Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-06-01
16:15:16 elodilles Uggla: ACK, we can do that
16:15:32 Uggla just a personal opinion
16:16:12 Uggla other could not agree
16:16:13 elodilles either that, or merge the above fix will unblock the gate for now
16:16:45 elodilles for stable/2025.1
16:16:54 elodilles and that's all from me
16:17:14 Uggla thanks elodilles
16:17:20 elodilles np
16:17:43 Uggla #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:17:47 Uggla fwiesel, do you have something to share?
16:17:52 fwiesel Hi, no updates from my side. I was on PTO.
16:18:12 Uggla thanks, I hope they were good!
16:18:44 Uggla #topic Gibi/Kamil's news about eventlet removal
16:19:23 Uggla or sambork
16:19:34 sambork Eventlet update:
16:19:35 sambork https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983179 - This updates the nova-alt-configurations job to run with the noVNC proxy enabled over TLS. It previously had a +2, but after a rebase, it is now missing one.
16:19:35 sambork https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988583/7 - This switches fixtures from in-memory SQLite to per-test, file-backed SQLite with WAL mode to support native threading.
16:19:35 sambork https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987815 - I am still trying to figure out the Python 3.14 / websockify issue with pickling (specifically, how to fix it to avoid pickling entirely).
16:19:36 sambork https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986282 - gibi also update poison eventlet patch
16:20:09 sambork so we progressing but slower in last weeks bigest progress was with testing
16:20:26 sambork do you have something to add gibi?
16:20:46 sambork and thanks for passing mic :)
16:21:02 gibi I have nothing to add
16:21:07 gibi thanks sambork for the summary
16:21:10 Uggla admin question? all the eventlet work is covered by bugs right ? Or do we have a SLBP ?
16:22:13 Uggla gibi , sambork ^?
16:22:15 gibi Uggla: that is a good question.
16:22:30 sambork I think most of it but definitely not all
16:22:37 gibi If we want we can file a SLBP just to be sae
16:22:39 gibi safe
16:23:10 gibi i.e. if we have the chance to go back to the rally based perf testing that is hardly qualifys as a bug
16:23:36 gibi Uggla: could you file a simple SLBP for us?
16:24:54 Uggla yes sure although, I will put a "draft" content, then feel free to adapt if I missed or you need to add stuffs?
16:25:07 Uggla s/?/./
16:25:31 Uggla Skipping next topic coz Layos is not available.
16:25:53 gibi Uggla: thanks
16:25:56 Uggla as well as Ironic, Doug is on PTO.
16:26:08 Uggla #topic Bug scrubbing
16:26:14 Uggla #info up to 185 (-4)
16:26:21 Uggla #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:26:27 Uggla #link https://truc.uggla.fr/ to follow the trend.
16:26:34 Uggla #info I'm gonna assign new bugs.
16:26:39 Uggla Next meeting (this week): [public] Upstream bug triage. Wednesday, June 03 · 15:30 – 16:00 UTC. Video call link: meet.google.com/zjr-rxus-hzj
16:27:10 Uggla I will also close the bug we discussed last week. I'll do that probably tomorrow
16:27:35 Uggla #topic Open discussion
16:27:56 Uggla 3 topics, I think we can start with (cw0306-lee) blueprint for reduce build fail value by time base
16:28:07 Uggla cw0306-lee[m], please go ahead
16:28:15 cw0306-lee[m] Thank you!
16:29:05 cw0306-lee[m] I want to get approve for adding periodic job to reduce build failed value by time based.
16:29:16 cw0306-lee[m] That is used for scheduling
16:30:14 cw0306-lee[m] Now, it can be reduced only when vm success to build on that host.
16:31:42 cw0306-lee[m] So i made this blueprint
16:32:18 cw0306-lee[m] Should i have to do something else to get approve?
16:32:38 Uggla cw0306-lee[m] do you have the link to the BP ?
16:33:03 gibi cw0306-lee[m]: why do we need another periodic? Isn't the stats flushed to the DB by the update_available_resources periodic? Can that periodic due the aging before flushing?
16:33:16 gibi /due/do
16:33:51 cw0306-lee[m] blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/reduce-build-fail-time-base
16:35:33 tkajinam gibi, maybe the proposal is not flushing (resetting the value to 0) but gradually decreasing it
16:36:04 Uggla cw0306-lee[m], so I think you want this as a spec less blue print.
16:36:56 tkajinam the decision may depend on how we control that "graduality"
16:37:13 gibi tkajinam: I mean https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/380f657b5102707a3da676478e72fd96691e966b/nova/compute/manager.py#L2490-L2492 says we only update the stats in the DB at a the update_available_resources periodic
16:37:20 Uggla gibi, bauzas, tkajinam do you think this can be a SLBP ?
16:38:34 tkajinam gibi, ah, ok so we use separate mechanism to maintain the counter and report it to placement
16:38:55 gibi the counter ends up in the stats. I'm not sure where we update the placement trait
16:39:35 tkajinam I'm inclined to say we need a spec to discuss the mechanism to configure this feature.
16:40:23 cw0306-lee[m] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/380f657b5102707a3da676478e72fd96691e966b/nova/compute/stats.py#L153
16:40:53 cw0306-lee[m] So one reason i made this blueprint was that todo
16:42:01 cw0306-lee[m] I thought this is small topic that can be spec less blueprint, but if i need to write spec, i'll add spec until next time
16:43:02 cw0306-lee[m] cw0306-lee[m]: Todo -> fixme
16:44:38 Uggla cw0306-lee[m], problem from an admin perspective we are after soft spec freeze so we should not accept new specs. But if others are ok, maybe we can make a small exception.
16:45:09 gibi_ sure lets file a spec and see how complicated it is. I'm lost in finding how we manage the trait based on the stats
16:46:12 Uggla yes, fill a spec ASAP, and maybe if it is simple we can re-discuss/approve it next meeting/week.
16:46:44 Uggla but no promises it will be accepted.
16:47:19 Uggla does it sounds good to everobody ?
16:48:06 cw0306-lee[m] Sure. Thank you and i'll write the spec until next irc meeting!
16:48:17 Uggla also maybe, we will have Dan, he might explain what he wanted to do behind the fixme.
16:49:16 Uggla cw0306-lee[m], please ping me as when you have the spec. I'll add it to the tracking file
16:50:01 cw0306-lee[m] Ok, when i write spec, i'll ping you in irc! Thank you!
16:50:45 Uggla as we are almost at the top of the hour, I will not cover the 2 topics from Sean and left them for next week.
16:51:00 Uggla Anything you want to discuss in 5mn ?
16:51:18 gibi -
16:51:41 Uggla seems not, so I think we are done for today
16:51:47 Uggla Time to close, thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening.
16:51:50 gibi thanks Uggla
16:51:54 Uggla #endmeeting
16:51:54 opendevmeet Meeting ended Mon Jun 1 16:51:54 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:51:54 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-06-01-16.00.html
16:51:54 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-06-01-16.00.txt
16:51:54 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-06-01-16.00.log.html
16:51:55 phildree[m] I wanted to ask if i could have a review on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/984384 but Uggla already wrote about this
16:52:13 elodilles thanks o/
16:52:19 Uggla phildree[m] I have mentionned it in the review point above
16:52:52 phildree[m] Thank you Uggla is there something i can do to it or do i just have to wait and see?
16:53:57 phildree[m] If there is nothing i can do then i might start implementing it for our infrastructure and if something happens down the line then i might push the code to the openstack repo as well
16:54:14 Uggla I think Dan was interested by this, so I suggest you add him as a reviewer.
16:55:12 Uggla I'll try to have a look too. So maybe it could ease the review for a last core reviewer.
16:55:33 phildree[m] Ok, thank you very much! :)
16:56:01 Uggla also try to ping people around Thursday, as this is a review day.
16:56:23 phildree[m] Good to know, will do!
16:57:25 Uggla They have a lot to review. But maybe they will find a slot before the spec freeze.

Earlier   Later