Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-06-11
11:49:34 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Separate volume, snapshot and volume attachments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952347
11:49:34 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for volumes APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952348
11:49:35 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for snapshots APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952349
11:49:35 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for volume attachments APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952350
11:50:23 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate MEM_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT from root provider https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/921814
11:51:23 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Detect AMD SEV-ES support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925685
11:52:48 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_mem_encryption_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927706
11:52:56 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch instances with SEV-ES memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926106
12:08:05 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Address issues with hypervisors APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/950867
12:26:08 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: got another very small one for you https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951941/
12:27:10 sean-k-mooney oh its nova-manages fault
12:27:21 sean-k-mooney thanks for finding that out
12:27:41 sean-k-mooney done
12:43:03 stephenfin nw
12:44:43 Uggla sean-k-mooneythx
12:44:47 Uggla sean-k-mooney, thx
13:26:07 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for showing instance-action finish_time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928933
14:18:21 dansmith gibi: I'm about to push up a couple typo fixes to your pci alias verification series, as noted in review comments
14:18:23 dansmith and then I will fast approve after that
14:18:25 dansmith hope that's okay
14:21:40 gibi dansmith: sure, thanks. I trust your English :)
14:21:59 dansmith I've been practicing it for longer than I'd like to admit :)
14:22:40 gibi :)
14:23:21 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Return HTTP400 for multi spec pci alias if PCI in Placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951007
14:23:21 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Multiple spec per PCI alias limitation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/944062
14:23:22 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Validated that PCI alias has proper ids https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951129
14:23:22 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Validate [pci]alias at service startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951143
14:23:23 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Cache [pci]alias parsing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951151
14:24:43 dansmith bauzas: not sure why you didn't, but can you upgrade to +2+W here? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/944062/6
14:25:56 bauzas done
14:26:12 dansmith bauzas: thanks, there's one other in that series you didn't seem to hit that forms a hole
14:26:12 gibi dansmith: bauzas: thanks for the reviews there
14:26:24 dansmith bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951129/4
14:26:40 dansmith an unapproved sandwiched between approveds
14:27:04 bauzas I'll review the series when I'm done with J*RA
14:32:36 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add functional reproducer for bug 2102038 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/944061
14:33:14 Uggla FYI now: [public]Nova Eventlet removal sync --> meet.google.com/bcy-uqoz-hje
22:36:11 melwitt Uggla, bauzas: when I was looking at service versions I noticed the oldest version needs to be bumped and found this patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/944018 it should be to merge now right?
22:43:03 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove unused config options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951945
#openstack-nova - 2025-06-12
03:13:24 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Allow autopep8 to fix more things https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/949292
03:13:36 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: reorder and extend pre-commit hooks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/949299
03:28:07 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Return HTTP400 for multi spec pci alias if PCI in Placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951007
03:28:19 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Multiple spec per PCI alias limitation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/944062
03:28:56 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Validated that PCI alias has proper ids https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951129
03:31:13 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Validate [pci]alias at service startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951143
03:31:25 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Cache [pci]alias parsing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951151
06:38:34 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for showing instance-action finish_time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928933
06:46:29 Uggla melwitt, I think you are right, we forget about this patch.
