| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-05-20 | |||
| 16:04:07 | Uggla | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:04:16 | Uggla | #info https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2110545 from last week. | |
| 16:04:24 | Uggla | #info We merged https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/949622 proposal to skip the the problematic job. | |
| 16:04:39 | gibi | we probably need to decrease the severity of it now that it is not blocking the gate | |
| 16:04:57 | gibi | moved it to High now | |
| 16:05:02 | Uggla | ok I was about to ask about it | |
| 16:05:09 | Uggla | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922140 bauzas working on a patch to enable nova-next. | |
| 16:05:39 | Uggla | bauzas, am i correct with ^ ? | |
| 16:05:40 | bauzas | I still need to understand why compute1 doesn't like me | |
| 16:05:54 | bauzas | but let's not discuss my problem now | |
| 16:06:25 | bauzas | I would appreciate some devstack/zuul expert to help me finding the cause that's it | |
| 16:07:10 | Uggla | cool, it is on a good path to be resolved. | |
| 16:07:13 | bauzas | tldr: multi-node's compute1 apparently doesn't get the right repo branch | |
| 16:07:49 | Uggla | bauzas, anything else you want to add ? | |
| 16:08:28 | Uggla | seems not so moving on | |
| 16:08:33 | Uggla | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:08:42 | Uggla | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:08:47 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:08:55 | Uggla | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:09:02 | Uggla | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:09:05 | bauzas | Uggla: sorry, nope | |
| 16:09:08 | Uggla | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:09:49 | Uggla | #topic tempest-with-latest-microversion job status | |
| 16:10:00 | Uggla | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tempest-with-latest-microversion&skip=0 | |
| 16:10:16 | Uggla | gmaan, do you want to say something about it ? | |
| 16:11:00 | gmaan | one update, keypair test passing. I was working for server tags tests which need more update as its schema missing since starting | |
| 16:11:21 | gmaan | it in-progress https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/949682 | |
| 16:11:26 | gmaan | sorry instance action | |
| 16:11:32 | gmaan | that is all for this week | |
| 16:11:41 | Uggla | gmaan, thx | |
| 16:11:53 | Uggla | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:11:58 | Uggla | #link https://releases.openstack.org/flamingo/schedule.html | |
| 16:12:05 | Uggla | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:12:15 | Uggla | #info Only 2 weeks before Nova Spec Soft Freeze, do not forget to submit your specs. | |
| 16:12:31 | Uggla | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:12:36 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-status | |
| 16:12:49 | Uggla | FYI I have requested #openstack-nova channel ops for sean-k-mooney, bauzas, gibi, dansmith, melwitt, Uggla | |
| 16:13:34 | gibi | thanks1 | |
| 16:13:38 | sean-k-mooney | ack. i suspect we will very rarely need to use that | |
| 16:13:53 | sean-k-mooney | but it would have been nice to have been able to fix the topic before | |
| 16:14:31 | Uggla | I think we should start reviewing and approving specs. | |
| 16:14:31 | gibi | yeah it is only for the topic | |
| 16:14:51 | bauzas | noted | |
| 16:15:08 | Uggla | Let's start with : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/945549, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/947542, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/949504 | |
| 16:15:31 | Uggla | The 2 last ones are reproposal, so it will be glad to approved them. | |
| 16:16:07 | Uggla | The first one is about cloud hypervisor. It was reviewed by Dan | |
| 16:16:29 | Uggla | But that would cool to have feedbacks from another core. | |
| 16:16:46 | dansmith | fwiesel: I reviewed that spec, but I'm not going to approve it, FWIW | |
| 16:16:51 | sean-k-mooney | i pushed my pending comments... | |
| 16:16:55 | dansmith | oops, sorry Uggla: ^ | |
| 16:17:07 | sean-k-mooney | i really need to stop forgetign to do that | |
| 16:17:26 | dansmith | I don't have time to really review the implementation in detail and so I don't want to be the +2 on the spec | |
| 16:17:43 | sean-k-mooney | if i recall correctly they have set up a ppa to rpovide the libvirt integration. | |
| 16:17:55 | Uggla | cool, the author pinged me and was worried, so that's cool if he has new feedback. | |
| 16:17:58 | sean-k-mooney | that solves part of the how can we test this in ci aspect | |
| 16:19:07 | sean-k-mooney | i think were we are right now is | |
| 16:19:16 | sean-k-mooney | without seeign the code and some work towards the integration | |
