Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-20
13:12:16 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: new parent job for collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
13:16:35 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: new parent job for collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
14:09:02 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove all ansible bits https://review.opendev.org/703342
15:10:10 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: new parent job for collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
15:34:56 openstackgerrit Valery Tschopp proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix os_user_role issue to grant a role in a domain https://review.opendev.org/703428
16:07:27 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: new parent job for collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
16:58:03 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: new parent job for collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
18:38:35 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: new parent job for collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
19:34:55 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: new parent job for collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
19:55:40 openstackgerrit Pedro Henrique Pereira Martins proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add documentation about login with federation https://review.opendev.org/693232
20:58:57 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run functional devstack job on ansible collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
21:01:15 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove all ansible bits https://review.opendev.org/703342
21:07:19 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove all ansible bits https://review.opendev.org/703342
21:09:34 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fail a job for ansible modules with message https://review.opendev.org/703342
21:10:20 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run functional devstack job on ansible collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
22:26:01 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run functional devstack job on ansible collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-21
08:20:39 gtema_ we can't maintain same test, but we should not exclude it's reference from SDK. I'm ok for holding this change, but they should be linked. Actually: define job in collections, use it in collections and SDK
08:30:44 openstackgerrit Abhijeet Kasurde proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix argument spec for os_subnet and os_zone https://review.opendev.org/703554
09:06:18 openstackgerrit Abhijeet Kasurde proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix argument spec for os_subnet and os_zone https://review.opendev.org/703554
09:35:02 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Run ansible collection job in check https://review.opendev.org/703565
09:35:25 sshnaidm gtema_, ^^
09:36:16 sshnaidm gtema_, that's exactly what I meant to do
12:35:11 openstackgerrit Georgina Shippey proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Incorrect title for service provider https://review.opendev.org/703600
14:45:17 KeithMnemonic smcginnis: are the tests still pulling in some components with the wrong version. Do you know by chance where the "usage" error pop up from ? https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/95b51a89457c42a4af32d2a73bcfa1df
14:50:20 smcginnis KeithMnemonic: Hmm, not sure at first quick glance. I'll try to look a little closer later.
14:58:39 KeithMnemonic thanks
14:59:38 openstackgerrit Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Stop configuring install_command in tox and stop use pip. https://review.opendev.org/694484
15:24:11 frickler KeithMnemonic: not sure whether I found the right spot, but swift is installing osc into py2.7 as test-req at 2020-01-21 05:05:07.931122 in that log, and it is using the released version
16:02:24 smcginnis That's not good. If swift is using osc as a requirement, that imposes py2 support on python-openstackclient and all of its dependencies.
16:03:36 smcginnis Oh, but this is stable/stein.
16:06:56 smcginnis OK, looks like swift is installing the released version, but then later the locally checked out version is reinstalled.
16:12:43 smcginnis But then it looks like maybe current master tests are being run using the stable/stein version of osc, so missing some things that have changed since stein.
16:13:19 smcginnis Some of the errors are on not recognizing changes-before, but that wasn't added until train - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657373/
16:13:45 smcginnis So it's looking like issues with how the job is configured maybe.
16:17:56 smcginnis This is also running with py3.6 on a branch that technically only supported up to 3.5.
16:37:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run functional devstack job on ansible collection https://review.opendev.org/703383
16:41:01 KeithMnemonic smcginnis thanks for the analysis. is this something swift needs to fix?
16:41:35 smcginnis No, I don't think so.
16:42:03 smcginnis I've run out of time to dig more right now, so I'll have to try to look more later. But first impression is that there is an issue with the way that job is defined.
16:42:16 smcginnis It shouldn't be running base_python=3.6 for a stable/stein job.
16:42:45 smcginnis And somehow it is installing the right version of osc, but then running tests from master (I'm assuming that's what's happening at least).
16:44:09 KeithMnemonic ok thanks for looking at this when you have more time
16:56:17 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix os_user_role issue to grant a role in a domain https://review.opendev.org/703428
18:33:46 openstackgerrit Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132
19:23:41 frickler KeithMnemonic: smcginnis: oh, I completely missed the fact that this is a backport. then I think the solution is simple, the failing tests are introduced within the patch, so they need to be amended to match the pre-train available options https://review.opendev.org/#/c/702260/2/openstackclient/tests/functional/compute/v2/test_server.py
19:27:49 KeithMnemonic frickler i can resubmit my patch and run a recheck
19:29:52 frickler KeithMnemonic: you need to drop those parts of the tests that require --changed-before according to what smcginnis wrote
19:30:28 KeithMnemonic thanks let me try it now
19:30:41 smcginnis Ah, didn't even notice those tests were being added in the patch.
