Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-09-10
14:40:33 bauzas and fwiw the i18n team works on a change from zanata
14:40:38 bauzas I dunno where they are
14:48:06 opendevreview Gabin Lanore proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: stop the event dispatch loops on cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005022
14:50:20 gablan gibi: thanks! Checked both of gmaan's patches 1003386 is the task-registry leak, 1001572 is the executor ownership refactor. Neither seems to touch Host.cleanup(), so I pushed a patch for it :D
14:51:56 gibi gablan: thanks cc gmaan ^^
15:27:08 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: perf(ironic): eliminate O(N²) ProviderTree deepcopy at startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005073
15:48:51 opendevreview Grzegorz Grasza proposed openstack/nova master: Mask password-like content in exception notifications https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005074
16:09:42 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Mark 2.104 as maximum API version for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004872
16:09:55 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980544
16:14:24 gibi Uggla: I've approved the prelude as the highlights laned. Are we done? :)
16:14:32 gibi s/laned/landed/
16:15:01 gibi ahh we are not doen
16:15:02 gibi done
16:15:21 gibi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004430 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004424 are still need to land to have RC1
16:16:04 gibi but then every patch from the tracking etherpad are approved now
16:16:09 gibi so we only need to wait for the gate
16:16:40 gibi sean-k-mooney: I guess the discussion about about the job changes went into the direction that we should not risk it now
16:17:12 sean-k-mooney did i miss that
16:17:30 sean-k-mooney were there comemtns on the patches
16:17:46 sean-k-mooney because i tought we were landing the other way
16:17:51 sean-k-mooney that htis was low risk
16:18:13 gibi I think bauzas and dansmith discussed above
16:18:37 sean-k-mooney ah ok i was in a watcher irc meetign when we were chatting about it so i had swapped back to that
16:19:16 sean-k-mooney the debian change i feel really shoudl be done this cycel becase it was propsed 10 months ago and was defered lat cycel for similar reasons
16:19:37 sean-k-mooney the ubuntu 24.04->26.04 change for nova next is more a nice ot have
16:20:01 sean-k-mooney anyway i guess we can do them right after we cut rc1
16:20:44 zigo Hi team !
16:20:44 zigo I get it for the 2 nova patches above that needs to land, but anything preventing placement to be released ?
16:21:25 sean-k-mooney im not directly aware of anything pending on that side beyond perhaps a release not prelude
16:21:35 sean-k-mooney but im not sure that is strictly requried
16:21:38 Uggla gibi, thanks I think we are done. We just need to wait the latest SHA to put it into the RC1 release
16:21:57 sean-k-mooney we didnt really have any placmeent feature so the normal release notes i sproably enough
16:22:38 sean-k-mooney gibi: anyway so looking at the service version patchs they are now approved so i think thats all good
16:25:31 sean-k-mooney bauzas: for context on the ubuntu change i proght it up at FF and i was asked to wait to RC1 which is why i put it up yesterday
16:26:09 sean-k-mooney we can wait again but i woudl like to get that testign in place early in 2027.1
16:27:24 sean-k-mooney the base testing of nova on 26.04 has been runing in devstack for several months now which is why i was not expecting this to be contoversial
16:29:29 sean-k-mooney https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-08-24-16.00.log.html#l-217
16:30:04 gmaan sean-k-mooney: gibi: same here, i would not prefer to touch the testing bit at this stage, let's have master rc-1 cut and then we can do those for 2027.1
16:30:11 gmaan gibi: gablan thanks, will check
16:30:39 gmaan sean-k-mooney: for py3.14 testing on 2026.2 you mean unit/functional test or tempest job?
16:31:03 sean-k-mooney i ment moving nova-next to ubuntu 26.04 to test with 3.14 in tempest
16:31:18 sean-k-mooney that what i propsed a few weeks ago in the irc meeting
16:31:30 sean-k-mooney specifcly for advance testing in 2026.2
16:32:05 sean-k-mooney gibi asked i do it after FFs and i asked to do it before RC1
16:32:17 sean-k-mooney so i proposed the patches this week to do that
16:33:00 gmaan yeah i know we discussed it on IRC to do it after FF but seeing gate unstability over last month, i agree to do it after rc-1.
