| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-09-16 | |||
| 16:15:46 | Uggla | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:16:11 | Uggla | r-taketn wants to discuss about Arm CCA if I'm not wrong. | |
| 16:16:22 | r-taketn | yes. thanks. | |
| 16:16:43 | r-taketn | We have re-proposed the CCA spec, as the SEV-ES patches have been merged(Thank you). | |
| 16:17:04 | r-taketn | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/960777 | |
| 16:17:23 | r-taketn | Firstly, we'd like to explore the possibility of getting reviews for the spec partly(that are not dependent on libvirt/QEMU/Kernel) | |
| 16:17:34 | r-taketn | In proposed change, L130-140, L201-236 are dependent on libvirt/QEMU. Can other part be got reviews? | |
| 16:17:42 | r-taketn | We understand that the spec cannot be approved completely now because the implementations for Arm CCA in libvirt, QEMU, and the Linux kernel are not yet upstreamed. | |
| 16:20:04 | Uggla | r-taketn I can try to ask for review, but as the qemu/libvirt are not ready, I'm not sure people are really "motivated" to do it. | |
| 16:22:07 | Uggla | What I can say, from my employer perspective this is something on the radar for security. So it might help when the "low level" part will be available. | |
| 16:23:14 | Uggla | r-taketn something else you would like to add ? | |
| 16:24:12 | r-taketn | OK. Thanks. I understand it might be difficult to get reviews from core members until libvirt/QEMU are upstreamed. | |
| 16:24:21 | r-taketn | And, Can I add one entry next PTG? I want to discuss how to provide CCA CI test environment mainly. | |
| 16:25:06 | Uggla | definitevely yes having a point on the current status and CI is good! | |
| 16:25:39 | bauzas | o/ | |
| 16:26:13 | Uggla | Anything else to discuss ? | |
| 16:27:11 | tkajinam | I was wondering if we could discuss https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2122296 but it's probably better to discuss it in a different chance seeing only bauzas is available from cores. | |
| 16:27:14 | r-taketn | Thanks. I will add one entry. And. we will explain the current status of low level software and discuss CI planning next time or PTG. | |
| 16:27:37 | Uggla | r-taketn 👍 | |
| 16:27:44 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:28:43 | Uggla | tkajinam, unless bauzas wants to discuss this bug, I would rather move it to next week, because of the lack of core. | |
| 16:28:56 | tkajinam | no problem from my side | |
| 16:28:57 | bauzas | please do it indeed, we don't have a quorum | |
| 16:30:09 | tkajinam | +1 | |
| 16:31:22 | Uggla | ok something else you would like to discuss. If not I'll close. | |
| 16:31:56 | Uggla | 3 | |
| 16:32:13 | Uggla | 2 | |
| 16:32:27 | Uggla | 1 | |
| 16:33:48 | bauzas | - | |
| 16:33:55 | Uggla | Thanks for joining this meeting, a bit shorter than usual. See you next week. | |
| 16:34:05 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 16:34:05 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Sep 16 16:34:05 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:34:05 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-16-16.00.html | |
| 16:34:05 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-16-16.00.txt | |
| 16:34:05 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-16-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:34:26 | r-taketn | Thank you | |
| 16:34:34 | bauzas | thanks ! | |
| 16:34:36 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:34:38 | Uggla | tkajinam no I was not but received a slack from my manager at the same time. ;) | |
| 16:35:04 | tkajinam | Uggla, :-D | |
| 16:37:57 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Drop explicit setting of iommu for AMD SEV support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909635 | |
| 17:01:25 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: AMD SEV: Stop explicitly enabling emulated iommu for virtio devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909635 | |
| 17:14:16 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: AMD SEV: Stop explicitly enabling emulated iommu for virtio devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909635 | |
| 17:22:11 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: AMD SEV: omit iommu='on' for virtio devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909635 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-09-17 | |||
| 02:42:39 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: AMD SEV: omit iommu='on' for virtio devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909635 | |
| 07:31:56 | jlejeune | gibi: hello, can i have review for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960349 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901655 please ? :) | |
| 08:44:01 | ianwatsonit | Hey nova team I have a few PRs that are pending review wondering if anyone would be able to take a look? | |
| 08:44:24 | ianwatsonit | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955690 | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955686 | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955687 | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955685 | |
| 09:35:56 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Switch nova-conductor to use ThreadPoolExecutor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957088 | |
| 10:13:16 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: libvirt: Disable VMCoreInfo device for SEV-encrypted instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958874 | |
| 10:41:54 | opendevreview | Jonas Schäfer proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve vTPM state between power off and power on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955657 | |
| 10:57:53 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Correct version for rebuild response https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958862 | |
| 10:57:53 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove unnecessary action method prefix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958863 | |
| 10:57:54 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Deprecate os-volumes_boot API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958864 | |
| 10:59:16 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Deprecate os-volumes_boot API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958864 | |
| 11:00:46 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#2044235 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960349 | |
