| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-09 | |||
| 15:13:06 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: ok i have foudn the anser sort of in the schema | |
| 15:21:43 | Uggla | Reminder: Nova meeting in ~40mn | |
| 15:26:42 | ralonsoh | sean-k-mooney, ping me tomorrow about the vif type virtual thing | |
| 15:26:59 | ralonsoh | in a nutshell, we use it for the OVN virtual ports | |
| 15:27:01 | sean-k-mooney | ralonsoh: i think it may be buggy | |
| 15:27:06 | ralonsoh | why? | |
| 15:27:09 | sean-k-mooney | or logiclly incorrect | |
| 15:27:37 | sean-k-mooney | well how do you handel the same ip beigin allowed to fail over between 2 vms | |
| 15:27:44 | sean-k-mooney | where im using vrrp or somiler in the guest | |
| 15:28:14 | ralonsoh | sean-k-mooney, I don´t get your point | |
| 15:28:15 | sean-k-mooney | we cant assuem that allowed_address_pair values are uniquce on a network or subnet | |
| 15:28:26 | ralonsoh | yes | |
| 15:28:34 | sean-k-mooney | so we can assuem the port is bound to only one host | |
| 15:28:41 | sean-k-mooney | but its fien we can chat tomorrow | |
| 15:28:54 | ralonsoh | yeah, I need to go to the doctor in some minutes, sorry | |
| 15:28:56 | sean-k-mooney | ill read the bug report | |
| 15:29:13 | ralonsoh | add any comment there, please | |
| 15:29:20 | ralonsoh | I'll check it tomorrow morning | |
| 15:35:25 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/placement stable/2025.2: [CI][stable-only] Fix docs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/979685 | |
| 15:36:57 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/placement stable/2025.1: DNM: CI health test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/979686 | |
| 15:38:08 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.1: DNM: CI health test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/979687 | |
| 15:38:37 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/2024.2: DNM: CI health test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/979688 | |
| 15:52:03 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/2024.2: [CI][stable-only] Workaround for missing pkg_resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/979691 | |
| 15:56:40 | Uggla | Hi elodilles | |
| 15:57:02 | Uggla | Do you have a specific deadline for RC1 ? Is Thursday ok ? | |
| 15:57:06 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.1: [CI][stable-only] Fix docs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/979692 | |
| 15:58:01 | elodilles | Uggla: thursday is OK | |
| 15:58:08 | elodilles | that is the official deadline | |
| 15:58:33 | elodilles | if you want to include something that is not yet merged, then add a -1 to the patch and we can wait a bit | |
| 15:58:45 | Uggla | elodilles ok it is what I thought, but I'd like to crosscheck. | |
| 15:58:51 | elodilles | +1 | |
| 15:59:07 | Uggla | We will discuss that in the meeting. | |
| 15:59:17 | elodilles | ACK :) | |
| 16:00:17 | tkajinam | I always feel I get extra bonus when people are talking about "deadline" | |
| 16:00:28 | Uggla | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:28 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Mon Mar 9 16:00:28 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Uggla. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:28 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:28 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:32 | tkajinam | thanks to time diff | |
| 16:00:34 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:00:36 | Uggla | Hello everyone | |
| 16:00:52 | melwitt | o/ | |
| 16:00:52 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:00:54 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:01:12 | kaisers | o/ | |
| 16:01:12 | bauzas | o/ | |
| 16:02:31 | Uggla | Let's start | |
| 16:02:46 | Uggla | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:52 | Uggla | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:52 | lajoskatona | o/ | |
| 16:03:30 | Uggla | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2143057 is now closed | |
| 16:03:40 | Uggla | Thanks tkajinam | |
| 16:04:06 | Uggla | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:13 | Uggla | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:04:19 | tkajinam | oh the fix is still blocked by CI | |
| 16:04:20 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:04:26 | opendevreview | Thibaut Démaret proposed openstack/nova master: Add default SSD rotation rate for instance disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979693 | |
| 16:04:27 | tkajinam | let me rerun CI | |
| 16:04:36 | Uggla | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:04:38 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:04:43 | Uggla | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:04:49 | Uggla | #info Please try to provide a meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:05:27 | Uggla | Look quickly at the reports, I have not seen something wrong. Please tell me if I'm wrong? | |
| 16:06:45 | tkajinam | I'm not aware of any problem so far | |
| 16:07:16 | Uggla | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:07:21 | Uggla | #link https://releases.openstack.org/gazpacho/schedule.html | |
| 16:07:32 | Uggla | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:07:39 | Uggla | #info PTG etherpad for 2026.1 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-ptg | |
| 16:07:53 | Uggla | I will probably open 2026.2 this week | |
| 16:08:01 | Uggla | #info This week is RC1 target week. | |
| 16:08:42 | Uggla | We will probably hold the RC1 until Thursday. | |
| 16:09:21 | dansmith | "hold" it? | |
| 16:09:23 | dansmith | like delay it? | |
| 16:09:37 | Uggla | yep delay. :) | |
| 16:10:02 | Uggla | reasons in the next points. | |
| 16:10:08 | dansmith | okay | |
| 16:10:12 | Uggla | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:10:20 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-status | |
| 16:10:39 | Uggla | Starting here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-status#L70 there are interesting bugs to improve live migration. So I would like cores to review them. | |
| 16:10:57 | Uggla | I know some of them have already been merged. | |
| 16:11:14 | Uggla | And others seem in a good shape. | |
| 16:11:30 | dansmith | the first I clicked on has a -1 from you still | |
| 16:11:41 | dansmith | but yeah will take a look | |
| 16:11:42 | opendevreview | Thibaut Démaret proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec for default SSD rotation rate on instance disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/979694 | |
| 16:12:08 | Uggla | dansmith the are others with +2 from sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:12:12 | dansmith | ack | |
| 16:12:45 | dansmith | they seem to conflict with each other and aren't stacked though, which is unfortunate | |
| 16:12:48 | Uggla | so first reason of delaying is to try to introduce these patches. | |
| 16:12:49 | dansmith | or at least, two do | |
| 16:13:49 | Uggla | Second reason, if about the confidential computing refactoring. gibi is following it. | |
| 16:15:37 | Uggla | Last reason is what we will discuss later in open topics. | |
| 16:15:38 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: not sure which patch our refeing to | |
| 16:15:48 | sean-k-mooney | but i can catch up later | |
| 16:16:08 | bauzas | I can try to look at some | |
| 16:16:08 | dansmith | Uggla: what about the refactor? I don't see that on the status page | |
| 16:16:28 | bauzas | the SEV refactor series is a blueprint so it can't be merged now | |
| 16:16:41 | dansmith | the status page has quite a list to cram in before thursday.. and I guess I'm wary of the neutron SDK stuff | |
| 16:17:12 | dansmith | those sorts of things tend to have corner cases and since they're not fixing anything or anything that should be user-visible they seem high risk, low reward to me | |
| 16:17:39 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney I was refering to 965927: Add regression test for bug #2088066 | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965927 | |
| 16:17:40 | dansmith | bauzas: yeah, anything refactor seems like undue risk given where we are | |