| 16:19:16 | Uggla | Also FYI I think the document is up2date regarding the current spec status, so feel free to pick specs for review. | |
| 16:19:28 | sean-k-mooney | we cant really make much more of a judvemnt call on the desgin | |
| 16:19:54 | masahito | hi, we started to update the supporting trait tracking by the provider.yaml feature nova-spec with PoC. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/937587 | |
| 16:20:00 | sean-k-mooney | so we coudl approve the spec btu we cant really commit to landign the feature until they start building it out and imporantly the devstack supprot and ci for the same | |
| 16:21:22 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, sure I think approving the spec is good. So author can "check" that box. | |
| 16:21:25 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: the vtpm spec is on my radar to review this week. if the cinder one actully makes progress i dont have issues with that either but i have not reviewd it since last cycle. im not sure if we really want to go into details on those in real time | |
| 16:21:50 | gibi | is it a general rule that we should not +2 a spec if we are not commiting to review the impl? | |
| 16:22:12 | sean-k-mooney | in the past no. | |
| 16:22:12 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: agreed, I think we need to see a little sniff of the implementation in CI | |
| 16:22:31 | dansmith | gibi: not a hard rule, I just think for something like this I'm going to avoid putting my name on such an effort | |
| 16:22:39 | sean-k-mooney | but there is at least some expecation i guess that if you do +2 and the authour has questions you will at least try to guide them | |
| 16:22:59 | gibi | dansmith: ack | |
| 16:23:23 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: i thinik if you know you wont have time then signaling that is also valuable | |
| 16:23:28 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yeah by voting on the spec I agree I will be around to answer questions about the spec | |
| 16:25:09 | Uggla | Something to add ? | |
| 16:25:36 | sean-k-mooney | i think its good to call out the spec that are ready for review but i think we need to actully do the review async | |
| 16:25:59 | sean-k-mooney | so unless you have specific question i would suggest we move on and if we want to have a spec review day | |
| 16:26:28 | gibi | +1 | |
| 16:26:32 | sean-k-mooney | we can do that but do that at/around the soft spec freeeze in june | |
| 16:26:45 | Uggla | sure this topic is just to highlight that specs are waiting and that we should start to review them not to be overwhelmed. | |
| 16:27:09 | sean-k-mooney | masahito: your sepc also has a poc implemantion if i recall correct | |
| 16:27:21 | sean-k-mooney | i belive gibi has alrady started to look at it too | |
| 16:27:24 | masahito | yup. | |
| 16:27:40 | masahito | is it okay to add it into the priority? | |
| 16:27:41 | sean-k-mooney | masahito: since you are here did you have any questions for us that you wanted input on | |
| 16:28:03 | sean-k-mooney | you can certenlly put it in the etherpad as ready for review if you think it is | |
| 16:28:05 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yeah I looked at the PoC and I liked what I saw | |
| 16:28:25 | masahito | nothing now. i think the spec and poc need first review round now. | |
| 16:28:58 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ack i opened it but didnt get to read it yet. masahito: ack | |
| 16:29:21 | Uggla | and so moving on. | |
| 16:29:23 | Uggla | #topic OpenAPI | |
| 16:29:30 | Uggla | #link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned | |
| 16:29:35 | sean-k-mooney | masahito: please add it here https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-status#L34 | |
| 16:29:40 | Uggla | 21 patches remaining. | |
| 16:30:04 | sean-k-mooney | actully slightly more | |
| 16:30:19 | sean-k-mooney | stephen as a branch on his github fork with all of them | |
| 16:30:42 | sean-k-mooney | but is propsoing them in batches. i was intended to review them today but didnt get to it so i will be reviewign them tomrrow | |
| 16:31:13 | masahito | sean-k-mooney: got it. thanks | |
| 16:31:16 | sean-k-mooney | im hoping gmaan or other will also have time in the next week or two to reviwe some of them | |
| 16:31:17 | Uggla | This topic is to follow progress on openapi. Because we said in PTG we would try to close it. | |
| 16:31:40 | gmaan | yeah, I will try if I can do during end of this week otherwise next week sometime | |
| 16:32:16 | Uggla | I have reviewed 2 of them. | |
| 16:32:52 | gmaan | I would not be able to review all of them together as it exhaust eyes checking all fields for many APIs :) but I will target some set | |