Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-10-21
16:34:40 Uggla bauzas sure, I hope they will get in touch with me soon. If not I'll try to ping.
16:34:58 Uggla So I could update the schedule.
16:35:10 bauzas having PTG right after Summit doesn't help, in particular when most of attendees take a few days off after the latter
16:35:35 gibi sean-k-mooney: yes
16:35:47 bauzas sure, and please people let mention your interest if you wanna speak up on those topics
16:36:51 Uggla can we move on ?
16:37:23 gibi +
16:37:32 Uggla next topic
16:37:33 Uggla #topic OpenAPI
16:37:39 Uggla #link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned
16:37:45 Uggla #info still 28 remaining atm.
16:37:52 Uggla #topic Stable Branches
16:38:10 elodilles thanks
16:38:18 elodilles #info stable branches (stable/2025.* and stable/2024.*) seem to be in OK state
16:38:29 elodilles #info final stable 2024.1 Caracal release (and all other stable/202*.* release patches) are proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/964471
16:38:45 elodilles #info 2024.1 Caracal (stable/2024.1) is planed to move to Unmaintained in less than a week
16:39:05 elodilles and that's all for now about stable from me
16:39:23 Uggla thx elodilles
16:39:37 Uggla #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:39:50 Uggla fwiesel anything you'd like to tell us ?
16:39:51 fwiesel #info Cinder VMware bug fixed for reimaging volume
16:40:00 fwiesel #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/961357
16:40:21 fwiesel Took a while, but that was blocking me from fixing the last two failing tempest tests.
16:40:28 fwiesel That and the still broken CI
16:40:36 fwiesel But that's it from my side
16:41:02 fwiesel Uggla: back to you
16:41:04 Uggla thanks fwiesel, thx correting this
16:41:29 Uggla #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal.
16:41:36 Uggla gibi anything to report ?
16:42:47 gibi o/
16:42:52 gibi basically the same as last week
16:43:06 gibi * please look at the topic in the PTG etherpad
16:43:43 gibi * you can review things on the eventlet-removal topic, we have couple of smallish green patches on the unittest side
16:44:17 gibi + I finally get back to the rally job patch and iterating on it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130
16:44:21 gibi that is is
16:44:23 gibi it
16:45:42 Uggla gibi, fyi I gave some ad about eventlet testing at the end of my presentation.
16:46:10 Uggla Explaining that if folks want to test it that would be hihgly appreciated.
16:46:21 gibi Uggla: thanks
16:46:30 gibi was there any further question about it?
16:46:59 Uggla yes, just one about the overall plan : If all the services will remove eventlet.
16:47:38 Uggla and I explained quickly our approach for nova. 2 steps phases and current services "migrated"
16:48:11 Uggla Then I got a question about python 3.14 support for us, from Canonical guys.
16:48:39 gibi yeah I have no comment on 3.14. That is too far ahead
16:49:02 gibi I would assume that with GIL mode and threading we will work in 3.14 without issues
16:49:07 Uggla yep I said that and explain that it will probably happen after eventlet removal.
16:49:14 gibi the GILles mode is a different beast probably
16:49:56 Uggla sure, tbh I did not have the time to speak about GIL.
16:50:47 gibi :)
16:50:51 Uggla Especially because at the same time I noticed that someone took my bag. Hopefully it was just a mistake, and I managed to find it quickly.
16:51:00 gibi ohh
16:51:06 gibi anyhow thanks for the advertisment
16:51:29 Uggla moving on because we are almost at the top of the hour
16:51:36 Uggla #topic Open discussion
16:51:45 Uggla reminder:
16:51:46 Uggla (Uggla) Pool for the new schedule of upstream meeting: https://framadate.org/ao12zK6wR3K3nfbF
16:51:55 Uggla #linkAnnonce : https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/H5PBFZJ4X3TSGSC4YF6E4WTV43CBOVS6/
16:52:04 Uggla the trend seems to go on Monday
16:52:27 nicolairuckel I iterated on my NVRAM patch (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682) but there's still an open issue regarding the file permissions.
