Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-03-16
13:59:27 zigo Building Nova backport to Trixie leads me to these unit test failures:
13:59:27 zigo https://paste.opendev.org/show/bgO4WRXAvotrU1s66cx8/
13:59:27 zigo sean-k-mooney: Does some of them ring a bell?
14:04:51 zigo As much as I can see, I have 5 types of failures.
14:07:41 nicolairuckel elodilles: Thanks for restarting the pipeline. The same test failed a few times already though so I'm wondering if that's a bigger issue with the CI. And when it doesn't fail, another (unrelated) test fails.
14:14:21 elodilles nicolairuckel: i was having the same feeling - that something introduced a bug in tempest (?) - but then i saw a successful job run on stable/2025.2 branch, so it's either got fixed, or it's disappeared somehow o:) so i gave it another try now :)
14:19:19 zigo The aquire_lock thingy looks like probably comming from the fasterners version, I'm fixing that.
14:26:00 nicolairuckel Fingers are crossed that it works now. :D
14:27:00 elodilles nicolairuckel: grenade-skip-level passed already ( https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/337549cbec7f480a8f36bba5cd23f208 ) now only the others should do the same. fingers crossed, indeed ;)
14:34:45 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/placement stable/2025.1: [CI][stable-only] Fix docs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980761
14:52:18 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/2024.2: [CI][stable-only] Workaround for missing pkg_resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/979691
14:56:44 zigo Ok, that fixed 10 unit tests, now only got the oslo.middleware api-paste.ini loading thingy to fix ... (plus one unit test that looks like non-deterministic).
15:05:28 zigo The healthcheck thing is probably due to my own patch.
15:11:48 zigo Yeah, all is passing now. :P
15:13:11 zigo Any reason why oslo.policy was taken away from nova.conf namespace list when generating it?
15:13:22 zigo Is this handled in nova.conf namespace?
15:19:29 Uggla Nova upstream meeting in ~40mn
15:32:52 worteks-thidem Hey, I try to propose a PR for rotatation rate in Libvirt, I know it is a old subject. But I have few applications use this informations to make a choice on specific scheduler. My PR is here : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979693. If somebody can review my code and explain me if I forget something.
15:37:19 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Use consistent program name for wsgi scripts and entry points https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980775
15:38:52 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Use consistent program name for wsgi scripts and entry points https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980775
15:41:51 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Use consistent program name for wsgi scripts and entry points https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980775
15:56:06 s3rj1k Hi, I would like to ask for review of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/973924, this is mainly needed for Metal3 support and complementary PR is already proposed to Cloud-Init, I am hoping that Nova can consider merging this so cloud-init feature gets unblocked for merge
16:01:33 Uggla #startmeeting nova
16:01:33 opendevmeet Meeting started Mon Mar 16 16:01:33 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Uggla. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:01:33 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:01:33 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:01:41 Uggla Hello everyone
16:02:01 dansmith o/
16:02:04 r-taketn hello
16:02:16 gmaan o/
16:02:21 lajoskatona o/
16:02:50 elodilles o/
16:03:33 s3rj1k hi all
16:04:14 Uggla Let's start
16:04:21 Uggla #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:04:26 Uggla #info No Critical bug
16:04:40 Uggla #topic Gate status
16:04:45 Uggla #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:04:54 Uggla #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal
16:05:02 Uggla #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:05:08 Uggla #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:05:15 Uggla #info Please try to provide a meaningful comment when you recheck
16:05:41 Uggla Anything wrong with the gate ?
16:06:11 gmaan did not notice anything broken last week but have not checked today yet
16:07:10 Uggla me either, but I have just quickly looked at it;
16:07:27 bauzas o/ (late)
16:08:17 Uggla #topic Release Planning
16:08:23 Uggla #link https://releases.openstack.org/gazpacho/schedule.html
16:08:28 Uggla #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule
16:08:37 Uggla #info PTG etherpad for 2026.2 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg
16:08:43 Uggla #info This is a "work in progress document", but you can enter you topics at the bottom of the document
16:09:07 Uggla #info RC1 released last week.
16:09:29 Uggla I guess elodilles will comment more on ^
16:09:42 Uggla #topic Review priorities
16:09:48 Uggla #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-status
16:10:12 Uggla #info I have updated Launchpad and the above doc. Please ping me if you spot something missing.
16:10:45 Uggla Nothing special, thanks everybody who looked at the patches last week.
16:10:58 Uggla #topic Stable Branches
16:11:18 elodilles thanks o/
16:11:33 elodilles given that the RC1 patches have merged,
16:11:39 elodilles #info stable/2026.1 branch was cut for placement and nova
16:12:11 elodilles so don't forget to backport bug fixes first to stable/2026.1 from master from now on ;)
16:12:40 elodilles #info nova stable gates should be OK, but placement and osc-placement have blocked stable gates (stable/202{4,5}.*, see list of fixes in tracking pad
16:12:47 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:13:03 elodilles i'd appreciate stable core reviews on those fixes ^^^
16:13:21 elodilles and that's all from me about stable branches
16:13:32 elodilles Uggla: back to you
16:14:23 Uggla Thanks elodilles
16:14:32 elodilles np
16:15:09 Uggla #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:15:21 Uggla fwiesel do you have something ?
16:15:31 fwiesel hi, no updates from my side.
16:15:42 Uggla fwiesel thanks
16:16:18 Uggla Skiping Gibi's topic about eventlet because gibi is on PTO this week.
16:16:55 Uggla ;)
16:17:04 Uggla #topic Nova using openstack sdk for neutron
16:17:38 Uggla lajoskatona do you have something ?
16:17:49 lajoskatona o/
16:18:18 lajoskatona Not much, I went back to the patches to make them up-to-date and started to work on the next API: security-groups
16:18:26 lajoskatona that's it from me
16:18:56 Uggla ok thanks lajoskatona
16:19:07 Uggla #topic Open discussion
16:19:19 Uggla We have a couple of topic from r-taketn
16:19:37 r-taketn yes, thanks
16:19:43 r-taketn (r-taketn): SEV refactor series: I'd like to discuss the timing for restarting reviewing and merging the remaining patches.
16:19:50 r-taketn #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-status#L43
16:20:03 r-taketn Regarding these sev refactor series, most patches were skipped in the previous development cycle.
16:20:30 r-taketn Is the target for restarting reviews During Nova Implementation Days of the next cycle (maybe, early July and late August)?Or, could they be reviewed and merged earlier?
16:21:20 r-taketn My concern is the potential for conflicts between these patches and the implementation for the next proposed confidential computing features (SEV-SNP/Intel TDX)
16:21:33 Uggla To my mind there is no reason to wait.
16:21:51 Uggla As soos as ready we can merge on 2026.2
16:22:20 Uggla and yes it will be great because it is useful for SEV SNP and TDX
16:23:04 Uggla I'll try to review them this week
16:24:04 dansmith 2026.2 is open for merging patches now right?
16:24:22 dansmith the stable branch was cut, AFAICT, so we should be good to go
16:25:00 Uggla dansmith yep
16:26:02 Uggla r-taketn does it answer your question ?
16:26:55 r-taketn Yes. thanks. I understand that you can review these and there's no need to wait for review days. I'll wait for the review.
16:27:13 r-taketn I'll move to the second topic.
16:27:41 r-taketn (r-taketn): Update on Arm CCA software status

Earlier   Later