06:58:09 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix instance vm_state during shelve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/934294
10:22:07 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Show finish_time field in instance action show https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/929780
11:08:03 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Show finish_time field in instance action show https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/929780
11:47:41 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Show finish_time field in instance action show https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/929780
12:02:31 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Show finish_time field in instance action show https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/929780
12:58:10 opendevreview Johannes Beisiegel proposed openstack/nova master: Adds packing_host_pci_numa_cells_allocation_strategy option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952451
13:25:58 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Add functional reproducer for bug 2102038 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952452
13:25:59 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Return HTTP400 for multi spec pci alias if PCI in Placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952453
13:26:00 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Multiple spec per PCI alias limitation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952454
13:26:01 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Validated that PCI alias has proper ids https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952455
13:26:02 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Validate [pci]alias at service startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952456
13:26:03 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Cache [pci]alias parsing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952457
13:57:13 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for hypervisors APIs (3/3) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937247
14:16:32 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Address issues with hypervisors APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/950867
14:29:47 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Every +W'd openapi patch is now merged and gmaan has most of the outstanding patches reviewed. The ball's in your court now if you're happy/eager for us to keep moving on these 🙏
14:38:22 opendevreview Moritz Wanzenböck proposed openstack/nova master: Implement extend_volume for local devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/878763
14:38:58 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: ack. not today but ill try and do a pass on some/all them tomorrow
14:39:06 sean-k-mooney thats really good progress
14:39:10 stephenfin thanks
14:39:13 stephenfin and yes, great progress
14:40:25 sean-k-mooney so there are 16 patches i think for nova outstanding. do you stil have another batch on your github once this next bactch is done or is this the full set - any followups needed
14:41:58 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: context im tryign to decied if i think we can get this compleded by m2 or not
14:42:23 sean-k-mooney it woudl be nice if we can but im not sure how much review time i can dedicate between now and then
14:43:29 stephenfin Ah, there's quite a few patches still outstanding. 20 in total, targeting 14 APIs (I've split the servers one up into 6 patches, as you've already seen)
14:43:55 stephenfin When is m2? Assuming it's less than ~6 weeks away, that sounds optimistic
14:44:30 sean-k-mooney so the 16 that are open and ~20 after. ok well i hope we can land the first batch of 16 before m2 and we can then continut with the rest. its july 3rd i think
14:44:48 sean-k-mooney so 3 weeks time
14:45:29 sean-k-mooney that not a deadline by any means i just wanted to knwo were we were since i knew you proviosly had more patches that were pending
14:46:52 sean-k-mooney i dont knwo what gmaan PTO plans are like and im also aware that they have the policy work to do this cycle so im just trying to guage it we are likely to get this compelte this cyle. i think we are still on track to do that
14:47:06 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [DNM] testing rdo experimental jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927762
14:48:02 sean-k-mooney gibi: as an fyi whiel that "works" we get some volume related test failures if i recall corectly
14:48:12 sean-k-mooney im not really sure why
14:49:19 sean-k-mooney gibi: ^ we also need to clean up the fr2 branch of the operator to remvoe the duplicate definiton of the pragm that may or may not cause that job to fail
14:49:52 sean-k-mooney gibi: if it does nto work as exepcted let me knwo an ill take a quick look
14:53:36 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks. I just told the story about this possibility to artom and then I wanted to see if it still works
14:53:40 gibi I will report back
14:54:18 sean-k-mooney we have the watcher-operator reporting on changes to master opendev.org prs
14:54:30 sean-k-mooney we had to swap it to use c10s contianers
14:54:51 sean-k-mooney so its defintly possibel btu this is actully going to break because we dropped 3.9 supprot
14:55:35 sean-k-mooney gibi: we can chat downstream about how to prot the test change form watcher-operator to nova-operator to make this work if your interested
14:55:46 sean-k-mooney although maybe not this evening
14:57:04 sean-k-mooney the short version is https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/watcher-operator/blob/main/.zuul.yaml#L308-L344 defiens a c10s based job that will run on all changes ot opendev master for watcher
14:57:45 sean-k-mooney we have both watcher and epoxy version fo those jobs so that we will be able to do some testing on stable/2025.1 to if needed
14:57:48 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/watcher-operator/blob/main/.zuul.yaml#L153-L270
14:58:47 sean-k-mooney chandan got all that working in the last month or so, if we want to improve our upstream nova testign we can definetly do that in the future
15:00:59 gibi thanks for the pointers
15:16:20 gmaan sean-k-mooney: no PTO planned until Sept. for policy, yes that is what I will be pushing now. but I will keep eyes on stephenfin series if anything new or need re-review
15:17:54 sean-k-mooney gmaan: just as a follow up any removal of the tempest policy tests wont happen until 2025.1 goes to unmaintaed right
15:18:40 sean-k-mooney so it will be removed in 2026.2 or 2027.1 ish
15:18:59 gmaan sean-k-mooney: there are no specific policy tests there but idea is to move the tempest tests to move to new defaults (as default) and we have one job testing tempest on old defaults also
15:19:08 sean-k-mooney sorry not policy
15:19:14 sean-k-mooney i ment the schema validation

Earlier   Later