| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-01-12 | |||
| 16:50:38 | dansmith | again, this is sounding more like a spec than a bug fix, given it's going to introduce new behavior and affect many operations | |
| 16:51:41 | sean-k-mooney | maybe but to me this was just restorign the behvior we orginally intended | |
| 16:51:57 | sean-k-mooney | but i agree its non trivial and we need to docuemnt the lifecylce | |
| 16:52:46 | dansmith | I didn't ever have intent for this, so don't lump me into that "we".. perhaps you mean what _you_ intended, and that's fine, but regardless it's going to be more of a change from where we are | |
| 16:52:56 | dansmith | especially if we're doing things like only recreating if rebuilding to a different image, etc | |
| 16:53:29 | sean-k-mooney | well that actully more of a a comment on the related vtpm feature rather then nvram | |
| 16:53:43 | sean-k-mooney | we said we wanted to adress both the same way | |
| 16:53:59 | sean-k-mooney | and for vtpm we very explcitly wanted to preserve the data across lifecycle operations | |
| 16:54:12 | nicolairuckel | I mean, there were a few bug reports were people expected the behaviour from my patch. | |
| 16:54:41 | sean-k-mooney | lets give the last 5 mins to jayaanand | |
| 16:54:49 | Uggla | guys, can we stop and let some time for jayaanand | |
| 16:54:51 | jayaanand | thank you | |
| 16:55:14 | jayaanand | We are planning to implement NetApp FlexGroup Backend for Ceph-like Ephemeral Storage Performance on NFS similar to Ceph by overriding RAW format | |
| 16:55:15 | sean-k-mooney | jayaanand: if i understand your propsoal form the list you want to intoduce nfs awarenes to the image_types backend by adding a new backend | |
| 16:55:40 | dansmith | jayaanand: I dunno what "override RAW" means, but that's almost certainly not going to fly.. either way, we need a detailed spec proposed to review to explain what you're planning and then we can review | |
| 16:56:04 | jayaanand | This cow operations will be taken care at storage | |
| 16:56:06 | dansmith | we're not going to get into the details of that in a meeting, and certainly not with five minutes left, until we have some context to build | |
| 16:57:18 | jayaanand | Ok, Has anyone explored or implemented storage-side cloning for other NFS vendors? | |
| 16:57:31 | sean-k-mooney | no not in nova | |
| 16:57:43 | sean-k-mooney | we do not creat vendor specific backend in nova in general | |
| 16:58:19 | sean-k-mooney | so for us to supprt that in nova we woudll ideally want ti wot work for any generic nfs server | |
| 16:58:23 | jayaanand | Ok, concerns is any architectural red flags with this approach in the Nova driver? NFS Ephemeral volumes | |
| 16:59:07 | sean-k-mooney | the main concern with adding a nfs images_type backend is there is a lot fo existing technial debt in that part of the code base | |
| 16:59:14 | dansmith | yes, I have red flag concerns because of what sean-k-mooney said and also because server-side snapshotting of files nova is accessing is already complicated and different when we do it with cinder | |
| 16:59:36 | dansmith | yes, I also don't really want to be adding new image backends to the current implementation | |
| 17:00:17 | bauzas | agreed | |
| 17:00:58 | sean-k-mooney | its something we can try and dicsus about more but if it would only work for netapp that proably not someting we would pursue. we would also need to dicuss how this will be tested in ci. all of witch would be captures in a spec | |
| 17:01:11 | jayaanand | Ok, we have multiple customers looking for this feature... What is way out?any suggestions | |
| 17:01:33 | sean-k-mooney | i think we need to know what the problem statement is first | |
| 17:01:49 | tkajinam | jayaanand, I think the general preference is to use cinder volume in case you want better features. I still don't understand why you really need it within ephemeral volumes | |
| 17:01:52 | sean-k-mooney | perhaps there si a way to adress that without requriing a new backend | |
| 17:01:58 | tkajinam | that's something I expect to be covered by that statement | |
| 17:02:55 | sean-k-mooney | tkajinam: i think the main issue is the copy tiem if your using a raw image. obvioulsy there is no copy invoveld for qcow since we just share the backing file form the cache outise of the initial spawn | |
| 17:03:41 | jayaanand | We want to leverage copy on write technology from ONTAP | |
| 17:03:50 | tkajinam | ok but I think that can be also eased by image cache volume in cinder/glance I guess | |
| 17:03:55 | jayaanand | Instead of qcow2 format | |
| 17:04:48 | sean-k-mooney | i think we will need more context on hwo that work and if tis a generic feature in nfs itslef or some propeirty extnsion | |
| 17:04:51 | jayaanand | We explored cinder volumes. Direct ONTAP volumes give better performance | |
| 17:05:30 | sean-k-mooney | but you said using nfs right so taht woudl still just be a file of some form on disk | |
| 17:05:41 | sean-k-mooney | well a file on a file system | |
| 17:05:56 | jayaanand | It's propeirty on top of NFS | |
| 17:06:13 | sean-k-mooney | right os that also problematic | |
| 17:06:25 | jayaanand | Yes NFS on compute node | |
| 17:06:51 | jayaanand | File on ONTAP with better copy on write | |
| 17:07:40 | sean-k-mooney | ack can you create a draft spec, it does not have to be compelte with your problemstatemen use cases and any relvente context/info on the feature | |
