Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2018-08-13
19:32:05 mnaser guilhermesp: maybe you can have a look over https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/lib/ansible/modules/cloud/openstack/os_router.py if you have sometime
19:32:18 guilhermesp yeah, I'm going to take a look at this
19:32:18 mnaser and see what difference is it being called with compared to osc
20:28:27 dtroyer amotoki: yes, I had meant to do that earlier, apologies for the delay...
#openstack-sdks - 2018-08-14
07:23:24 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: DNM: implement block-storage backup resource https://review.openstack.org/591445
08:19:33 usr2033 hi, are there any way to check connection scope[domain/project]?
08:50:33 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: add pool member operating status https://review.openstack.org/591281
11:22:35 dtantsur no microversion talks for us in Berlin :(
11:28:09 cdent dtantsur: :(
11:28:27 cdent it really does seem like we need an actual openstack conference
11:28:49 cdent maybe it is time for an alterstack
11:28:57 dtantsur ++
11:41:54 dtantsur cdent: but careful, this can lead you to asking for an openstack foundation to govern it :D
11:42:20 cdent /o\
12:08:27 dtantsur mordred: hey, is it intentional that functional tests are not running on stable branches? e.g. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591617/
12:50:40 openstackgerrit Matthias Lisin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fwaas: Add support for FWaaS v2.0 API https://review.openstack.org/591650
12:53:07 mordred dtantsur: nope! that seems like a thing we should fix
12:53:16 dtantsur indeed
12:53:19 mordred dtantsur: and BOO for our microversion talk not getting accepted
12:53:26 dtantsur very much BOOOO
12:53:34 dtantsur you were right, we should have included "Edge" in the title :(
12:54:06 mordred edge solves everyone's problems
12:56:12 cdent Microversions are very edgy
12:56:35 cdent Microversions: We'll sell you the whole API but you'll only get the edge
12:56:39 cdent etc
14:18:17 openstackgerrit Matthias Lisin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fwaas: Add support for FWaaS v2.0 API https://review.openstack.org/591650
15:13:36 mordred cdent: Microversions: Edge edge containers edge nfv micro-services golang edge?
15:14:15 cdent I think you need an innovation in there
15:24:03 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: import zuul job settings from project-config https://review.openstack.org/591750
15:24:04 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: switch documentation job to new PTI https://review.openstack.org/591751
17:11:36 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Fix sphinx-build invocation https://review.openstack.org/591790
17:44:19 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Detailed help message for QoS max-burst-kbps value https://review.openstack.org/588168
17:46:43 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: switch documentation job to new PTI https://review.openstack.org/591751
17:46:43 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Fix sphinx-build invocation https://review.openstack.org/591790
17:59:43 samueldmq dtantsur: hi you around?
18:02:34 openstackgerrit Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Refactor require_service to use conn.has_service https://review.openstack.org/591029
18:03:47 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: import zuul job settings from project-config https://review.openstack.org/591750
18:04:11 samueldmq dtantsur: wanted to talk about your comments on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591029. but I just saw you addressed them on another patch
18:06:05 dtantsur samueldmq: hi! yeah, essentially I had a competing patch. I'm not sure if we still need to switch to has_service or just remove the TODO.
18:07:06 samueldmq dtantsur: I still need to do that, since the get_endpoint stuff is still there
18:07:32 samueldmq dtantsur: what cases would we need to care about the verison, do you have examples?
18:07:41 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Fix sphinx-build invocation https://review.openstack.org/591790
18:07:59 dtantsur samueldmq: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/590806/2/openstack/tests/functional/baremetal/test_baremetal_port_group.py@20 this API has a hard minimum requirement
18:08:02 samueldmq the upper abstraction layer (previously shade) deals with different versions right?
18:08:20 dtantsur samueldmq: yeah, but we need to know what we can test on the given cloud
18:08:42 dtantsur e.g. in this case we should skip portgroup tests if portgroups are not available
18:09:06 samueldmq dtantsur: gotcha, microversions is hard :(
18:09:31 samueldmq dtantsur: and then portgroups is something available as a new feature in an API (url/method,etc) that already existed?
18:09:32 dtantsur oh they are (don't tell mordred)
18:10:08 dtantsur samueldmq: it's a new set of endpoints. but we do have features introduced on existing APIs as well
18:10:29 dtantsur we're at version 1.46 now, we have quite a history :D
18:10:31 samueldmq dtantsur: if it's a new set we could have guessed by trying and getting 404?
