| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-06-03 | |||
| 18:20:45 | melwitt | (that was what I was thinking of) | |
| 18:20:51 | melwitt | is the one you saw with ceph also? | |
| 18:21:23 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 18:21:26 | melwitt | I swear google is working less and less. launchpad search found me that when google couldn't | |
| 18:22:06 | melwitt | you might consider closing the older one as a dupe, it clearly is not getting searched easily haha | |
| 18:22:14 | sean-k-mooney | https://tinyurl.com/2k63h77v | |
| 18:22:37 | sean-k-mooney | so that the case where the trace happend but the job passes | |
| 18:22:58 | sean-k-mooney | but if you weiden that out | |
| 18:23:17 | melwitt | yeah. it absolutely happens all the time. and there was/is a patch proposed but it got stalled out for reasons i don't remember and I think that discouraged everything | |
| 18:23:18 | sean-k-mooney | its present in cidner cinder-plugin-ceph-tempest devstack-plugin-nfs-tempest-full | |
| 18:23:25 | sean-k-mooney | and cinder-tempest-lvm-multibackend | |
| 18:23:27 | sean-k-mooney | job | |
| 18:23:44 | sean-k-mooney | so it seam to be backend indepenent | |
| 18:23:54 | sean-k-mooney | if for any reason the snapshot is not found | |
| 18:23:56 | sean-k-mooney | it will explode | |
| 18:24:00 | melwitt | yeah it is the arbitrary dict thing which really sucks | |
| 18:24:16 | sean-k-mooney | well in my case there was a 404 | |
| 18:24:17 | melwitt | some backends use X keys some use Y keys and it's a wild west | |
| 18:24:36 | sean-k-mooney | i..e the snapshot was not found in cinder durign the delet test | |
| 18:24:47 | melwitt | there's no standard for that payload, last I checked | |
| 18:24:48 | sean-k-mooney | and then we didn have the info a as a reult | |
| 18:25:06 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: ya i have noticed that too | |
| 18:25:21 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. tht the payload is very backend secific | |
| 18:25:31 | melwitt | I remember digging into it a bit and getting really discouraged | |
| 18:25:47 | melwitt | yeah. and I think they are not documented either. so I'm not sure what the first step in the right direction is even | |
| 18:26:14 | melwitt | that isn't just papering over something, I mean | |
| 18:26:33 | melwitt | it could probably be its own PTG topic | |
| 18:26:54 | sean-k-mooney | have you heard fo microverions :P | |
| 18:27:29 | melwitt | heh | |
| 18:27:59 | melwitt | I mean like for this, we could catch and ignore KeyError for this specific thing but the problem is bigger than that | |
| 18:29:05 | sean-k-mooney | skimmig the patch comment im unsure if this just stalled out because fo a 2 month dely in updatin the patch for your -1 or if there was any other outstading issue with it | |
| 18:30:10 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900783/13/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py | |
| 18:30:24 | sean-k-mooney | i think is fine for this specific case | |
| 18:30:53 | sean-k-mooney | it just does nto resove that class of issue generally | |
| 18:31:21 | opendevreview | Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix KeyError on assisted snapshot call https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900783 | |
| 18:31:23 | melwitt | ok I see | |
| 18:31:35 | sean-k-mooney | i just rebased that in th ui lets see if it passes or not | |
| 18:31:42 | melwitt | cool thanks | |
| 18:34:12 | sean-k-mooney | that was july 2024 which was right atount the time we wre dealing with https://security.openstack.org/ossa/OSSA-2024-001.html | |
| 18:35:24 | sean-k-mooney | i.e we were fixign the qemu image stuff and the fallout for breaking iso ectra | |
| 21:07:03 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: [CI][stable-only] nova-grenade-multinode fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989579 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-06-04 | |||
| 01:42:40 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Avoid reading 4GiB of reason text from RFB https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991220 | |
| 03:18:51 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: [CI][stable-only] nova-grenade-multinode fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989579 | |
| 07:54:37 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix swap disk creation skipped on NFS during cold migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988547 | |
| 09:04:20 | Uggla | Reminder: Today is spec review day | |
| 09:48:08 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Change nova-alt-configurations job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983179 | |
| 10:07:57 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Intel TDX support in libvirt driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/979608 | |
| 10:19:17 | gibi | Uggla: both SNP and TDX specs are approved now. So we made good progress :) | |
| 10:24:20 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: AMD SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/983376 | |
| 10:48:35 | gibi | bauzas: dansmith: I reviewed the bidirectional RPC liveness spec and I have one RPC compat questions that one of you probably can answer easily https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/984384 | |
| 10:49:04 | bauzas | gibi: I can try to look at this afternoon | |
| 10:55:47 | gibi | thanks | |
| 12:10:42 | opendevreview | dalekseev proposed openstack/nova master: Restrict machine type check to QEMU instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991137 | |
| 12:18:46 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Update support python versions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/991603 | |
