| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-19 | |||
| 12:21:24 | mordred | beatiful | |
| 12:21:51 | gtema | mordred: also started implementing "stage" and "import" for glance yesterday - also very nice things | |
| 12:22:12 | mordred | oh cool - yeah, I've been meaning to work on those | |
| 12:22:18 | gtema | I also need around 30 hours in a day to be able to work at all | |
| 12:23:06 | mordred | gtema: did I mention aligning the shade and sdk image methods (specifically, replacing the sdk methods with the ones in the shade layer)? | |
| 12:23:13 | mordred | gtema: I started on it here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609684/ | |
| 12:23:17 | gtema | wrt osc: as I wrote in the maillist I would be doing that. And Glance is the beginning, therefore those patches | |
| 12:23:20 | mordred | but that's in merge conflict and needs to be updated | |
| 12:23:28 | mordred | gtema: ah - awesome! | |
| 12:23:31 | gtema | oh great | |
| 12:23:36 | mordred | gtema: sorry, I missed that from the mailing list | |
| 12:23:45 | gtema | no worry | |
| 12:24:20 | gtema | probably wrong subject prefix ;) | |
| 12:25:00 | gtema | mordred, have you seen my query in maillist about "*" region for identity? | |
| 12:25:10 | mordred | no - I'll go look for that | |
| 12:25:49 | gtema | mordred: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-February/002777.html | |
| 12:26:27 | gtema | is somehow a tricky setup in my case which makes some troubles, but there are no strict regulations from OpenStack about that | |
| 12:27:07 | mordred | yeah. I agree - we should make a solution :) | |
| 12:27:22 | gtema | yupp | |
| 12:27:52 | mordred | gtema: I think the 'easy' workaround for the short term is to just register the identity endpoints in the catalog for each region - even if it's the same endpoint | |
| 12:27:59 | mordred | but I agree completely that this is lame | |
| 12:28:14 | mordred | and we should actually support the thing you're talking about | |
| 12:28:20 | gtema | mordred: I agree this is an "easy" solution from the implementation POV | |
| 12:28:27 | mordred | in a real non-hacky way | |
| 12:28:29 | gtema | but I need to convince operations about that | |
| 12:28:36 | gtema | and this is not trivial | |
| 12:28:41 | mordred | yeah. it never is :) | |
| 12:29:09 | mordred | would an API-SIG document describing it as a 'correct' choice help? | |
| 12:29:32 | gtema | yes, I think it would be | |
| 13:43:25 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Make sure we pick flavors with disk https://review.openstack.org/637618 | |
| 13:43:44 | dtantsur | \o/ | |
| 13:44:06 | dtantsur | mordred: could you check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636601/ if you have a minute? | |
| 13:48:00 | mordred | dtantsur: lgtm! | |
| 13:48:38 | dtantsur | cool | |
| 13:56:45 | dulek | Hi folks! Can I somehow use openstacksdk to just do plain REST calls to OpenStack endpoint, so I won't worry that e.g. there's no support for Octavia tags yet? | |
| 13:57:37 | dulek | Bare requests module won't do all the keystone authentication for me, that's why I'm looking for some middle layer here. | |
| 13:57:50 | dtantsur | dulek: I think you need the keystoneauth library | |
| 13:58:08 | dtantsur | dulek: https://docs.openstack.org/keystoneauth/latest/using-sessions.html | |
| 13:58:36 | mordred | dulek: you can totally make REST calls to an openstack endpoint | |
| 13:59:14 | dtantsur | dulek: openstacksdk also provided keystoneauth Adapters for known services, e.g. connection.baremetal is an adapter for Ironic. | |
| 13:59:24 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image attributes from v2.7 https://review.openstack.org/637538 | |
| 13:59:43 | mordred | dulek: each service type has a corresponding adapter on the Connection object - so you should be able to do "conn.load_balancer.get('/something/in/octavia') and it'll return a requests.Response | |
| 13:59:52 | dulek | dtantsur: Ooooh, this would probably be perfect… | |
| 14:00:09 | dulek | dtantsur: So I won't need to deal with endpoints names and stuff. | |
| 14:00:13 | mordred | yah | |
| 14:00:18 | dtantsur | yep, see mordred's example | |
| 14:00:21 | dulek | mordred, dtantsur: Awesome, thank you guys! | |
| 14:00:26 | mordred | \o/ | |
| 14:00:36 | mordred | ok. I've been helpful for today - I can go back to bed now | |
| 14:00:52 | dtantsur | ++ about the right time | |
| 14:06:07 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684 | |
| 14:12:04 | gtema | mordred: just rebased your change 609684 on top of master leaving all other related changes off, since there were lots of conflicts | |
| 14:44:24 | mordred | gtema: sweet. obviously the code needs some cleanup to start using Image resource objects internally - but I think if we can get that passing tests landing it in that state should let us Resource-ify it in smaller patches | |
| 14:46:55 | gtema | great | |
| 14:47:42 | gtema | mordred: let's see what the tests show now. Do you want to continue on it, or should I take it? | |
| 14:56:30 | johnsom | dulek: fyi, Octavia tags support has merged. Still waiting on the rest of those patches however. | |
| 15:02:23 | dulek | johnsom: Oh, I see, it's even released. :) | |
| 15:19:27 | Shrews | dtantsur: +A'd https://review.openstack.org/636594 but left a nit there you might want to see | |
