Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-07-26
07:39:03 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: update instance request_spec with secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952630
07:39:03 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: confirm secret security via hard reboot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955847
09:26:41 opendevreview Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Propose enabling parallel live migrations for libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/955783
10:04:40 sean-k-mooney clarkb: yes thats part of the porblem. you have to opt in to vtpm but if its there it will be used by windows. everything i have reviewed on the nova side seams to have exepcted it to not be delete when we hard reboot butthat was obvioulsy an oversight on our part
10:04:48 sean-k-mooney clarkb: i would like to fix this as a bug fix
10:06:08 sean-k-mooney but im just pointing out that looking at libvirt c code and nova code i could find no evidance that it ever worked in the past the way we expected and therefor it technially not a regression. but to me it fundemently breaks how a tpm should work so while its tecnially a "feature" im very open to say this is a bug
10:08:14 sean-k-mooney its one of those things wehre the letter of the law says it a feature but being pragmatic and reflecting on both the enduser and operator impact combined with our orginal in tent i think it a bug, even if that was a bug in the orginal spec because we did not account for the deletaion on domain undefine
10:44:31 opendevreview Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to perform parallel live migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955784
10:45:08 opendevreview Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to perform parallel live migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955784
#openstack-nova - 2025-07-28
01:15:20 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate MEM_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT from root provider https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/921814
01:15:21 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Detect AMD SEV-ES support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925685
01:15:22 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_mem_encryption_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927706
01:15:23 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch instances with SEV-ES memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926106
02:01:28 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_mem_encryption_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927706
02:01:28 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch instances with SEV-ES memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926106
02:31:44 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_mem_encryption_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927706
02:31:44 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch instances with SEV-ES memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926106
07:00:37 opendevreview Friedrich Hiekel proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nova-scheduler placement error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951936
07:46:31 opendevreview Friedrich Hiekel proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nova-scheduler placement error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951936
11:02:08 opendevreview Florian proposed openstack/nova master: Add check for PCIe devices attach limit for volume and ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955584
11:04:51 opendevreview Florian proposed openstack/nova master: Add check for PCIe devices attach limit for volume and ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955584
12:53:47 opendevreview Florian proposed openstack/nova master: Add check for PCIe devices attach limit for volume and ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955584
15:27:16 opendevreview Wesley Hershberger proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Use dict object for request_specs_dict in the _list_view https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955310
15:30:06 opendevreview Wesley Hershberger proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Use dict object for request_specs_dict in the _list_view https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955305
16:38:48 opendevreview Wesley Hershberger proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Use dict object for request_specs_dict in the _list_view https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955310
16:41:50 opendevreview Wesley Hershberger proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Use dict object for request_specs_dict in the _list_view https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955305
16:42:21 opendevreview Wesley Hershberger proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Use dict object for request_specs_dict in the _list_view https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955305
17:00:20 sean-k-mooney dansmith: gibi i mentioned this a few day ago but before the end fo the release we probly need to add a license file to nova-contibe and decied if that shoudl be refactored into a actul python package or not
17:00:58 sean-k-mooney the latter topic does not nessisarly need to be decied now
17:01:31 sean-k-mooney but we should have a license file in the repo ideally before rc1 and figure out what the release model for that repo is ectra
17:02:03 sean-k-mooney at the moment i dont think its possibel to use the release repo to actully do releases of it
17:02:26 dansmith license file is fine, I think we should mark it as non-released (like os-test-images)
17:02:53 gibi yeah I'm OK to add a licence file and make it non-released
17:03:27 sean-k-mooney i dont really have a stong opion currently
17:03:54 sean-k-mooney it might be nice to release it eventually but i kind fo wanted use to have a dicussion about what it should and shoudl not contains and docuemnt that somehere like in a readme file
17:04:10 sean-k-mooney but we dont need to have that dicusssion now
19:11:55 melwitt dansmith, gibi, sean-k-mooney: I expect this question will need context load time so no worries to answer right away but in the vTPM patches I have up for review, I did not do a service version bump. the reason is because I could not find how it is needed,
19:12:41 melwitt new instances require compute traits that old computes will not have, so attempts to live migrate from new to old will fail with NoValidHost if there are no eligible new computes to go to
19:13:38 melwitt were you thinking maybe of rejecting in the API if the min service version in the deployment is still old? to not allow live migration at all even to new computes when mid-upgrade? if so, then I do understand that
19:14:22 sean-k-mooney i need to load context but it may have been related to how the traits usage is implemented
19:14:24 melwitt I might be missing something totally obvious but so far I was not understanding the requirement
