| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-02-25 | |||
| 16:11:05 | elodilles | just an fyi as we have Epoxy-3 now o:) | |
| 16:11:06 | sean-k-mooney | so those have the same freeze deadline as nova right | |
| 16:11:08 | bauzas | noted, I'll review them | |
| 16:11:10 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. thrusday | |
| 16:11:18 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:11:30 | sean-k-mooney | but we will want to do a release at m3 to test with them for RC1 | |
| 16:11:41 | elodilles | +1 | |
| 16:12:11 | sean-k-mooney | we shoudl not haver anything pending for osc-palcement or novaclient that im aware of | |
| 16:12:18 | sean-k-mooney | so we can probly do those effectivly now | |
| 16:12:50 | sean-k-mooney | on clients | |
| 16:13:08 | sean-k-mooney | we have some new api versions this cycle and im not sure we will have osc suprot for those in time | |
| 16:13:20 | sean-k-mooney | so they may get enabled next cycle | |
| 16:13:54 | sean-k-mooney | but there isnt really anything we can do there at this point if the sdk supprot is not already merged | |
| 16:14:59 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: am i correct in saying the sdk is subject to the non clinet code freeze so we should not expect to merge supprot for spice direct or image property shod api microversion between now and FF | |
| 16:15:32 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: if i'm not mistaken sdk already merged it's final release patch recently | |
| 16:15:48 | sean-k-mooney | ack that what i was expecting | |
| 16:15:59 | elodilles | well, | |
| 16:16:06 | elodilles | it's still open, | |
| 16:16:32 | elodilles | waiting for a 2nd +2: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/941859 | |
| 16:16:38 | elodilles | from release team | |
| 16:17:06 | sean-k-mooney | i think we are missing a finaly release for os-traits and perhaps os-resouce classes too by the way | |
| 16:17:45 | elodilles | those are 'independent' projects, hence not picked up by release tools | |
| 16:17:46 | sean-k-mooney | we have not merged any content since the last release we did for either | |
| 16:17:53 | sean-k-mooney | ah ok | |
| 16:17:57 | elodilles | but wasn't there os-traits release recently? | |
| 16:18:30 | sean-k-mooney | yes but we had traits we wanted to add and have anouther release 3 days after that happend:) | |
| 16:18:49 | sean-k-mooney | the os-traits patch is still pending a second +2 | |
| 16:18:56 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: this is the content of SDK release (if it doesn't change anymore): https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/24cc79c0e8e84d7d853e679e4e928585/log/tox/list-changes/list-changes-results.log#918-947 | |
| 16:19:13 | opendevreview | Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/nova master: PoC: Allow unversioned-notify specific transport url https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942710 | |
| 16:19:26 | sean-k-mooney | ok we can likely move on and revisit in open dicuss if there is more to bring up | |
| 16:19:49 | elodilles | +1 | |
| 16:21:19 | bauzas | can we move on ? | |
| 16:21:41 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:23:02 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:23:13 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:23:20 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status | |
| 16:25:30 | bauzas | nothing to tell about, I'm doing hard reviews | |
| 16:25:39 | bauzas | anything else ? | |
| 16:26:08 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:26:15 | opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/nova master: ironic: fix logging of validation errors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942019 | |
| 16:26:17 | bauzas | #topic PTG planning | |
| 16:26:23 | bauzas | #info Next PTG will be held on Apr 7-11 | |
| 16:26:38 | bauzas | usual reminder, please fill the agenda ! | |
| 16:26:42 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-ptg | |
| 16:27:59 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:28:04 | bauzas | elodilles: your turn | |
| 16:28:17 | elodilles | ACK | |
| 16:28:23 | elodilles | actually, same as last week: | |
| 16:28:31 | elodilles | #info stable gates seem to be healthy | |
