Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-01-13
18:28:35 sean-k-mooney im going to quickly test without the change to make sure it still fails
18:28:48 sean-k-mooney its possibel that the oslo change make it not required
18:29:02 sean-k-mooney but i suspect that the extra call to waitall is related to that
18:29:44 sean-k-mooney with the new oslo release i was able to remove the funcitonal test change
18:30:00 sean-k-mooney but i didnt test master with the new versions which im doing now
18:30:28 JayF nice, that'll build even more confidence that the oslo.log pipemutex stuff fixed something \o/
18:33:04 sean-k-mooney hum ok master apprelty passed. but i need to verify that it has the correct versions fo eventlet. changing branch might have cause the venv to be recreateded
18:34:28 sean-k-mooney https://paste.opendev.org/show/bUq1UNJTP1NHybsQJHPN/
18:34:40 sean-k-mooney so ya i actully think the nova change is not requried any more
18:35:09 sean-k-mooney frickler: do we want to try droping the depends-on form the requirements change?
18:36:15 sean-k-mooney oslo.log==7.0.0 might be all tha twas requried to fix nova with eventlet 0.38.2
19:04:45 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Bump requirement to PrettyTable>=2.4.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939157
19:13:30 frickler sean-k-mooney: ack, confirmed locally, updating the change now
19:32:36 sean-k-mooney cool im goign to call it a night, ill leave my nova change open but ill abandon it if the requiremetn patch passes
19:38:05 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: libvirt: Wrap un-proxied listDevices() and listAllDevices() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939158
20:19:19 opendevreview Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test eventlet bump https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/938879
20:33:19 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: libvirt: Wrap un-proxied listDevices() and listAllDevices() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939162
20:34:25 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.2: libvirt: Wrap un-proxied listDevices() and listAllDevices() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939163
#openstack-nova - 2025-01-14
00:58:44 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Handle iso+gpt detections https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/931833
01:55:56 opendevreview Tatsuya Hayashino proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose instance metadata protection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/939190
01:59:46 opendevreview Tatsuya Hayashino proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose instance metadata protection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/939190
08:52:43 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Create specs directory for 2025.2 Flamingo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/939091
14:29:48 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Handle GPT image detection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933928
14:29:48 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test with latest oslo.utils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933444
16:01:45 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:01:45 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Jan 14 16:01:45 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:01:45 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:01:45 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:01:49 bauzas heyho
16:01:52 fwiesel \o
16:02:01 masahito o/
16:02:02 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:02:13 s3rj1k hi all
16:03:14 elodilles o/
16:03:15 Uggla o/
16:03:26 bauzas (on a meeting but I can run)
16:05:06 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:05:44 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:05:50 bauzas #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:05:57 bauzas any bug report to discuss ?
16:06:39 bauzas looks not
16:06:49 masahito If there is a time, I want to talk this bug in the review priority topic. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2085709
16:06:50 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:07:02 bauzas masahito: sure, I'll ping you at that time
16:07:12 masahito thank you.
16:07:37 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:07:44 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal
16:07:57 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:08:03 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:08:10 bauzas #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck
16:08:46 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: blueprint: iothreads-for-instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939254
16:09:54 bauzas periodic jobs are all green
16:10:01 bauzas any gate failure to report ?
16:12:19 bauzas okay moving on
16:14:02 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:14:09 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html
16:14:16 bauzas #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule
16:14:53 bauzas #info 6 weeks before Feature Freeze
16:14:59 bauzas #info we'll try to create as os-traits release by the next 2 weeks, please provide your os-traits patches sooner than later.
16:15:02 bauzas you know this
16:16:09 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:16:16 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status
16:16:29 bauzas #action bauzas to update the etherpad with the latest changes
16:16:40 bauzas masahito: you had an itemù
16:16:52 masahito Thanks.
16:17:09 masahito I added two bugs in the bottom of the etherpad page.
16:17:29 masahito https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2075100 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2085709
16:17:48 masahito The second one is a bug patch I mentioned before.
16:17:53 gibi masahito: I'm wondering if you problem is related to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/932669 that fixed a freeze
16:18:42 masahito gibi: thanks, let me check. I didn't notice the patch.
16:20:05 masahito It looks like C or later release has the problem that long running thread blocks other thread operation because of libvirt connection.
16:21:53 bauzas masahito: okay, that's good that you added both fixes, we'll try to review them
16:23:03 bauzas can we move on ?
16:23:29 masahito I'm ok, thank you.
16:25:07 bauzas ack
16:25:15 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:25:24 bauzas elodilles: do you have anything ?
16:25:29 elodilles #info nothing to report, stable gates seem to be healthy
16:25:43 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:25:53 elodilles that's all from me
16:26:38 bauzas cool
16:27:45 bauzas #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:27:54 fwiesel No updates from my side
16:27:54 bauzas fwiesel: anything on your side ?
16:27:56 bauzas cool
16:28:03 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:30:06 bauzas nothing on the agenda, anything else ?
16:30:10 masahito If time is allowed, I want to hear your opinion for this spec, too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/937587
16:30:50 masahito According to the gibi's comment, it's a bug not a new feature. We're wondering the spec approval is needed or not.
16:32:40 bauzas unfortunately, we're post spec approval deadline
16:34:15 bauzas hmmmm
16:34:19 masahito yes, that's why I asked the question. If it's a bug, we can push bug fix for the problem, IIUC. But it's defined as a new feature, we'll wait the next development cycle.
16:34:23 bauzas I don't have that context in mind
16:34:58 bauzas sean-k-mooney: about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/937587/2/specs/2025.1/approved/add-mutual-prefix.rst, do you think like gibi that's just a placement bug ?
16:35:14 gibi not a placement one but a nova one :)
16:35:47 bauzas because that's nova which knows that, I see
16:35:49 bauzas you're right
16:36:30 bauzas so we should do something like set(new_traits) - set(existing_traits) to calculate the ones that should be deleted
16:36:47 bauzas and if we don't do that for custom traits, I agree with you that's a bug
16:37:02 bauzas because operators expect to only get custom traits that they pass

Earlier   Later