| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-09-14 | |||
| 16:43:23 | Leo[m] | Ok, great. Thank you for your help. Is there a link to information about the PTG and its agenda? | |
| 16:43:25 | sean-k-mooney | so ideally the mon adresses there woudl jsut eb updated to the fqdn and nova would "just work" | |
| 16:44:04 | sean-k-mooney | note that nova access ceph in 2 ways | |
| 16:44:05 | Uggla | Leo[m] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2027.1-ptg | |
| 16:44:22 | sean-k-mooney | we use the ceph cli and the pythyon bi9nding so we need a coherent story for both | |
| 16:44:41 | tkajinam | put your topic at the bottom | |
| 16:46:07 | sean-k-mooney | so in the interest of time, are we ok with updateign https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-vfio-variant-driver-managed-mode-via-cyborg to 2027.1 and seting it back to approved? | |
| 16:46:46 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: you marked it as implemnted on last week but i reset it because its still in progress hence its current state | |
| 16:46:57 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney ok | |
| 16:47:11 | gibi_ | sean-k-mooney: any findings from the original plans during the implementation? | |
| 16:47:21 | Uggla | so I might have write something wrong in HL/prelude. | |
| 16:47:42 | sean-k-mooney | gibi_: just that the cybrog side needed me to implment ovo indirection api.. | |
| 16:48:06 | gibi_ | sean-k-mooney: ack that probably not affecting nova :) | |
| 16:48:06 | sean-k-mooney | gibi_: i realised late that we didnt have that in cybrog so i paused the work to focus on other features | |
| 16:48:33 | sean-k-mooney | so my plan is to complete the cybrog work includign ci then update the nova patch once im happy with all of that | |
| 16:49:14 | sean-k-mooney | im not expecting any scope change on the nova side for this specificly | |
| 16:49:37 | sean-k-mooney | i hae some ptg topic like using the sdk to talk to cybrog proerply | |
| 16:49:43 | sean-k-mooney | but that independint of this feature | |
| 16:49:45 | gibi_ | sean-k-mooney: sounds good to me | |
| 16:50:06 | gibi_ | Uggla: if this is in the prelude and highlight the we need to get remove it :) | |
| 16:50:37 | sean-k-mooney | i dont htink this is is there | |
| 16:50:48 | sean-k-mooney | i think we called out the mdev support | |
| 16:50:51 | sean-k-mooney | that did merge | |
| 16:50:58 | sean-k-mooney | so the nvidia drvier in thery shoudl now work | |
| 16:51:26 | Uggla | yep but I extended with variant because I thought it was merged. | |
| 16:51:56 | sean-k-mooney | oh ok | |
| 16:52:01 | sean-k-mooney | almost but not quite | |
| 16:53:01 | sean-k-mooney | ah i see https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/nova/2026.2.html | |
| 16:53:10 | sean-k-mooney | ya i can push a fix for that if you want | |
| 16:53:48 | sean-k-mooney | well this is the current text | |
| 16:54:01 | sean-k-mooney | ```Nova’s libvirt driver now supports Cyborg-managed mediated devices (such as vGPUs) via a new MDEV accelerator request binding type. Operators can choose to manage vGPU/mdev lifecycle through Cyborg as an alternative to Nova’s native support. Both management paths coexist safely thanks to a new OWNER_NOVA trait that prevents scheduling collisions between Nova-managed and | |
| 16:54:03 | sean-k-mooney | Cyborg-managed devices.``` | |
| 16:54:16 | sean-k-mooney | that does not mention manage mode | |
| 16:54:19 | sean-k-mooney | so i think we are good | |
| 16:55:09 | Uggla | yep | |
| 16:55:37 | gibi_ | cool then | |
| 16:55:49 | sean-k-mooney | ok so jsut to be clear gibi_ Uggla are you ok with markign this as approved again for this cycle | |
| 16:56:00 | Uggla | yep | |
| 16:56:03 | sean-k-mooney | if so we can move on/finsh up for this week | |
| 16:56:08 | gibi_ | 6yepp | |
| 16:56:27 | sean-k-mooney | cool thanks | |
| 16:56:30 | gibi_ | one queston before we stop | |
| 16:57:04 | gibi_ | are we then OK no to have an RC2 for the os-vif change being bumped into nova's min requirements? | |
| 16:57:37 | sean-k-mooney | we could its not stricly needed but i dont object | |
| 16:57:57 | gibi_ | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/1005496 | |
| 16:58:08 | sean-k-mooney | that a diffent question | |
| 16:58:27 | sean-k-mooney | your asking are we ok requestign a lib freeze excption for os-vif | |
| 16:58:39 | sean-k-mooney | a min verison bump in nova would not pick that up | |
| 16:58:42 | sean-k-mooney | since its not released | |
| 16:58:56 | gibi_ | I'm asking, does we as the compute team needs to anyting with this in connection with the Hibiscus GA :) | |
