Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-06-24
16:48:23 sean-k-mooney i would suggest that if we want to do somethign this clcye we keep it small and targeted
16:48:45 sean-k-mooney and we can dicuss larger changes but in the context of next cycle
16:49:03 sean-k-mooney just being practical we hae several large api serises in flight
16:49:32 sean-k-mooney openapi scemea, service role and manger role
16:50:00 sean-k-mooney we may be ableo to review a targed patch but if you want to do many endpoint we will need more time to discss it then we have before m2
16:50:08 Uggla Tbh, I would rather have a specless BP. Easier to track on my side.
16:50:23 andreykurilin I’m ok to have only one endpoint “fixed” this cycle
16:50:45 andreykurilin Creating a specless BP works for me
16:50:54 Uggla So andreykurilin, if you can open a specless BP so I could track it.
16:50:55 sean-k-mooney then i woudl suggest filing a specless blueprint for server show
16:51:13 Uggla 👍
16:51:19 sean-k-mooney and then asking for it to be approved on the mailing list or next meeting
16:51:25 sean-k-mooney to give gmaan or other type to respond
16:51:37 andreykurilin Ok, got it. Thank you
16:51:40 sean-k-mooney s/type/time/
16:52:03 gmaan I am ok for the spec-less BP and agree that it does not need microversion
16:52:17 sean-k-mooney im ok with that direction too
16:52:27 sean-k-mooney just for the metting ^
16:52:54 gmaan I tried to search history why we did not do for SHOW server when doing for details and could not find any reason
16:53:04 gmaan it was just not needed by anyone till now
16:53:52 andreykurilin It was “workaroundable”. We lived with list + id filter for several years already and finally I found time to ask you guys about this
16:54:07 gmaan ++, thanks for bringing that
16:54:14 Uggla andreykurilin++
16:55:20 Uggla moving on to next topic.
16:55:25 Uggla #topic (ratailor) spec and implementation for show-instance-action-finish-time (https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/show-instance-action-finish-time%22)
16:55:40 Uggla ratailor please go ahead.
16:56:08 ratailor As the implementation is also completed, just a request to provide feedback on spec so that it gets merged before FF.
16:56:17 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server IPs APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937608
16:57:48 ratailor That's all from my side re this.
16:58:30 sean-k-mooney ratailor: do you have tempest coverage showing that this works ?
16:59:04 sean-k-mooney specificly it would be nice to see the test that orginally demponstrated this did not work passing
16:59:23 ratailor sean-k-mooney, don't have tempest tests yet, but I can try to submit chagne for that.
16:59:40 ratailor sean-k-mooney, yes, sure. I will try with that one.
16:59:40 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/905130
17:00:04 sean-k-mooney it woudl be nice to update that and have it depend on your seriese to show ti workign end to end
17:00:31 ratailor sean-k-mooney, sure. Thansk!
17:00:37 Uggla sean-k-mooney, I agree it might also help on an escalation we have internaly
17:03:11 Uggla We have 2 more topics, but we are also at the top of the hour. So gibi, jonnyb if you don't mind we would be able to discuss next week. Except if it's urgent.
17:03:26 jonnyb hi, fine for me
17:03:36 Uggla jonnyb, thx for your understanding
17:03:44 Uggla gibi ?
17:04:14 sean-k-mooney jonnyb: you wanted to add a tiny weigher right?
17:04:25 jonnyb yeah right
17:04:50 sean-k-mooney if you have the patch it woudl be good for other to at least condier it before the next meeting
17:04:59 sean-k-mooney or perhaps start a mailing list thread on the topic
17:05:16 sean-k-mooney tl;dr is it weighs host by how old they are
17:05:23 sean-k-mooney and prefers the newer ones
17:05:43 jonnyb its a pretty simple patch
17:05:48 sean-k-mooney which is similer but differnt to the hyperviors_version weigher and they both complement each other
17:06:24 sean-k-mooney im generally ok with this as a specless blueprint by the way but we can disscuss that outside teh meeting or next week
17:07:02 gibi Uggla: no worries my topic was touched during the eventlet block
17:07:14 jonnyb I can move this to the mailing list to not drag this out here. thanks
17:07:48 Uggla jonnyb, that will be ok next week, I guess it will not take long.
