| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-07-15 | |||
| 16:24:53 | gmaan | still 21 more tetts to fix | |
| 16:24:59 | bauzas | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:25:29 | bauzas | we have around 7 weeks before ff, if I recount correctly | |
| 16:26:09 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:26:29 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-status | |
| 16:26:36 | bauzas | #topic OpenAPI | |
| 16:27:33 | gmaan | last I checked yesterday, still 18 changes yet to review. | |
| 16:27:33 | bauzas | #link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned | |
| 16:27:54 | bauzas | #info 18 remaining. | |
| 16:27:54 | bauzas | doh, jinxed | |
| 16:28:39 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:28:52 | bauzas | elodilles: happy to speak up ? | |
| 16:28:55 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:28:59 | elodilles | #info stable branches (stable/2025.1 and stable/2024.*) seem to be in OK state | |
| 16:29:09 | elodilles | well, i mean i haven't seen any issue | |
| 16:29:24 | elodilles | release nova stable versions: | |
| 16:29:31 | elodilles | 31.0.1 (2025.1 Epoxy) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/955058 | |
| 16:29:37 | elodilles | 30.0.2 (2024.2 Dalmatian) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/947847 | |
| 16:29:41 | elodilles | 29.2.2 (2024.1 Caracal) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/954474 | |
| 16:29:46 | elodilles | (the latter is preparation for 2024.1 Caracal to move to Unmainained in October) | |
| 16:30:08 | elodilles | they need a release liaison / PTL Code-review+1 | |
| 16:30:43 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:31:00 | elodilles | that's it from me about stable branches | |
| 16:31:06 | elodilles | bauzas: back to you | |
| 16:31:32 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:32:00 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:32:05 | bauzas | fwiesel: there ? | |
| 16:32:10 | fwiesel | No updates from my side. | |
| 16:32:48 | fwiesel | Back to you, bauzas | |
| 16:32:54 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:33:03 | bauzas | #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal. | |
| 16:33:12 | gibi | hey that is me | |
| 16:33:21 | bauzas | gibi: anything to say except that you're awaiting eagerly for my reviews ? | |
| 16:33:30 | gibi | I was busy trying to unblock to land the last approved patch | |
| 16:33:50 | gibi | I'm waiting review starting at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954990 | |
| 16:34:23 | gibi | sorry wrong link | |
| 16:34:27 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948187/24 | |
| 16:34:31 | gibi | this is the good one | |
| 16:34:54 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954990 is valid but it has a rabbit hole we need to go into but maybe not right now. | |
| 16:35:13 | dansmith | gibi: I think we should go ahead with removing the eventlet dependency with that patch, no worse than today | |
| 16:35:15 | gibi | I have to go back and read dansmith's answer but I think we will procide with it | |
| 16:35:24 | gibi | yepp | |
| 16:35:38 | gibi | thanks dansmith for helping out | |
| 16:35:46 | dansmith | gibi: I'm POCing a proper fix to scatter-gather/multi-list that will make it do the thing we were thinking it does | |
| 16:35:57 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:36:04 | gibi | that will be an interesting patch :) | |
| 16:36:10 | dansmith | I'll try to get that working and proposed and then will try to circle back on reviews | |
| 16:36:16 | gibi | awesome | |
| 16:36:17 | dansmith | I also have outstanding glance pings | |
| 16:36:31 | dansmith | so, I don't want to over-promise :) | |
| 16:36:37 | gibi | no worries :) | |
| 16:36:46 | bauzas | excellent thanks | |
| 16:36:50 | gibi | I have no other news | |
| 16:37:21 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:37:25 | bauzas | (crickets) | |
| 16:37:30 | bauzas | anything anyone ? | |
| 16:38:06 | gibi | - | |
| 16:38:09 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:38:31 | bauzas | I'll be honest, I don't have the same energy than Uggla about skimming the long list of untriaged bugs | |
| 16:38:40 | bauzas | but I can give the baton to any volunteer | |
| 16:39:13 | bauzas | thanks all then :) | |
| 16:39:20 | bauzas | see you next week | |
| 16:39:21 | gibi | thanks folks | |
