Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-07-08
20:34:20 sean-k-mooney melwitt: im not agaisnt makign it configurabl i just dont think that the correct limit to use in this case in general
20:34:31 sean-k-mooney but we coudl change that in a followup
20:35:14 melwitt sure. I'm also happy to just change it to resident_set_size if there is no potential bad thing about that haha
20:35:31 melwitt I am a bit wondering why no one has made use of it before
20:36:36 sean-k-mooney well almost nothign uses this in general https://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=ProcessLimits&i=nope&literal=nope&files=&excludeFiles=&repos=
20:36:45 sean-k-mooney and i think the code was cargo culted form nova to the rest
20:37:31 sean-k-mooney tweaking the adress space limit will allow more meory to be used like rss would
20:37:44 melwitt nova trend setter
20:37:47 sean-k-mooney but you may have to set it higher then otherwise
20:38:26 melwitt yeah. I mostly saw how cinder and ironic both doing it
20:38:44 sean-k-mooney you know what ill appove your current patch but lets chat about this more
20:38:53 sean-k-mooney your currrent patch matches cinder and ironics approch
20:39:06 sean-k-mooney so if it works for them it will proably be fine
20:39:11 melwitt it's ok, I don't mind chatting for rss
20:39:32 sean-k-mooney ok but lets check back tomorrow so we dont forget :)
20:40:12 melwitt I feel like dan would have a good input for this but I think he's away until next week
20:40:20 sean-k-mooney gmaan: related to ^ i rebased https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/955177 to get new results
20:41:06 sean-k-mooney ok im goign to go eat dinner o/
20:41:16 melwitt ok seeya o/
20:48:49 gmaan sean-k-mooney: ack
21:38:07 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Task tracking mechanism for graceful shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996299
21:57:03 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Rename cyborg-tempest to cyborg-tempest-py3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996297
23:18:48 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: file-backed SQLite with WAL in threading mode for Database and CellDatabases Fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988583
23:24:43 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: use file-backed Placement SQLite in functional threading https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992581
23:27:11 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Use per-database write locks instead of global lock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992862
#openstack-nova - 2026-07-09
00:11:18 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: file-backed SQLite with WAL in threading mode for Database and CellDatabases Fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988583
00:13:14 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: use file-backed Placement SQLite in functional threading https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992581
00:15:14 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Use per-database write locks instead of global lock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992862
00:27:58 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Use domain capabilities to detect SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996316
00:52:40 sean-k-mooney gibi: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/996567 and the followups may be of interst.
02:24:28 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove redundant version check for virtio-fs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996496
02:41:05 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Call manager graceful_shutdown while RPC server waits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996583
07:15:43 frickler anyone around for stable reviews of the OSSN-0101 fix? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995956 etc.
07:25:33 opendevreview Bhavana proposed openstack/nova master: Add Minimal Displacement Solver for MIG GPU Repartitioning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996058
07:54:35 gibi frickler: +2
07:54:47 gibi elodilles: could you look at these backports? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995956
07:57:31 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: HACK:Speed up functional test in threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996500
08:14:26 opendevreview Thibaut Démaret proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: add disk rotation_rate support for local disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979693
08:39:04 elodilles gibi: +2'd it. will follow up with the backports to older branches when this merges
09:30:16 gibi elodilles: thanks
10:43:54 ralonsoh hi folks, a quick review for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/995933 will be appreciated
10:43:55 ralonsoh thanks!
