| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-10-20 | |||
| 20:06:26 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LibvirtLiveMigrateData https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952628 | |
| 20:06:26 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483 | |
| 20:06:27 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: bump service version and require it for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962051 | |
| 20:06:27 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021 | |
| 20:06:28 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771 | |
| 20:06:28 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629 | |
| 20:06:29 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975 | |
| 20:06:30 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052 | |
| 20:06:30 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add documentation and reno for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962889 | |
| 20:06:32 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477 | |
| 20:42:22 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| 22:27:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Dump conf to debug log later in the WSGI app pipeline https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963619 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-10-21 | |||
| 06:18:24 | opendevreview | Ahmad Hassan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Offline VM migration using https https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/964444 | |
| 06:33:33 | opendevreview | Ahmad Hassan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Offline VM migration using https https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/964444 | |
| 06:55:17 | opendevreview | Ahmad Hassan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Offline VM migration using https https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/964444 | |
| 07:32:35 | jlejeune | elodilles: hello, as requested, now my change has been merged on 2025.2, is it ok for you for moving on 2025.1 ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961774 | |
| 07:39:05 | elodilles | jlejeune: sorry, i was at OpenStack Summit in the past days and was traveling yesterday, but yepp, i'm adding the patch to my TODO list ;) | |
| 07:44:38 | gibi | elodilles: welcome back o/ | |
| 07:45:24 | gibi | hope you did not get croissant overdose (/me jealous) | |
| 07:55:33 | elodilles | gibi: thanks :] we ate just enough croissant ;) | |
| 08:15:39 | jlejeune | elodilles: I was also there, I missed you... | |
| 08:17:06 | elodilles | jlejeune: good to hear that you were there! maybe next time we'll meet :] | |
| 08:18:02 | elodilles | i hope you had great talks with other openstackers! | |
| 08:19:16 | jlejeune | yeah, and I saw bauzas, Uggla and sean-k-mooney[m] :) | |
| 08:19:41 | Uggla | jlejeune o/ | |
| 08:19:57 | jlejeune | hi :) | |
| 08:20:53 | Uggla | jlejeune I hope you had a nice trip back to britany. | |
| 08:22:21 | jlejeune | a bit long by train but it was ok and you ? | |
| 08:26:40 | Uggla | Not bad except my train was delayed 15mn because someone forgot a bagage inside the previous one. | |
| 08:27:53 | jlejeune | classic... | |
| 08:29:41 | bauzas | my own train line was blocked in between Lyon and Grenoble, the train I was in went back to Lyon and then I had to use another train to Grenoble :) | |
| 08:31:15 | jlejeune | :/ | |
| 08:34:40 | bauzas | well, I'm used to it :) I had the exact same issue last time for the OpenInfra Paris Day in Palaiseau as well, that's why I took a stayover this time on Sunday just to make sure I couldn't have this issue around 11pm :) | |
| 08:36:39 | jlejeune | so, I hope for the next summit in Paris it won't be there anymore :) | |
| 08:38:58 | bauzas | long story short, easier to travel by flight | |
| 09:14:41 | jlejeune | thanks elodilles :) | |
| 09:15:43 | elodilles | np! thanks too o/ | |
| 09:19:57 | jlejeune | and if you have time, I would really appreciate that my topics (bug-2044235 and bug/2085135) moved forward until 2024.1 before that release is set to 'unmaintained' :) | |
| 09:32:37 | elodilles | jlejeune: i'm planning to review all stable patches that are ready to merge, but on the other hand we are very late already with the final stable release of 2024.1 Caracal, so I don't think we have time to merge there any more patches :/ | |
| 09:33:09 | elodilles | jlejeune: note that bug fixes can land to unmaintained/2024.1 after the transition | |
| 09:34:05 | elodilles | jlejeune: though i understand that it is less comfortable for consumers as the releases have to be cut downstream by themselves from unmaintained/2024.1 branches | |
| 09:40:02 | jlejeune | ok understandable, so I would need to repush my change on new unmaintained/2024.1 branch later and abandon my changes over stable/2024.1 branches | |
| 09:58:15 | elodilles | jlejeune: yes, that will be the way forward | |
| 10:05:11 | jlejeune | ok got it | |
| 10:39:46 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Adds regression test for bug LP#2044235 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961601 | |
| 10:43:18 | gibi | dansmith: could you add back your +2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937275 ? The devstack dependency landed finally so we can good to go and test the placement optimization stuff in nova-next permanently | |
| 10:43:32 | gibi | s/can/are/ | |
| 10:44:27 | gibi | and if you are around that then there is a similar patch that enables such optimizations in some of the nova func tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963036 | |
| 10:44:53 | gibi | cores, there is a super easy doc patch that needs a second +2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963281 | |
| 10:54:18 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: o/ still gong thorugh my email but ill take a look in a bit, i think i looked at the docs patch before while traveling but didn leave a review | |
| 11:16:34 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961774 | |
| 11:17:51 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| 11:20:56 | nicolairuckel | sean-k-mooney: I changed my patch according to your comments. The patch is now a lot smaller but it still only works if I set the permissions manually. I was hoping that just letting libvirt do its thing would solve that. :/ | |
