| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-04-16 | |||
| 20:21:45 | sean-k-mooney | its ok to report other VF form the same card with a differnt type. | |
| 20:21:58 | sean-k-mooney | *differnt resouce class. | |
| 20:23:40 | sean-k-mooney | if you had a gpu that you partioned into 3 Mig device 1 that used half the card an 2 that used 1/4 each | |
| 20:24:20 | sean-k-mooney | the correct way to model that in placment via nova ro cyborg would be 1 RP for the PF with an inveotyr of 2 of one resocue class and 1 of a diffent one | |
| 20:26:36 | sean-k-mooney | being very hand wavy that is the eventual plan for how to do that in cybrog but not right away. | |
| 21:22:11 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix keypairs lost during cross-cell resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/981558 | |
| 21:22:28 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Skip some unit tests on macOS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/985014 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-04-17 | |||
| 00:27:47 | opendevreview | ChungWon Lee proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test for bug #2134375 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984900 | |
| 02:58:11 | opendevreview | Sam Morrison proposed openstack/nova master: Filter out deleted instances when looking for build timouts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880125 | |
| 06:57:50 | opendevreview | chanyeol yoon proposed openstack/nova master: Fix infinite WARNING loop in _reclaim_queued_deletes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/985068 | |
| 07:55:13 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Enable threading mode for proxy services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/976089 | |
| 09:31:01 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Test nova CLI commands with native threading https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984036 | |
| 09:43:38 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, as discussed I will prepare the pci grouping topic because that's an internal high prio topic. | |
| 09:44:38 | sean-k-mooney | thanks i have not really had tiem to propsoe it bvut that partly becasue i dont really knwo what if any the open questiosn are | |
| 09:44:53 | sean-k-mooney | the spec has obvioulsy been up for a while and its jsut a refinement of the previoulsy appoved spec | |
| 09:45:35 | sean-k-mooney | so i dont really know what need ptg discussions vs what just need gerrit reivew | |
| 09:45:55 | bauzas | Uggla: sean-k-mooney: IMHO we should be discussing this in the cyborg-nova x-p session | |
| 09:46:02 | sean-k-mooney | nope | |
| 09:46:16 | sean-k-mooney | thi is not a cyborg related topic | |
| 09:46:50 | sean-k-mooney | this is a pure nova proposal and even if cyborg may have simialr functionaltiy in the future it is indepent of that | |
| 09:46:59 | gibi | it is hard to say what are the open question before loading context on the PCI grouping topic. I'm doing that loading now | |
| 09:47:16 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: thanks ++ | |
| 09:48:06 | sean-k-mooney | this is what im suggesting for the nova-cybrog topics https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cyborg-2026.2-ptg#L294 | |
| 09:48:15 | sean-k-mooney | but honestly i feel like that already too much | |
| 09:48:33 | gibi | Uggla: on a related note, I found hints in the pci/stats code that also assumes that VFs under the same parent are equivalent https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/525158521281cf643a9942522788efd15ba12d6b/nova/pci/stats.py#L164-L169 so this code need to be looked at when we want to remove the restriction of one RC for all VFs under the same PF | |
| 09:49:10 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, Could you send me the link to the spec if you have it handy? | |
| 09:49:22 | sean-k-mooney | sure ill go grab it | |
| 09:49:57 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/975635 | |
| 09:50:17 | Uggla | I agree the cyborg content seems already too large. So definitively need a session for PCI grouping. | |
| 09:50:26 | sean-k-mooney | weired in my brian i pushed that in like december not febuary | |
| 09:51:06 | sean-k-mooney | i guess because i sated on it just before i went on pto and then picked it up agan breifly in late jan early febuary | |
| 09:51:19 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney thx | |
| 09:52:00 | sean-k-mooney | the other spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/967515 will be taken over by joan thaat is the first cyborg sepcifc spec for nova for this cycle | |
| 09:52:32 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure if we will have another | |
| 09:52:44 | sean-k-mooney | it kind of depend on which feature/integration we priorites | |
| 09:55:29 | Uggla | Also, I’m likely lacking some knowledge on PCI grouping, but I’m counting on all of you to help me out. <3 | |
| 09:57:43 | bauzas | stephenfin: thanks a lot for your proposals ! Sorry I preferred to have some bootstrapped files but sure I'll review your patch and accept it once I doublecheck about the differences between the markdown file and the restructured one | |
| 09:57:44 | sean-k-mooney | in essence its just a way to say "provision these togeher and schdule them as a group" that the core idea, today you can have man pci alias request in a single flavor but they alwas provide you 1 device per aplis, pci grouping is just a way to say thses specific set of device are member of a group and i would like 1 of that type of group in a concise way | |
| 09:58:14 | sean-k-mooney | everything beyond that and the usecase that enabels are the details but that is the 10,000 foot view | |
| 09:59:59 | stephenfin | bauzas: Thanks. Can I get core on that too, please? I think sean-k-mooney is after it also | |