| 16:59:35 | sean-k-mooney | :) it would be nice to have but could come later, neutron would like for that to be backported and released | |
| 16:59:44 | sean-k-mooney | here is the backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/1005591 | |
| 17:00:21 | sean-k-mooney | doing an early release or asking for an expction work for me | |
| 17:00:35 | sean-k-mooney | early meaing in early october when the lib freeze lifts | |
| 17:02:30 | sean-k-mooney | oh good/bad timeing not sure how muhc of that gibi_ saw | |
| 17:02:47 | gibi | not much | |
| 17:02:54 | gibi | i started lagging again | |
| 17:02:59 | Uggla | 2nd option looks simpler. | |
| 17:03:02 | gibi | and reconnect took time | |
| 17:03:14 | sean-k-mooney | so second option is we merge the backport | |
| 17:03:26 | sean-k-mooney | and propsoe the release wehn we are allowed too in early october | |
| 17:03:34 | sean-k-mooney | but dont need to do anything else now | |
| 17:03:58 | gibi | OK | |
| 17:04:02 | gibi | that works for me | |
| 17:04:04 | Uggla | I'm ok with that. | |
| 17:04:11 | gibi | if nobody objects then this is cheap | |
| 17:04:27 | gibi | thanks | |
| 17:04:30 | gibi | I have nothing further | |
| 17:04:32 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: if your internet coperates this is the backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/1005591 | |
| 17:04:38 | gibi | sure | |
| 17:04:50 | gibi | only IRC is problematic which is strange | |
| 17:04:53 | elodilles | sounds OK to me with my relmgt core hat on d:) | |
| 17:05:07 | sean-k-mooney | even better :) | |
| 17:05:14 | Uggla | ok so I think we are done for today. | |
| 17:05:17 | sean-k-mooney | +1 | |
| 17:05:41 | Uggla | Thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening. | |
| 17:05:49 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 17:05:49 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Mon Sep 14 17:05:49 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 17:05:49 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-09-14-16.01.html | |
| 17:05:49 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-09-14-16.01.txt | |
| 17:05:49 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-09-14-16.01.log.html | |
| 17:05:51 | gibi | thanks | |
| 17:06:39 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 17:10:41 | lajoskatona | o/ | |
| 17:10:50 | Leo[m] | thanks o/ | |
| 17:19:44 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-vif stable/2026.2: ovs: disable IPv6 on taps created by create_tap before bringing them up https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/1005591 | |
| 18:19:17 | opendevreview | Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005119 | |
| 19:18:01 | opendevreview | Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Fix init_host crash migration test under native threading https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001369 | |
| 19:21:05 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: [func test]Catch hanging task at graceful shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003266 | |
| 19:46:02 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Remove physical_network from ARQ binding profile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005623 | |
| 19:47:34 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: ^ | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-09-15 | |||
| 01:32:23 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Remove physical_network from ARQ binding profile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005623 | |
| 02:35:28 | opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005643 | |
| 06:50:39 | opendevreview | yatin proposed openstack/os-vif stable/2026.1: ovs: disable IPv6 on taps created by create_tap before bringing them up https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/1005663 | |
| 13:04:41 | gibi | gmaan: bauzas: Uggla: (and of course anybody interested) as we disucssed on yesterday on the IRC meeting I started the nova-reviewers topic on the PTG etherpad. I added some context and I started the PTG perparation by adding my proposal as a braindump | |
| 13:05:12 | Uggla | gibi 👍 | |
| 13:05:27 | gibi | I ask you folks when reading this try to focus on understanding my view before jumping in to debate or refine it. Instead add your own proposal as a counter so I can also start understanding you full view | |
| 13:05:42 | gibi | we will have time until an on the PTG to go to debate mode | |
| 13:08:09 | gibi | of course clarifying questions are welcome more than ever | |
| 13:09:54 | bauzas | okay I'll try to look at it shortly | |