| 16:28:39 | elodilles | #info stable/2023.2 release patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/941420 (stable/2023.2 (bobcat) is going to transition to EOL in ~2 months) | |
| 16:28:47 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:28:57 | elodilles | that's all | |
| 16:31:22 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:31:34 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:31:37 | bauzas | fwiesel: around ? | |
| 16:31:48 | fwiesel | No updates from my side. I am a bit under the weather. | |
| 16:33:08 | bauzas | ditto here | |
| 16:33:10 | bauzas | I understand you | |
| 16:35:38 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:35:45 | bauzas | I have one item | |
| 16:36:01 | bauzas | kudos to Uggla for being our next PTL \o/ | |
| 16:36:10 | Uggla | thx | |
| 16:36:25 | gibi | congrats | |
| 16:36:40 | gibi | and thanks bauzas for the long service as PTL | |
| 16:36:45 | fwiesel | Congrats | |
| 16:36:53 | elodilles | yepp ++ \o/ | |
| 16:38:26 | bauzas | I will ! | |
| 16:38:29 | masahito | congrats and thank you | |
| 16:38:39 | bauzas | anyway, moving to the questions | |
| 16:39:09 | bauzas | (hertrste) Nova Cloud Hypervisor support | |
| 16:39:23 | hertrste | Hi o/ | |
| 16:39:55 | hertrste | We would like to add support for the Cloud Hypervisor VMM to openstack Nova | |
| 16:40:12 | hertrste | As we have not contributed anything yet, we would like some guidance how to approach that | |
| 16:40:29 | sean-k-mooney | this yes https://github.com/cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor | |
| 16:40:31 | hertrste | As you can see in the meeting notes, we have a proof of concept | |
| 16:40:40 | hertrste | exactly | |
| 16:41:08 | sean-k-mooney | i breifly looked at that a few months ago out of interest when i was playing with rust | |
| 16:41:13 | hertrste | We also have a proof of concept adding some basic support for that VMM: https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/617ac2f655492d1b84b2d924412ac7063d231110 | |
| 16:41:14 | sean-k-mooney | it has an interesting feature set | |
| 16:41:29 | gibi | I think the next step there is to have PTG topic proposed for this | |
| 16:42:12 | sean-k-mooney | hertrste our main concerns would be likely testing, and building out a minimal supportrable feature set | |
| 16:42:36 | bauzas | yeah, looks to me a good PTG session | |
| 16:42:39 | sean-k-mooney | that would invovle defining a spec (if the propsal to add a new driver was green lit) | |
| 16:42:42 | bauzas | hertrste: can you attend it ? | |
| 16:42:44 | dansmith | I'd also be interested in knowing how widely it is used/deployed | |
| 16:42:44 | sean-k-mooney | to descibe the expecations | |
| 16:43:05 | dansmith | and also, why it's not just a libvirt driver :) | |
| 16:43:50 | sean-k-mooney | well i dont neesislay think we shoudl say all linux hyperviors shoudl be behind libvirt | |
| 16:43:55 | hertrste | I can very much attend a PTG. What would I need to prepare for that? When would that meeting take place? | |
| 16:43:57 | sean-k-mooney | it has its pros and cons | |
| 16:44:43 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: no, doesn't have to be, but there's a lot of stuff to re-implement in nova if it's not, and so I'd expect there to be a good reason for it | |
| 16:44:50 | gibi | hertrste: https://openinfra.org/ptg/ | |
| 16:44:54 | bauzas | hertrste: see the above discussion about PTG | |
| 16:45:32 | Uggla | hertrste, Apr 7-11 | |
| 16:45:38 | sean-k-mooney | hertrste: i think the main things to prepare is an elevator pitch explaining why an operator may want ot use this | |
| 16:45:53 | sean-k-mooney | wwhat usecases and target workloads woudl it enable | |
| 16:46:02 | tpressure | libvirt has a poor hypervisor abstraction. If we would go the libvirt route, we would effectively have to maintain two components instead of only one. You cannot simply map qemu calls to cloud hypervisor | |
| 16:46:05 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: especially since it appearently already exist: https://libvirt.org/drvch.html | |
| 16:46:19 | sean-k-mooney | and beyond that how you plan to test and develop supproted for it on an ongoing basis | |
| 16:46:58 | sean-k-mooney | tpressure: well we dont generate qemu calls today | |