16:33:40 sean-k-mooney ok anyway here is the devstack patch to make it voting there https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/1004684?tab=change-view-tab-header-zuul-results-summary
16:33:45 gmaan I am not against of adding it on 2020.2 but let's do it once stable/2026.2 exist so that it would not block current master dev/release
16:33:46 sean-k-mooney if you have not seen that as well
16:34:41 sean-k-mooney well once we cut RC1 master will be 2027.1 and it shoudl be voting there anyway in the next week or 2 as our default shoudl be chaning
16:35:03 sean-k-mooney but ya lets focus on getting RC1 out for nova and placement and come back to this next week
16:36:01 gmaan yeah, we can backport that based on hoiw it run on stable/2026.2
16:36:18 sean-k-mooney ack
16:36:38 gmaan sean-k-mooney: but from testing runtime, i think we will keep 24.04 and 26.04 noth voting on 2027.1
16:36:55 sean-k-mooney no
16:37:11 gmaan https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/2027.1.html#additional-testing-for-a-smooth-upgrade
16:37:13 gmaan yes
16:37:26 sean-k-mooney we will keep 24.04 for upgrades
16:37:36 sean-k-mooney but 26.04 shoudl be voting and our new default
16:37:37 gmaan because its 2027.1 where we are bumping the distro testing
16:37:46 gmaan yes and at least one job for 24.04
16:37:48 gmaan and voting
16:38:04 sean-k-mooney ya so proably the skiplevel greande job
16:38:21 sean-k-mooney with the normal greade job using 26.04
16:38:27 sean-k-mooney but we can select one fo the others
16:38:28 gmaan yeah, that only. so upgrade path from 2026.2 (on ubuntu 24.04) -> 2027.1 (ubuntu 26.04 ) is covered
16:38:59 gmaan ski level job is always there for SLURP and NON-SLURP by default unless project opt-out on non-SLURP release
16:39:01 sean-k-mooney yep i think the skip level job is often the best for that smoth upgrade path
16:39:08 gmaan yeah
16:40:14 sean-k-mooney ok i need to check that all the rc/stable branches for the cybrog and watcher repos that should exsit have been created so ping if anything comes up else ill be doing that for the next while
16:42:52 sean-k-mooney gmaan: actully for the tempest plugins those will happen as a group correct?
16:43:20 sean-k-mooney i guess they are not typiclly branched
16:43:35 sean-k-mooney so that probaly fine but they will be tagged
16:43:41 gmaan sean-k-mooney: yeah, there will be only final release for tempest plugin and no stable branch
16:43:51 sean-k-mooney ack perfect
16:44:00 gmaan and jobs/ new master twick will happen usually at same time
16:44:03 gibi Uggla: sean-k-mooney: zigo: the placement RC1 release patch is not up to date with the tip of master
16:44:24 gmaan for devstack/greande branches, yes it wait for all projects stable exist and when i get release go ahead
16:44:34 gmaan *release team go ahead
16:45:21 sean-k-mooney gibi: ah is it missing the packagign fix form earlier in the week
16:45:31 gmaan s/i/QA PTL, hoping it will not be me all the time :)
16:45:47 gibi the placement unreleased release notes looks OK to me I don't think we need a prelude there as it is sort
16:46:19 gibi Uggla: are you still around or should I go ahead and update the placement release patch?
16:47:00 sean-k-mooney oh that is there it just missing the tox changes
16:47:35 sean-k-mooney those are nice ot hvae if can bump them quickly
16:47:53 gibi I can
16:48:00 gibi so I start doing it
16:48:20 sean-k-mooney i think its low risk and we might as well inculde them
16:52:19 gibi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1004525/1..2
16:52:21 gibi updated
16:52:40 gibi but we need Uggla's or bauzas' approval a release liasons
16:53:44 sean-k-mooney well the current version is not approved
16:54:00 sean-k-mooney adn the release team only merge them tomorow if late
16:54:16 sean-k-mooney so updatign now wont really impact there appoval
16:54:42 sean-k-mooney i commented on the patch that the current sha is ok since the tox chagne are nice to have
16:54:52 sean-k-mooney we can alwasy backport them if needed
16:55:55 gibi I pushed the change :)
16:56:48 sean-k-mooney i guess the irc bot is not flexibel enough to tell use when nova related release patches are pushed
16:56:59 gibi yeah that would be too much :)
16:58:11 sean-k-mooney that looks good to me

Earlier   Later