| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-10-15 | |||
| 16:13:44 | bauzas | unless someone wants to discuss about another bug report | |
| 16:14:18 | bauzas | okay, moving on | |
| 16:14:25 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:14:32 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:14:37 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:14:42 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:14:48 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:14:53 | bauzas | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:15:06 | bauzas | the periodics were fine, that's cool | |
| 16:16:01 | bauzas | except placement in stable/yoga but that should be EOM, right? | |
| 16:16:19 | bauzas | elodilles: ^ | |
| 16:16:53 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:16:55 | elodilles | hmmm | |
| 16:17:21 | elodilles | i'll add it to my TODO to check what's going on | |
| 16:17:26 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:17:48 | bauzas | but is there any reason why we keep CI checking that stable branch ? | |
| 16:18:16 | elodilles | you mean the unmaintained? | |
| 16:18:30 | bauzas | nevermind, my mind blipped | |
| 16:18:52 | bauzas | unmaintained != EOL | |
| 16:19:08 | elodilles | i've proposed some patches that removes periodics from unmaintained/* | |
| 16:19:18 | bauzas | but still the question remains : should we care of the state of unmaintained branches ? | |
| 16:19:34 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:19:44 | bauzas | moving on then | |
| 16:19:46 | elodilles | so yepp, it's not a general concern | |
| 16:19:47 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:19:54 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html | |
| 16:20:05 | bauzas | as a reminder, we'll discuss the epoxy nova deadlines next week | |
| 16:20:17 | bauzas | nothing further to say | |
| 16:20:22 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:20:27 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status | |
| 16:20:42 | bauzas | I did some cleanup in the etherpad and added the recent approved blueprints | |
| 16:20:53 | bauzas | a round of reviews is strongly encouraged | |
| 16:21:38 | bauzas | #topic PTG planning | |
| 16:21:45 | bauzas | #info as a reminder, we'll meet (virtually) at the PTG on Oct 21-25 2024 | |
| 16:21:52 | bauzas | ... which is next week :-) | |
| 16:21:58 | bauzas | # info Please register yourself to the virtual PTG | |
| 16:22:04 | bauzas | #info Please register yourself to the virtual PTG | |
| 16:22:10 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-ptg | |
| 16:22:19 | bauzas | feel free to add more topics in the above etherpad | |
| 16:24:55 | bauzas | also, we'll have a x-p session between Horizon and Nova | |
| 16:25:03 | bauzas | feel free to add items for that session | |
| 16:25:12 | bauzas | which will happen on Wed 1600UTC | |
| 16:25:28 | tkajinam | iirc we have a few slots in tc PTG to discuss eventlet removal, so we may want to decide the plan for it and nova specific one. | |
| 16:25:52 | bauzas | yeah I heard it | |
| 16:25:52 | tkajinam | my current preference is to have global discussion first and then nova one but I'm open for different opinions | |
| 16:25:58 | bauzas | when would those topics happen ? | |
| 16:26:02 | bauzas | ditto | |
| 16:26:28 | tkajinam | I think we have a slot on Monday and the other on Wednesday | |
| 16:26:29 | bauzas | I hope the eventlet talks would happen on Monday or Tuesday to leave other projects time for discussing that again | |
| 16:26:30 | sean-k-mooney | there is a sperate etherpad for an overall session | |
| 16:26:36 | tkajinam | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2024-ptg-os-tc | |
| 16:27:15 | tkajinam | ok it seems they canceled the slots on Wednesday | |
| 16:27:16 | sean-k-mooney | not that oen this https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2024-ptg-eventlet-removal | |
| 16:27:26 | tkajinam | ah, ok | |
| 16:27:42 | bauzas | okay, I'll mention that etherpad in our own Nova etherpad | |
| 16:27:47 | sean-k-mooney | but yes curerntly a monday and wednesday slot but no adjenda | |
| 16:27:54 | bauzas | I need to write the agenda, I'll refer to that session | |
| 16:28:36 | tkajinam | sean-k-mooney, ok. thanks for the info. | |
| 16:30:30 | bauzas | cool, ditto | |
| 16:30:33 | bauzas | moving on then | |
| 16:30:49 | bauzas | there will also be an i18n discussion I'll attend | |
| 16:31:07 | bauzas | I'll refer to it too with possibly follow-up discussions during nova sessions | |
| 16:31:36 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:31:42 | bauzas | elodilles: floor is yours | |
| 16:31:45 | elodilles | ack | |
| 16:31:49 | elodilles | #info stable/202*.* gates seem to be OK | |
| 16:32:03 | elodilles | #info final 2023.1 Antelope nova release before the branch transitions to 'unmaintained': https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/932406 | |
| 16:32:08 | elodilles | does anyone have any bug fix that should be part of the final antelope release? | |
| 16:32:19 | elodilles | open & merged patches on stable/2023.1: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-2023.1-eom | |
| 16:32:58 | elodilles | there are some patches that wait for a 2nd +2, but otherwise i don't know if anything would be important | |
| 16:33:13 | elodilles | and that's all from me | |
| 16:33:38 | tkajinam | maybe we should check if all follow-up fixes for image inspector have been backported | |
| 16:34:27 | elodilles | tkajinam: good point. afair, we had quite many of that backported, | |
| 16:34:44 | elodilles | though i don't know if that were all | |
| 16:35:05 | bauzas | well, there are a bunch of them | |
| 16:35:19 | sean-k-mooney | i think for the issues that are already fix the answer is yes | |
| 16:35:31 | bauzas | if you speak of the CVE fixes, yeah | |
| 16:35:41 | tkajinam | ah, ok | |
| 16:35:51 | sean-k-mooney | we also backported the fix for the aws and iso regressions on stable | |
| 16:35:52 | elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22format-inspector%22+branch:stable/2023.1 | |
| 16:35:57 | bauzas | if that's about the 'improvements' (like raw means raw), then I'm unsure | |
| 16:36:17 | elodilles | these are the ones that i'm aware of, at least (plus the bug fixes) | |
| 16:36:45 | bauzas | those are the CVE fixes | |
| 16:37:17 | tkajinam | My thought was mostly about regression fixes, not improvements. but I think we are ok about the known issues. | |
| 16:37:49 | elodilles | ACK | |
| 16:38:22 | bauzas | yeah so I checked | |
| 16:38:37 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926144 is more a signal patch, like 'dude, you shouldn't be doing that' | |
| 16:39:35 | bauzas | and this was following https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924866 which was backported | |
| 16:39:56 | tkajinam | lgtm | |
| 16:40:31 | bauzas | we recently merged https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930754 but I don't see any interest in backporting it down | |
| 16:40:51 | bauzas | and there is a dep on glance | |
| 16:41:08 | bauzas | so I think we can't use the glance safebelt | |
| 16:41:17 | bauzas | hence the non-backport | |
| 16:41:30 | bauzas | so I guess we're cool | |
| 16:42:02 | bauzas | moving on ten | |
| 16:42:06 | bauzas | then* | |
| 16:42:09 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:42:23 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:42:31 | bauzas | fwiesel: anything to mention ? | |
| 16:42:43 | fwiesel | No, nothing from my side. | |