| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-02-18 | |||
| 14:35:41 | danfai | hypervisor, which then breaks. If I hardcode/override the vif_type/bridge name on the destination hypervisor, most things work (in our case). I see that part of it comes from neutron when asking about the vif type and it would get bridge. Another one I'm not sure where it comes from, but I guess from the rpc call from the source hypervisor. What I was wondering is, should | |
| 14:35:43 | danfai | bridge names not be independent of the source hypervisor and rather be calculated based on the destination hypervisors information? (our case libvirt/kvm, public network only, still yoga) | |
| 14:39:51 | danfai | (best part of it is, that if you migrate twice, it will use the correct bridge name as the vif_type would change) | |
| 15:18:23 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Support multiple allocations for vGPUs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/845757 | |
| 15:18:24 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: document how to ask for more a single vGPU https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/906151 | |
| 15:33:29 | bauzas | dansmith: sean-k-mooney: thanks for the reviews on the weigher, I got an interesting race condition that I need to fix fwiw https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940642/9 | |
| 15:33:41 | dansmith | I saw | |
| 15:33:46 | bauzas | I'll probably try/catch the call | |
| 15:34:00 | bauzas | any other opinion ? | |
| 15:34:27 | sean-k-mooney | huh i see | |
| 15:34:34 | sean-k-mooney | that form looking upt the isntnaces on the host right | |
| 15:34:58 | sean-k-mooney | or rather there image properites | |
| 15:35:19 | sean-k-mooney | so ya wraping it in a try and ignoring it if the lookup fails makes sense | |
| 15:35:53 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure if you want to explcity handlel the detelete case or also skip if there is a general exception | |
| 15:36:08 | sean-k-mooney | like the cell db was not accsabel at the time | |
| 15:37:23 | sean-k-mooney | you shoudl handel nova.exception.InstanceNotFound for sure | |
| 15:48:37 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yeah, I'll go this way | |
| 15:48:49 | bauzas | because users can delete their instances anyway | |
| 15:48:59 | bauzas | even when scheduling | |
| 15:55:45 | sean-k-mooney | yep and in this case the instnace that could raise this migh belong to another tenant | |
| 16:01:06 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:01:06 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Feb 18 16:01:06 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:01:06 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:01:06 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:01:12 | bauzas | howdy folks | |
| 16:01:17 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:01:26 | r-taketn | o/ | |
| 16:01:46 | bauzas | wiki again is super slow | |
| 16:02:00 | bauzas | I updated it in advance but the update failed | |
| 16:02:28 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:57 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:03:03 | bauzas | yeah it failed | |
| 16:03:19 | elodilles | did my update interfere with yours? :-o | |
| 16:03:23 | bauzas | okay, lemme bring you my notes directly | |
| 16:03:31 | bauzas | Error: 1205 Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction (dd34c169f1ba97e28fc00622156bd8b2e9de60ef.rackspaceclouddb.com) | |
| 16:03:39 | bauzas | that's what I get | |
| 16:03:44 | elodilles | hmmm | |
| 16:03:55 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:04:02 | bauzas | #info No critical bug | |
| 16:04:09 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:04:16 | bauzas | any bugs to raise ? | |
| 16:04:49 | bauzas | looks not, moving on | |
| 16:05:24 | bauzas | agenda for today will be https://paste.opendev.org/show/bHNrlGFsGF7V7TpuLwGY/ | |
| 16:05:35 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:05:48 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:05:56 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:06:06 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:06:31 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:07:03 | bauzas | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:07:10 | bauzas | that's it for gate | |
| 16:07:50 | bauzas | anything to talk about our gate ? | |
| 16:08:04 | bauzas | fwiw, I was more present upstream these days and found no real problem | |
| 16:08:38 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:08:42 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:08:48 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html | |
| 16:09:15 | bauzas | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:09:22 | bauzas | #info 1.5 week before Feature Freeze | |
| 16:09:29 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:09:30 | bauzas | the bell is ticking | |
| 16:09:38 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:09:54 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status | |
| 16:10:02 | bauzas | I eventually updated this etherpad \o/ | |
| 16:10:15 | bauzas | and I've started to do a round of reviews | |
| 16:11:51 | bauzas | anything we should discuss ? | |
| 16:12:09 | bauzas | if not, moving on in a sec | |
| 16:13:13 | bauzas | #topic PTG planning | |
| 16:13:19 | bauzas | as a reminder, | |
| 16:13:22 | bauzas | #info Next PTG will be held on Apr 7-11 | |
| 16:13:29 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-ptg | |
| 16:13:44 | bauzas | please add your items to discuss at that PTG into that etherpad | |
| 16:14:45 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:14:54 | bauzas | elodilles: take the mic | |
| 16:14:59 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:15:03 | elodilles | #info stable gates seem to be healthy | |
| 16:15:14 | elodilles | #info stable/2023.2 release patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/941420 (stable/2023.2 (bobcat) is going to transition to EOL in ~2 months) | |
| 16:15:35 | elodilles | note that it will directly go to End of Life as it is not a SLURP release | |
| 16:15:48 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:15:56 | elodilles | and that's all from me | |
| 16:18:20 | fwiesel | I suspect it is my turn. | |
| 16:18:21 | fwiesel | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:18:29 | fwiesel | No updates from my side. | |
| 16:18:29 | bauzas | thanks fwiesel | |
| 16:18:34 | bauzas | cool thanks | |
| 16:18:45 | bauzas | still fighting the dragons ? | |
| 16:19:25 | fwiesel | Yes, I didn't quite get around to it, that is the main reason of the lack of progress. | |
| 16:19:36 | bauzas | no worries, we all have urgent business to sell | |
| 16:19:42 | bauzas | moving on then | |
| 16:19:53 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:20:00 | bauzas | two items today AFAICS | |
| 16:20:07 | bauzas | (sean-k-mooney) neutron removal of linux bridge | |
| 16:20:09 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: around N? | |
| 16:20:14 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:20:28 | sean-k-mooney | so... neutron removed linxu bridge | |
| 16:20:38 | sean-k-mooney | they did not deprecated it in the last slurp | |
| 16:20:42 | sean-k-mooney | so we never did | |
| 16:20:55 | sean-k-mooney | so my propsoal is we deprecate it this release | |
| 16:21:03 | sean-k-mooney | disable the linux bridge job | |
| 16:21:09 | sean-k-mooney | and remove supprot next cycle | |
| 16:21:14 | sean-k-mooney | we need to do this in os-vif as well | |
| 16:21:18 | sean-k-mooney | i have a patch up for that | |