Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2017-01-19
15:09:44 briancurtin reedip_: yep. it will be interesting to see what kind of API you come up with, so it would be best to just try and solve one particular operation, like for one resource. that way if you make everything ever do bulk and we have to change the API, you’re not having to do a ton of work to adjust 20 methods
15:10:39 reedip_ braincurtin : okay , got it.
15:10:52 briancurtin reedip_: we’re mostly doing what was just done in network, updating any remaining services to use openstack.resource2/proxy2 instead of openstack.resource/proxy. once that’s all done and we can remove the old resource, that is basically 1.0
15:11:21 reedip_ anywhere I can help you with ?
15:12:20 briancurtin reedip_: i’m going to go through and do an audit so i know where we’re at (which i need to do anyway), and i’ll create a bunch of issues on https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstacksdk for each service we need to port
15:12:39 reedip_ braincurtin : Okay , I will look out on it
15:12:43 briancurtin reedip_: i’ll send you a couple of them shortly and you can pick whatever you’d like
15:12:54 reedip_ briancurtin : okay great :)
15:13:15 reedip_ thanks a lot briancurtin :)
15:13:26 briancurtin reedip_: you’re welcome, and thanks for all of your work
15:13:40 reedip_ braincurtin : dont thank me yet if there is work to be done :)
15:26:07 stevemar briancurtin: just tag 1.0, problem solved (reading scroll up)
15:26:25 stevemar err scroll back
15:30:55 briancurtin reedip_: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstacksdk/+bugs?field.tag=resource2-port is a list of them. i’ve already done work locally on database and object_store so i assigned those and will push them soon. the rest are open!
15:31:22 reedip_ briancurtin : okay
15:31:29 reedip_ briancurtin : looking
15:31:50 reedip_ stevemar : I knew you would have an innovative answer :D
15:32:03 briancurtin stevemar: i’ll do that and then go on vacation for a month
15:32:08 stevemar briancurtin: hehe
15:32:09 reedip_ hahahahaha
15:32:39 stevemar briancurtin: you've got to be getting close to a 1.0 by now? i think?
15:33:03 stevemar in terms of breadth anyway, lots of resources and APIs are covered
15:33:40 reedip_ briancurtin : you mentioned a document in the Bug report
15:33:57 reedip_ When porting, do a walkthrough of the documentation to see if anything has changed so that we can keep the service updated."
15:33:57 reedip_ "
15:34:05 reedip_ Link to the document ???
15:34:09 briancurtin stevemar: yeah pretty close. just need to get 8 services moved over to the newer base classes so everything is on the same API, and most of those are pretty small services
15:34:36 stevemar briancurtin: then we can deprecate all the python-*clients, yesss
15:34:55 briancurtin reedip_: oh i meant the REST API docs, like on docs.openstack.org. meaning when you’re porting over a particular resource, just check that it still offers the same fields or if it has more, perhaps add them
15:35:10 reedip_ briancurtin : oohhhh !
15:35:11 reedip_ ok
15:35:59 briancurtin stevemar: some of those smaller services are pretty light in terms of depth, but now that we’ll be locked down on the API, just expanding things to keep up with what a REST API provides borders on trivial
15:36:10 briancurtin and adding new ones is pretty easy
16:07:57 dtroyer waj334: There is quite a bit that needs attention in that review, not the least of which is the resource name 'message', that's _very_ generic and we even have a project with a very sinilar type tag 'messaging'
16:08:26 dtroyer Right now we are in a pre-Ocata release freeze prep and new things like this simply are not getting much (if any) attention
16:08:58 dtroyer None of the volume v3 is merging before the stable/ocata branch is cut either way, we talked about this in the meetings the last couple of weeks
16:10:06 waj334 dtroyer: I'm aware of the freeze. I'm just completing the tasks I was given so I pay my bills every month lol
16:11:33 waj334 dtroyer: Shall I change that resource name to something or just put it under another resource?
