| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-03 | |||
| 08:47:02 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/os-vif stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/978643 | |
| 08:47:04 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/os-vif stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/978644 | |
| 08:47:06 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/os-vif master: Update master for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/978645 | |
| 08:47:17 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/978646 | |
| 08:47:19 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/978647 | |
| 08:47:21 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Update master for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/978648 | |
| 08:47:32 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/978649 | |
| 08:47:34 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/978650 | |
| 08:47:37 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Update master for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/978651 | |
| 08:49:42 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [openstack-tox-cover]Increase timeout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978652 | |
| 08:50:02 | gibi | Uggla: melwitt: ^^ bumping the timeout higher | |
| 08:50:22 | gibi | bauzas: stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: ^^ if you are around to land this gate fixing change | |
| 09:20:44 | stephenfin | gibi: ack, done | |
| 09:32:24 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement master: Update master for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/978648 | |
| 09:35:29 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-vif master: Update master for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/978645 | |
| 09:58:16 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Libvirt NUMA Migrate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971177 | |
| 10:01:51 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: looks lik it merged | |
| 10:01:57 | sean-k-mooney | well appoved | |
| 10:38:56 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Object changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978209 | |
| 11:21:17 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate coverage configuration to pyproject https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978737 | |
| 11:21:17 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Enable sysmon core https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978738 | |
| 11:21:48 | stephenfin | gibi: melwitt: That ☝️ needs more investigation, but it might be an option for speeding up our coverage tests | |
| 11:23:24 | stephenfin | Ideally we'd run on py314 since we get the faster profiler *and* branch coverage, but we're a bit awat from that | |
| 11:23:56 | sean-k-mooney | so 3.14 is currently failing on some oslo.service issues with how we init the backend | |
| 11:24:09 | sean-k-mooney | we shoudl fix that as soon as we can to get that job passign then sure | |
| 11:25:21 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: i replied in the review but swaping to sysmon si not a good trade off if it woudl prevent use testing with threaded mode | |
| 11:25:53 | sean-k-mooney | early next cycle that will be the defualt for nova-compute as well and its already the defautl for the api, schduler and conductor i bleive | |
| 11:26:52 | sean-k-mooney | so anything that would make it harder to have the tox target test how we deploy in production (in threaded mode) next cycle woudl be a regression even if its faster | |
| 11:28:40 | sean-k-mooney | the first commit im +2 on | |
| 11:29:39 | sean-k-mooney | the second might want to wait until we can run it on py3.14 as you said. its now aviabel in the gate but we need to get 3.14 in general passing first | |
| 11:37:50 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Scheduler changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971176 | |
| 12:02:22 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Libvirt NUMA Migrate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971177 | |
| 12:05:12 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Rename deadline parameter to more accurate timeout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957411 | |
| 12:12:23 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: Regression test for Placement allocations remaining during failed schedule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969251 | |
| 12:14:48 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-vif stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/978643 | |
| 12:15:19 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/978646 | |
| 12:15:31 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-vif stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/978644 | |
| 12:19:27 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/978647 | |
| 14:08:47 | opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/nova master: return error about external network to the user on build failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972601 | |
| 14:36:30 | nicolairuckel | gibi, elodilles: You said I should use `git cherry-pick -x` for backporting. I'm getting merge conflicts though and according to the man page of cherry-pick that `-x` only works if there are no conflicts. Is this a problem or can I just fix my merge conflicts and create a new merge request? | |
| 14:41:45 | dansmith | nicolairuckel: -x has nothing to do with conflicts.. the man page is describing a style not a rule (incorrectly, IMHO) | |
| 14:42:14 | dansmith | nicolairuckel: you must use -x for openstack regardless of conflicts.. and you're going to have conflicts. you just need to resolve them manually | |
| 14:42:59 | nicolairuckel | okay, thanks | |
| 14:43:24 | elodilles | nicolairuckel: as dansmith says :) also when resolving conflicts please keep "Conflicts" lines in the commit message to help reviewers (e.g. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/686292 ) | |
| 14:45:06 | nicolairuckel | got it | |
| 14:58:04 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978766 | |
| 15:01:37 | dansmith | nicolairuckel: how far back are you going with that? | |