19:14:33 sean-k-mooney im not sure we need a comptue service version bump
19:15:10 sean-k-mooney but if you requet say user mode vs one of the other modes you need to be sure the host that the vm land on understands the new iamge metadata
19:15:21 sean-k-mooney if we are doign that via traits uncondtionaly
19:15:29 sean-k-mooney then we are prorbaly fine as you said
19:15:34 melwitt yeah I kind of wondered if the service version bump was a discussion before the traits were decided on, so something like that. so I wanted to talk and find out if there is something I'm missing
19:15:50 melwitt *or something like that
19:16:18 sean-k-mooney i would honestly need to reload context by reading the spec
19:16:50 melwitt yeah, np. I wasn't sure when to ask this because I know it is complicated
19:17:33 sean-k-mooney i mean if i had recently read your patchs askign here woudl be fine but i have not looked at the vtpm stuff this cycle so this has all been paged out of my workign memory
19:17:56 melwitt for now I'm working on more func tests and maybe some more whitebox coverage and maybe some plain tempest coverage
19:18:02 sean-k-mooney melwitt: so based on yoru current undersdainding yoru not seeign a need for a bump is that correct
19:18:06 melwitt yep 100% understand
19:18:40 melwitt sean-k-mooney: that is my belief yes but I am aware I might be missing understanding
19:19:02 sean-k-mooney i wonder if maybe it was related to the image show changes?
19:19:17 sean-k-mooney did we ant to make sure tha tyou could see the policy or something
19:19:35 sean-k-mooney that in epoxy so at this poitn we woudl not need it
19:19:40 melwitt oh, hm, that's an angle I didn't think of
#openstack-nova - 2025-07-29
03:12:32 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_tpm_secret_security image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940196
03:12:32 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw:tpm_secret_security extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940197
03:12:33 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: migrate legacy instances to new security policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942501
03:12:33 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `user` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942502
03:12:34 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941795
03:12:34 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LiveMigrateData https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952628
03:12:35 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483
03:12:35 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021
03:12:36 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
03:12:37 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629
03:12:37 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: update instance request_spec with secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952630
03:12:39 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: confirm secret security via hard reboot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955847
05:44:32 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483
05:44:33 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021
05:44:33 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
05:44:34 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629
05:44:34 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: update instance request_spec with secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952630
05:44:35 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: confirm secret security via hard reboot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955847
08:09:34 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test pyroute2 bump to greate than 0.9.x https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955858
08:14:54 opendevreview Florian proposed openstack/nova master: Add check for PCIe devices attach limit for volume and ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955584
11:24:21 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Replace eventlet.event.Event with threading.Event https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/949754
12:45:23 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Add ServersViewBuilderTestV296 unit test class https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955309
13:27:10 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Replace eventlet.event.Event with threading.Event https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/949754
14:52:26 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for images APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952284
14:52:26 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Separate volume, snapshot and volume attachments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952347
14:52:27 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Use valid UUIDs for cinder resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952935
14:52:27 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Only apply "soft" additionalProperties validation to requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952936
14:52:28 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for volumes APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952348
14:52:28 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for snapshots APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952349
14:52:29 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for volume attachments APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952350
14:52:29 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for floating IP APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952972
14:52:30 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for security group APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952973
14:52:31 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for services APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953196
14:52:31 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server usage audit log APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953209
15:24:48 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for tenant network APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956088
15:25:10 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Warn on long task wait time for executor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952666
15:25:11 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make RBD Tpool usage conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956089
15:25:11 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make libvirt Tpool proxying conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956090
15:25:12 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix ProviderTree copying with threading Lock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956091
15:25:12 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [test]Further categorization of disabled unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956092
15:28:03 Uggla Nova meeting in ~30mn
16:00:48 gibi o/

Earlier   Later