| 11:22:28 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130 | |
| 11:27:31 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130 | |
| 11:32:05 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130 | |
| 11:37:34 | sean-k-mooney | nicolairuckel: thats odd. i guess we can try and replicate the behvior and see if we can avoid this but. did you test this with a new vm? is it possibel that you previous attempet left the files in a non standard state? | |
| 11:43:11 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: by the way the numa in placemetn talk was very good. they also appremntly foudn hand fixed the placment scaling issue in there work | |
| 11:43:13 | nicolairuckel | Ah, that could be the problem. | |
| 11:43:20 | nicolairuckel | I didn't create a new VM. | |
| 11:55:16 | opendevreview | Ahmad Hassan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Offline VM migration using https https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/964444 | |
| 11:58:41 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: [doc]PCI in Placement tuning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963281 | |
| 12:11:46 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961775 | |
| 12:16:56 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Update start_service() function in test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963848 | |
| 12:16:57 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Adds regression test for bug LP#2085135 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963849 | |
| 12:16:58 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Reset the mapped field of nodes at service deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963850 | |
| 12:36:45 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I looked at their slidset. What I decoded form there is that they found something similar but maybe not exactly the same as they mentioned same_subtree which was not part of our problem or our solution for the PCI case | |
| 12:36:59 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I left some comments / question on the PTG etherpad related to this | |
| 12:37:24 | sean-k-mooney | gibi im not sure if its exactly the same, related or independent fo what you fixed | |
| 12:38:03 | sean-k-mooney | but yes it would be nice to see what there solution was and if its an addtional enhancement or not needed now | |
| 12:42:32 | gibi | I have a hunch that we could move the same_subtree check also inside the product() call if we want that might help pruning the searchspace in case same_subtree is used for their NUMA solution | |
| 12:42:55 | gibi | for PCI we don't need that but for NUMA RP with multiple children under it it is needed | |
| 12:43:06 | sean-k-mooney | yep maybe. | |
| 12:43:48 | sean-k-mooney | we can cross that bridge when we evaulate there solution | |
| 12:43:56 | gibi | yepp | |
| 12:43:58 | sean-k-mooney | they hope to upstream it | |
| 12:44:07 | sean-k-mooney | which would be cool if it work well | |
| 12:44:25 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961778 | |
| 12:44:26 | sean-k-mooney | they apprently have backported it to yoga internaly had have custoemr using it in production | |
| 12:44:46 | sean-k-mooney | so at least for there use cases it apprenlty funcitonal at the scale they are using it at | |
| 12:44:58 | gibi | yeah if it not spread or exaggerate the placement performance issue then lets get it, if it is then we need to think a bit more and assess the risk | |
| 12:45:49 | sean-k-mooney | i also think i agree with them about the ux issue | |
| 12:46:09 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. the workaround they had to do for member_of ectra related to the unamed group | |
| 12:46:34 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Update start_service() function in test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963851 | |
| 12:46:35 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Adds regression test for bug LP#2085135 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963852 | |
| 12:46:36 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Reset the mapped field of nodes at service deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963853 | |
| 12:46:37 | sean-k-mooney | i forget the explcit excption they said they got but i dont think they shoudl have got that | |
| 12:47:02 | sean-k-mooney | it would be good to get that into a placmenet bug report so we can assess it properly | |
| 12:47:36 | sean-k-mooney | with out going into the detail is sounded like a design oversight that could be condiered a bug | |
| 12:49:49 | gibi | sure, I'm happy to read incoming bugreports | |
| 12:50:06 | gibi | the slideset is low on details so most of I know are based on guesses and extrapolations | |
| 12:54:05 | sean-k-mooney | we invited them to the ptg. they have some pto this week so they proably wont have time to prepare much. bauzas added the topic on there behalf but we can try and connect with them on irc or the list seperatly as well | |
| 12:55:00 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: bauzas offered to help them with engaging with the upstream comunity so i assume if they submit a spec they will act as the feature liason or at least helping them if they have any issues with that | |
| 12:59:57 | Uggla | Hi sean-k-mooney, I hope you had a nice trip back to your home town. Can you point me to the patch about image encryption (lucks), we need to discuss next weak ? | |
| 13:00:37 | sean-k-mooney | am sure. the oen that is is currently kind fo blocked is on the glance side one sec | |
| 13:01:36 | sean-k-mooney | and ya the trip back was pretty ok. of couse when we got back to ireand it was raining and the car was parked in a 1 inch high puddel of water but other hten that it was fine | |
| 13:02:47 | sean-k-mooney | i more or less went to bed after getting back and slept until 2 am. i went back to sleep but got up again at liek 4 so my slep patther is off but not unexpected | |
| 13:02:57 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/926295 | |
| 13:03:26 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: how was your train? did you and sylvain travel back together? | |
| 13:03:38 | Uggla | do you think we need to discuss that at the glance/nova cross session ? | |