| 16:39:22 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:39:22 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jul 15 16:39:22 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:39:22 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-07-15-16.00.html | |
| 16:39:22 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-07-15-16.00.txt | |
| 16:39:22 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-07-15-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:39:26 | fwiesel | Thanks, everyone | |
| 16:39:27 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:39:33 | gmaan | thanks | |
| 16:41:17 | ratailor_ | thanks | |
| 17:34:07 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet timer from multi_cell_list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954990 | |
| 17:34:08 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Parallelize s-g generators https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955091 | |
| 18:56:04 | opendevreview | Brett Holman proposed openstack/nova master: Add DMI data to non-x86 architectures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953989 | |
| 20:38:33 | sean-k-mooney | do we have a critiria for what can and cant go in nova-contrib? | |
| 20:40:34 | sean-k-mooney | now that it exists im wondering if it makes sense to port https://opendev.org/x/nfv-filters/src/branch/master/nfv_filters/nova/scheduler/filters/aggregate_instance_type_filter.py | |
| 20:41:52 | sean-k-mooney | i suspect that may not quite work any more due to the removal of log translation and six | |
| 20:42:46 | sean-k-mooney | but im wondering if we are ok with out of tree filters/weigher in nova-contrib in general | |
| 20:43:29 | sean-k-mooney | nova-contibe is not actully a valid python package | |
| 20:43:58 | sean-k-mooney | which is why im wondering how it can be used/extended over time | |
| 20:47:01 | sean-k-mooney | maybe a topic for the ptg? alhtough we likely shoudl at a minium add a licene file before the end of the release and likely a readme too even if its short | |
| 21:08:35 | dansmith | yeah, discuss next ptg.. I don't really want it to grow to a python package with all the release requirements (if we can help it) | |
| 21:09:10 | dansmith | and, I'd say I'm not sure if I want to encourage (via setting an example) out of tree drivers for interfaces that aren't really very strong, even though we all acknowledge that filter/weighers are pretty common | |
| 21:09:22 | dansmith | so not opposed, but think it might be good to set some ground rules | |
| 21:41:09 | opendevreview | Brett Holman proposed openstack/nova master: Add DMI data to non-x86 architectures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953989 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-07-16 | |||
| 01:18:10 | gmaan | finally this is merged, ceph job should be green now https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/954949 | |
| 01:18:13 | gmaan | gibi: ^^ | |
| 07:32:27 | gibi | gmaan: thanks! | |
| 07:34:16 | gibi | gmaan: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954956 this now proves the the original problem is the ceph version 19.2.1 with pinned back packages to 19.2.0 the tempest test still passes. I'm in the process to find a way to report the bug to ceph upstream... | |
| 10:38:43 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: as a workaround shoudl we just move the affected jobs to debian like the nova-hybrid-plug job | |
| 10:38:56 | sean-k-mooney | i can push up a patch to just update the node set and see if that passes | |
| 10:39:38 | sean-k-mooney | we can alwasy swap back later if we want or keep the ceph jobs on debian. we have had no real issues with the hybrid plug job since we swapped | |
| 10:40:18 | sean-k-mooney | we are installing ceph via cephadm using containers fo the ceph version wont change it would just be the qemu and librbd/rados version that change | |
| 10:40:50 | sean-k-mooney | since that the only part that actully comes form the distro packages in the devstack job | |
| 10:41:15 | sean-k-mooney | assuming that works we coudl avoid skipping the testing | |
| 10:41:43 | sean-k-mooney | oh https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/954949 merged... | |
| 10:42:07 | sean-k-mooney | well i guess i can propose a revert and depend on and test that as well | |
| 10:57:52 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: move ceph jobs to debian to avoid bug 2116852 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955179 | |
| 10:58:23 | sean-k-mooney | so something like ^ | |