17:07:58 Uggla anyway time to close.
17:08:03 Uggla Thanks all
17:08:16 Uggla #endmeeting
17:08:16 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jun 24 17:08:16 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
17:08:16 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-06-24-16.01.html
17:08:16 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-06-24-16.01.txt
17:08:16 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-06-24-16.01.log.html
17:30:08 gibi sorry I mixed up my topic
17:30:14 gibi we need to discuss https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952966
17:30:38 gibi this is pretty much needed by debian and ubuntu to be able to release on top of 3.13 while cpython 3.13 fixing a GC bug
17:30:49 gibi so I need core reviews, pretty please
#openstack-nova - 2025-06-25
02:27:01 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add new policies for live migrate APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953063
02:27:30 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add project manager role in Nova API policy rule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941347
07:37:36 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Drop unused method https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927680
08:06:02 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Address issues with server group APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953281
08:31:01 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix neutron client dict grabbing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952966
08:35:54 gibi dansmith sean-k-mooney thanks for the review on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952966 I did a bit of simplification and added a comment. Please check it when you are around
08:37:15 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix neutron client dict grabbing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952966
08:54:26 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Address issues with remote consoles APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952213
11:29:12 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [DNM] testing py3.13 eventlet bug workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951749
12:15:39 sean-k-mooney gibi: by the way ^ some how seams to be triggering issues with mysql, rather then using pyenv i think i need to enabel the deadsnakes ppa or try a diffent approch to get 3.13 working
12:16:05 sean-k-mooney gibi: how did you test with 3.13 locally
12:20:33 gibi I tested it with py312, jkulik tested it with 3.13. I don't have a 3.13 devstack env.
12:21:16 gibi I only tested the small change in isoltion with py313 about the dict grabbing
12:21:33 gibi we can also ask zigo to test it :)
12:22:09 sean-k-mooney im ok with merging it without full 3.13 testing provided it works on older verion as it clean up the code in general
12:22:24 sean-k-mooney i was just wondering how to pivot my WIP patch
12:22:47 zigo You'd need the latest version of eventlet, plus maybe a fix for https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/135552 then hopefully, we can spawn VMs ... :P
12:22:52 sean-k-mooney i was condierign using either UV to try and provide a python env in the hope that avoid teh mysql issue ro deadsnake ppa
12:23:09 sean-k-mooney althernitivly i coudl try using a diffent distor for my 3.13 poc job
12:24:31 gibi zigo: I guess you are grabbing this fix from nova until the py3.13 GC bug is fixed upstream in cpython. So I guess if it works for you then that is good enough for us.
12:25:15 zigo I didn't have time to work on OpenStack on Trixie (ie: Debian 13 and Python 1.13) for a week or so.
12:25:20 zigo I intend to resume that work again.
12:25:29 zigo I currently still can't tell what works or not.
12:25:41 zigo At least I was able to spawn *one* VM, but that's all I can say.
12:25:48 zigo Maybe other stuff are broken too.
12:26:03 zigo I wont be able to tell until I run the full tempest set of tests.
12:26:15 gibi zigo: thanks. I appreciate all the effor you do and the feeback you provide to us
12:28:58 zigo Whenever I can, I'll push my CI up to end and report in the list my findings.
12:33:49 gibi thanks
12:48:03 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Replace eventlet.event.Event with threading.Event https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/949754
14:27:29 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Replace eventlet.event.Event with threading.Event https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/949754
15:00:17 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Replace eventlet.event.Event with threading.Event https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/949754
15:08:14 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add spawn_on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948079
15:08:14 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Move ComputeManager to use spawn_on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948186
15:08:15 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Move ConductorManager to use spawn_on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948187
15:08:15 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make nova.utils.pass_context private https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948188

Earlier   Later