| 10:00:31 | sean-k-mooney | yes i would like to activly be inovled in the development fo that repo | |
| 10:00:34 | stephenfin | or better, just add various `*-core` projects for now, which we can extend with non-cores (ops, other end-users) over time | |
| 10:00:50 | stephenfin | *`*-core` groups from projects | |
| 10:01:11 | sean-k-mooney | im also reuickly reivewing the scafold patch | |
| 10:01:21 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: it's already merged :( | |
| 10:01:31 | sean-k-mooney | ok i can propsoe a revert :P | |
| 10:01:34 | sean-k-mooney | just kidding | |
| 10:01:35 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: where I feel complication (and digging into) is that today we schedule based on per device parameteres like live-migratable, traits, device_type, numa, etc. But when you have a group of such devices these parameters are not always easily inherited from a diverse set of device to a single group the devs are in | |
| 10:01:35 | stephenfin | bauzas slightly jumped the gun, I'm afraid | |
| 10:01:48 | sean-k-mooney | but i want to get some agreement on the repo layout ectra before we go too far | |
| 10:02:02 | stephenfin | (I understand his rationale, but it was still under very active review) | |
| 10:02:06 | sean-k-mooney | i was going to work on some liniting/precommit tooling too | |
| 10:02:52 | sean-k-mooney | if this is going to be a real repo it need at least basic zuul ci | |
| 10:02:59 | sean-k-mooney | and that shoudl be doen very early | |
| 10:05:44 | stephenfin | true | |
| 10:09:02 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: stephenfin: which repo are you talking about? :) | |
| 10:09:15 | stephenfin | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/agentic-workflows | |
| 10:09:27 | sean-k-mooney | https://opendev.org/openstack/agentic-workflows | |
| 10:10:34 | sean-k-mooney | we have a lot of thing to agree on like rst+sphink or markdonw ectra before we start commiting content there | |
| 10:12:00 | gibi | ohh, is it a grassroot movement, or was there already a decision on the tc / community level to have it? | |
| 10:12:26 | sean-k-mooney | it was discssed on the list and propsoed to buidl it under the tact sig | |
| 10:12:32 | sean-k-mooney | but litrlly in the last day | |
| 10:12:43 | gibi | very strange move before the PTG | |
| 10:12:48 | sean-k-mooney | which is why i was not expecting to really merge any content ther until after it was more widely dicssed at the ptg | |
| 10:12:52 | sean-k-mooney | right | |
| 10:13:06 | stephenfin | yeah | |
| 10:13:11 | sean-k-mooney | i didnt expect either the repo to be create or content to be merged untile after the tc slot | |
| 10:13:33 | sean-k-mooney | i fine with propsoing some review ectra | |
| 10:13:59 | gibi | I'm affraid that the content in this repo is seens as the communities agreement about this topic | |
| 10:17:57 | bauzas | sorry I was off for 15 mins due to a taxi need | |
| 10:18:23 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: stephenfin: I had to merge some things but we can change anything for sure | |
| 10:18:38 | sean-k-mooney | well you not really | |
| 10:18:48 | sean-k-mooney | it could have statyed in gerrit | |
| 10:19:05 | stephenfin | yeah that's what I said 😅 | |
| 10:19:40 | sean-k-mooney | but ya we can change things | |
| 10:20:08 | bauzas | stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: I'm just adding you both as cores | |
| 10:20:25 | sean-k-mooney | i need to also go do taxi for "Freya" since my frid does not want to walk in the rain with the dog. | |
| 10:20:47 | sean-k-mooney | because of course teh "dog" does not want to walk :P | |
| 10:21:01 | bauzas | stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: added you both | |
| 10:21:07 | bauzas | stephenfin: now reviewing your change | |
| 10:22:53 | stephenfin | ty 🙏 | |
| 10:26:06 | bauzas | stephenfin: 2 nits and I'm cool | |
| 10:26:08 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/agentic-workflows/+/985078 | |
| 10:31:45 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: sorry, as I said with my +W comment, it was a chicken-and-egg issue, but please review https://opendev.org/openstack/agentic-workflows/src/branch/master/AGENTS.md because of your concerns about the directories | |
| 10:33:09 | bauzas | stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: gibi: would you prefer I revert my merged changes actually ? | |
| 10:35:39 | stephenfin | bauzas: thanks, done | |
| 10:36:07 | gibi | bauzas: I prefer to have proper discussion on the PTG | |
| 10:36:23 | stephenfin | RE: changes, I don't see the point of reverting now, but I'd certainly hold off merging any skills yet. PTG is next week: let's wait until after that | |
| 10:36:32 | gibi | before sending an official looking message via a repo in the openstack namespec | |
| 10:36:37 | gibi | namespace | |
| 10:36:41 | bauzas | I'm like stephenfin here | |
| 10:37:04 | bauzas | I think we can stop merging anything but the AGENTS.md and the README.md | |
| 10:37:11 | stephenfin | maybe worth adding a note to the README(.md) that this is not an official project also | |
| 10:37:14 | bauzas | so then we can discuss about the skills | |
| 10:37:18 | bauzas | stephenfin: can do that | |
| 10:37:50 | bauzas | it would only become "official' once https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/984958 is accepted | |
| 10:38:07 | bauzas | (yet another chicken-and-egg issue) | |
| 10:41:16 | stephenfin | gibi: bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/agentic-workflows/+/985082 | |
| 10:45:01 | bauzas | stephenfin: +Wd both patches (and we need some kind of core policy :-) ) | |
| 10:45:42 | bauzas | for the moment, we bootstrap only README and AGENTS.md but for sure we will need to find a way to have consensus :) | |