| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-11 | |||
| 14:53:06 | sean-k-mooney | its just a test and has no runtime impact on the shipped nova content | |
| 14:53:26 | Uggla | ok so it will be after rc1. | |
| 14:53:42 | sean-k-mooney | we can proably merge it early next week | |
| 14:53:55 | sean-k-mooney | we just wotn cherry pick it until after the offical release is done | |
| 14:54:20 | sean-k-mooney | note ill be on pto monday->wednesday inclusive | |
| 14:55:09 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, dansmith, bauzas, gibi, gmaan I think nothing on your radars that still needs to land before RC1 ? | |
| 14:55:37 | Uggla | melwitt too ^ | |
| 14:55:50 | dansmith | nothing on my radar, although the dev alias fixes from MaxLamprecht[m] are definitely on my short list after | |
| 14:55:54 | sean-k-mooney | not form me. i have some bug fixes i would like review on but not before rc1 or the final rc | |
| 14:56:12 | Uggla | stephenfin too ^ | |
| 14:56:48 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: i think most of us are in a wait and see holding patten until the rc is done and trying to minimise change | |
| 14:57:18 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, yep that's my feeling too. But just checking with all of you. | |
| 14:58:40 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2140631%22 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975500 are the changes i personally want to make progress on next but they can wait a week or two | |
| 14:59:23 | sean-k-mooney | the second id very low risk but we can backprot that to enable the ci testing later. neutorn alrady have it enabeld on there side | |
| 14:59:34 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney ok | |
| 15:00:10 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/placement stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980094 | |
| 15:00:11 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/placement stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980095 | |
| 15:00:13 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/placement master: Update master for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980096 | |
| 15:01:45 | sean-k-mooney | on a releated note ^ they have actully started creating the rc/stable branch today so the point is sort of mute | |
| 15:04:01 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: on an unrelated note did you ever start woring on manilla share hotplug or live migration supprot | |
| 15:04:20 | sean-k-mooney | i know we wanted to do add supprot for memfd as well | |
| 15:04:32 | sean-k-mooney | to improve the overall expeince | |
| 15:04:41 | sean-k-mooney | is that still somethign your interested in? | |
| 15:06:11 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, this is on the radar for H. I know I'll have some time to prepare the spec for share hotplug and live migration support. So we could discuss at the PTG. | |
| 15:06:14 | stephenfin | Uggla: nothing from me either. I have a few bug fixes starting at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974687/ but they're all latent issues/not regressions | |
| 15:06:37 | stephenfin | though I will note server share support is still not done in SDK or OSC | |
| 15:06:53 | stephenfin | that should really happen in H: it's been 3 or 4 cycles now | |
| 15:06:56 | Uggla | stephenfin, i know :( | |
| 15:07:21 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: ya it would be nice ot have at least a daft spec on that topic before the ptg if you intened to progress it but cool good to know | |
| 15:07:51 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: 2 it merged in 2025.1 | |
| 15:07:57 | sean-k-mooney | but yes it should | |
| 15:08:12 | stephenfin | 3 we won't get it done in G | |
| 15:08:15 | stephenfin | :) | |
| 15:08:44 | sean-k-mooney | i guess it depend on how you count be either way ya it shoudl be resolved if we expect to extend it in h | |
| 15:09:07 | sean-k-mooney | i woudl assum that horizon also does not have supprot for it | |
| 15:09:20 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, stephenfin, my understanding is that it is an "internal" priority now, so that might help. | |
| 15:09:22 | sean-k-mooney | coudl be good to add to a cross project session | |
| 15:09:41 | opendevreview | Akira KAMIO proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: support flavor disk/cdrom bus and SCSI model https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980072 | |
| 15:09:46 | stephenfin | that would be my assumption. And I don't think Gophercloud does either so right now no one can use it using our clients | |
| 15:09:59 | stephenfin | except if they're using gtema's rust client, perhaps | |
| 15:21:11 | gmaan | Uggla: stephenfin we need to get this in before rc1, still stuck in gate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978494 | |
| 15:21:33 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: speaking of sdk/client supprot have you added suprpot for flavor seach by name | |
| 15:21:50 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. openstack flavor list --name ... | |
| 15:21:51 | stephenfin | oh, I thought that had merged already | |
| 15:21:59 | sean-k-mooney | it may have i just never checked | |
| 15:22:18 | sean-k-mooney | oh you mean ganshams link | |
| 15:22:58 | sean-k-mooney | that woudl quallify for rc2 anwyay and befcause fo the oder we do the rpc version pinning we alwasy? have one | |
| 15:23:01 | stephenfin | yeah. I haven't done the client changes yet | |
| 15:25:02 | sean-k-mooney | ok i should go back to testing things o/ | |
| 15:27:38 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/980101 | |
| 15:28:58 | sean-k-mooney | do we need changes (seperatly) for 103 | |
| 15:29:05 | sean-k-mooney | to acoont for the rild cleanup | |
| 15:29:15 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Update master for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980096 | |
| 15:29:28 | sean-k-mooney | maybe it woudl be good to have a list of these soemwhere | |
| 15:30:12 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980094 | |
| 15:32:53 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980095 | |
| 15:51:01 | gibi | Uggla: nothing on my radar that needed in rc1 | |
| 15:51:38 | gibi | but I see we are tracking a fix above | |
| 16:07:29 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests for NUMA aware vswitches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979999 | |
| 16:34:56 | Uggla | gibi, yes gmaan's patch which does not want to land. :) | |
| 17:48:27 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests for NUMA aware vswitches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979999 | |