| 12:24:31 | gibi | sambork, Uggla filed a new CLI UX bug for eventlet + py3.14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2155245 | |
| 12:27:49 | Uggla | gibi ok | |
| 12:28:01 | Uggla | and cool for the CC spec | |
| 12:28:58 | sambork | @gibi, ack, I can take a look at that. At first glance, it looks like a similar issue to the one you described yesterday with oslo and pickling | |
| 12:35:19 | gibi | yeah someting wrong happens when the python interpreter exits | |
| 12:35:35 | gibi | it only uggly but causing no issue as far as I see | |
| 12:35:59 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987815 | |
| 12:35:59 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: [dnm] testing python 3.14 with restored fork https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987821 | |
| 12:50:49 | Uggla | gibi, if you have time to review 471815: Expose vlan trunking in metadata/configdrive | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/471815 | |
| 12:51:18 | Uggla | sorry to bother all of you with this one, but I would like not to miss it another time. | |
| 13:15:53 | opendevreview | Thibaut Démaret proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: add disk rotation_rate support for local disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979693 | |
| 13:25:08 | Uggla | gmaan, there is this new bug entered by jlejeune that might interest you: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2155153 | |
| 13:31:51 | opendevreview | ChungWon Lee proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec for reduce failed builds value by time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/991636 | |
| 13:33:10 | gibi | Uggla: I feel like https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2155153 is a duplicate of an older bug of mine. Looking for it... | |
| 13:33:54 | Uggla | gibi, :) I was just thinnking about it | |
| 13:35:55 | gibi | found https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2147554 and did the paperwork | |
| 13:37:57 | opendevreview | ChungWon Lee proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec for reduce failed builds value by time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/991636 | |
| 13:46:41 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add reproducer for bug #2115798 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991642 | |
| 13:46:41 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Fix race condition in security group add/remove https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991643 | |
| 13:57:07 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Fix misleading description of assisted volume snapshots https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991649 | |
| 14:02:16 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: is this on your review list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/990259 | |
| 14:02:39 | bauzas | no | |
| 14:02:42 | sean-k-mooney | i woudl assume if we are goint to do the virtio fs cold migrtion of host attach stuff | |
| 14:02:47 | sean-k-mooney | we would want that to be ocmplete first | |
| 14:02:55 | bauzas | I won't have time for reviewing the implementation | |
| 14:03:23 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 14:04:15 | sean-k-mooney | it feel strang not to adress the hugepage/file backed memory pain point with manilla share attachment so that the feature "just works" with all vms | |
| 14:04:46 | sean-k-mooney | before inveting in the lifecyle operations but ok the memfd work is much smaller then the move opertions | |
| 14:04:55 | sean-k-mooney | or hot attahce/detach | |
| 14:05:10 | sean-k-mooney | tis technically not a hard requriement | |
| 14:05:21 | sean-k-mooney | but it would also make testing this in ci simpler | |
| 14:05:35 | sean-k-mooney | anyway im happe to review the memfd sutff if someone else is | |
| 14:05:37 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix resize error notifications using wrong event type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991657 | |
| 14:05:54 | sean-k-mooney | i probaly wont have tiem for the other virtio fs features however | |
| 14:06:53 | cw0306-lee[m] | Hi, Uggla! I tried to write spec for reducing failed_builds value. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/991636 | |
| 14:54:30 | Uggla | cw0306-lee[m] cool thanks putting it on the list | |
| 15:20:13 | sean-k-mooney | cw0306-lee[m]: i provcided some feedback on wordign ectra | |
| 15:20:45 | gouthamr | sean-k-mooney: Uggla: my 0.02 agreement for your sentiment.. i'm okay continuing to work on hot attach/live migration with virtiofs and let them slip into I. Would really like the memfd and cold migration enablement to land in hibiscus | |
| 15:21:31 | gouthamr | and can help push this as much as possible :) | |
| 15:21:32 | sean-k-mooney | gouthamr: dont think tis stricly a bloceker for any of that work | |
| 15:21:54 | sean-k-mooney | but if we are going ot invest int impvoing the ux i think the memfd work si certally one of the more valuabel aspects | |
| 15:22:18 | sean-k-mooney | not that i really have an issue with any of the virtiofs enchment in genreal | |
| 15:23:17 | sean-k-mooney | we can test with file backed memory or hugepages in ci today if we need too but for the maniall share move operaiton we will need to do that and have tempest testing | |
| 15:23:42 | sean-k-mooney | functional testing will prove out most of the flow but i woudl really like to see tempest actuly do the moves as well | |
| 15:23:50 | gouthamr | yes.. am working on that part | |
| 15:24:27 | gouthamr | not memfd, but working on the cold migration tempest tests right now, i see memfd as making things a whole lot easier | |