| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-10-29 | |||
| 16:10:49 | sean-k-mooney | one is devstack will change its default nodeset | |
| 16:10:57 | sean-k-mooney | the other is we need to update our in repo jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/932648 | |
| 16:11:00 | sean-k-mooney | does the latter | |
| 16:11:46 | frickler | there's an ML thread on the noble upgrade https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/JOMDY26TCW7OX3NXRGOYQCIDXNNJ4E25/ | |
| 16:11:51 | bauzas | ok, I'll cc myself on gmann's patch | |
| 16:11:56 | frickler | I assume gmann will update once ready | |
| 16:12:35 | sean-k-mooney | yep so at the momp[ent the only blocker on teh nova side that im aware of is including the correct package for prce.h | |
| 16:12:42 | sean-k-mooney | in the docs jobs (api ref ectra) | |
| 16:12:58 | frickler | ack, lots of other projects look much worse off | |
| 16:13:04 | bauzas | hence the failure | |
| 16:13:18 | sean-k-mooney | yep so in my devstack i have pcre 2 and 3 and maybe 1 installed | |
| 16:13:32 | sean-k-mooney | we just need to see which one actully provides the correct dep | |
| 16:13:35 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:13:41 | sean-k-mooney | the packaging of that is a bit weired and may have changed | |
| 16:13:49 | bauzas | I guess we're cool then | |
| 16:13:58 | sean-k-mooney | more or less | |
| 16:14:02 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Refactor obj_make_compatible to reduce complexity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928590 | |
| 16:14:10 | sean-k-mooney | i think we can just review this as normal | |
| 16:14:17 | sean-k-mooney | and check in each week until merged | |
| 16:15:05 | bauzas | ok, moving on then | |
| 16:15:57 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:16:03 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html | |
| 16:16:09 | bauzas | #action bauzas to add Epoxy nova deadlines in the schedule | |
| 16:16:41 | bauzas | if you were not present at the PTG, you need to know that we'll have a spec soft freeze by mid-Dec | |
| 16:16:54 | bauzas | plan in advance to write your spec accordingly | |
| 16:17:10 | bauzas | the earlier the better as always | |
| 16:17:24 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:17:30 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status | |
| 16:17:55 | bauzas | I moved some stuff, but I need to do a scan check of all the items in there | |
| 16:18:19 | bauzas | #topic PTG summary | |
| 16:18:27 | bauzas | for those who were not able to attend : | |
| 16:18:36 | bauzas | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/HZZPADKTWNMBGRSOEMSPLN432DXZYYTL/ | |
| 16:18:52 | bauzas | feel free to raise questions or remarks in that thread | |
| 16:19:05 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:19:18 | bauzas | hah, elodilles_pto is on PTO as the nick says | |
| 16:19:40 | bauzas | let's move on then to the next topic unless someone wants to raise something about stable branches | |
| 16:19:45 | zigo | FYI (about this link): We'd love to have "vTPM live migration" implemented... :P | |
| 16:20:01 | bauzas | zigo: make a wish | |
| 16:20:31 | sean-k-mooney | many woudl and there is at least some hope that it will be doen in epoxy | |
| 16:20:57 | sean-k-mooney | its non trivial however without wekening security | |
| 16:20:58 | bauzas | there is already some code there so the wish wouldn't be too hard to do | |
| 16:21:49 | sean-k-mooney | yes and no the current code is not accpabel as is as it wont work in the general case without custom policy | |
| 16:21:52 | bauzas | zigo: if you really like the case, please review the spec then once it's uploaded | |
| 16:22:05 | sean-k-mooney | but that is why we are goign to have a spec and try and delvier a better generic solution | |
| 16:22:40 | bauzas | zigo: as sean-k-mooney is explaining, we discussed about user bond of trust with admins | |
| 16:22:57 | bauzas | so I'd like your op voice to be shared on that spec | |
| 16:23:49 | bauzas | anyway, let's not derail the meeting into a technical discussion about a specific feature | |
| 16:24:20 | bauzas | moving on (and I think we can skip the stable branches topic for today) | |
