| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-12-09 | |||
| 20:09:35 | abishop | hi, cinder guy here who is looking for a "feature liaison" to help me with a feature I'd like to work on for epoxy | |
| 20:09:37 | abishop | in the 2025.1 PTG our teams discussed a possible enhancement to the "Update a volume attachment" API to support cinder's driver assisted volume migration | |
| 20:09:39 | abishop | that turns out to not be feasible for several (cinder) reasons, and so I'm now pursuing an alterntive approach to improving the user experience | |
| 20:09:41 | abishop | it would entail a small enhancement to the "Show a detail of a volume attachment" but that would still require a microversion which means a spec | |
| 20:09:43 | abishop | I have a few liaison questions, starting with what's the epoxy deadline for specs? | |
| 20:27:38 | artom | abishop, you don't necessarily need a feature liaison right off the bat, you could pick up one during spec review. Official deadline is E-2, so Jan 10, but we're trying to get specs posted ASAP and at least looked at before the end of 2024, because otherwise the time because real short. | |
| 20:29:21 | abishop | artom phew, Jan 10 is great news to me and I can post something by mid next week | |
| 20:29:58 | artom | abishop, I don't think bauzas ever posted our "unofficial" timeline, but yeah, get something up ASAP | |
| 20:30:03 | artom | (posted on the ML) | |
| 20:30:52 | abishop | on the ML? I though it would be submitted for review to nova-specs | |
| 20:32:38 | abishop | though I don't know how nova specs transition from proposed to the "approved" directory | |
| 20:37:48 | artom | No no, I was completing my previous sentence: "ever posted on the ML" | |
| 20:38:13 | artom | abishop, they don't, you write them directly under the approved directory. They become approved when they merge. | |
| 20:38:47 | abishop | ah, that makes sense | |
| 21:28:42 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Rephrase the help message https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925207 | |
| 23:34:43 | sean-k-mooney | abishop: the unoffical deadlien for specs is thusrday of r-16 december 12th i.e this thursday but that really just because most nova folks will be on pto starting sometime this/next week. | |
| 23:35:44 | sean-k-mooney | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.4f297ee4698e02c16c4007f7ee76b7c1#L204 | |
| 23:36:29 | sean-k-mooney | so in theory tomorow is a spec review day, thrusday is the soft freeze and the actul freeze is january 9th | |
| 23:36:51 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. epoxy milestone two https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html#e-2 | |
| 23:42:54 | sean-k-mooney | abishop: by the way we are still waitign on cinder folks to weigh in on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/932653 | |
| 23:43:26 | sean-k-mooney | we dont nessiarly have concerns with adding new volume frontend qos types provide the cinder side of it is done first | |
| 23:55:06 | abishop | sean-k-mooney: thank you for the additional details; I'll try to post the spec ASAP (I'm also out for the rest of the year starting next Thu). I don't have any info on the other qos spec, but will see what I can find | |
| 23:56:12 | sean-k-mooney | abishop: as far as im aware the burts qos value are not standardised in cinder so i think they need a cinder spec first to add those | |
| 23:56:20 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure if they have create one since | |
| 23:56:48 | sean-k-mooney | that seams to be the only review the author has so proably now | |
| 23:56:50 | sean-k-mooney | *not | |
| #openstack-nova - 2024-12-10 | |||
| 01:37:49 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for flavor access API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924593 | |
| 02:15:30 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/placement master: Require cchardet>=2.2.0a2 for perfload job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/937423 | |
| 05:26:20 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/placement master: Require cchardet>=2.2.0a2 for perfload job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/937423 | |
| 05:27:57 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/placement master: Use cchardet>=2.2.0a2 for placement-perfload job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/937423 | |
| 09:31:48 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Update Nova bdm with updated swap info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/929858 | |
| 09:38:13 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Update Nova bdm with updated swap info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/929858 | |
| 10:34:41 | bauzas | gibi: I have an appointment today at 5:30pm which means I can't run the nova meeting | |
| 10:34:50 | bauzas | could you run it ? | |
| 11:47:28 | gibi | bauzas: I also have a 1:1 scheduled to 5:30 today so I cannot run the second half of the meeting | |
| 11:47:44 | gibi | but I can do a 30 minutes one | |
| 12:42:33 | fwiesel | bauzas: I forgot to mention last time, that I can't attend this meeting. I'll be hopefully on a plane. | |
| 12:57:43 | frickler | sean-k-mooney: is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933365 ready for reviews? ralonsoh made some good progress on the neutron side, so IMO it would be good to get this blocker removed from nova | |