19:30:54 smcginnis That's good, a lot simpler than the scenarios I was imagining.
19:35:11 KeithMnemonic yup i just posted a new revision
19:54:55 openstackgerrit Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132
19:55:25 openstackgerrit Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132
19:56:09 openstackgerrit Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132
23:09:19 openstackgerrit Colleen Murphy proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix copypaste errors in access rule command https://review.opendev.org/703707
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-22
06:16:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: "qos_network_policy_id" attribute added to port resource https://review.opendev.org/693247
07:03:54 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Use the bifrost bionic CI job https://review.opendev.org/703739
07:19:05 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444
07:27:06 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444
08:10:40 openstackgerrit Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Stop configuring install_command in tox and stop use pip. https://review.opendev.org/694510
09:28:08 openstackgerrit Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132
10:36:13 gtema sshnaidm: if you merge it with 703565 it would be much better, so that in single patch we "replace" test jobs
10:36:49 sshnaidm gtema, you mean to squash it?
10:37:13 gtema i mean make 1 change out of 703565 and 703342
10:38:20 sshnaidm yeah, np
10:38:48 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fail a job for ansible modules with message https://review.opendev.org/703342
10:38:53 sshnaidm gtema, ^
10:39:27 gtema perfect.
10:53:26 openstackgerrit Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132
11:19:44 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix argument spec for os_subnet and os_zone https://review.opendev.org/703554
11:55:59 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix os_user_role issue to grant a role in a domain https://review.opendev.org/703428
12:30:05 sshnaidm this patch needs some love: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703342/
19:09:47 openstackgerrit Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-23
07:08:40 openstackgerrit Bram Verschueren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add os_routers_info module https://review.opendev.org/703927
07:26:00 openstackgerrit Bram Verschueren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: fix os_user_role for groups in multidomain context https://review.opendev.org/703930
10:56:08 elmiko dtantsur: is there another ansible meeting during the office hour today?
11:25:27 dtantsur elmiko: probably? sshnaidm?
11:26:01 sshnaidm elmiko, dtantsur I think as usual, ansible-sig mtg
11:26:50 sshnaidm I'll start it anyway, if no participants will close, 16.00 UTC
11:26:54 elmiko thanks dtantsur and sshnaidm
11:27:14 dtantsur elmiko: did you want to discuss anything re API SIG?
11:27:18 elmiko i am travelling currently and i might not be able to be around for the meeting
11:27:28 elmiko no, i don't think i have any specific topics
11:27:58 sshnaidm if you're here, please vote :) https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703342/
11:28:00 elmiko i /still/ would like to get back to a few PRs for the guidelines, but i have not found any spare time
11:32:00 dtantsur same..
11:32:08 elmiko ^5
11:33:01 elmiko bbl o/
11:33:48 dtantsur mordred, gtema, when you have time, a very simple CI fix: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703739/
12:00:04 gtema ok
12:03:57 dtantsur thx
12:04:05 gtema wlcm
12:07:43 sshnaidm dtantsur, how do I make clean node with SDK? that's all I found: https://docs.openstack.org/openstacksdk/train/user/proxies/baremetal.html#openstack.baremetal.v1._proxy.Proxy.set_node_provision_state
12:09:10 dtantsur sshnaidm: you mean, run cleaning? what exactly are you trying?
12:09:27 sshnaidm dtantsur, run cleaning, yes
12:10:09 dtantsur sshnaidm: this is the call to run manual cleaning, yes. I can help you more if you tell me the context.
12:10:33 sshnaidm dtantsur, I think I need a parallel to "openstack baremetal node clean "
12:10:55 dtantsur sshnaidm: okay, so do set_node_provision_state('clean', clean_steps=...)
12:11:10 dtantsur eeehhmm, missed a node, but I think you get an idea
12:14:55 dtantsur sshnaidm: you can ping me for any related reviews (it's actually quite encouraged)

Earlier   Later