Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-10-14
16:16:39 sean-k-mooney yep ^ its an inclusive range of startimes
16:16:52 sean-k-mooney so its really 15:00-18:00
16:17:05 Uggla yep 15:00 --> 18:00 CET
16:17:05 gibi ack, so 3 hours for 4 days
16:17:11 gibi works forme
16:17:15 sean-k-mooney based on https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html
16:17:34 Uggla yep as usual, starting (Tue)
16:17:52 sean-k-mooney well you need to adjust that actully
16:18:03 sean-k-mooney it curernly show all 5 hours not just the fine 3 in the slot
16:20:01 Uggla sean-k-mooney yes I reserved a bit larger at the first shot
16:21:29 bauzas at least the slots are booked
16:21:39 Uggla yep :)
16:21:53 bauzas if we need to continue to discuss, we can book another slot... or we can unbook another one :)
16:22:28 Uggla I'will arrange that in the coming days
16:24:57 Uggla ok moving on
16:25:03 Uggla #topic OpenAPI
16:25:13 Uggla #link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned
16:25:20 Uggla #info still 28 remaining atm.
16:25:43 Uggla #topic Stable Branches
16:26:12 elodilles thanks o/
16:26:20 elodilles #info stable branches (stable/2025.* and stable/2024.*) seem to be in OK state
16:26:26 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:26:40 elodilles #info 2024.1 Caracal (stable/2024.1) moves to Unmaintained at the end of next week - final stable Caracal release should be proposed and merged ASAP
16:26:56 elodilles #info elod will propose the release patches tomorrow
16:27:06 elodilles and a question:
16:27:13 elodilles does anyone have any important patch to land to stable/2024.1 before we release? (list of open patches: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-caracal-eom )
16:27:30 Uggla -
16:27:36 gibi -
16:27:40 elodilles thanks for the reviews so far, btw!
16:28:37 elodilles Uggla: gibi: ACK, then i'll propose the review patches right away (flamingo, epoxy, dalmatian, caracal)
16:28:51 elodilles (though caracal is the most important for now o:))
16:29:07 elodilles and that's all from me about stable for now
16:29:10 gibi poor caracal, I will miss it
16:29:15 elodilles :]
16:29:15 Uggla rip caracal
16:29:37 elodilles you don't have to dig it, it won't go to EOL, just Unmaintained o:)
16:29:55 elodilles so people can still backport bug fixes to unmaintained/2024.1 ;)
16:30:01 sean-k-mooney elodilles: as an aside there is only ment to be one unmtianed slurp release at a time
16:30:14 gibi yeah basicaly kicked out to the streets nice elodilles :)
16:30:23 sean-k-mooney elodilles: im fine with not enforce that as long as you still care about the rest
16:30:49 elodilles sean-k-mooney: in case there is no volunteer to keep open unmaintained/2023.1
16:30:49 sean-k-mooney but in thory 2023.1 is ment to go eol when 2024.1 moves to unmainted
16:31:09 gmaan antelope is still unmaintained, any plan to move to EOL before caracal moving to unmaintained ?
16:31:18 gmaan sean-k-mooney: yeah
16:31:38 sean-k-mooney so i think elodilles is still interested in keeping it alive
16:31:44 gmaan because based on that we need to see if we can continue running grenade job on unmaintained caracal
16:31:46 sean-k-mooney so as long as the gates are green that is fine
16:32:10 sean-k-mooney well grenade is not ment to test upgrades form unmaintained
16:32:46 gmaan as long as it run green then no harm to test it but if previous base relaese is not maintained or broken then yes we can remove
16:32:48 elodilles sean-k-mooney: yes, i want to step up as a volunteer to keep it open
16:33:04 sean-k-mooney or rahter the oldest stable is not ment to test upgrading form unmaintaiend but you coudl run it your self i guess
16:34:53 elodilles sean-k-mooney: yes, the oldest stable is officially not supported, so can be disabled, though if it works then i'd rather ask for keeping it, and also help maintaining it as long as it possible
16:35:24 sean-k-mooney well the counter point to that
16:35:38 sean-k-mooney is we want to evntually be able to remove old disto images and mirrors
16:36:11 sean-k-mooney so im not objecting to keepign it for a release or two bvut we shoudl nto keep it indefinetly
16:36:18 elodilles of course if it blocks the gate then it can be removed (though i'd rather set it as non-voting if not completely unfixable or broken forever)
16:36:49 elodilles sean-k-mooney: +1
16:36:50 sean-k-mooney 2023.1 is using ubuntu 22.04 which is supprot until 2027
16:36:58 sean-k-mooney that kind of the upper bound on testing that IMO
16:37:29 sean-k-mooney so it has 18months+ runway i think
16:37:53 sean-k-mooney anyway we can likely move on since its not being EOLd this cycle but we could talk about it more at the ptg if poepel wanted
16:38:40 elodilles yepp
16:39:04 gmaan I am only concern about the running grenade skip job on Epoxy which will be from caracal to Epoxy and if we can continue running it it will be great
16:39:25 gmaan and it seems like we will do that until it is broken so I am good here
16:39:41 elodilles gmaan: ++
16:40:28 Uggla ok so moving on.
16:40:36 Uggla thx elodilles
16:40:42 Uggla #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:40:50 fwiesel No updates from my side
16:41:03 Uggla fwiesel thanks
16:41:15 Uggla #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal
16:41:18 gibi o/
16:41:37 Uggla gibi anything on your side ?
16:42:06 gibi then first couple of patches are reviewable on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956089/
16:42:16 gibi and the ptg etherpad as the longer term plan
16:42:53 gibi Also please report any strange test failures from nova-next, since last week we run conduct there in threading mode as well
16:43:08 gibi (top of scheduler api, and metadata)
16:43:13 gibi that is ti
16:43:15 gibi it
16:43:18 sean-k-mooney hum on the rbd thread pool i guess everually we will wnat to use the asinc api instead
16:43:30 sean-k-mooney so we can actully pass timeouts ectra
16:44:17 sean-k-mooney but i guess the intial plan is to just not swapn it on a tread pool at all which i guess is ok
16:44:19 gibi sean-k-mooney: this will not prevent doing that later when we actaully go and translate the nova-compute
16:44:44 sean-k-mooney ack ya just chekcign that still the medium term plan
16:44:46 gibi the patches on that series are for unblocking unit testing
16:44:47 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Move cleanup of vTPM secret from driver to compute https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962007
16:45:17 sean-k-mooney ah ok
16:47:03 gibi I think we can move on
16:47:11 Uggla thx gibi
16:47:20 Uggla #topic Open discussion
16:47:45 Uggla Just a reminder for the poll: Pool for the new schedule of upstream meeting: https://framadate.org/ao12zK6wR3K3nfbF
16:48:10 Uggla Anything you want to discuss ?
16:48:25 nicolairuckel I worked on a patch to preserve the NVRAM after reboots that got mentioned a few weeks ago.
16:48:39 nicolairuckel I'm not sure if that's the correct place to talk about that.
16:48:47 Uggla yes
16:48:54 nicolairuckel https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682
16:49:29 sean-k-mooney looks like it needs a rebase
16:49:59 nicolairuckel The only caveat is that at the moment you have to set the permissions for the NVRAM file manually. I wasn't able to figure out if there's a way to change the permissions through libvirt.
16:50:08 nicolairuckel sean-k-mooney, I'll do that!
16:50:35 sean-k-mooney why do you need to do that?

Earlier   Later