| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-02-04 | |||
| 16:24:44 | sean-k-mooney | maybe show is using the rebuild schdmea but i tought this was merrged in novmber | |
| 16:24:55 | ratailor | gibi, but the catch here is that we are adding 'image_properties' in 'properties' subkey and 'properties' has special meaning in schema validation, so we might need to change it to 'image_properties' in response. | |
| 16:24:56 | sean-k-mooney | we can follow up after the metting | |
| 16:25:15 | bauzas | are we then clear with what I proposed ? | |
| 16:25:22 | ratailor | sean-k-mooney, sure. | |
| 16:25:31 | sean-k-mooney | oh ok stephn responded so rebuild is there btu show is still pending | |
| 16:25:42 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yep that is my view | |
| 16:26:25 | gibi | ratailor: even if properties is a keyword for jsonschema we should have a way to have a schema that matches a field called properties :) but I have to load context and dig | |
| 16:26:49 | sean-k-mooney | ok ya looking at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/915743/8/nova/api/openstack/compute/schemas/servers.py that correct. | |
| 16:27:15 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: oh does it not like having a feild in the repsonce called properties | |
| 16:27:33 | ratailor | gibi, sure. Thanks! that would be helpful. | |
| 16:29:10 | bauzas | can we move on folks ? | |
| 16:29:14 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:29:21 | bauzas | I think we agreed on the plan | |
| 16:29:32 | sean-k-mooney | we can pick this up on gerrit or after the meeting | |
| 16:29:36 | bauzas | we'll look where we are next week | |
| 16:29:46 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:29:54 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:29:59 | bauzas | elodilles: welcome back | |
| 16:30:02 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:30:06 | elodilles | #info nothing to report, stable gates seem to be healthy | |
| 16:30:13 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:30:19 | elodilles | that's all i got | |
| 16:32:18 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:32:24 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:32:33 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:32:40 | bauzas | fwiesel: hello | |
| 16:33:03 | bauzas | any news so far ? | |
| 16:33:06 | fwiesel | So, I fixed the "regression". As it turns out, I didn't clean properly up after each run in the network department, which eventually became too much. | |
| 16:33:41 | fwiesel | Looking at the past test runs, it looks fairly stable with the one know broken test. | |
| 16:33:43 | bauzas | bravo then | |
| 16:33:45 | fwiesel | That's from my side. | |
| 16:34:03 | bauzas | excellent news and thanks for the hard work on investigating the root cause and fixing it | |
| 16:34:26 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:34:47 | bauzas | I have one topic | |
| 16:35:04 | r-taketn | bauzas: I want to add one topic (request) , is it ok? | |
| 16:36:08 | bauzas | r-taketn: sure, I'm just grabbing some email link, sec | |
| 16:36:52 | r-taketn | I have another topic to mention from last week.. | |
| 16:37:08 | bauzas | there we go | |
| 16:37:21 | bauzas | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/3DBNNHXAPGVUX44NHH43WTDFMIDJ3X5U/ | |
| 16:37:30 | bauzas | disabling the instance info caching | |
| 16:37:47 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I guess we can move forward and propose the patch, then ? | |
| 16:38:13 | bauzas | we said to look at the results this week | |
| 16:38:23 | bauzas | and the only person who replied was very happy with it | |
| 16:38:44 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: so I guess you'll propose the instance info cache disabling patch | |
| 16:38:55 | sean-k-mooney | ah well the patch is already up | |
| 16:39:00 | sean-k-mooney | so we can proceed with the review | |
| 16:39:10 | bauzas | oh my bad you're right | |
| 16:39:13 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939476 | |
| 16:39:29 | bauzas | I'll then proceed with the review | |
