Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-09-02
16:20:55 Uggla and gmaan if you can have a look at there 2: #link 952894: Reproducer for bug 2114951 | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952894 & 952895: Fix bug 2114951 | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952895
16:21:18 jayaanand i am from NetApp. Multiple customers asking for extending NFS volumes attached to instances
16:21:40 gmaan right, I opened those when you added me in review and then got distracted, will check those
16:21:51 Uggla gmaan 👍
16:22:14 jayaanand Is it possible in G release
16:22:50 Uggla jayaanand, it is a feature if I'm not wrong.
16:23:17 jayaanand Related to spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/949504
16:26:12 Uggla ok I'll put that in the PTG topic, it is in the pipe for quite a long time. So I'll try to set it as a "priority".
16:26:29 Uggla Any draft patches already attached to it ?
16:28:15 jayaanand Thank you! We don't have any draft patch
16:29:20 dansmith jayaanand: you don't have draft patches because... you expect someone else to work on it?
16:29:44 jayaanand We have partial fix proposed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/680648 for a Bug related to NFS extension. Is it possible to merge
16:30:41 Uggla jayaanand, there are 2 x -1 so it looks difficult.
16:30:48 jayaanand Reviewers pointed to this feature
16:31:29 dansmith well, some discussion is definitely required.. and that discussion should happen before we try to give you any sort of idea about when it could land
16:32:52 jayaanand ok
16:33:10 bauzas are we already in the open discussion ?
16:33:18 Uggla bauzas not yet.
16:33:34 bauzas if not, please await until we have this topic as we are on our nova meeting, please :)
16:33:59 bauzas (fwiw, I have an item for our open discussion as well :-) )
16:34:09 Uggla jayaanand, let's discuss that at PTG.
16:34:30 Uggla moving on
16:34:37 Uggla #topic OpenAPI
16:34:47 Uggla #link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned
16:34:53 Uggla #info still 28 remaining atm.
16:35:01 Uggla #topic Stable Branches
16:35:08 Uggla elodilles, please go ahead.
16:35:25 elodilles #info stable branches (stable/2025.1 and stable/2024.*) seem to be in OK state
16:35:31 jayaanand Thank you! 👍
16:35:35 elodilles #info stable/2025.2 branch cut patch for nova libraries (needs release liaison approve): https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/959137
16:35:53 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:36:08 elodilles that's all from me, back to you Uggla
16:36:28 Uggla Thx elodilles
16:36:57 Uggla Skipping next topic beacause I guess Fabian is still on pto
16:37:12 Uggla #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal.
16:37:19 Uggla #link Blog: https://gibizer.github.io/categories/eventlet/
16:37:25 gibi o/
16:37:26 Uggla #link nova-scheduler series is ready for core review, starting at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/947966
16:37:43 Uggla gibi, the mic is your if you'd like to share someting.
16:37:44 gibi so n-sch, n-api, n-metadata is done and tested in nova-next.
16:38:08 gibi the n-conductor patch missed the FF due to a late futurist bug that is since fixed but we will only try n-cond in G
16:38:49 gibi the py312-threading job is the last piece for F making it voting is on the gate as we speak. This runs the majority of our unit test without eventlet
16:39:09 gibi plans for G is in the PTG etherpad
16:39:22 gibi expect a tight schedule :)
16:39:53 Uggla 👍
16:39:56 gibi that is it
16:39:59 gibi back to you Uggla
16:40:58 Uggla thx gibi, it's great you manage to do that. I think it will give confidence for the next steps.
16:40:59 JayF gibi: I'll note that futurist bug was fixed and released and added to requirements :)
16:41:09 gibi JayF: correct
16:41:15 JayF May not change your internal status for conductor, but wanted to make sure folks knew
16:41:41 gibi thanks JayF
16:42:10 sean-k-mooney o/ sorry was in an internal meeting
16:42:32 Uggla #topic Open discussion
16:42:59 Uggla Sean would like to discuss about https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2060916
16:43:07 Uggla So please go ahead.
16:43:17 sean-k-mooney this is short
16:43:36 sean-k-mooney basically the truest_vif feature for years required custom policy ot use
16:43:55 sean-k-mooney in 2025.1 neutron finally fixed that with a proper api exentions
16:44:08 sean-k-mooney nova now jsut need to use it
16:44:14 sean-k-mooney my question is
16:44:29 sean-k-mooney shoudl we treat this as a security hardening opertuity/bug
16:44:36 sean-k-mooney or a specless blueprint
16:44:53 sean-k-mooney i.e. would we consier backporting it or master only
16:45:30 sean-k-mooney we could also defer that to the ptg but to me this is either whishlest rfe bug
16:45:44 sean-k-mooney or a very small specles blueprint but i dont know what people would prefer
16:46:56 gibi I cannot really tell without checking how this will look like
16:47:10 gmaan in that case, should not neutron policy for "binding:profile" needs to be change the default to admin-or-service?
16:47:15 gibi I guess we need to depend on the new neutron API
16:47:30 gmaan that is what they have for many other APIs
16:47:31 bauzas that's a new extension ?
16:47:34 sean-k-mooney gmaan: its curent admin only and it shoudl eventually be service only yes
16:47:44 bauzas if so, I'm afraid of any backport
16:47:54 gmaan sean-k-mooney: service only or admin-or-service?
16:47:57 sean-k-mooney what i can do is make time to do a poc
16:48:04 sean-k-mooney gmaan: it shoudl be service only eventually
16:48:10 sean-k-mooney humans shoudl never modify its content
16:48:27 sean-k-mooney only nova ironic or zun shoudl ever modify binding:profile
16:48:56 sean-k-mooney and hta twas the sechruity issue. you had to relax access to people to modify its content to use trusted_vif
16:49:30 gmaan i see
16:49:49 Uggla I have the feeling that a specless BP looks more adequate.
16:49:52 sean-k-mooney what i can do is see if i can find time to do a poc before the ptg or a future irc meeting
16:50:01 sean-k-mooney and we can revisit then
16:50:33 sean-k-mooney note we treated a similer issue for hardware offloaded ovs as a securyt hardining bug
16:50:37 sean-k-mooney that why i asked
16:50:46 gmaan neutron API extension is done this cycle?
16:51:20 sean-k-mooney https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2020813
16:51:32 sean-k-mooney gmaan: it was done in 2025.1 i belive so epoxy
16:52:35 gmaan yeah, since 2025.1 https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lib/blob/stable/2025.1/neutron_lib/api/definitions/port_trusted_vif.py
16:52:50 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/926068
16:53:07 sean-k-mooney the neutron change is older? not sure but i see 2024.2
16:54:06 sean-k-mooney anyway i just wanted to get an initial read form folks
16:54:13 sean-k-mooney to me it was the same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2020813
16:54:38 gmaan I think till we have neutron API available, we can backport it but not beyond that
16:55:11 sean-k-mooney we can also defer the backporting question until we see what the patch looks like
16:55:27 gmaan ++
16:55:33 sean-k-mooney it shoudl be small and non invaisves in general but i have not witten it yet
16:57:11 Uggla ok, bauzas, you would like to discuss something. I hope it will be ok in the remaing time.
16:57:22 bauzas just a quick one
16:57:30 bauzas but let's discuss this in the next meeting

Earlier   Later