Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-09-09
16:43:19 tkajinam you mean requirements channel ?
16:44:01 gibi I pinged the release channel I'm not aware of having a separate channel to requirements
16:44:14 elodilles #openstack-requirements o:)
16:44:20 tkajinam yeah
16:44:26 sean-k-mooney gibi: is there a workaround
16:44:26 elodilles but i think i pinged the release folks
16:44:31 elodilles on release channel
16:44:32 sean-k-mooney beyond downgrading
16:44:46 gibi sean-k-mooney: try again and it will succeed
16:44:56 elodilles (yeah, i did ping them)
16:45:02 gibi the issue happens pretty infrequently
16:45:34 gibi https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-vif/+bug/2109396
16:45:37 sean-k-mooney i guess you could also use the legacy vsctl driver if we have not deleted that yet
16:45:40 gibi this is the bug it has the links
16:45:55 sean-k-mooney oh actully no
16:46:25 gibi I also don't have clear answer if we can revert the requirements
16:46:28 gibi later on stable
16:46:47 tkajinam though I've been struggling to get any feedback there. Maybe sending an email to ml would be a good option, hoping that Tony and Sean may be reading it. though I know release team has full +2 access to requirements, too.
16:47:03 tkajinam I mean I've been struggling to get any feedback in #openstack-requirements
16:47:25 gibi I will drop a mail to the ML
16:47:26 sean-k-mooney gibi: i guess the reals concern with the cap
16:47:32 tkajinam frickler has been the only one there for some time (though he is not a req team member but a release team member)
16:47:34 sean-k-mooney is has neutron started depending on it
16:47:39 sean-k-mooney and what are distos shiping
16:48:45 sean-k-mooney if we cant cap it later we mgith eb able to work around it with a retry in os-vif by cathcing the RuntimeError
16:48:52 gibi at least ykarel is aware of the issue from neutron as he discovered that the issue is happening with 0.9.4
16:49:22 sean-k-mooney meaning they likely would not object to the cap?
16:49:36 sean-k-mooney i.e. its impacting them also
16:49:36 gibi I don't want to solve it here. I will drop a mail to ML asking for guidance from requirements team
16:49:42 sean-k-mooney ack
16:49:49 gibi I think they saw it in CI
16:49:57 gibi making interface attach failing
16:50:14 gibi but the failure is during the call from nova
16:50:22 gibi not a call form neutron to os-vif
16:50:34 sean-k-mooney ack well as i said we may be able to catch that excption and retry a limtied number of tiem in os-vif
16:50:43 sean-k-mooney kind of like we do for powering off cores
16:50:48 gibi sure. I rather want pyroute2 to fix the async code
16:50:49 sean-k-mooney btu i know neutron uses it more widely
16:51:09 gibi anyhow I have nothing further on this
16:52:17 elodilles (i added this to release team's weekly meeting's agenda for Friday, but i really hope that this will be sorted out until then :S)
16:53:02 gibi no worries I think we can go out with Flamingo even if the bug is there. Occasional failures that are fixed by the human retrying is not an end of the world
16:53:27 gibi elodilles: thanks!j
16:53:54 elodilles gibi: thanks too in advance for your mail to ML about this
16:55:03 Uggla good, anything else ?
16:55:43 tkajinam I was wondering if I could get any thoughts for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2122296 . we don't have enough time and I likely skip the meeting next week but we can discuss it later here or the meeting in 2 weeks
16:56:20 tkajinam that's about sateless firmware but I also want to discuss similar problem with sev/sev-es, too
16:56:45 sean-k-mooney i belive we had a similar situration with secure boot before
16:57:19 sean-k-mooney i.e. if you enabel uefi adn dont reqeust secure boto we shoudl not use the SB+SMM one right
16:57:30 tkajinam yeah
16:57:31 tkajinam we have firmware detection logic for secure boot now so I'm wondering if I should follow that pattern.
16:57:46 tkajinam though this means that we may break existing usage with firmware without explicit support declared
16:58:09 tkajinam (I feel like such usage would be anyway broken but want to hear any opinion about it
16:58:13 sean-k-mooney ya i dont have context loaded but i think that would be a good thing to fix eventually
16:58:36 tkajinam this is just for early heads-up
16:59:16 sean-k-mooney we cant rely on libvirt to select it?
16:59:29 sean-k-mooney i vagely recall that being a thing in newer relases
16:59:29 tkajinam we can, though that would be a huge change
16:59:47 tkajinam libvirt is now capable to select a correct firmware with only flags provided
16:59:47 sean-k-mooney ack. that is prbaly the correct long term solution
17:00:00 tkajinam Uggla, I think we can wrap up the call (unless anyone else has additional topics)
17:00:11 tkajinam s/call/meeting/
17:01:02 Uggla ok time to close. Thanks everyone.
17:01:09 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Sep 9 17:01:09 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
17:01:09 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-09-16.03.html
17:01:09 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-09-16.03.log.html
17:01:09 Uggla #endmeeting
17:01:09 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-09-16.03.txt
17:01:23 gibi Uggla: thanks
17:01:24 elodilles thanks o/
17:02:04 tkajinam thanks !
17:02:12 Uggla you are welcome
17:03:54 opendevreview Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2025.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/959744
17:06:05 sean-k-mooney elodilles: just an fyi i have created a watcher release note prelude and will be proposing the cycle hights for it soon. once that is done i think we are also mostly done with watcher release artifacts
17:06:23 sean-k-mooney elodilles: my hope is to have those both merged before rc1 is created on thursday
17:08:57 gibi Uggla: FYI I've just approved https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959604 As I consider the content to be safe to land close to RC1. We have extensive discussion about the solution on IRC last week
17:09:18 gibi s/have/had/
17:09:39 Uggla gibi, thx and sorry for the mistake in the meeting. :)
17:10:09 gibi Uggla: no worries
17:13:15 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130
17:15:56 opendevreview Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.2: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2025.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/959745
17:18:34 opendevreview Nell Jerram proposed openstack/nova master: Add managed='no' flag to libvirt XML definition for VIF type TAP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960284
17:19:50 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: setup: Remove pbr's wsgi_scripts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902688
17:19:51 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate mypy configuration to pyproject.toml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953703
17:19:51 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate codespell configuration to pyproject.toml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953704
17:19:52 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate setup configuration to pyproject.toml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953705
17:25:07 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Update libvirt version support matrix for Flamingo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960301
17:25:29 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Update libvirt version support matrix for Flamingo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960301
17:25:40 tkajinam ^^^ this might be worth merging before rc1
19:12:51 elodilles sean-k-mooney: ACK, will check those tomorrow, thanks for the heads up o/
#openstack-nova - 2025-09-10
07:53:21 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130
08:40:02 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add Flamingo prelude section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959188
09:26:05 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#2044235 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960349
09:33:34 Uggla zigo would you be able to rebase your patch 930444: Update Debian qemu/libvirt/libguestfs versions | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930444 on top of the one from tkajinam (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960301) ?
09:46:09 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Update Debian qemu/libvirt/libguestfs versions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930444
09:46:26 tkajinam Uggla zigo, I've rebased it. I also modified it a bit because Trixie is already GA (UUIC)
09:46:57 Uggla tkajinam 👍
09:48:21 zigo tkajinam: Great, thanks a lot !
09:49:06 zigo This lists versions of qemu, libvirt and so on, right?
09:52:00 zigo Got it: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/libvirt-distro-support-matrix.html :)
10:03:39 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Update libvirt version support matrix for Flamingo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960301

Earlier   Later