Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-24
16:40:21 tkajinam +1
16:40:27 gibi yeah
16:40:42 Uggla cool congrats to all! especially antia for the implementation.
16:41:01 Uggla moving on
16:41:09 Uggla #topic Bug scrubbing
16:41:17 Uggla #info down to 65 (-8) but up to 69 (+4) due to gate issues.
16:41:25 Uggla #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:41:32 Uggla #link https://truc.uggla.fr/ to follow the trend.
16:41:38 Uggla Next meeting (this week): [public] Upstream bug triage. Wednesday, August 26th · 15:30 – 16:00 UTC. Video call link: meet.google.com/zjr-rxus-hzj
16:41:44 gmaan yeah, friday i added a few which are happening in gate in this etherpad
16:41:47 gmaan #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal#L400
16:42:08 gmaan as gibi mentioned I will check graceful shutdown one today or tomorrow
16:42:17 gibi gmaan: thanks!
16:42:47 gmaan fix for one of them is up for 2nd core
16:42:49 gmaan #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001017
16:43:10 gmaan the top of it which makes jobs results more readable
16:43:20 gmaan #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001212/1
16:43:34 gmaan fucntional tests one happening more frequeently which I will check
16:43:46 gibi I will check these ^^ tomorrow
16:43:49 gmaan thanks
16:43:55 Uggla gmaan 👍
16:44:21 Uggla #topic Open discussion
16:44:41 Uggla nothing on the agenda, but sean-k-mooney wanted to discuss something.
16:44:48 sean-k-mooney yep https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-resolute
16:45:01 sean-k-mooney so i ment ot make that voting in devstack about a month ago
16:45:05 sean-k-mooney its been pretty stable
16:45:15 sean-k-mooney but i would also like to add it to check
16:45:17 sean-k-mooney in nova
16:45:37 sean-k-mooney that is runing ubuntu 26.04 and python 3.14
16:46:02 sean-k-mooney whith these tests https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_b12/openstack/b126e9e318f340e6bc4aa1a357feaf17/testr_results.html
16:46:30 sean-k-mooney whish is pretty basic but gives us some level of coverage
16:46:36 sean-k-mooney what do folks think?
16:46:36 gmaan ++ on both, anyways this needs to be done for next cycle testing runtime
16:46:59 gmaan I am going to add tempest full job on resolute in tempest gate
16:47:08 Uggla from the result I would say yes. Should we enable them now or after the release of H ?
16:47:14 gmaan ping me once you are making ti voting in devstack, I will review
16:47:26 sean-k-mooney i would like to have it on h
16:47:33 gmaan sean-k-mooney: you want to add voting in nova or non voting in check pipelone only
16:47:33 sean-k-mooney that why i raised it now
16:47:46 sean-k-mooney but its not stricly requried until i (2027.1)
16:48:00 sean-k-mooney gmaan: its passing so why not make it voting
16:48:10 sean-k-mooney we can alwasy change it later if its an issue
16:48:16 gmaan sure, I am ok with that, if we see it unstable then we can always revert
16:48:19 gmaan yeah
16:48:52 Uggla yep we can enble them, and disable if it's not ok. So +1 for me.
16:48:58 sean-k-mooney we know cannoical ship 2026.1 on 26.04 so for the most part i expect 2026.2 to work on it
16:48:59 gibi what if we make it voting on nova after FF? not to get surprises this week? :)
16:49:21 sean-k-mooney gibi: im fine with merging this after FF for what its worth
16:49:28 sean-k-mooney i just want it before we brnach for RC1
16:49:39 gmaan ++ a few of the series are in edge of merging
16:49:58 sean-k-mooney ill prepare the devstack patch to make it voting this week
16:50:04 sean-k-mooney and ill submit the nova one on monday
16:50:27 Uggla ok
16:50:54 Uggla anything else ?
16:51:21 gibi cool
16:51:25 gibi nothing else from me
16:51:35 sean-k-mooney thats all i had as well
16:52:12 Uggla ok so I think we can close for today.
16:52:17 Uggla Thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening.
16:52:24 Uggla #endmeeting
16:52:24 opendevmeet Meeting ended Mon Aug 24 16:52:24 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:52:24 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-08-24-16.00.html
16:52:24 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-08-24-16.00.txt
16:52:24 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-08-24-16.00.log.html
16:52:29 gibi thanks folks
16:52:34 elodilles thanks o/
16:52:41 tkajinam thanks
16:52:54 gmaan gibi: the shutdown executors change is ready for review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000211
16:53:08 gmaan and the last change of gracefult shutdown series, doc/releasenotes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997141/11
16:53:28 gmaan gibi: will you be ok to review that doc change also ^^ (its not big)
16:55:07 gmaan if not then also fine, I think melwitt (^^) can check it as she reviewed the main change for tracking things
16:55:08 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add libvirt driver MDEV ARQ support for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995840
16:55:18 gmaan these two left for this series
16:55:42 gibi I will review them but not today
16:55:47 gibi is it OK tomorrow?
16:55:57 gmaan yeah sure thanks.
16:56:08 gibi cool
16:59:55 melwitt yes I can look
17:02:37 gmaan melwitt: thanks
17:32:43 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Support Cyborg PCI ARQ managed mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994579
17:32:43 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Add guide for NVIDIA vGPU with SR-IOV variant drivers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994160
17:58:42 gmaan seems like one more test unstable, reported new bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164931
18:00:40 dansmith man.. wonder if something else is going on.. I would have expected more instability from eventlet stuff that all seemed to go smoothly..
18:00:52 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Switch Cyborg client from keystoneauth1 to openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002007
18:09:55 melwitt yeah, the gate has been pretty painful
18:53:23 JayF we had a bug filed, against ironic, by the openstacksdks team about a fail that had gotten to a reasonable % of time. I dug in, it was an old race that we were more reliably losing due to slower I/O
18:53:43 JayF so I would believe we're seeing some performance characteristics change and impact runs
18:54:33 sean-k-mooney so load near FF causling races that normally dont matrialise to show up?
18:55:08 JayF sean-k-mooney: I suggest we just replay the chat logs from every previous 6 months ago going back a decade instead of re-saying all the things at FF busy time ;)
18:55:26 sean-k-mooney :)
18:55:32 JayF [standard cycle-end CI complaint #24987]
18:55:56 JayF (honestly thanks for mentioning that, I had "forgotten" about that tendency and it puts the last brick in place about "why now?" for that CI fix)
18:57:05 sean-k-mooney nova is still doting the Is and crosing the Ts on eventlet -> threading by default move in ci
18:57:25 sean-k-mooney so its less of a clear picture fo is io slow beacuse of ci or threading
19:22:26 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Switch Cyborg client from keystoneauth1 to openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002007
20:30:33 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova master: perf(ironic): eliminate O(N²) ProviderTree deepcopy at startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980676
20:30:37 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova master: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980679
20:54:23 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Switch Cyborg client from keystoneauth1 to openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002007
21:37:16 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova master: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980679
21:39:06 clif I think the per-node resource updates patch is in a good spot now, all review comments should be addressed

Earlier   Later