Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-05
16:57:50 dtantsur I guess we need to match ansible?
16:57:56 gtema I think current version checking in modules is sufficient. So no need for openstack releases from my POV
16:58:01 sshnaidm dtantsur, why?
16:58:24 dtantsur to allow combining them as gundalow mentioned?
16:58:42 dtantsur SDK has stable branches, OSC too (?)
16:58:46 sshnaidm dtantsur, sorry, I missed it, to combine?
16:58:48 dtantsur it feels like the modules could
16:58:50 gtema at least "API" for the collections structure need to be kept in sync with Ansible
16:58:59 sshnaidm gtema, yeah, that's right
16:59:04 dtantsur sshnaidm: a distribution of ansible with all collections
16:59:08 dtantsur right
16:59:44 sshnaidm yeah, I think we agree on keeping them compatible with ansible
16:59:55 sshnaidm otherwise it won't work :)
17:00:01 dtantsur exactly :)
17:00:14 dtantsur I guess we need to decide about stable branches
17:00:16 dtantsur probably next time
17:00:17 sshnaidm #agreed to keep modules compatible with Ansible collections API
17:00:26 sshnaidm dtantsur, yep
17:00:34 sshnaidm ok, thanks all for participation!
17:00:42 sshnaidm next Thu same time same place
17:00:44 dtantsur thanks, and thanks elmiko for tolerating us!
17:00:56 dtantsur #endmeeting
17:00:57 gtema otherwise it is too silent :D
17:00:58 openstack Meeting ended Thu Dec 5 17:00:56 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
17:00:59 openstack Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_sig/2019/api_sig.2019-12-05-16.00.html
17:01:00 openstack Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_sig/2019/api_sig.2019-12-05-16.00.txt
17:01:01 openstack Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_sig/2019/api_sig.2019-12-05-16.00.log.html
17:01:20 sshnaidm yeah, we fixed that)
17:02:46 elmiko dtantsur: gladly =)
17:04:10 gundalow Good to chat everybody, please do shout out if there is anything else
17:04:22 gtema thanks gundalow
17:36:46 gundalow dtantsur|afk: sshnaidm another option could be `redhat.openstack`. I think this comes down to how many OpenStack Collections you think there maybe
17:39:45 sshnaidm gundalow, mm.. but our projects are community wide, not limited to redhat
17:47:41 gundalow sshnaidm: nod, that's a fair point
18:04:23 mordred yeah - I would hope we only have one openstack collection
18:04:33 mordred also - sorry I missed the meeting - I have plague today
18:26:11 elmiko hope you feel better soon mordred =)
18:26:50 mordred elmiko: thanks! nothing says the holidays like laying around groaning
18:27:21 sshnaidm gundalow, is there somewhere written about plans to move modules in 2.10? The roadmap looks a little bit empty https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/roadmap/ROADMAP_2_10.html
18:42:53 gundalow sshnaidm: we are working on comma at the moment. I expect it to be out in the next week or so
18:59:39 elmiko mordred: heh, totally
19:08:50 ekultails Ansible 2.10 should really be 3.0 with all of this restructuring going on. Just my two cents.
19:11:44 pabelanger I'd be interested in how the collection release process will work
19:11:47 pabelanger eg:
19:12:10 pabelanger what will be the version number of this first collection release, targetted for 2.10
19:44:51 ekultails I can't imagine every Collection aligning with Ansible's life cycle. I guess that is both a pro and a con that a Collection could push out updates independent of Ansible.
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-06
11:11:38 openstackgerrit Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Stop testing python 2 in tox and zuul. https://review.opendev.org/695427
15:06:04 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for setting and removing tags from server instance https://review.opendev.org/697674
15:17:31 melwitt dtroyer: hi, I was wondering what your thoughts are on backporting https://review.opendev.org/691459 and https://review.opendev.org/691460 to stable/queens? just trying to get some feedback about whether they're wanted upstream before looking at downstream backports. thanks
16:04:40 efried mordred, dtroyer: on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695427/ are you ready with a quick reapproval if I fix up the commit message?
