| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-02-28 | |||
| 17:32:25 | reedip | sindhu : thats not necessary , is it? | |
| 17:32:26 | wklm | briancurtin: simply: pip install python-openstackclient | |
| 17:32:35 | wklm | being root | |
| 17:33:23 | openstackgerrit | Sindhu Devale proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: "floating ip set/unset port" for OSC https://review.openstack.org/383025 | |
| 17:33:48 | sindhu | reedip: it is, I have updated | |
| 17:33:58 | reedip | sindhu : testing the same | |
| 17:34:03 | reedip | I have made some other changes as well | |
| 17:34:05 | sindhu | reedip: can u check now with the latest patch | |
| 17:34:23 | reedip | sindhu : sure, gimme a minute. My changes are just running right now | |
| 17:34:31 | sindhu | reedip: sure | |
| 17:34:32 | briancurtin | wklm: someone else will have to take a look, i thought you were installing the sdk | |
| 17:35:09 | wklm | briancurtin: is there a more proper channel for it, or am i right here? :) | |
| 17:35:16 | briancurtin | fine here | |
| 17:35:26 | briancurtin | i just don’t know about that | |
| 17:39:04 | reedip | sindhu : my patch failed :P Now trying yours | |
| 17:39:23 | wklm | here more specific error stack trace: | |
| 17:39:24 | wklm | Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/pip-build-mgg6jby7/cliff/.eggs/pbr-1.10.0-py3.4.egg/pbr/core.py", line 111, in pbr attrs = util.cfg_to_args(path, dist.script_args) File "/tmp/pip-build-mgg6jby7/cliff/.eggs/pbr-1.10.0-py3.4.egg/pbr/util.py", line 248, in cfg_to_args kwargs = setup_cfg_to_setup_kwargs(config, script_args) File "/tmp/pip-build-mgg6jby7/cliff/.eggs/pbr-1.10.0-py3.4. | |
| 17:39:30 | sindhu | reedip: ok, thanks :) | |
| 17:45:20 | reedip | sindhu : okay , your patch also didnt work on my system | |
| 17:45:25 | openstackgerrit | Brian Curtin proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize network docs https://review.openstack.org/439074 | |
| 17:45:40 | sindhu | reedip: Ah really?? what does it say now? | |
| 17:46:05 | reedip | Just a min | |
| 17:46:10 | openstackgerrit | Brian Curtin proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize workflow docs https://review.openstack.org/439028 | |
| 17:46:32 | reedip | http://paste.openstack.org/show/600823/ | |
| 17:46:37 | reedip | sindhu : ^^ | |
| 17:46:46 | reedip | I fixed that in my patch but failed somewhere else | |
| 17:49:10 | reedip | sindhu : this one is really tricky patch for a long time :) | |
| 17:49:30 | sindhu | reedip: lol, yeah !! | |
| 17:49:38 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Yea what is going on haha | |
| 17:50:34 | reedip | ankur-gupta-f4 : a patch !!!! | |
| 17:50:58 | sindhu | reedip: I am going to wait to see what jenkins says | |
| 17:51:05 | reedip | sindhu : sure :) | |
| 17:51:15 | reedip | till then I will make my patch :D | |
| 17:54:33 | sindhu | ankur-gupta-f4: I had missed a parameter in cleanup | |
| 18:00:23 | ankur-gupta-f1 | stevemar: are you going to do the network osc mapping? else I can | |
| 18:02:32 | dasanind | ankur-gupta-f1: I started the network osc mapping here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ZtWC75BNCwFqLfFpCGGJ9uPVBvUXX0xuXP1yYG0NDA/edit?ts=58ab0c43#gid=527671830 | |
| 18:02:48 | reedip | hey dasanind :) | |
| 18:03:14 | reedip | BTW u missed tap-as-a-service CLIs in this :) | |
| 18:03:23 | dasanind | hi reedip : | |
| 18:03:36 | dasanind | reedip: oops | |
| 18:03:42 | reedip | no issues :) | |
| 18:03:44 | dasanind | reedip: can you nplease add it | |
| 18:04:05 | reedip | I cannot until I have write access :P :D | |
| 18:04:21 | reedip | sindhu : My patch succeeded :D | |
| 18:04:51 | dasanind | reedip: I can add you what is your email id? | |
| 18:05:06 | reedip | I requested for the update | |
| 18:05:27 | reedip | didnt u get the request ? | |
| 18:07:10 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Yea i filled it | |
| 18:07:16 | ankur-gupta-f4 | No tap tho | |
| 18:09:44 | sindhu | reedip: what did I miss | |
| 18:10:11 | reedip | reordering the CLIs | |
| 18:10:33 | reedip | but also the sdk_session issue which I was talking about earlier | |
| 18:10:57 | reedip | the Funtional test fails because you are unsetting FLoating IP after Router's interface removal | |
| 18:11:29 | reedip | but they fail even before that , because there is no sdk_session in ClientManager | |
