| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-02-04 | |||
| 16:55:42 | bauzas | just add it in the open discussion and request for a specless blueprint approval | |
| 16:56:56 | bauzas | see the documentation here for trivial features approval https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/readme.html#trivial-specifications | |
| 16:57:30 | bauzas | or ping me whenever you want | |
| 16:57:38 | bauzas | anyway, we're almost at time | |
| 16:57:43 | MengyangZhang[m] | thanks! | |
| 16:57:44 | bauzas | anything anyone ? | |
| 16:58:08 | bauzas | then thanks all | |
| 16:58:12 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:58:12 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Feb 4 16:58:12 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:58:12 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-02-04-16.03.html | |
| 16:58:12 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-02-04-16.03.txt | |
| 16:58:12 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-02-04-16.03.log.html | |
| 16:58:22 | r-taketn | Thank you for discussing. | |
| 16:58:26 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:58:31 | gibi | thanks forlks | |
| 16:58:36 | gibi | and folks even :) | |
| 16:58:41 | fwiesel | Thanks | |
| 16:58:43 | masahito | thanks everyone | |
| 17:00:03 | sean-k-mooney | MengyangZhang[m]: i suspect the current impletion is missing some fucntionatliy to ensure the compute node supprot the feature when we have a mix os openstack version on different compute nodes by the way | |
| 17:00:16 | sean-k-mooney | MengyangZhang[m]:the existin spec does not cover that properlys. | |
| 17:00:28 | sean-k-mooney | ill leave a comment to that effect on teh current one. | |
| 17:02:07 | ratailor | sean-k-mooney, gibi I have to leave now, its too late for me. I will update the patch tomorrow and we can discuss then. | |
| 17:02:12 | masahito | gibi sean-k-mooney: if you have time, please review this bug fix again. The new patchset returns null at list API in both no pinned az case and no request spec case. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939658 | |
| 17:02:22 | gibi | ratailor: sure. I also don't have time right now to load context there | |
| 17:02:36 | ratailor | gibi, sean-k-mooney ack. Thanks! | |
| 17:02:50 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ratailor i suggested just adding additional_properties=True | |
| 17:03:17 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I think stephenfin was against that | |
| 17:03:42 | sean-k-mooney | if we cna restrict that only a filed called properties in the image object then that woudl be better | |
| 17:03:44 | gibi | and I also would like to be at least specific on the level of string keys, with length check | |
| 17:03:47 | gibi | and charset check | |
| 17:04:13 | sean-k-mooney | we could do that | |
| 17:04:24 | sean-k-mooney | what i want to avoid is listing the speicic image properties | |
| 17:04:56 | sean-k-mooney | specicicly becasue adding a new image property is not an api change today so we should not encode the set of options in the respocne schema | |
| 17:06:03 | sean-k-mooney | but im ok with encodeign some general restrictions. image properties are not free from so its less problatic then other files but we can still do some level fo validation | |
| 17:06:49 | gibi | yeah, lets try to be strict about having a field "properties" and that it is an object with string key values with some length and charset requirements | |
| 17:07:00 | gibi | I think we have example of such schema pieces already | |
| 17:07:16 | sean-k-mooney | ack probaly server metadata? | |
| 17:09:33 | gibi | yeah that is a good candidate | |
| 17:10:45 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure if the schema for that has merged or not but its the clsoet i can think of. the server tags api is not key:value if i recall, aggreate metadata woudl be another option to look at too | |
| 17:14:03 | gibi | jsonschema is OK with a field called properties https://paste.opendev.org/show/b8Vs43sf3PThcDuMbjIn/ | |
| 17:14:15 | gibi | I will link this to the patch as ratailor is offline... | |
| 17:15:13 | sean-k-mooney | cool, i agree with the restirction you were proposing so can you capture that in your comment also | |
| 17:15:29 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. lenght/charset enforcement | |
| 17:18:14 | gibi | done :) | |
| 17:20:14 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug/2097359 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940603 | |
| 17:20:14 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Bump InstanceNUMACell version after data migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940604 | |
| 17:24:36 | opendevreview | Fabian Wiesel proposed openstack/nova master: Re-raise exception for failed reboot for error reporting. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940725 | |
| 17:55:18 | gibi | Salah Hazaa: I see that you updated my review in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937275 was there any particular reason to do so? I will going to restore my version of that review now... | |
| 17:59:35 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: im kind of confused by there coment with just a sha or change id | |
| 17:59:47 | sean-k-mooney | its not the first time i have seen someone do that recently | |
| 18:00:01 | sean-k-mooney | it makes me wonder if thsoe are bot comments or similar | |
| 18:00:53 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [CI][nova-next]test with placement ac breadth-first https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937275 | |
| 18:01:03 | sean-k-mooney | same thing here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/940448/comments/53acb822_bf3e4455 | |