16:05:16 mordred efried: ++
16:06:38 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Stop testing python 2 in tox and zuul. https://review.opendev.org/695427
16:06:59 efried mordred: done ^
16:11:28 mordred efried: re +2 from me
16:11:36 efried thanks
16:11:56 efried I guess somebody ought to go fix that other test...
17:00:23 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cliff master: Add contributors link to readme https://review.opendev.org/689293
17:00:23 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cliff master: Switch to Ussuri jobs https://review.opendev.org/691148
17:35:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/shade master: Switch to Ussuri jobs https://review.opendev.org/691162
17:40:10 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: update OVH vendor entry https://review.opendev.org/692961
17:53:29 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: update OVH vendor entry https://review.opendev.org/692961
20:49:31 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: update OVH vendor entry https://review.opendev.org/692961
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-09
04:35:38 iokiwi Bug when creating bootable volume via SDK? http://paste.openstack.org/show/787293/
04:36:50 iokiwi neither is_bootable=True nor bootable=True results in a bootable volume.
04:37:20 iokiwi Creating bootable volume via openstack client works fine though
05:03:47 eandersson iokiwi what is the output if you use bootable=True instead, identical?
05:05:09 eandersson but I see the bug
05:05:30 eandersson https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/140eaf7547cf9f557fdd119bf278c41f7b49e1e2/openstack/cloud/_block_storage.py#L242
05:05:59 eandersson When bootable is set, the volume is just return, but not normalized.
05:06:12 eandersson mordred ^
05:07:07 eandersson So don't think is_bootable could ever be true?
09:56:47 iokiwi eandersson yes I tried bootable=True
10:00:48 iokiwi Yes, the volume will go to status 'CREATING' first so that condition will probably never be met. But I dont see a way via the sdk to set the volume bootable after the volume has been created
10:13:38 iokiwi Oh nevermind, I am inside the wait block. I am not sure what normalizing the volume means?
15:04:30 mordred eandersson: oh - yeah. that's unfortunate there
15:06:34 mordred eandersson: but iokiwi is using the resource layer
15:06:51 mordred iokiwi: can you try con.create_volume instead of con.block_storage.create_volume?
15:10:06 mordred or - alternately, if you want to use the resource layer - you need to get the Volume object back from that create call, then you need to update it with the bootable flag - like v.is_bootable = True ; v.commit(con.block_storage)
17:02:39 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for setting and removing tags from server instance https://review.opendev.org/697674
17:18:07 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Make an OpenStackModule base class https://review.opendev.org/698044
18:16:11 sshnaidm is it a duplicate? or intentional https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/.zuul.yaml#L298-L314
18:17:49 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Import modules from ansible/ansible https://review.opendev.org/684788
18:17:49 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add collections metadata info https://review.opendev.org/684787
18:17:50 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add tox.ini file for running pep8 https://review.opendev.org/698056
18:17:50 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Make an OpenStackModule base class https://review.opendev.org/698044
18:18:16 mordred sshnaidm: duplicate :)
18:18:45 mordred sshnaidm, dtantsur|afk, Shrews, mnaser: ^^ added a pep8 job and rebased the other stuff on it
18:21:09 sshnaidm mordred, commented
18:22:58 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove duplicate job definition https://review.opendev.org/698057
18:29:27 eandersson oh yea my bad mordred
18:29:32 eandersson but still that should probably be fixed :p
18:47:27 mordred eandersson: ++
18:52:30 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix F841 and remove exclusion https://review.opendev.org/698063
18:52:30 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Make an OpenStackModule base class https://review.opendev.org/698044
18:52:31 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix F401 and remove exclusion https://review.opendev.org/698065
18:52:31 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix E128 and remove exclusion https://review.opendev.org/698064
18:52:32 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Remove from __future__ lines https://review.opendev.org/698067
18:52:32 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix H236 and remove exclusion https://review.opendev.org/698066
18:52:33 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix H301 and remove exclusion https://review.opendev.org/698068
18:52:40 mordred sshnaidm, mnaser: enjoy

Earlier   Later