Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-02-25
22:49:37 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
22:49:37 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629
22:49:38 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975
22:49:38 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: enable conversion of secret security modes via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052
22:49:39 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477
23:54:42 cardoe gmaan: neat. So we'll be able to shutdown gracefully and let it continue to manage things.
23:59:03 gmaan cardoe: yes, we introduced the 2 RPC server in compute so that compute stop accepting the new request and finish the in-progress one. in this phase-1, services wait for configuration timeout which will be replaced by task tracking in next part.
#openstack-nova - 2026-02-26
00:05:12 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Add operator document for graceful shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977590
01:33:05 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Add operator document for graceful shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977590
01:35:56 gmaan gate is in its worst situation
02:38:41 gmaan gibi: sean-k-mooney and this doc also need re-review, fixed pep8 spell things https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977590
03:00:11 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (6/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956240
08:50:26 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server shares APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956266
08:50:39 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Invert validation check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956241
08:59:22 gibi I'm envy about the folks who can land patches through the gate. The eventlet series now stuck for more than 24 hours behind random failures. I feel bad about grinding rechecks but I will do it anyhow :/
09:15:37 frickler let me know if you need help like re-enqueueing changes directly back into gate or even force-merging. once you're sufficiently sure the failures are unrelated IMO it doesn't make sense to keep doing rechecks and using up CI resources
09:16:11 frickler and I say this knowing that getting tests more stable is a high priority for the nova team anyway
09:18:51 gibi yeah, we need to stabilize our gate
09:19:08 gibi and thanks I might eventually ask for help requeuing
09:28:56 sean-k-mooney frickler: gibi os we can remove a class of error form the ceph jobs it we just move them to useing nested virt (kvm)
09:29:12 sean-k-mooney nova doesnt do that but nuetorn and some other teams do
09:30:03 sean-k-mooney for exampel the kernel panics on volume detach
09:31:00 sean-k-mooney the ssh timeout might go away if we enabel the creation fo the tap devices by os-vif. i need to try enableing that in the gate now that the neutron bits are all in place
09:32:23 sean-k-mooney but yes we take some time to adress more of those failures. the issue nova has is those failure are often not form nova/hypervior comonents
09:32:34 sean-k-mooney i.e. the etc/ceph contianer download fialures
09:33:16 sean-k-mooney *etcd
09:33:46 sean-k-mooney i think we can improve ^ in devstack by stragicly retrying some fo the downloads
09:33:51 bauzas do we have at least an idea on why the failures are more recurrent those days ? those look like usual suspects
09:34:36 bauzas (speaking of the volume detach kernel panics and the ssh timeouts - the latter already being WA'd a lot)
09:34:47 sean-k-mooney bauzas: i dont think any of the failure gibi has been hitting were new. they all looked like the "ususal suspects"
09:35:13 sean-k-mooney so my guess is load make it manifest more
09:35:29 sean-k-mooney the kernel panics dont happen if we use either kvm or the uec images
09:35:52 sean-k-mooney both of which change (speedup) the timing of the kernel loading in cirrus
09:36:06 gibi yeah load does not help
09:36:18 gibi I just saw a guest bootop where every step took a second
09:36:20 gibi SEND
09:36:30 gibi [ 4.017889] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
09:36:30 gibi [ 5.258926] ACPI: \_SB_.LNKB: Enabled at IRQ 10
09:36:30 gibi [ 5.553620] Freeing initrd memory: 8864K
09:36:30 gibi [ 6.239466] ACPI: \_SB_.LNKC: Enabled at IRQ 11
09:36:30 gibi [ 7.080979] ACPI: \_SB_.LNKD: Enabled at IRQ 11
09:36:33 gibi [ 7.966979] ACPI: \_SB_.LNKA: Enabled at IRQ 10
09:36:35 gibi [ 8.834095] Free page reporting enabled
09:36:38 gibi [ 8.839828] Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 32 p
09:36:52 sean-k-mooney ya...