18:10:44 dtantsur samueldmq: we could here, but not in future cases
18:11:02 samueldmq dtantsur: why?
18:11:29 dtantsur samueldmq: imagine adding a parameter or response value
18:11:51 dtantsur or even worse: acceptable value for an old parameter (we have a lot of these)
18:11:51 samueldmq dtantsur: but shade normalizes the responses anyway doesnt it?
18:12:08 dtantsur sure, but you need to know whether you can test something or not
18:12:41 samueldmq ok so it's not a matter shade can make things transparent to the end user
18:12:55 dtantsur right, but that's not my point
18:12:58 samueldmq it's about how we discover the versions so we test the if/else branches of it accordingly
18:13:20 samueldmq because shade does all the if/else to make thigns transparent to its users, correct/
18:13:34 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: switch documentation job to new PTI https://review.openstack.org/591751
18:13:37 samueldmq how do we call shade now? can I just say abstraction layer?
18:13:55 dtantsur I call it "the shade part" :)
18:14:46 dtantsur sorry, I had to bail out for dinner. we can talk tomorrow about this if you don't mind.
18:15:09 samueldmq dtantsur: sure, bon apetit!
18:15:44 dtantsur thnx
19:41:07 openstackgerrit Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Consolidate cloud/base.py into functional/base.py https://review.openstack.org/591031
19:46:36 openstackgerrit Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Consolidate cloud/base.py into functional/base.py https://review.openstack.org/591031
21:59:21 amotoki dtroyer: could you give your ack for osc-lib 1.11.1 release? it's waiting ack from PTL. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591556/
21:59:40 amotoki dtroyer: osc-lib 1.11.1 FFE has been accepted.
#openstack-sdks - 2018-08-15
00:12:47 dtroyer amotoki: +1
00:31:38 amotoki dtroyer: thanks. we can unblock neutronclient gate soon :)
07:42:15 openstackgerrit Matthias Lisin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fwaas: Add support for FWaaS v2.0 API https://review.openstack.org/591650
07:48:13 openstackgerrit Shuo Liu proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: add release notes to readme.rst https://review.openstack.org/591943
07:49:10 openstackgerrit yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add NODE and HOST parameters in "server create" help text https://review.openstack.org/591944
10:24:23 openstackgerrit yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add NODE and HOST parameters in "server create" help text https://review.openstack.org/591944
11:05:36 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-sig master: Add an api-design doc with design advice https://review.openstack.org/592003
11:24:54 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-sig master: Add an api-design doc with design advice https://review.openstack.org/592003
11:47:25 openstackgerrit Matthias Lisin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fwaas: Add support for FWaaS v2.0 API https://review.openstack.org/591650
13:43:40 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-sig master: Add link to Building Protocols with HTTP https://review.openstack.org/589132
13:43:40 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-sig master: Explicitly link to the HTTP RFCs https://review.openstack.org/589131
14:18:24 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/cliff master: cap cmd2 also for python3 https://review.openstack.org/592060
14:29:09 gtema mordred: are you here?
14:29:23 mordred gtema: heya
14:29:52 gtema mordred: can you please have a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591445/, I need help finding problem in test failure
14:30:28 mordred gtema: hrm. it's only failing in the senlin and magnum jobs?
14:30:35 gtema yupp
14:30:48 gtema exactly this is suprising
14:31:00 mordred gtema: you know - it might just be a resourcing issue
14:31:19 mordred like, when magnum/senlin installed maybe there aren't enoguh resources on the test node to deal with the backup
14:31:20 gtema you think of "recheck"?
14:32:05 mordred gtema: I think perhaps we might want to consider doing $something to not run those tests in the senlin/magnum jobs ... one of the reasons those are in their own jobs in the first place is resource competition
14:32:12 mordred because 8G vms
14:32:41 gtema mordred: hmm, what can I do then?
14:33:24 gtema invent new super powerfull switch for tests?
14:35:21 gtema mordred: in http://logs.openstack.org/45/591445/3/check/openstacksdk-functional-devstack-senlin/059f44e/controller/logs/screen-c-bak.txt.gz
14:35:38 gtema seems to be details to failure
14:36:05 mordred yah. that sure does seem to be an issuein volumebackups

Earlier   Later