| 15:22:51 | openstackgerrit | Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Cleanup: Remove deprecated role list filters https://review.openstack.org/637166 | |
| 15:24:13 | dtantsur | Shrews: thanks! I'll check that and also the place I copy-pasted it from :) | |
| 15:42:16 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image.task resource https://review.openstack.org/637913 | |
| 16:13:54 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix help message of image add project https://review.openstack.org/637828 | |
| 16:21:32 | mordred | gtema: if you haven't started yet - I'm going to take a quick stab at the failures on that WIP image reorg patch | |
| 16:22:48 | mordred | Shrews, dtantsur: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/637563/ if you have a sec ... odyssey4me was having a hard time debugging a failure yesterday in nodepool, and it's a failure mode that is always confusing to users when it happens | |
| 16:23:42 | mordred | Shrews, dtantsur: it's a behavior change, but I **seriously** doubt it's a behavior change anyone is depending on because I think I might be the only person to have that whole behavior stack in my head :) | |
| 16:24:53 | mordred | gtema: ^^ you might also want to look at that one | |
| 16:25:22 | dtantsur | mordred: any unit tests to update? | |
| 16:25:46 | mordred | dtantsur: no - it worked fine (although that maybe indicates there is a missing unittest) | |
| 16:25:55 | dtantsur | exactly ;) | |
| 16:27:27 | mordred | the only use case I could see this making harder is if a user has a cloud that only has an unknown verion of a known service - but even in that case they can set an endpoint_override and a version override and it'll work | |
| 16:27:55 | mordred | dtantsur: after I poke at this image patch I'll see if I can't come up with a unittest | |
| 16:31:16 | gtema | mordred: you should definitely have a look in to the image-reorg. I have managed to resolve some of the issues, but here a knowledge of shade-creator is required to do it properly | |
| 16:37:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: implement set_node_power_state in the proxy https://review.openstack.org/636601 | |
| 16:39:58 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: support for allocation API https://review.openstack.org/636594 | |
| 16:43:14 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image.task resource https://review.openstack.org/637913 | |
| 17:03:07 | gtema | mordred, odyssey4me: with https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/37390 a change of "default" port_security_enabled from True (when not given) to False (explicitly) was introduced. Now all openstacksdk-ansible-devel-functional-devstack are failing | |
| 17:08:10 | gtema | mordred, odyssey4me: I do not really understand why so far, but comparing logs from stable-2.6 and master I see that in 2.6 when no port_security_enabled was given - a net with "True" was created, even when in the SDK we have a default of "False" | |
| 17:13:07 | gtema | mordred, odyssey4me: I got it. Ansible calls cloud.create_network and it bypasses Resource completely, so a "deployed default" plays role. I think we need to create a follow-up in Ansible to make default 'None' | |
| 17:14:14 | Shrews | mordred: 563 lgtm, but will wait for your unittest | |
| 17:14:38 | Shrews | mordred: also, sorry for delay. still quite sick :( | |
| 17:14:41 | mordred | Shrews: coolio | |
| 17:14:49 | mordred | Shrews: no worries! you should stop being sick :( | |
| 17:14:54 | Shrews | ikr? | |
| 17:35:51 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image.task resource https://review.openstack.org/637913 | |
| 18:49:35 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image attributes from v2.7 https://review.openstack.org/637538 | |
| 20:20:26 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image attributes from v2.7 https://review.openstack.org/637538 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-20 | |||
| 09:33:23 | openstackgerrit | David Rabel proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix help message of image add project https://review.openstack.org/638113 | |
| 11:33:03 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684 | |
| 11:38:03 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix minor issues in the baremetal proxy docs https://review.openstack.org/638136 | |
| 11:38:08 | dtantsur | Shrews: ^^^ (also get better soon!) | |
| 13:25:25 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684 | |
| 13:56:16 | Shrews | dtantsur: thanks, feeling much better today | |
| 13:56:30 | dtantsur | great :) | |
| 14:01:38 | Shrews | dtantsur: i guess something in neutron is broken based on the failures in your doc change? | |
| 14:02:12 | dtantsur | dunno, haven't checked yet (crazy day) | |
| 14:02:33 | Shrews | embrace the crazy | |
| 14:03:42 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix minor issues in the baremetal proxy docs https://review.openstack.org/638136 | |
| 14:06:22 | frickler | slaweq: ^^ that looks like a neutron regression, have you seen that yet? http://logs.openstack.org/36/638136/1/check/openstacksdk-functional-devstack/1cdc712/controller/logs/screen-q-svc.txt.gz#_Feb_20_12_04_53_392346 | |
| 14:10:03 | slaweq | frickler: I will check | |
| 14:10:18 | frickler | https://review.openstack.org/635671 looks slightly suspicous in that context | |