09:36:54 gibi this is not sustainable with our current ssh timeouts
09:38:20 sean-k-mooney so the ceph jobs i think we shoudl consdier movign to the nested virt lables to compenstate for the ceph cpu load or look at the perfromence of them in general because those are the ones that hit those time out most often
09:38:29 sean-k-mooney and the kernel panincs most often
09:38:57 sean-k-mooney it would be intersting to compare the boot time form one of those jobs vs the non ceph jobs
09:39:06 sean-k-mooney or look at the load average for the jobs
09:40:04 gibi eah
09:40:06 gibi yeah
09:40:18 sean-k-mooney gibi: i take it the eventlet changes didnt merge last night
09:51:12 sean-k-mooney amazed that any of the jobs pass? :)
09:51:46 bauzas gibi: were you able to see the vmstat values of the host at the time the VM was booting that fast ?
09:53:20 bauzas sean-k-mooney: looks like we play a Claw machine game
11:07:27 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove unnecessary action method prefix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958863
11:07:28 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Deprecate os-volumes_boot API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958864
11:09:54 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Deprecate AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation opts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783396
11:09:55 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Deprecate AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation opts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783396
11:28:13 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Update REST API version history for 2.101 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978002
11:28:13 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Fix typo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958855
11:28:14 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add runtime check for query additionalProperties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958856
11:28:14 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Add missing test coverage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958857
12:14:31 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: ci: Define nested nodesets, audit KVM/UEC, move nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978066
12:21:49 gibi sean-k-mooney: it didn't. I still rechecking :/
12:22:27 gibi bauzas: I did not dig deeper. I see overall slowness so it is probably infra overload due to FF churn
12:22:28 sean-k-mooney ^ might help but it has not run in ci yet to see if its functionatl
12:22:41 sean-k-mooney lol nope
12:22:51 sean-k-mooney it has zuul sytax errors
12:22:56 sean-k-mooney which i thinkis a typo
12:34:53 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: ci: Define nested nodesets, audit KVM/UEC, move nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978066
12:37:14 sean-k-mooney was missign a 1 in compute1
12:47:52 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: ci: Define nested nodesets, audit KVM/UEC, move nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978066
13:00:37 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: ci: Define nested nodesets, audit KVM/UEC, move nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978066
13:00:52 sean-k-mooney i shoudl not try to update patches while also in an irc meeting...
13:25:53 gmaan oh, i hoped at least a few will be merged overnight...
13:26:10 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Fix issue with instance usage audit log schema https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977967
13:26:27 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add runtime check for general additionalProperties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958858
13:26:44 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.2: api: Fix validators for hw:cpu_max_* extra specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957744
13:26:57 sean-k-mooney so it si posibel to merge things ^
13:27:06 sean-k-mooney but that seriese is apprently cursed
13:27:19 DominikDanelski[m] sean-k-mooney: In https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971176/comment/e96c41d6_d900c91a/ you mentioned 'repurposing' the spec. Is it done by essentially making a modified copy that targets a newer release and has no direct link to the previous one, or should git move the accepted one from Ussuri, since it wasn't implemented then, modify it, and add an appropriate line to redirects file?
13:28:07 sean-k-mooney DominikDanelski[m]: yes you copy the spec to the new folder and update the history section at the end to note its re proposed
13:28:47 sean-k-mooney we do not move them as we want to keep every revsion fo the spec that were prevsouly approved so we can clearly see any deltas
13:29:23 DominikDanelski[m] All right, thank you.
13:49:26 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove unnecessary arg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881817
14:16:07 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove unnecessary action method prefix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958863
14:16:08 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Deprecate os-volumes_boot API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958864
14:19:32 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove unnecessary action method prefix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958863
14:19:32 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Deprecate os-volumes_boot API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958864
14:35:17 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove unnecessary action method prefix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958863
14:35:17 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Deprecate os-volumes_boot API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958864
14:42:41 gibi dansmith: o/ I'm +2 on the making the volume attach async in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971068
14:43:08 dansmith ack
14:50:08 cardoe sean-k-mooney: around? Wanted to follow up about what I posted here.
14:51:13 Uggla gibi, bauzas, any chance we can merge https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/generalize-sev-code%22 to my mind it is ok except maybe the latest one.
14:53:21 bauzas Uggla: I was trying to look at it
14:54:15 Uggla dansmith it would be super cool if you can check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971068
14:54:16 gibi Uggla: I have couple of +2s in the series

Earlier   Later