Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-19
20:56:47 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Create services required thread pool executors during service initialization https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001572
21:01:04 gmaan dansmith: gibi: ^^ this is the further refactoring of thread pool executors as discussed in original change
21:20:16 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Shutdown thread pool executors during graceful shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000211
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-20
03:03:02 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Shutdown thread pool executors during graceful shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000211
03:57:00 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Create services required thread pool executors during service initialization https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001572
04:00:55 gmaan gibi: i saw the same notification test failing again, reported the bug with trackback and link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164606
04:01:29 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Create services required thread pool executors during service initialization https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001572
13:38:36 dansmith gouthamr: I've restarted m-shr and no reconcile has happened. I've captured the logs for the service during the restart, a dump of the manila database, and a capture of what osc shows me
13:38:51 dansmith gouthamr: anything else you want me to capture (other service logs) before I force fix the share and move on?
14:21:38 gouthamr dansmith: o/ ty, looking
14:57:04 opendevreview Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994321
15:22:17 gouthamr dansmith: in meetings and got distracted; did you have the log posted somewhere? i can take a look at it and i'm thinking we have an eventlet bug.. I don't need anyhing else though, so yes.. force-fix the share with "access delete --unrestrict" as admin
15:22:50 dansmith gouthamr: no, I was waiting to see if you wanted me to capture anything else.. I'll post what I have in a sec then
15:23:01 gouthamr dansmith: i reported this https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2164609 and started investigating.. my hunch is this has to do with the eventlet backend (default today)
15:23:31 gouthamr dansmith: tyty
15:23:51 dansmith gouthamr: the logs and things could go in the bug.. do you want the DB dump there as well (or not at all?)
15:26:17 dansmith oh, is that bug for something more specific and thus not quite appropriate?
15:26:29 dansmith FWIW, it does seem like restarting the service takes a long time, like it's waiting for something
15:28:18 gmaan dansmith: btw, this is ready. CI is flaky over other unrelated failure so zuul -1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000211/14
15:28:46 dansmith ack
15:28:49 gmaan thanks
15:44:28 dansmith gouthamr: the log is too big to paste, as is the sql dump of course, so I emailed them to you and you can decide what to do witht hem
15:48:10 gouthamr ah! thank you dansmith, got that email - this is super helpful
15:49:39 dansmith gouthamr: using --unrestrict let me delete the stuck access rule. attempting to start the instance after that re-created the rule and the instance started (for the first time ever)
15:50:26 dansmith so that's good, I was able to get it working again with just admin/api stuff and no surgery.. IIRC, this would all have required surgery to resolve before you added the idempotent give-myself-access-always-on-start behavior
15:50:32 dansmith so a definite win for robustness, IMHO
15:50:33 gouthamr wow 😅
16:06:25 gouthamr dansmith: ty for pushing for that robustness.. this looks a lot better than i initially intended it
16:06:37 gouthamr will get back to you about the m-shr issues
17:40:44 opendevreview Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994321
18:06:57 gmaan another bug (most prob tempest schema) happening in gate, reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164677
18:08:01 gmaan currently I am seeing these many failure happening in CI, not sure we have etherpad to track them ( Uggla may knows ) but listing here just in case anyone else want it to check it before recheck
18:08:09 gmaan https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164606
18:08:10 gmaan https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2163552
18:08:16 gmaan https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2163448
18:08:28 gmaan https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2160254
18:08:35 gmaan https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164677
18:20:11 melwitt gmaan: I thought a schema validation failure would be 100% fail rate, so I'm a bit confused for this. the example linked in https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164677 patch is also not touching any API area so it's not that either
18:22:44 gmaan melwitt: indeed. it is a clear error in tempest schema but not sure why it was/is not failing 100% there is 'instance_uuid' in required field instead of 'server_uuid' field https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/lib/api_schema/response/compute/v2_1/servers.py#L555
18:26:09 melwitt gmaan: hm, it looks like it's /servers/{server_id}/migrations API has the 'server_uuid'
18:27:15 melwitt https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/ec47550235877e82f529f6a8c99f32dd9ea9c1a8/nova/api/openstack/compute/schemas/server_migrations.py#L85
18:27:33 gmaan melwitt: yeah, i think i got it. this schema is for list server in-progress live migration and most of time it may be empty so passing but this time it catch the in-progress live migration and hit the schema bug
18:27:45 melwitt ahhh
18:28:09 melwitt makes sense
18:28:16 gmaan here https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/compute/admin/test_live_migration.py#L477C9-L477C31
18:28:46 gmaan will fix it but happy that this test is catching some in-progress live migration :)
18:29:26 melwitt yeah agreed
