation links to README.md https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/814782
08:29:34 thomasb06 gtema: all the files of the first batch are in conflict. Would you know a command to fetch everything back from the server?
08:34:18 thomasb06 done one by one, there were only 4
08:34:42 gtema ok
08:54:54 thomasb06 the command `git review -v -y` returns the following error: https://x0.at/0QLb.txt
08:55:58 gtema maybe as before you have empty commit or something similar?
09:14:14 frickler thomasb06: gtema: "change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814370 closed" you are trying to push again a change that was already merged
09:14:26 frickler likely need to rebase your stack on top of current master
09:14:53 gtema ah, sure
09:14:58 frickler or feature branch even
09:45:27 thomasb06 frickler: wow, how do you do that?
09:50:29 thomasb06 If run `git pull origin feature/r1`, it says "Already up to date."
09:53:40 frickler thomasb06: I usually have the branches checked out locally, so I'd do "git checkout feature/r1;git pull;git checkout my-branch;git rebase feature/r1"
09:56:21 thomasb06 let me try
10:05:32 thomasb06 now there's a new message: https://x0.at/1fyC.txt
10:08:02 gtema thomasb06 - you are having fun trying things nobody from us ever tried as I see :)
10:08:21 frickler thomasb06: that means that you have either messed up the gerrit remote or your public key
10:08:46 frickler thomasb06: you could try to remove the remote and recreate it with "git review -s"
10:09:01 gtema try really doing those manually one by one. I guess the problem is that you rely on script to generate changes and under some conditions things are not going it is expected by platform
10:10:04 gtema we should plan apply https://git.tsi-dev.otc-service.com/ecosystem/service_catalog/-/merge_requests/19 on Friday
10:10:14 thomasb06 It seems ok now: https://x0.at/zrAx.txt ? No idea what I did wrong...
10:10:26 gtema sorry, wrong room
10:13:28 thomasb06 gtema: /we is reliefed
10:13:39 thomasb06 * /m
10:27:00 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815467
10:27:24 thomasb06 frickler: cheers
10:27:54 thomasb06 gtema: do I keep going, or it gets a bit messy afterwards?
10:29:11 gtema You can keep going. Just try to make not depending changes (each from/to current HEAD) and not stacked changes like last time
10:30:23 thomasb06 so `git reset HEAD` after each commit?
10:48:36 gtema Yeah
12:00:45 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815476
12:02:13 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815477
12:03:57 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815478
12:05:15 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815480
12:06:17 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815481
12:07:15 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815482
12:08:07 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815483
12:09:01 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815484
12:11:36 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815485
12:12:33 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815486
12:13:54 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815487
12:14:38 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815488
12:15:45 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815489
12:16:33 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815490
12:17:35 opendevreview Thomas Bucaioni proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Reindentation of the docstrings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815491
12:18:27 thomasb06 This is it
12:42:41 frickler thomasb06: wasn't that supposed to go to the feature branch?
12:43:12 thomasb06 frickler: it's not feature/r1 ?
12:43:27 frickler thomasb06: the above msgs all state master
12:44:32 thomasb06 Arg... Usually, I'm on feature/r1. Maybe it's the rebase
12:45:01 thomasb06 Anyway, it's just the doc. Maybe it can go the master straightaway?
12:46:53 frickler gtema: ^^ I'm not sure what the thing with feature/r1 is exactly
12:47:53 thomasb06 the command `git branch` says `* master`. No idea how I landed there...
12:47:57 gtema well, it should go to feature/r1. It will be "soon" going to master, but we want those changes to happen in r1 branch. In gerrit Web UI you can "move change"
12:49:14 thomasb06 let me try
12:50:32 thomasb06 gtema: in `Move change to branch`, I write `feature/r1` only?
12:50:47 gtema yes, should be like that
12:51:33 thomasb06 The UI answers: `Could not perform action: move changes endpoint is disabled`
12:51:47 gtema hmm, it worked for me before
12:52:18 thomasb06 maybe origin/feature/r1 ?
12:52:27 gtema maybe with gerrit update it was disabled
12:53:46 thomasb06 Otherwise, I cancel them all and checkout the feature/r1 branch?
12:54:39 gtema then - cherry-pick it into r1 branch. Otherwise - abandon and create new this time checking carefully
12:55:20 thomasb06 let me check cherry-pick
12:59:27 opendevreview SEUNG TAE KIM proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add "image task list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/813554
13:03:11 opendevreview SEUNG TAE KIM proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "limit" string in _query_mapping variable in task.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814270
13:07:07 opendevreview SEUNG TAE KIM proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add "image task list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/813554
13:08:43 opendevreview SEUNG TAE KIM proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add "image task list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/813554
13:09:32 thomasb06 gtema: solution 3) with 115 votes seems ok: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2941517/how-to-fix-committing-to-the-wrong-git-branch ?
13:10:18 gtema do it in UI - chances to screw are much lower
13:10:47 thomasb06 ah, there's a cherry-pick in UI. Let me check
13:12:33 thomasb06 it says: `Cherry Pick failed! (merge conflicts). Please select "Continue" to continue with conflicts or select "cancel" to close the dialog.`
13:13:55 gtema argh - then just start new. It is not worth of effort
13:19:01 thomasb06 git branch says * (HEAD detached at origin/feature/r1) master
13:19:04 thomasb06 it's ok?
13:19:49 gtema hmm, why detached
13:20:25 thomasb06 because when I commit some change, I always rewind
13:21:35 gtema but you should rewind to feature/r1 and not land in detached state
13:22:11 thomasb06 then I check the log
13:22:22 gtema once you pushed one change `git reset --hard feature/r1 && git pull`
13:23:34 thomasb06 git pull asks a distant and branch so `git pull origin feature/r1` ?
13:25:53 gtema yes, maybe. I guess I set this in some settings for myself therefore it doesn't ask anymore
13:34:29 thomasb06 one to try: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/815503
13:51:00 opendevreview Rodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add --security-group to port list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815506

Earlier   Later