| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-04-22 | |||
| 11:23:40 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: gmaan sambork so i hacked up some py 3.14 testing yesteday and got some interesting result on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/985735 | |
| 11:24:01 | sean-k-mooney | we can boot vms but some things fail | |
| 11:24:11 | sean-k-mooney | for example some of the novnc tests | |
| 11:24:30 | sean-k-mooney | the dnm to nova above shoudl give us better results fro our edgecases | |
| 11:25:07 | sean-k-mooney | basicly i have a WIP serise for devtack to use uv to provide python and replace pip with uv pip | |
| 11:25:30 | sean-k-mooney | what that allows use to do is use basicly any python verion on any distro within reason | |
| 11:26:23 | sean-k-mooney | so with that dnm all our jobs regrdless of the disto will run on python 3.14 and give ues a good overviewr of compatiablity | |
| 11:27:42 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: tkajinam sambork so the novnc issue iw the pikel issue we were discussing in the eventlet removeal room https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/6f2857af77aa41eabb9f28a077081d89/log/controller/logs/screen-n-novnc-cell1.txt#16 | |
| 11:32:09 | sean-k-mooney | we can see that tempest.api.compute.volumes.test_attach_volume.AttachVolumeMultiAttachTest.test_snapshot_volume_backed_multiattach and other complex test passed so for the most part we seam to be in a relitively good place | |
| 11:55:18 | sambork | nice findings, I'm curious if this will pass with threading mode (because patch for proxies runing with threading are still under review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/976089) | |
| 11:55:48 | sean-k-mooney | you could add a second dnm on top of your patch | |
| 11:55:58 | sean-k-mooney | you just need to depend on the devstack dnm | |
| 11:56:15 | sean-k-mooney | but ya im not sure if the pikel issue is eventlet related or not | |
| 11:56:40 | sean-k-mooney | sambork: or actully once my currnt dnm reports back | |
| 11:56:46 | sean-k-mooney | i can rebase it on yoru review | |
| 11:57:09 | sean-k-mooney | i just eamiled the list so other project can tyr this themselve if they want | |
| 12:02:40 | elodilles | Uggla: Nova deadlines patch LGTM, i've +2'd it >>> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/985791 | |
| 12:03:25 | elodilles | bauzas Uggla : i've corrected the version bump on the epoxy release patch, can you please revisit that? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/985651 | |
| 12:03:46 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: im not sure the ptg dicussion for that has happend yet https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg#L179 | |
| 12:03:57 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: if it did there were not any notes taken | |
| 12:04:21 | sean-k-mooney | i left some comment on it yesterday for whenever that happens | |
| 12:04:22 | bauzas | elodilles: ack | |
| 12:04:22 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: it was discussed on Monday | |
| 12:04:38 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: and the notes are at the end of the lines o:) | |
| 12:04:41 | sean-k-mooney | oh well no agreement was recrored | |
| 12:05:09 | sean-k-mooney | the light green? | |
| 12:05:18 | elodilles | yes | |
| 12:05:21 | sean-k-mooney | because that just loosk liek comemnt folks had added | |
| 12:05:29 | sean-k-mooney | wiht no agreement recorreded | |
| 12:07:19 | elodilles | indeed, it is not commented at 'AGREED' section, but otherwise based on the discussion the commented dates were agreed, but correct me Uggla if i'm wrong | |
| 12:07:43 | sean-k-mooney | ack i was questioning the spec deadline | |
| 12:07:57 | sean-k-mooney | but im not agents the dates over all | |
| 12:08:53 | sean-k-mooney | we had less time for it spec last cycle (i..e it was before m2) so this proposal is just repeating that that patten again this cycle | |
| 12:09:28 | sean-k-mooney | but it effectily put the spec deadlien at the half way point of the cyle instead of 2/3rd | |
| 12:09:50 | sean-k-mooney | which is fine as long as we also apply that to blueprint and we adverise ti to folks early | |
| 12:10:02 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: there were no hard opinions afair, so maybe this can be negotiated further | |
| 12:16:12 | sean-k-mooney | the only real point i wanted to contibut is spec and blueprint approve deadline shoudl be the same, and tell peopel early because several contibutors in other poejct that wanted to do cross project things with nova didnt knwo we had the deadline in decemeber for it last cycle | |
| 12:16:48 | sean-k-mooney | i had to tell multiple peopel that they missed the spec deadlien in late decemebr early and early january because they were exectign m2 | |
| 12:17:49 | sean-k-mooney | so as long as we tell peopel in advance then thats fine. just uodatign the secheudler isnt enouch to "tell peopel" becausemost project dont recrod the deadliens in the schdule and dont expect that to be where its comunicated | |
| 12:18:01 | bauzas | Uggla: gentle reminder that I won't be able to join the nova sessions until 3pm UTC (hopefully), maybe a bit later | |
| 12:18:47 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: feel free to chime in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/985791 | |
| 12:18:52 | Uggla | bauzas 👍 | |
| 14:44:15 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: AMD SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/983376 | |
| 14:47:05 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: AMD SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/983376 | |
| 15:16:56 | tkajinam | mhen, ^^^ I've updated the spec to capture the firmware descriptor hack | |