| 15:06:40 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Object changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978209 | |
| 15:08:54 | nicolairuckel | just 2025.2 | |
| 15:09:32 | dansmith | ack | |
| 17:59:28 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Update master for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/978651 | |
| 20:20:53 | melwitt | thanks gibi and stephenfin for fixing the openstack-tox-cover stuff. I had worried the timeout was too low :( sorry for the trouble | |
| 20:28:30 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt:im actully surpised that the coverage collection add so much time to the executionover just adding the time for funtional and unit speratly | |
| 20:29:36 | sean-k-mooney | i mean it kind of make sense in retospect given it has to instroment/trace the actual exercied code paths | |
| 20:29:57 | sean-k-mooney | i just was not expecting it to exceed teh existign timeout | |
| 20:32:42 | melwitt | me too. that's why I mentioned to stephen if he knew some trick to make it faster. it seems disproportionately slow to me but that's just a feeling | |
| 20:34:09 | sean-k-mooney | it may also be one of those thign that sale idfently based on the provider | |
| 20:35:03 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. 4 fast cores on raxflex vs 8 slow cores on rax classic | |
| 20:35:24 | melwitt | hm yeah | |
| 20:36:48 | sean-k-mooney | the last 3 timeout were all on rax clasic on the old xen hardware | |
| 20:36:50 | sean-k-mooney | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-cover&project=openstack/nova | |
| 20:37:33 | melwitt | ahhh heheh. "classic" and "old xen" | |
| 20:38:09 | sean-k-mooney | as were the next 8 | |
| 20:38:32 | sean-k-mooney | so all the one sthat imes out seam to be on the xen vms | |
| 20:40:34 | melwitt | that's good to know. glad there appears to be some explanation | |
| 20:41:35 | sean-k-mooney | tehre are some success there too but my guess is the the xen cloud was flying a bit to close to the sun in terms fo the timeout | |
| 20:41:48 | sean-k-mooney | so if it end up on a busy host it failed | |
| 20:48:01 | melwitt | on wings made of pastrami | |
| 21:22:41 | rm_work[m] | so hey, re: native threads... I see there's a chain of patches that IS required for some stuff to work properly. any chance of backports to like 2025.2 at least? | |
| 21:22:44 | rm_work[m] | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956091 | |
| 21:22:53 | rm_work[m] | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965466 | |
| 21:22:58 | rm_work[m] | at a minimum it seems these two, not sure if more | |
| 21:45:23 | rm_work[m] | I would love to just be running 2026.1 :D | |
| 21:45:35 | rm_work[m] | just need it to be April | |
| 22:17:24 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: [openstack-tox-cover]Increase timeout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978652 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-04 | |||
| 00:49:22 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771 | |
| 00:49:23 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629 | |
| 00:49:23 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975 | |
| 00:49:24 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: enable conversion of secret security modes via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052 | |
| 00:49:24 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477 | |
| 00:49:25 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: fixup for bump service version documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978836 | |
| 02:34:19 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add nova-vtpm-live-migration job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978841 | |
| 02:35:43 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add nova-vtpm-live-migration job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978841 | |
| 07:49:47 | nicolairuckel | I just realized that it would make sense to also backport the vTPM patch (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955657) because my NVRAM patch (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682) builds on that. Can I backport them together or should they be separate merge requests? | |
| 08:48:24 | gibi | openstack-tox-cover seems to be healthy now https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-cover&project=openstack/nova | |
| 08:49:12 | gibi | the max runtime is around 75mins our current limit is 90mins | |
| 10:02:14 | bauzas | awesome | |
| 10:12:58 | opendevreview | Marius Leustean proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for handling orphan BDMs from late RPC processing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/975698 | |
| 10:43:52 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: Regression test for Placement allocations remaining during failed schedule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969251 | |
| 10:43:53 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: Remove Placement allocations in the broken build cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968446 | |
| 10:53:11 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Object changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978209 | |
| 10:55:32 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Scheduler changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971176 | |
| 11:01:30 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Libvirt NUMA Migrate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971177 | |
| 11:48:06 | sean-k-mooney | nicolairuckel: they shoudl be serpate commit but you can propose both yourself. please do not squash them into one | |
| 11:58:06 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate coverage configuration to pyproject https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978737 | |
| 11:58:06 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Enable sysmon core https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978738 | |
| 11:58:26 | nicolairuckel | sean-k-mooney: okay, I'll do that. Thank you. | |
| 14:37:11 | cardoe | gibi: can I get your re-review on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972601 ? I added sean-k-mooney's ask for validating the exact exception message. | |
| 14:39:48 | gibi | cardoe: done | |
| 14:40:17 | cardoe | thank you | |