| 17:07:49 | tkajinam | https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/ | |
| 17:08:00 | tkajinam | https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/readme.html | |
| 17:08:22 | jayaanand | Sure, i will create, thank you for the advice | |
| 17:08:53 | Uggla | Cool, we are already overtime, last minute thing to add ? If not then we will close. | |
| 17:09:03 | jayaanand | Need to understand how right OS that is problematic? | |
| 17:09:38 | womax | I had something I wanted to talk about but it can wait for next week | |
| 17:09:58 | womax | and i think it can be discussed outside of meetings | |
| 17:10:07 | Uggla | womax thanks, if you can update the agenda, so it will be identified. | |
| 17:10:10 | jayaanand | Sure | |
| 17:10:24 | womax | Uggla: ok i'll do that | |
| 17:11:15 | Uggla | Thanks for joining this meeting. Closing now. | |
| 17:11:24 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 17:11:24 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Mon Jan 12 17:11:24 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 17:11:24 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-01-12-16.05.html | |
| 17:11:24 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-01-12-16.05.txt | |
| 17:11:24 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-01-12-16.05.log.html | |
| 17:12:17 | jayaanand | Thank you | |
| 17:17:48 | sean-k-mooney | jayaanand: googleign thie a liitle ONTAP wafl filestiem when exported vis nfs 4.2 can transparently supprot servier side cloning when you use qemu-im or cp with the --reflink link flag | |
| 17:18:09 | sean-k-mooney | provided you have ONTAP 9.8 | |
| 17:19:20 | jayaanand | true, ONTAP handles RAW with native compression and dedupe. this with avoid double virtualization | |
| 17:20:04 | sean-k-mooney | so im wonderign if the flat backend woudl be enough for your usecase | |
| 17:20:07 | sean-k-mooney | or raw | |
| 17:20:34 | sean-k-mooney | if we ensure nova propelry uses that feature when nfs 4.2 is used | |
| 17:20:52 | jayaanand | raw is better handled at ONTAP | |
| 17:21:29 | sean-k-mooney | sure but we already supprot raw format | |
| 17:21:30 | jayaanand | file is facade hear, internally it is RAW at WAFL | |
| 17:21:52 | sean-k-mooney | what im saying is it may be possible to not add a new backend at all | |
| 17:22:08 | sean-k-mooney | and simple use the more efficnet copy method when tis supproted by the file systems | |
| 17:22:11 | jayaanand | we won't introduce new format. we will user RAW with ONTAP copy on write capabilities | |
| 17:22:55 | jayaanand | we will delegate any clone operation to ONTAP for quick VM creation | |
| 17:23:00 | jayaanand | on top of RAW | |
| 17:23:35 | jayaanand | these are NFS files at ONTAP on top of FlexGroup | |
| 17:24:01 | sean-k-mooney | right the feedback im providieng is im not sure that we will accpate a vendor speciics storage backend in nova | |
| 17:24:18 | sean-k-mooney | and im tryign to understand if we can achive the same thing by jsut doing "cp --reflink=always source.raw destination.raw" | |
| 17:24:31 | MaxLamprecht[m] | Interestingly I heard yesterday also about the nfs4.2 native server-side-copy/file-cloning feature. Sadly ONTAP 9.16 currently returns NFS4 error not supported. I guess it‘s not implemented by netapp or hidden by some config flag or so. | |
| 17:24:32 | sean-k-mooney | when doign the copy fo the image | |
| 17:25:11 | sean-k-mooney | well nfs v3 supprot is deprecated in general | |
| 17:25:23 | sean-k-mooney | we ahve recommend 4.2 or a bove for many years now | |
| 17:25:46 | sean-k-mooney | that recomendation orgianlly came form the qemu storage maintaienrs | |
| 17:25:58 | jayaanand | docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap/nfs-admin/ontap-support-nfsv42-concept.html | |
| 17:26:01 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. to move to v4+ due to lockign issues | |
| 17:26:28 | jayaanand | Max, almost all of our customers on NFS 4+ | |
| 17:26:39 | jayaanand | you can look into your specific issue | |
| 17:26:58 | MaxLamprecht[m] | Yes we also use nfs4.2 :) | |
| 17:27:44 | jayaanand | we tried "if we can achive the same thing by jsut doing "cp --reflink=always source.raw destination.raw""... this is introducing conversion overhead at ONTAP | |
| 17:27:54 | sean-k-mooney | http://nfsv4bat.org/Documents/ConnectAThon/2010/ss-copy-spec.pdf that netaps presetion on the feature form 2010 | |
| 17:28:24 | sean-k-mooney | but maybe it never got enabeld or is behind a config flag | |
| 17:30:10 | jayaanand | For direct storage on the ONTAP backend, QCOW2 images are automatically converted to the raw format | |
| 17:31:03 | jayaanand | https://www.netapp.com/media/10720-tr-4067.pdf | |
| 17:31:54 | sean-k-mooney | ok but i am not suggestign you woudl use qcow im suggestign you configre nova to use raw format but when we copy the raw file from the casche we woudl do that with --reflink so that there would nto be a data copy | |
| 17:32:29 | sean-k-mooney | so you woudl set https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.force_raw_images to true | |
| 17:32:31 | jayaanand | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/OCDzzgTM/ | |
| 17:32:47 | sean-k-mooney | and images-type=raw or images_type=flat | |
| 17:36:01 | jayaanand | ok, let me check if reflink will trigger clone at ONTAP | |
| 17:36:25 | jayaanand | i will explore and share my findings | |