| 16:40:04 | sean-k-mooney | i have at least one typo to correct so ill respin it this evnnign or tomorrow | |
| 16:40:12 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 16:40:14 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:40:17 | sean-k-mooney | so if there are other comments ill try and adress those too | |
| 16:40:20 | bauzas | r-taketn: your turn then | |
| 16:40:46 | r-taketn | ok, i just added topic today's agenda. | |
| 16:40:56 | r-taketn | Request for replies on the following - About RDT/MPAM feature | |
| 16:41:04 | r-taketn | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/HIKLBMNMTJR6GFPKFKODECMR56SYPT5J/ | |
| 16:41:07 | bauzas | oh sorry | |
| 16:41:25 | bauzas | I removed it because I was thinking it was the topic we discussed last week | |
| 16:41:29 | bauzas | but indeed, this is different | |
| 16:42:00 | r-taketn | Yes. I have another topic to mention from last week. | |
| 16:42:08 | r-taketn | I'm considering the feasibility of MPAM/RDT feature within OpenStack to solve noisy neighbor problems on VM clouds. | |
| 16:42:08 | sean-k-mooney | r-taketn: the best way to move forward with that is to start a spec and bring it up to dicuss in the ptg | |
| 16:42:50 | sean-k-mooney | r-taketn: depending on how its mature it may be something that can be supproted | |
| 16:42:54 | bauzas | agreed | |
| 16:42:59 | sean-k-mooney | its a very invasive change | |
| 16:43:27 | sean-k-mooney | which is partly why the previous efforts were abandonded | |
| 16:44:18 | bauzas | r-taketn: the PTG dates are now known | |
| 16:44:18 | r-taketn | I intended to discuss the feasibility of this before submitting spec because its implementation will not be simple | |
| 16:44:33 | bauzas | r-taketn: would you be able to join us remotely ? | |
| 16:45:09 | r-taketn | sure. | |
| 16:45:20 | bauzas | cool thanks | |
| 16:45:29 | bauzas | then let's discuss this at the PTG | |
| 16:45:39 | bauzas | I need to create an etherpad for tracking those topics | |
| 16:45:43 | sean-k-mooney | r-taketn i was off on firday and yesterday so i have not fully read your latest post on this topic | |
| 16:45:53 | sean-k-mooney | ill see if i can do that later today | |
| 16:46:12 | r-taketn | sean-k-mooney: Thanks | |
| 16:46:58 | r-taketn | It's for confirming. Should I submit a spec before the PTG? | |
| 16:47:07 | bauzas | it would be nice | |
| 16:47:17 | bauzas | fwiw, I just created a PTG etherpad | |
| 16:47:20 | sean-k-mooney | it does not hurt to do so, it give use somethign concrete to dicuss | |
| 16:47:22 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-ptg | |
| 16:47:38 | bauzas | r-taketn: could you please add your two topics at the bottom of that etherpad ? | |
| 16:47:49 | r-taketn | ok, i'll prepare | |
| 16:47:58 | r-taketn | bauzas: ok i'll add | |
| 16:48:00 | bauzas | the one we discuss last week and the other one from this week | |
| 16:48:09 | bauzas | r-taketn: thanks | |
| 16:48:17 | bauzas | I'll also add a couple of topics too | |
| 16:48:27 | bauzas | and I'll tell about the PTG etherpad next week | |
| 16:49:24 | bauzas | are we done for today? | |
| 16:49:27 | masahito | is it okay to start adding some topics on the etherpad? | |
| 16:49:34 | MengyangZhang[m] | I have a question. I was wondering if it is still possible to request an exception to add this bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=add-burst-length-support to Eproxy. The code change is minor and is ready for review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939490 | |
| 16:49:37 | masahito | it's quick question. | |
| 16:49:46 | sean-k-mooney | r-taketn: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/662264 was the spec i wrote for RDT 5 years ago just an fyi. | |
| 16:50:03 | bauzas | masahito: yes indeed, you can add topics | |
| 16:50:14 | sean-k-mooney | MengyangZhang[m]: its very very late to do that | |
| 16:50:14 | masahito | thanks. | |
| 16:50:34 | bauzas | MengyangZhang[m]: yeah unfortunately, we're past approval freeze from 3 weeks now | |
| 16:50:42 | bauzas | and feature freeze is in 3 weeks too | |