| 13:20:32 | sean-k-mooney | frickler: so i have not really had time to look at this | |
| 13:20:51 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think the removel of lock ustis and going to treading.RLOCK is a generic solution that we can take | |
| 13:21:09 | sean-k-mooney | frickler: i belive that is what neutron were trying yes? | |
| 13:22:10 | sean-k-mooney | it does seam to be passign now but didt we have some issue with it still deadlocking in one run | |
| 13:25:08 | frickler | if more work is needed, I fine with that, too, I just wasn't sure whether I should try to look for reviewers | |
| 13:33:42 | sean-k-mooney | if its funcitonal and passing ci then that was all i needed locally to get it to pass i just dont knwo fi other chagnes are required. | |
| 13:34:04 | sean-k-mooney | is the cross job passing with the bumped eventlet version and that patch? | |
| 13:34:21 | sean-k-mooney | if it is i think we can proceed with it and adress any other followups as they ariase | |
| 13:51:51 | frickler | sean-k-mooney: oh, I thought it was, but actually it is hitting a timeout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/933257 | |
| 14:02:12 | sean-k-mooney | frickler: right i didnt have a chance to see why but that what i was vagely recalling | |
| 14:35:01 | bauzas | gibi: this is OK, I'll create the agenda, I just wanted to mention that tomorrow will be a spec review day and that thursday EOD is the soft spec freeze | |
| 14:36:40 | gibi | bauzas: OK then I will run a 30 minutes meeting | |
| 14:39:00 | bauzas | thanks a lot | |
| 15:16:48 | opendevreview | Kaloyan Kotlarski proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Fetch the available vCPUs from the respective cgroup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927474 | |
| 15:50:34 | gibi | nova meeting starts in 10 minutes here in the channel | |
| 15:50:41 | gibi | (yes I will be your host today) | |
| 15:55:48 | ildikov | sean-k-mooney: bauzas: I think this one is ready to go now, I resolved the doc build issues: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/936759 | |
| 15:59:38 | bauzas | gibi: I just wrote the agenda | |
| 15:59:58 | bauzas | oh man, the wiki is super slow | |
| 16:00:45 | gibi | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:45 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Dec 10 16:00:45 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:45 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:45 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:50 | gibi | bauzas: thanks | |
| 16:01:26 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:01:47 | bauzas | \o (will be standing at the back of the room and mostly silent) | |
| 16:01:49 | gibi | so this is a special occasion as I will be hosting the meeting and I have a hard stop at half past :) | |
| 16:02:02 | s3rj1k | hi all | |
| 16:02:31 | gibi | due to time pressure I will be quick | |
| 16:02:32 | gibi | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:43 | gibi | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:52 | gibi | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:03:05 | gibi | is there any bug we need to discuss today? | |
| 16:04:13 | gibi | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:20 | gibi | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:04:28 | gibi | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:04:36 | gibi | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:04:40 | gibi | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:04:45 | gibi | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:05:17 | gibi | I see some instability in the nova-emulation job | |
| 16:05:23 | gibi | but I think this is not new | |
| 16:05:50 | gibi | is there anybody how is willing to take a look at the job? | |
| 16:06:40 | gibi | I guess we will see similar failures next week and try to ask the same question :) | |
| 16:06:41 | Uggla | */ | |
| 16:07:18 | bauzas | yeah the nova-emulation job is a bit stale | |
| 16:07:29 | gibi | is there any other gate bug to be raised? | |
| 16:07:46 | bauzas | I saw that for stable branches, that's the first time I'm seeing that for master, but we could look at that next week | |
| 16:08:58 | gibi | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:04 | gibi | #link https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html | |
| 16:09:09 | gibi | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:09:15 | frickler | not gate bug, but jsonscheme reqs bump is blocked by nova | |
| 16:09:15 | gibi | #info Specs review day planned for tomorrow | |
| 16:09:33 | gibi | frickler: do you have a link to the bump? | |
| 16:09:41 | frickler | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/925059 | |
| 16:10:29 | gibi | thanks I will take a look later today or tomorrow | |
| 16:10:55 | frickler | ty | |
| 16:11:30 | gibi | so going back to the schedule, let me repeate | |
| 16:11:32 | gibi | #info Specs review day planned for tomorrow | |
| 16:11:57 | gibi | so please review incoming specs and if you are spec author please be ready to reply on comments | |
| 16:12:06 | gibi | #info Specs soft freeze planned for Thursday EOB | |
| 16:12:22 | gibi | bauzas: do you have a statement what soft means? | |
| 16:12:54 | gibi | ahh I found it in the scheduel | |