11:00:03 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Fix mutating global config in websocket proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995956
11:01:35 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928022
11:01:35 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron subnets https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962190
11:53:00 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/placement master: tests: Support file-backed SQLite URL in placement fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/993106
12:31:57 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: use file-backed Placement SQLite in functional threading https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992581
12:34:54 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Use per-database write locks instead of global lock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992862
13:14:19 gibi gmaan: sean-k-mooney: the threading functional test reproduces a seemingly valid API race condition between volume attach and attachment show https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2160224
13:15:05 sean-k-mooney :) thats fun
13:15:42 gibi we create the BDM in one transaction and populate the attachment_id in second one
13:15:53 gibi in between the two there is a BDM but no attachment_id in it
13:15:59 sean-k-mooney i need to refine the futurist patches not only based on your feed back but to have them relibaliy pass the unit tests :) but there are a lot of optimisation opterutnities there
13:16:19 gibi but the API response schema on showing the attachment insists on having a not non attachment_id in the response
13:16:29 gibi ~not None
13:16:46 sean-k-mooney we proably should weaken it slightly
13:16:50 gibi I will push a fix to return 404 until the BDM has a valid attachement_id
13:16:58 sean-k-mooney if the servier has been built it shoudl be non non
13:17:00 gibi that does not need an response schema chang
13:17:40 sean-k-mooney oh for just GET servers/<server_id>/os-volume_attachments/<volume_id>
13:17:44 gibi yepp
13:17:48 sean-k-mooney so this isnt an issue in server show
13:17:51 gibi nope
13:17:59 sean-k-mooney its an isssue int he aggachemts proxy api
13:18:14 sean-k-mooney ok then ya a 404 makes sense before its finished attaching
13:18:23 gibi but I'm not sure what nova does if creating an attachment in cinder fails
13:18:38 gibi if we cannot show the attachment then I guess we cannot delete it either
13:18:57 gibi i.e. the user cannot show the attachment as we will return 404
13:19:05 gibi hm
13:19:39 gibi but deleting an attachment only needs the volume_id not the attachement_id
13:19:46 gibi then the user can delete a half baked attachemtn
13:19:51 gibi the it is OK
13:20:05 gibi I can return 404 in show until the attachment_id is None
14:26:49 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: HACK:Speed up functional test in threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996500
14:34:58 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Fix mutating global config in websocket proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995957
14:59:51 sean-k-mooney gibi: melwitt do we want to proceed with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969538 for now and we can loop back to adress_space vs rss vs both later?
15:02:10 sean-k-mooney i am not sure i have the capsity to track that and rather then forget about it i think im ok to upgrade to +2w if ye are both happy with the current appoch
15:11:55 gibi lets land it and get back to it later if needed
16:01:37 melwitt thanks gibi and sean-k-mooney, if you prefer rss I can quickly change it to that, I am good either way
16:05:53 sean-k-mooney melwitt: while i do in general i dont know htat i want to have to try and validate that does not break anythign else. it shoudl not but lets leave it for a follow up
16:06:19 melwitt sean-k-mooney: yeah that's kinda where I was at too. thanks
16:07:22 sean-k-mooney cool noted in the review +2w
16:08:41 melwitt super thanks :)
16:10:17 sean-k-mooney one thing to note is this test is not failign because of debian 12 and now 13
16:11:07 sean-k-mooney so unless we try this on ubuntu 24.04 we wont know if its fully "fixed" i.e. if tweadkin the config option in the ci job is enough
16:16:16 melwitt yes that is true
16:17:52 melwitt IIRC the error was pretty clear it had hit the process limit, that combined with how ironic and cinder also have to configure it made me reasonably confident this would work
16:18:32 sean-k-mooney it shoudl but the defautl value might need to be higher, thats why i mentioned the job config. so one thing that might be interesting to try is how does ubuntu 26.04 and ceph intereact
16:19:00 sean-k-mooney although since debian 13 is fine
16:19:08 sean-k-mooney i think 26.04 will work as well
16:19:11 melwitt yeah, it was just the encryption overhead makes a 1G image slightly larger than 1G so the failure makes sense
16:32:14 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/placement master: tests: Support file-backed SQLite URL in placement fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/993106
16:59:48 gouthamr melwitt: bauzas gibi: could you folks review this OSSN for me: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/security-doc/+/996187
17:11:01 melwitt gouthamr: done
17:11:20 gouthamr thank you melwitt!
17:11:29 gmaan gibi: sean-k-mooney: on volume attachment id as None, agree on fixing the API and not schema. if atachment_id is not available we cannot guarantee that attachment is done in cinder side or not so returning 404 make sense .
17:13:33 gmaan gibi: sean-k-mooney now I am wondering that we used to return 200 before schema restriction which converted it to 400. now if I consider case where schema restriction is not enabled (actual production env) when by fixing this bug we will be converting 200 to 404 so we need microversion bump.
17:13:58 gmaan even tough it is bug fix, but need to take care of interoperability with version bump
17:14:50 sean-k-mooney gmaan: well if the attchment id is not avaibel the attchment is defnitly not don in nova yet
17:15:14 sean-k-mooney so regardless of cidner we have not compelted the attachment

Earlier   Later