| 20:37:06 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Move cleanup of vTPM secret from driver to compute https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979052 | |
| 21:28:34 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend vTPM live migration spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/980165 | |
| 21:28:35 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Propose vTPM live migration: 'deployment' mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/980166 | |
| 21:31:52 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Propose vTPM live migration: 'deployment' mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/980166 | |
| 21:34:03 | melwitt | Uggla: my lame attempt to split the spec ^ I kept the original blueprint url the same but updated the "title" to say 'host' mode. and I made a new blueprint for 'deployment' mode here https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vtpm-live-migration-deployment-mode (which is linked in the new spec) | |
| 21:45:07 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix wrong strict assertion of quota class set id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978494 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-12 | |||
| 00:09:04 | opendevreview | Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Add native threading support to test case ID propagation fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980179 | |
| 04:09:08 | seyeongkim | Do you think there’s a chance this patch could be merged into master, or does it need more work? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963665 Thanks! | |
| 05:22:36 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Preserve vTPM state between power off and power on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979866 | |
| 07:10:38 | opendevreview | Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Add native threading support to test case ID propagation fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980179 | |
| 07:49:13 | Uggla | gmann, gibi, 978494: Fix wrong strict assertion of quota class set id | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/9784gibi finally merged. What was just a matter of crossing fingers. :) | |
| 07:55:42 | Uggla | gibi, bauzas if you can review / +w 979008: Update compute rpc alias for Gazpacho | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979008, 979016: Add service version for Gazpacho | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979016 and 979023: Add Gazpacho prelude section | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979023 | |
| 07:56:59 | Uggla | gibi, bauzas, and this one too: 980165: Amend vTPM live migration spec | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/980165 | |
| 08:11:02 | bauzas | sure, I'll review those patches | |
| 08:11:06 | bauzas | (I'm used to :) ) | |
| 09:48:16 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: fwiw, I started to peek at numa aware vswitches numa affinity problems and I created functests here for reproducing : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979999/ | |
| 09:48:59 | bauzas | at the moment, I'm not seeing any issue by the fixtures, as the scheduler provides limits to the compute claim | |
| 09:49:43 | bauzas | that's only when the filter doesn't pass the limits or if the reqspec is modified that we no longer get the limits for the claim and then the compute doesn't look at the numa nodes affinities | |
| 10:10:48 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Libvirt NUMA Migrate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971177 | |
| 11:51:30 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: the probelm is not in the schduler | |
| 11:51:39 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: so in the schduler it works its on the compute node | |
| 11:52:13 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: when we reproduced it in a devstack enve we saw the schduelr do the right thing but when the compute agent called the same code it did not | |
| 11:53:03 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: by the way the limits form the schdluer are not provided to the compute agenet | |
| 11:53:45 | sean-k-mooney | we reconsudct the instance numa toplogy blob in the compute and recompute the pining ectra we dont pass it over rpc today | |
| 11:54:14 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: my guess its this si really dumb and we are just not passing a parmater somewhere | |
| 11:56:12 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: as an asside if the numa shculder filter is not used numa is not suprpoted at all but but ti ssond liek you may have fount part of the issue network_metadata is missgin? | |
| 11:58:05 | sean-k-mooney | the compute agent shoudl enfoce numa regardelss fothe schduler config obvioulsy but the point im making is we have alwasy said useign numa feature without the schduler filter is not supprot upstream the compute agenet protections are just a saftey net so that you can evenutally fix your scdhluer config without needing ot move your vms | |
| 12:08:32 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add service version for Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979016 | |
| 12:27:57 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Add version foot protector https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/978254 | |
| 13:21:44 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I'd appreciate if you could look at my func reproducer patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979999 | |
| 13:22:02 | bauzas | I agree with you on the fact the compute claim should do the same than the filter and doublecheck the network metadata | |
| 13:22:38 | bauzas | but I'm still wondering why those limits are not passed, because functests say "yes this is passed unless reschedules without alternativesé" | |
| 13:33:27 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: the are not passed because we can race with tow diffent request | |
| 13:33:57 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. we cant safely use what the schduler has calulated without moving the instnace calim to the schduler | |
| 13:41:52 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: the instnace claim buidl the numa constraits form teh falvor/image locally on teh comptue agent | |
| 13:42:16 | sean-k-mooney | my guess based on what you discsoced is we are not incuding the network metadtaa in that | |
| 14:09:26 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961896 | |
| 14:15:33 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.2: [nova-tox-py312-threading]Ignore failing tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980013 | |
| 14:18:56 | nicolairuckel | Is the CI having a bad day today? There are random jobs failing for my changes. | |