18:29:59 melwitt so yeah looks like in that case the tempest schema is wrong ... it should be server_uuid for the migrations API
18:32:27 gmaan yeah fixing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/1001722
19:12:24 gmaan btw added these gate failures in this etherpad https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal
19:18:51 melwitt ++
19:19:06 melwitt (aside: looks like i need to clean up some really old stuff on there)
20:16:56 opendevreview Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994321
20:32:18 gmaan Gmaan@openrh28
20:33:09 gmaan oops :)
21:11:13 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Unify the thread pool executors into a central factory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998571
21:13:10 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Add doc and release notes for the graceful shutdown task tracking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997141
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-21
02:35:39 opendevreview Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994321
05:37:48 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Extract share management from ComputeManager https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999349
05:37:48 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633
07:38:58 antia gmaan: Thanks for reviewing the TDX series. I replied to some of the comments and will make changes to address the rest.
13:13:13 sean-k-mooney antia: are you expecting to push new version of the patches today. i had hoped you would have prepared them on wednesday orginally?
13:14:26 antia sean-k-mooney: yes, just finalizing now
13:28:58 sean-k-mooney ack ill try an loop back to them so before i drop fo rthe weekend
13:41:16 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add Intel TDX host capability detection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994421
13:41:17 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Generalize memory encryption config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998466
13:41:17 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add memory encryption config for TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998608
13:41:18 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch security Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999249
13:41:18 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Add documentation for Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000081
13:41:19 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: reject_mem_enc_instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000082
13:41:19 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add os_firmware_secure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000472
13:41:20 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Check only x86_64 arch for Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000805
13:41:49 antia sean-k-mooney: submitted a new version of the patches now, but this is without moving the os_firmware_secure patch
13:42:06 sean-k-mooney ack
13:42:16 sean-k-mooney that order is ok was well
13:42:36 sean-k-mooney its a littel cleaner the other way but it shoudl be fien as is
13:42:49 sean-k-mooney the how woudl be to merge the full series before FF in anycase
13:44:12 sean-k-mooney ill need to to do one or two things before i have tiem to re reivew but ill try an do a pass over them in an hour or so
13:47:00 antia thanks!
13:51:31 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova master: perf(ironic): eliminate O(N²) ProviderTree deepcopy at startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980676
13:51:32 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova master: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980679
14:01:41 sean-k-mooney antia: one thing to keep in mind, in openstack we try to ensure that every commit is indepently correct
14:01:52 sean-k-mooney because we want master to be constaly deployable into production
14:02:16 sean-k-mooney so we allow follow up patches but only when they are not requried for correctness
14:02:30 antia that makes sense
14:02:52 sean-k-mooney that why even if its fixed in a later patch if its a correctness issue we as for it to be fixed in teh relevent patch that intoduced the issue just as wider context
14:03:25 sean-k-mooney that partly because we use gerrit but more because we do not belive in squash merging series
14:16:27 dansmith gmaan: looks like we're in good shape on the graceful patches.. I'll try to hit the last one today
14:56:42 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add Intel TDX host capability detection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994421
14:56:42 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Generalize memory encryption config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998466
14:56:43 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add memory encryption config for TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998608
14:56:43 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add os_firmware_secure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000472
14:56:44 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch security Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999249
14:56:44 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Add documentation for Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000081
14:56:45 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: reject_mem_enc_instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000082
14:56:45 opendevreview Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Check only x86_64 arch for Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000805
15:03:16 gmaan antia: thanks, will check today. i finished till doc yesterday but that is most of the key thing and last two were good maybe,
15:03:23 gmaan dansmith: ack, thanks
15:03:59 gmaan dansmith: and this doc/releasenotes one is last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997141/10
15:09:35 dansmith gmaan: yep, I know

Earlier   Later