| 11:10:58 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove unnecessary action method prefix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958863 | |
| 11:10:58 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Deprecate os-volumes_boot API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958864 | |
| 12:23:48 | gibi | can I get some stable reviews on https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2115905%22 ? | |
| 12:24:52 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: libvirt: Disable VMCoreInfo device for SEV-encrypted instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959913 | |
| 12:25:44 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: libvirt: Disable VMCoreInfo device for SEV-encrypted instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959914 | |
| 15:00:26 | MichielPiscaer[m] | Hi, I'm searching for some documentation on about live-migration? I would like to know what decision tree it uses to determine the destination host when I let "Openstack" choose the host. | |
| 15:05:06 | sean-k-mooney | MichielPiscaer[m]: so there isnt a descion tree as such | |
| 15:05:42 | sean-k-mooney | the saem proceess that is used to select a hsot when intially creat the vm is performed by the schdluer with the only excption being the current hsot is excluded | |
| 15:06:20 | sean-k-mooney | MichielPiscaer[m]: so https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/scheduling.html is the correct entry point in our docs to review | |
| 15:07:01 | sean-k-mooney | effectivly when you ask nova to migrate a vm, the api calls the conductor which then calls the schdluer to select a destination | |
| 15:07:55 | sean-k-mooney | the schduler use the info in teh reqeust spec form the rpc call to first call the placement service for a set of allcaiton candate based on reqcoue and trait request computeed form the flavor and image | |
| 15:08:24 | sean-k-mooney | the the filters run over the candiate host aplying difent policies liek numa affinity | |
| 15:08:46 | sean-k-mooney | finally teh weigher sort the restulant list of hosts | |
| 15:09:05 | sean-k-mooney | with default config we will then take the first host form the list | |
| 15:09:23 | sean-k-mooney | but you can apply a ranadomn suffel over the top n candiates via config | |
| 15:09:45 | sean-k-mooney | when you pass a host its mostly the same wrokflow the only real change is we only consier that host as a candiate | |
| 15:10:39 | sean-k-mooney | MichielPiscaer[m]: so there is no finite descison tree baked in in code. it depend on the filter, weghers adn cofnig option you define | |
| 15:29:14 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: libvirt: Disable VMCoreInfo device for SEV-encrypted instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959914 | |
| 15:31:38 | MichielPiscaer[m] | Thanks for the answer | |
| 15:52:31 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: hypervisors: Optimize uptime retrieval for better performance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960409 | |
| 21:10:03 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.2: libvirt: Disable VMCoreInfo device for SEV-encrypted instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959913 | |
| 22:28:18 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901655 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-09-18 | |||
| 00:45:50 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.2: hypervisors: Optimize uptime retrieval for better performance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960410 | |
| 01:08:47 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose vTPM live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/961564 | |
| 06:29:45 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/nova master: Support reusing existing port binding during instance live-migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961593 | |
| 06:50:52 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/nova master: Support reusing existing port binding during instance live-migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961593 | |
| 07:42:10 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Adds regression test for bug LP#2044235 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961601 | |
| 07:43:48 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Adds regression test for bug LP#2044235 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961602 | |
| 07:47:10 | opendevreview | Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Adds regression test for bug LP#2044235 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961603 | |
| 08:49:39 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.1: hypervisors: Optimize uptime retrieval for better performance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960411 | |
| 10:12:52 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Regression test for ImagePropsWeigher due to missing context https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961615 | |
| 11:57:34 | opendevreview | Pavlo Shchelokovskyy proposed openstack/nova master: Mention socket in pci numa affinity extra spec help https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961634 | |
| 13:23:21 | opendevreview | Josephine Seifert proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Add hw_mem_encryption_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961655 | |
| 14:03:55 | bauzas | dansmith: ping, if you are free of meetings :) | |
| 14:04:01 | dansmith | bauzas: just a sec | |
| 14:04:04 | bauzas | cool | |
| 14:05:58 | dansmith | bauzas: so, fill_faults() and fill_metadata() are operations on the list object, just like .save() on an instance or anything else | |
| 14:06:09 | dansmith | they expect to use the context that the object maintains | |
| 14:06:31 | bauzas | I see, those are not getters | |
| 14:06:33 | dansmith | since you're sort of yanking InstanceList into existence (and not getting one as the result of a DB query), you don't have a context set on the object itself | |
| 14:06:49 | dansmith | it's not wrong, it's just not the intended workflow | |
| 14:07:07 | dansmith | so just create the list like insts = InstanceList(context, ...) and then it will have it internally | |
| 14:07:27 | bauzas | sure, but then I wonder which context to pass | |
| 14:07:34 | dansmith | but you need to use an admin context, not the one for the current boot request, since that one won't be able to read all the instances you're going to survey | |