| 15:17:19 | tkajinam | it seems that the required content is available in c10s and even c9s (!!!) while it's not in ubuntu 24.04 or even 26.04 :-( | |
| 15:22:00 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [dnm] testing with python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/985802 | |
| 16:07:15 | tkajinam | oh I didn't notice that I've been holding the moderator role | |
| 16:07:29 | tkajinam | (probably I got it because I joined first today... | |
| 16:07:38 | clarkb | yes the first person to join gets it. You can give it to someone else | |
| 16:08:39 | tkajinam | I hope I transferred it to Uggla correctly ... | |
| 16:08:55 | Uggla | tkajinam seems ok thanks | |
| 16:09:09 | tkajinam | Uggla, is it still continued, right ? | |
| 16:09:21 | Uggla | tkajinam yep no pb. | |
| 16:09:27 | tkajinam | I left the meeting and saw message saying "the others are all leaving" | |
| 16:09:49 | tkajinam | which scared me really ... :-( | |
| 16:09:59 | Uggla | tkajinam no worries we are all in the room, it's working fine. | |
| 16:10:06 | tkajinam | that's good | |
| 16:10:07 | tkajinam | leaving now. will try to attend the attestation session tomorrow (but no guarantee) | |
| 16:10:44 | Uggla | tkajinam, thanks Takashi, yes please rest. | |
| 16:31:52 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: [py313-threading]Reenable last scatter-gather unit test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984349 | |
| 16:32:14 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: [py313-threading]Reenable test_show_simple_tenant_usage_policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984606 | |
| 17:28:13 | melwitt | gibi: thank you for the review on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/985741, I am very motivated to try and stabilize the CI 😆 | |
| 17:29:25 | gibi | melwitt: I'm always happy to review stabiliziation patches | |
| 17:30:42 | stephenfin | gibi: I checked and yeah, I have a WIP commit from 22-Jan in my local oslo.service repo where I started adding a LauncherBase command (and some others) 😅 | |
| 17:48:16 | gibi | :) | |
| 17:51:09 | stephenfin | And this is the first thing that comes to mind wrt the requested oslo.service issue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/985859 I'd prefer to rework this to make that more natural but it's emmintly doable | |
| 18:22:17 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: sambork so i said as much in the patch but the good news is the novnc proxy fails on 3.14 with eventlet but works in threaded mode | |
| 18:31:20 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: this is random but I spent some time trying to get multinode ipv6 to work to look at ceph live migration, I made my own page bc I didn't want to mess yours up too much https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984623 I come to the conclusion that this is known to not be possible (https://opendev.org/openstack/neutron/src/commit/2bc1bcc675ded515c8dd8da5e513010f6cb59794/zuul.d/tempest-singlenode.yaml#L744) but I don't | |
| 18:31:20 | melwitt | understand why | |
| 18:32:07 | melwitt | on the subnode, the interface that's found to support ipv6 just will not route to the controller and I don't get why | |
| 18:32:56 | sean-k-mooney | dont worrry about messing up ming beu totally fine to do it in your onw patch too | |
| 18:33:48 | sean-k-mooney | ok so is the limitaiotn with ovn | |
| 18:33:53 | melwitt | this isn't super important obviously but just wanted to let you know what I did haha | |
| 18:34:06 | sean-k-mooney | we could jsut swap to ml2 ovs | |
| 18:34:12 | sean-k-mooney | like the alt config job | |
| 18:34:35 | melwitt | sometimes ip route list finds host_ip_iface=enX0 sometimes it finds host_ip_iface=ens3 | |
| 18:34:50 | sean-k-mooney | that depens on the disto/kernle | |
| 18:35:05 | sean-k-mooney | the systemd/bios dev name stuff | |
| 18:35:26 | melwitt | ah ok. yeah I ended up having to make DNM https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/984605 to handle was it debian? I can't remember | |
| 18:36:02 | sean-k-mooney | yes we moved the ceph jobs ot debian 13 becuase of some qemu/ceph isues | |
| 18:36:16 | sean-k-mooney | basiclly to get newer versions with less bugs | |
| 18:36:24 | sean-k-mooney | so this is debian 13 | |
| 18:36:33 | melwitt | ok, so my next experiment can be configuring ml2 ovs in my dnm patch | |
| 18:36:38 | melwitt | that's helpful to know, thanks | |
| 18:36:58 | sean-k-mooney | you coudl do that or you could enable ceph in the nova alt config job | |
| 18:37:09 | sean-k-mooney | but eihter would worth a try | |
| 18:37:24 | melwitt | ah ok | |
| 18:37:38 | sean-k-mooney | the alt config job is already ml2 ovs i bleive | |
| 18:37:46 | sean-k-mooney | as is nova next | |
| 18:38:03 | sean-k-mooney | but one has legacy ip tables and hte other the ovs firewall driver | |
| 18:38:06 | melwitt | gotcha | |
| 18:41:31 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: the other thin we may or many not need too do is modify the multi node bridge | |
| 18:42:07 | melwitt | that is uncharted territory for me but I will keep in mind | |
| 18:42:36 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: if you have not looked at the multi node job in detail, it create linuxor ovs? briges on each of the hosts and and interconenct them with vxlan tunnels | |
| 18:42:54 | sean-k-mooney | so that we get a flat l2 network that we can shove vlans through | |
| 18:43:20 | sean-k-mooney | we might need to do somethign like assign ipv6 ips to that bridge and use those instead | |
| 18:43:31 | melwitt | is that something that's done in devstack? | |
| 18:43:35 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 18:43:43 | sean-k-mooney | well no | |