| 16:24:23 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:24:33 | bauzas | fwiesel: want to share something ? | |
| 16:27:47 | fwiesel | Yes, sorry. I found a regression in our networking driver and fixed it. But there is another one. | |
| 16:28:26 | fwiesel | Some race-condition in the startup. I am optimistic that I can fix it this week. | |
| 16:28:46 | fwiesel | That's from my side. Back to you bauzas. | |
| 16:29:03 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:29:10 | bauzas | and good luck with the investigation | |
| 16:29:19 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:29:48 | bauzas | just refreshed the page, nothing in there | |
| 16:29:53 | bauzas | so, anything anyone ? | |
| 16:30:37 | tkajinam | I've proposed oslo.utils release so we hopefully get it soon and can use it for some work in nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/933627 | |
| 16:30:38 | sean-k-mooney | i tought there was somethign we said to cover in the meeting instead of the ptg | |
| 16:30:40 | sean-k-mooney | but i dont recall | |
| 16:30:43 | tkajinam | dansmith, ^^^ just fyi | |
| 16:30:47 | dansmith | tkajinam: thanks | |
| 16:30:52 | bauzas | tkajinam: thanks | |
| 16:31:05 | tkajinam | I'll work on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2083518 once the release is created | |
| 16:31:52 | sean-k-mooney | i might be thinkign of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/932653 but i highlighted that in the cidner cross project | |
| 16:32:21 | tkajinam | sean-k-mooney, ah, yeah | |
| 16:32:23 | bauzas | yeah, we had no topics that were left to be discussed | |
| 16:32:26 | sean-k-mooney | tkajinam: you are porting that to oslo yes | |
| 16:32:40 | sean-k-mooney | and we will just consume the predecate form there once its released | |
| 16:32:49 | tkajinam | sean-k-mooney, yes. you are correct. | |
| 16:33:09 | sean-k-mooney | ya so i dont see anythign contoversion with that so im happy to review that when its ready | |
| 16:33:22 | tkajinam | :-) | |
| 16:34:13 | tkajinam | sean-k-mooney, talking about the spec you raised... I think you spotted a nice point and we need a new mechanism in cinder (qos specs which are not used by cinder but by nova during attachment) | |
| 16:34:43 | tkajinam | I overlooked the fact that the prpoosal is trying to use the existing qos specs but these are cinder internal one and can't be used by nova | |
| 16:34:47 | sean-k-mooney | well frontend qos policies are use by the hypervior (libvirt in this case) | |
| 16:35:03 | sean-k-mooney | to enforce it where as backend qos polcies are done on the stroage backend | |
| 16:35:04 | tkajinam | but that qos is associated with flavor, right ? | |
| 16:35:09 | sean-k-mooney | no | |
| 16:35:16 | sean-k-mooney | its assocated witht eh volume | |
| 16:35:30 | sean-k-mooney | we also have the ablity to do it via the flavor for nova created block devices | |
| 16:35:38 | sean-k-mooney | using the quota:* extra specs | |
| 16:36:12 | sean-k-mooney | i belive the current state is you can configure hard limits today | |
| 16:36:15 | sean-k-mooney | but not burst | |
| 16:36:27 | sean-k-mooney | and the brust limist are what they want to enabel | |
| 16:36:34 | sean-k-mooney | but that was my question to the cinder folk | |
| 16:36:50 | tkajinam | ok | |
| 16:36:51 | sean-k-mooney | to have them confirm what is and is not expected to be requestable vai cinder today | |
| 16:36:57 | tkajinam | I thought the qos specs are not propagated via connection info but it's set in storage backend | |
| 16:37:08 | tkajinam | I'll recheck it and fix my comments in that spec if needed | |
| 16:37:28 | sean-k-mooney | you set them on the voluem type and im not sure how they are propegated to nova | |
| 16:37:37 | sean-k-mooney | so this is where we need input form the cider folk | |
| 16:38:00 | sean-k-mooney | i.e are tehy on teh attachmetn? conection info? do we need to look them up ectra | |
| 16:38:05 | bauzas | can we end the meeting ? | |
| 16:38:12 | sean-k-mooney | yep i think so | |
| 16:38:15 | tkajinam | yeah we can discuss details in the spec | |
| 16:38:17 | sean-k-mooney | this can be an async dicussion | |
| 16:38:41 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:38:46 | bauzas | then thanks all | |
| 16:38:49 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |