Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-05-11
16:26:13 Uggla #topic Stable Branches
16:26:27 gmaan I will check the RPC one, I think phil updated it as per PTG discussion
16:26:28 elodilles thanks Uggla
16:26:45 elodilles maybe this is more to the Release Planning part:
16:26:48 elodilles Uggla: note, that this week is Hibiscus-1 milestone week
16:27:09 elodilles and we have 1 release patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/988061
16:27:50 elodilles (osc-placement and python-novaclient don't have any merged / relevant code changes yet)
16:28:15 elodilles and now about stable branches o:)
16:28:28 elodilles #info placement's stable/2025.1 gate is blocked, workaround: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980761
16:28:40 elodilles this needs a 2nd stable core review ^^^
16:28:53 elodilles thanks for the +2 gibi o:)
16:29:00 elodilles #info rest of the stable gates should be OK
16:29:16 elodilles * i am not aware of any issue
16:29:25 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:29:41 elodilles and that's all from me about stable
16:29:51 Uggla thx elodilles
16:29:54 elodilles np
16:30:30 Uggla btw I'm printing the schedule to have it close to me. 👍
16:30:53 Uggla #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:31:03 Uggla fwiesel something to share ?
16:31:36 fwiesel Hi, so the pipeline broke because our OS is too old. I am finally updating to ubuntu 24.04. It should work hopefully tomorrow again
16:31:48 fwiesel That's it from my side.
16:32:22 fwiesel @Uggla back to you then.
16:32:46 Uggla thx fwiesel
16:33:08 Uggla and thx for fixing this pipeline
16:33:59 Uggla #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal
16:34:09 gibi o/
16:34:30 gibi eventlet mode deprecation patch merged
16:35:20 gibi and I have a not too complex patch about poisoning eventlet import https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986282 if somebody has review time
16:35:45 gmaan its in my list, will check today
16:35:50 gibi thanks
16:35:56 gibi I have nothing else
16:36:04 Uggla thx gibi
16:36:43 Uggla Skipping Layos's topic because he is off.
16:36:53 Uggla #topic Ironic review priorities
16:37:05 Uggla cardoe something you'd like to highlight this week ?
16:37:41 cardoe Nothing specific
16:37:55 Uggla cardoe, ok no worries.
16:37:58 cardoe Same patches from last week are still opened
16:38:13 Uggla ok
16:38:24 cardoe https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/471815 for the trunk spec for example
16:39:03 Uggla yep I mentioned it before
16:40:50 cardoe https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/985785 & https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955685 for the optimization ones
16:41:03 cardoe Which are roughly doing the same thing but tested differently.
16:41:59 dansmith ...why does Uggla have a competing implementation there?
16:43:10 Uggla dansmith I did not know about the previous implementation and it was not linked to the bug. As it looked no too difficult I did a patch.
16:43:42 dansmith okay I think it'd be better to not have the duplication, and you help the other patch by improving the tests
16:45:41 Uggla I agree, but that's assuming I knew about it.
16:45:55 dansmith I'm saying.. now that you know...
16:47:47 gibi I can review whatever patch remains :)
16:48:11 Uggla Sean’s comment is a bit ambiguous. I get the impression he prefers my version, but regardless, I’m going to try to move things forward.
16:48:57 dansmith so they are actually competing?
16:49:27 dansmith I mean if that's the case, then fine, but let's figure out which one we want and close the other.. having two proposed without active management towards a decision is just asking for them to be ignored, IMHO
16:50:32 Uggla yes sure.
16:51:05 Uggla #topic Bug scrubbing
16:51:12 Uggla #info up to 193 (+2)
16:51:19 Uggla #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:51:24 Uggla #link https://truc.uggla.fr/ to follow the trend.
16:51:29 Uggla #info New bugs assigned.
16:51:35 Uggla Next meeting (this week): [public] Upstream bug triage. Wednesday, May 13 · 15:30 – 16:00 UTC. Video call link: meet.google.com/qdd-fwzs-tje
16:52:11 gibi I'm affraid I have to skip it again. I promise I'm not intentionally avoiding it
16:53:05 sean-k-mooney Uggla: if its the one im thinking of you had better testing but i prefer there version
16:53:30 sean-k-mooney Uggla: in either case it woudl be nice to converge them
16:54:24 Uggla sean-k-mooney, ok thanks for the clarification.
16:54:28 Uggla Are you abandoning me?
16:54:34 Uggla gibi ^
16:54:36 Uggla ;)
16:55:05 dansmith sean-k-mooney: agree I prefer the original patch (in terms of the runtime code)
16:55:14 gibi Uggla: It is complicated ;)
16:55:31 sean-k-mooney dansmith: more reuse and uses len()
16:55:41 dansmith also, the original patch has unanswered questions/comments from gibi AFAICT
16:55:43 dansmith sean-k-mooney: exactly
16:56:11 sean-k-mooney its been a while since i looked at either so i have not seen them
16:56:18 dansmith basically precisely what I said in a review a few minutes ago
16:56:24 sean-k-mooney ack
16:57:10 sean-k-mooney Uggla: maybe you coudl take over both patchs and adress gibi's comments
16:57:31 sean-k-mooney or even just add your extra tests into ther patch for them
16:58:03 Uggla yes I thought about the latest option.
16:58:20 Uggla which looks simpler.
16:58:48 Uggla #topic Open discussion
16:59:19 Uggla nothing on the agenda. So I think we can close. Unless someone has a 2mn things to say
17:00:15 Uggla TBH I wanted to discuss a bug, but I'll do it outside of the meeting.
17:00:33 Uggla So I think we are done for today
17:00:59 Uggla Time to close, thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening.
17:01:07 Uggla #endmeeting
17:01:07 opendevmeet Meeting ended Mon May 11 17:01:07 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
17:01:07 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-05-11-16.00.html
17:01:07 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-05-11-16.00.txt
17:01:07 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-05-11-16.00.log.html
17:01:16 gibi thanks Uggla
17:01:57 dansmith Uggla: just some feedback from me.. it feels like the pace of the meetings has really slowed to a crawl lately and it's feeling like there's a lot of dead space.. I wonder if we could pick up the pace a bit and try to make it a quicker in-and-out sort of thing?
17:02:12 dansmith maybe it's just me, in which case ignore me, but.. might be worth considering
17:03:04 sean-k-mooney the last few meeting i have either been double booked or not able to focus much on ti so cant commet if tis just dan but ya it proably coudl be a littel snappier
17:03:44 dansmith right, it's easy to get distracted because the pace is so slow and I tend to do other things to try to fill the minutes
17:06:44 Uggla Oh, I didn't realize! I'll definitely try to make it snappier next time.
17:11:10 dansmith thanks :)
17:11:31 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Fix resize to unpermitted flavors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988148
17:21:19 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Fix resize to unpermitted flavors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988153
17:21:20 womax sean-k-mooney: hi I updated the spec for tempurl usage (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/975883), last time you said it was a bit lacking in details, and apart for explicity adding the use of download_handlers, I did not feel I have added much. If you had some part in mind that were lacking details, and if it was more an overall impressions I'm curious if you could point to me to a spec I could refer to have an idea
17:21:20 womax of how much I should go in details

Earlier   Later