| 18:01:20 | gibi | I think the person tried to resolve my review in merge conflict but failed | |
| 18:01:45 | sean-k-mooney | maybe but that does not explian the same behaivor on the requirements patch | |
| 18:02:14 | gibi | yeah | |
| 18:02:50 | sean-k-mooney | and here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/931314 | |
| 18:04:15 | sean-k-mooney | to me its sus that they comemnted the same tyep of hash comment on releas eand reqiuremnts patches in 19 seconds appart, | |
| 18:05:10 | sean-k-mooney | the comment on your patch was a few hours later | |
| 18:05:12 | gibi | we can try to reach out to the email the account has on file in gerrit | |
| 18:06:59 | sean-k-mooney | perhaps, frickler also asked about thi son a diffetn review if i recall | |
| 18:07:42 | gibi | anyhow I'm done for today. See you tomorrow o/ | |
| 18:12:26 | sean-k-mooney | frickler: it seams to be a recurring pattern where all there comments are a sha or review link of some kind https://review.opendev.org/dashboard/37702 | |
| 18:15:26 | sean-k-mooney | often the comment is just the change id or gerrit query url with the change id | |
| 18:49:13 | bauzas | gmann: I counted 23 jobs running on check pipeline for nova | |
| 18:50:00 | bauzas | gmann: I forgot context but I guess we still need to run the two jobs for the old rbacs and the new default policies ? | |
| 18:52:01 | gmann | bauzas: I think we can do only old rbac, I kept new rbac because of cinder still not default to new RBAC but that we can in tempest gate and that should be enough | |
| 18:52:09 | gmann | I will cleanup that today | |
| 18:53:19 | gmann | bauzas: Also, we can run old rbac as periodic. As we are checking periodic jobs in weekly meeting, that should be enough. what you say? | |
| 18:57:13 | bauzas | gmann: yeah I guess we can run old rbac in periodic, provided we get the list of periodics :) | |
| 18:57:22 | bauzas | this time, I wasn't able to get that list :) | |
| 19:00:41 | gmann | ack, will propose change today | |
| 19:06:07 | mikal | sean-k-mooney: good morning. I _think_ that CI should pass on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926126/12 once the trait merges. The unit tests pass locally for me at least. That said, I haven't done a compute service version bump, is that needed when new hypervisor traits are introduced? | |
| 19:07:57 | sean-k-mooney | ack. its passing for the first 3 patches and the failures do seam to be related to the traits | |
| 19:08:15 | sean-k-mooney | so i agree it shoudl pass when we add the traits | |
| 19:08:21 | sean-k-mooney | and do a release | |
| 19:22:02 | mikal | Any thoughts on if there is anything missing from that sound patch now? If you think its basically complete I'll go spend some time doing the same thing to the USB one. | |
| 19:24:14 | sean-k-mooney | mikal: im going to try and finsih aroudn the top of the hour ill see if i can review it before i do. | |
| 19:24:44 | mikal | sean-k-mooney: cool, thanks. No pressure. If you don't get to it I'll just move onto the USB one anyways and I can always circle back. | |
| 19:24:58 | sean-k-mooney | actully looking at the change files im not seeing a comptue service bump or min version check | |
| 19:25:32 | mikal | Yeah, that's what I was asking above -- I assume I need those, but I haven't done them before. Where are they? | |
| 19:26:01 | sean-k-mooney | if we go the traits route without those we need a addtional change to enforce the trait request. | |
| 19:26:07 | sean-k-mooney | ah am one sec | |
| 19:26:40 | sean-k-mooney | the service version is defiend here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/service.py#L34 | |
| 19:27:55 | mikal | Hmmm. Bump twice or bump that at the end after the sound and USB traits have both landed? | |
| 19:28:25 | sean-k-mooney | when we add a new feature tha tneed supprot form the compute manger we add a new constant here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py#L106-L126 | |
| 19:28:46 | sean-k-mooney | and then add a check on the relevent api action i.e spawn and rebuild in yoru case | |
| 19:29:50 | sean-k-mooney | so we tend to define a check funciton like this _check_support_vnic_accelerator https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py#L1054C9-L1054C40 | |
| 19:30:00 | mikal | Hmmm. How do you define support there? Is that any API request that wants USB or sound, or any API request which needs a compute manager with the SPICE direct code? | |
| 19:30:35 | sean-k-mooney | so you are addign a genic feature to add usb device or sound cards | |
| 19:30:37 | mikal | That is, for the SPICE direct console type to work, you cannot be running an ancient compute manager because it would generate the wrong domain XML. | |
| 19:30:58 | sean-k-mooney | so its not spice specific its server creeate which we validate in _validate_and_build_base_options | |
| 19:31:17 | sean-k-mooney | like this https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py#L1151-L1171 | |
| 19:31:20 | sean-k-mooney | and rebuild | |
| 19:31:29 | mikal | Ahhh, ok. And then the API microversion protects the overall SPICE direct feature I suppose. | |
| 19:31:37 | sean-k-mooney | correct | |
| 19:31:44 | mikal | Ok, that makes sense to me. | |
| 19:32:05 | mikal | In that case I'll take a swing at doing that version bump and so forth today before I move onto the USB traits stuff. | |
| 19:32:10 | sean-k-mooney | the min compute service check it just to make sure we dotn try to create the vm on a compute node that does not know about the new image properties | |
| 19:32:33 | sean-k-mooney | ya so there should be 2 bumps one for sound and one for usb | |