16:53:36 nicolairuckel Also, I heard that it would be a good idea to bring that up for the PTG as a crossproject topic, so I'll add that to the etherpad later.
16:54:02 Uggla nicolairuckel, yep please do
16:54:35 Uggla crossproject with cinder ?
16:55:09 nicolairuckel I think so
16:55:25 nicolairuckel I was told it was related to image encryption
16:55:43 Uggla more glance though
16:55:50 nicolairuckel tbh, I'm still quite new to openstack so I'm not *that* sure about the scope yet.
16:56:32 Uggla ok I'll look at that and try to find the appropriate slot.
16:56:38 nicolairuckel thank you
16:56:40 Uggla Any expected duratio, ?
16:56:46 Uggla *duration
16:56:48 sean-k-mooney gibi: supporting freethread pytyon is defeintly a post eventlet topic.
16:57:44 Uggla r-taketn I think you would like to share something, aren't you ?
16:57:55 sean-k-mooney nicolairuckel: the nvram patch is not related to the image encyption work
16:57:57 nicolairuckel I'm not sure yet. I'll think about that and add it to the Etherpad if that's okay.
16:57:58 r-taketn yes. Thank you. I have one quick request. Could someone please check this spec and give some feedbacks later?
16:58:10 r-taketn #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/962578
16:58:19 r-taketn I have proposed this spec for generalizing sev/sev-es code to add new confidential computing from other architecture(Intel TDX,Arm CCA)
16:58:25 sean-k-mooney but we shoudl dicuss the imange encyption work in the nova/glance slot.
16:58:25 r-taketn I have re-written the spec. In particular, I detailed the problem description about current sev/sev-es code.
16:58:42 sean-k-mooney r-taketn: i have not had time yet but ill tray and look at that again
16:58:56 r-taketn I have this topic on ptg slot, but I'd appreciate if you give some feedbacks in advance
16:59:04 r-taketn sean-k-mooney: Thank you
16:59:27 sean-k-mooney the real goal of this work is to enabel you to supprot arm CCA and SEV-SNP more eaisly in the future right
16:59:44 r-taketn yes
16:59:51 sean-k-mooney this is prepareing the memory encyption logic to be more generic and extensible in advance of the hardware
17:01:10 sean-k-mooney r-taketn: ok small comment initally . most of tghe work items shoudl be experses in pros in the proposed changes section and the work ites shoudl be a very short list of the thing that need to be deliverd
17:01:59 gibi sorry folks I have to drop.
17:02:01 gibi I will read back
17:02:14 Uggla gibi no pb about to close
17:02:16 sean-k-mooney r-taketn: so if you look at the sev-es spec form last cycle https://github.com/openstack/nova-specs/blob/master/specs/2025.2/implemented/amd-sev-es-libvirt-support.rst?plain=1#L287
17:02:34 Uggla Anything else you'd like to share ?
17:02:39 sean-k-mooney you can see more or less what is expected for that section vs proposed changes https://github.com/openstack/nova-specs/blob/master/specs/2025.2/implemented/amd-sev-es-libvirt-support.rst?plain=1#L50
17:03:18 r-taketn sean-k-mooney: ok. sorry. I'll fix it.
17:03:18 sean-k-mooney r-taketn: the sev spec is a good example fo what level of detail ectra is expected that you can use as a guide
17:03:19 bauzas we're overtime :)
17:03:59 Uggla bauzas atm reasonable overtime
17:04:31 r-taketn Uggla: That's all from me. thank you
17:04:46 Uggla ok so I'm going to close.
17:04:57 Uggla Thank you for participating in this meeting.
17:05:04 sean-k-mooney r-taketn: no worries at all. we just do it this way so that we we have discsed what we want to change before dissusing the impact of the change. ill look at your proposal regardless

Earlier   Later