16:11:56 dtroyer sure, and I am aware of how the supplier if said pay tends to operate
16:13:00 dtroyer I need to digest that new thing, this is the first I've even heard of it, and we have a nice history of pissing off Cider folk by changing their names for things, which sometimes are unfortunate choices in the bigger scheme of things
16:14:15 waj334 dtroyer: As long as I can say it's been implemented, I'm cool with however it gets done
16:18:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-client-config: Fix typo for baremetal_service_type https://review.openstack.org/422381
16:49:29 openstackgerrit Justin A Wilson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Refactor volume service tests https://review.openstack.org/422757
16:52:06 edleafe elmiko: If you could review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-wg-newsletter and make any changes you think are needed, that would be awesome
16:52:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/api-wg: Removes unnecessary utf-8 encoding https://review.openstack.org/414782
17:04:19 elmiko edleafe: ack, looking now
17:05:01 elmiko edleafe: lgtm +1
17:05:09 elmiko thanks =)
18:02:44 stevemar waj334: dtroyer pay dem bills
19:24:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk: Network L3 Router Commands https://review.openstack.org/385728
19:58:18 openstackgerrit Nikita Gerasimov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Switch server create to block_device_mapping_v2 https://review.openstack.org/407111
20:24:26 ankur-gupta-f1 did I miss the IRC meeting again :|
20:56:59 openstackgerrit Justin A Wilson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Refactor volume service v2 tests https://review.openstack.org/422757
20:58:22 stevemar oh no, i think i did too
20:58:42 stevemar dtroyer: looks like we all missed the meetign
20:58:44 stevemar :)
22:14:04 stevemar dtroyer: heads down work is fun
#openstack-sdks - 2017-01-20
00:38:07 openstackgerrit Corentin Ardeois proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib: Update supported keystone version https://review.openstack.org/422936
01:36:08 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/js-openstack-lib: Update supported keystone version https://review.openstack.org/422936
04:28:05 huanxuan dtroyer, stevemar: Sorry for missing the meeting, a bit busy at the end of the school term :(
04:28:33 huanxuan dtroyer, stevemar: I have some questions about the freeze...
04:28:54 huanxuan I don't quite sure about that, what cann't we do during the freeze? we cann't merge new features, or bug fixed, right?
04:48:51 stevemar huanxuan: o/
04:49:14 huanxuan stevemar: :)
04:49:29 stevemar huanxuan: you are in school! let me know when you graduate and are looking for a job :P
04:50:32 stevemar huanxuan: so, for feature freeze... we try to minimize the major changes doing into OSC this week and next
04:50:42 huanxuan stevemar: Yes... One year left, Will graduate in next year
04:51:03 stevemar huanxuan: if there is a major bug that needs fixing, we should fix it. But we shouldn't be introducing anything big, like a new feature
04:51:14 stevemar huanxuan: so a new command probably shouldn't merge
04:51:39 stevemar huanxuan: i am very impressed that you are doing this while in school, thats amazing
04:52:30 huanxuan stevemar: hehe! half time for study, half time for job :)
04:52:42 stevemar huanxuan: still very impressive!
04:53:13 stevemar huanxuan: the reason we have the freeze is because once we do our next release, it'll be the final release for the Ocata cycle
04:54:00 stevemar and we don't want to merge something that can be 1) incomplete or 2) possibly introduce bugs
04:54:43 stevemar huanxuan: other projects like tripleo and rally use OSC, so we can't have a broken CLI at the end of the release :)
04:54:57 huanxuan stevemar: OK! Get it, Thank you for your explanation
04:55:27 huanxuan stevemar: I need to learn more from you, dtroyer and others
04:56:23 stevemar huanxuan: ask away :)
04:56:50 huanxuan stevemar: Thanks :)
05:03:58 reedip stevemar : Do you wish to be back in school ??? :P
05:04:11 stevemar reedip: tempting offer :P
05:04:35 reedip o really ?? I think you will go back to school soon, for someone else though :)
05:07:24 stevemar reedip: few more years til that happens :D
05:07:33 reedip stevemar :D
05:18:50 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Fix Setting Quotas in Neutron https://review.openstack.org/419911
05:22:46 reedip stevemar : ^^ ??
05:24:15 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Add project ID in QuotaDefault requests https://review.openstack.org/420301
05:26:12 stevemar lgtm, but i don't know the sdk very well :(
05:43:54 reedip stevemar : hmm, okay
05:43:56 reedip no issues
05:44:10 reedip would wait for braincurtin's viewpoint
05:46:57 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Fix Setting Quotas in Neutron https://review.openstack.org/419911
06:28:48 openstackgerrit jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Functional test for volume qos https://review.openstack.org/421066
06:44:46 openstackgerrit Rui Chen proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Replace "Display Name" by "Name" in volume list https://review.openstack.org/423081
07:48:11 reedip RuiChen : Is there tabination support for OpenstackClients ??
07:48:17 reedip Just a query
07:58:30 RuiChen reedip: you means tagging support ?
08:00:03 reedip No , If I press a tab, then would the command be auto-complete ?
08:08:59 RuiChen reedip: openstack complete?
08:09:25 reedip ?

Earlier   Later