| 18:14:14 | reedip | sindhu: you can check the issue by running the tox command I pasted earlier | |
| 18:17:16 | sindhu | reedip: but I thought sdk_connection error was coz my devstack was not re based | |
| 18:17:27 | reedip | i dont think so ... | |
| 18:17:38 | dasanind | reedip: I didn't get the request | |
| 18:17:56 | reedip | what made u consider that the devstack rebase could cause that error sindhu? | |
| 18:20:25 | dhellmann | wklm : if you could put the entire output in a pastebin, that might help. formatting and some of the message (I think) was lost when you pasted it in channel | |
| 18:21:06 | dhellmann | wklm : it would also help to know which version of pip and setuptools you have installed | |
| 18:26:49 | sindhu | reedip: coz I had the same error before and when I asked dean, he said that was the latest change which was merged and I should get those changes when rebaked | |
| 18:27:22 | reedip | Oh ok | |
| 18:30:15 | openstackgerrit | Brian Curtin proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize object_store docs https://review.openstack.org/439093 | |
| 18:31:03 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: "floating ip set/unset port" for OSC https://review.openstack.org/383025 | |
| 18:34:05 | reedip | sindhu | |
| 18:34:09 | reedip | updated ^^ | |
| 18:36:52 | sindhu | reedip: cool thanks 😊 | |
| 18:43:37 | stevemar | ankur-gupta-f1: i was going to wait until the google doc was finalized | |
| 18:45:16 | ankur-gupta-f1 | stevemar: nearly finalized. Just need to add the ones that are plugins from Neutronclient (bgp, tap). Lbaas commands wont be for awhile and the rest are in progress. | |
| 18:46:20 | ankur-gupta-f1 | Though I am not seeing the BGP stuff, just BGP VPN | |
| 18:50:20 | ankur-gupta-f1 | stevemar: it looks like someone deleted some items. | |
| 18:57:15 | thingee | mordred: why are some clouds optional is specifying here? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430967/ | |
| 18:59:44 | openstackgerrit | Brian Curtin proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize cluster docs https://review.openstack.org/439110 | |
| 19:04:10 | stevemar | ankur-gupta-f1: you can check the history | |
| 19:04:35 | ankur-gupta-f1 | stevemar: its okay. Ignorance is bliss, readding now | |
| 19:04:44 | stevemar | :) | |
| 19:05:29 | reedip | stevemar, ankur-gupta-f1 : the doc needs to be updated, aint it ? Seems like its missing some things maybe from network side | |
| 19:06:44 | reedip | Note : I dont think we would be migrating LBaaS v1 to OSC | |
| 19:06:51 | reedip | confirming the same from lbaas team | |
| 19:07:10 | ankur-gupta-f1 | yea | |
| 19:07:16 | ankur-gupta-f1 | waiting for Lbaasv2 | |
| 19:07:21 | ankur-gupta-f1 | reedip: ^^ | |
| 19:07:43 | reedip | So we can remove the LBaaS v1 from the sheet | |
| 19:08:08 | reedip | as per johnsom: neutron-lbaas v1 API will not be supported by OSC, you will have to use the legacy neutron client ] | |
| 19:08:18 | ankur-gupta-f1 | thats what I was saying. It won't be done probably this cycle either | |
| 19:09:03 | johnsom | Yeah, no nlbaas v1 API support in OSC | |
| 19:09:05 | reedip | so we can remove that from the sheet, to get a better report | |
| 19:09:31 | reedip | I mean we do not need to track what we do not want to move , aint it ? | |
| 19:10:43 | ankur-gupta-f1 | agreed. Plus it takes up so much space haha | |
| 19:11:07 | reedip | updated the sheet , please check | |
| 19:11:31 | reedip | I am not removing them though, changed their status for now : stevemar, please confirm :) | |
| 19:12:05 | ankur-gupta-f1 | reedip: also the 'lbaas-*' commands | |
| 19:13:13 | reedip | ankur-gupta-f1 : that we need to track | |
| 19:13:23 | reedip | that would be the basis of our movement from NC to OSC | |
| 19:13:55 | ankur-gupta-f1 | fine :| | |
| 19:14:09 | reedip | what ?? dissapointed ?? :D | |
| 19:16:42 | ankur-gupta-f1 | never :P | |
| 19:17:51 | reedip | Updated the sheet, now we are 42% complete ! | |
| 19:17:53 | mordred | thingee: it's a new flag and I just didn't get through checking all of them - not having a setting should be safe, since that's the current "I dunno, you go figure it out" situation. adding positive attestations should allow us to optimize calling code to not have to figure out | |