| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-09-17 | |||
| 16:31:42 | sean-k-mooney | noonedeadpunk: bauzas is askign to make sure it will work with any arg | |
| 16:31:51 | noonedeadpunk | it's not restricted with path? | |
| 16:32:14 | noonedeadpunk | l133 of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928839/3/nova/tests/unit/objects/test_console_auth_token.py | |
| 16:32:21 | bauzas | "@item(hotlist):button2 | |
| 16:32:24 | bauzas | doh | |
| 16:32:46 | bauzas | the documentation says "You can also supply extra request arguments" | |
| 16:33:25 | bauzas | anyway, can we just (for the sake of my beer) accept that blueprint as specless and nitpick over the change as much as we want over the Epoxy timeframe ? :) | |
| 16:33:34 | noonedeadpunk | ++ | |
| 16:33:43 | sean-k-mooney | +1 form me also | |
| 16:34:04 | bauzas | any objection ? | |
| 16:34:48 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:35:10 | bauzas | #agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/novnc-base-url-respect-extra-params accepted as specless for the Epoxy release | |
| 16:35:17 | bauzas | I'll file the paperwork | |
| 16:35:22 | gibi | OK for me | |
| 16:35:24 | bauzas | that's it for the agenda | |
| 16:35:39 | bauzas | any other bit you'd like to raise ? | |
| 16:35:56 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:36:06 | bauzas | my beer won't heat, cool | |
| 16:36:10 | bauzas | thanks all | |
| 16:36:13 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:36:14 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Sep 17 16:36:13 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:36:14 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-09-17-16.01.html | |
| 16:36:14 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-09-17-16.01.txt | |
| 16:36:14 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-09-17-16.01.log.html | |
| 16:36:17 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:36:22 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:38:23 | gibi | o/ | |
| #openstack-nova - 2024-09-18 | |||
| 01:14:48 | opendevreview | Masahito Muroi proposed openstack/nova master: Use boot_roles_count and boot_role_ |
|
| 04:43:48 | opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/929719 | |
| 06:08:52 | gibi | bauzas: it seems to me we are still blocked https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928310/comments/b3c9bcb6_9be616a6 | |
| 06:11:45 | bauzas | eek ok I see | |
| 06:13:46 | bauzas | https://github.com/openstack/python-openstackclient/blob/master/openstackclient/compute/v2/server.py#L3875 | |
| 06:14:15 | bauzas | I'm lost now | |
| 06:14:26 | bauzas | we still send admin_password to evacuate | |
| 06:14:39 | bauzas | oh, but that's to the sdk | |
| 06:17:43 | bauzas | and I don't see 7.1.1 here https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/python-openstackclient/unreleased.html | |
| 06:18:17 | bauzas | elodilles: ^ | |
| 06:21:39 | bauzas | https://github.com/openstack/python-openstackclient/compare/7.1.0...7.1.1 | |
| 06:22:12 | bauzas | oh fuck, I understand it | |
| 06:22:54 | bauzas | https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/openstack/compute/v2/server.py#L748 | |
| 06:23:15 | bauzas | this is neither 'password' nor 'admin_password', but just 'admin_pass' | |
| 06:23:27 | bauzas | we lost 3 days basically and we need another fix and another release | |
| 06:23:46 | bauzas | stephenfin: elodilles: frickler: ^ | |
| 06:47:57 | bauzas | gibi: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/929726 | |
| 06:48:18 | bauzas | this is 8.47am and I already have headache | |
| 06:50:29 | bauzas | frickler: elodilles: I'm in favor of exceptionnally rollbacking to OSC6.x for Dalmatian, we are always awfully late for Nova RC1 | |
| 07:00:48 | gibi | bauzas: quickly reproduced the osc issue in a fresh devstack, then applied your patch and now I have proof that it works | |
| 07:01:02 | gibi | thanks for quickly proposing the fix | |
| 07:30:10 | gibi | bauzas: if you are interested in the microversion 2.95 evacuate issue I mentioned in my comment in the osc patch then https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2081023 This is probably just a cosmetic issue. | |
| 07:47:53 | frickler | thx, I commented on this yesterday already in the qa channel, I was under the impression that sean-k-mooney had tested my change, sorry for that. is this option also really named differently between this and what create and rebuild use? might be just an sdk thing, but certainly not helpful | |
| 07:48:25 | frickler | I'm also not really here this week, so try to ping other sdk, release and reqs people as needed | |
| 08:12:50 | bauzas | sorry folks, I was off the laptop last hour | |
| 08:12:52 | bauzas | now I'm back | |
| 08:14:39 | bauzas | so, I'd prefer to rollback the u-c by OSC6 now | |
| 08:16:16 | bauzas | gibi: elodilles ^ | |
| 08:16:19 | bauzas | stephenfin: too ^ | |
| 08:40:50 | danfai_ | Quick question: In nova I saw that the name is sanitized to be used as a hostname. The hostname should then be maximum 63 characters long. In case you use a name that is longer, the last characters are truncated. If you now use the server create call to create multiple VMs, this length will be longer, since the -{index} is appended. Is this supposed to be like this? | |
| 09:30:09 | gibi | bauzas: do you suggest to reopen https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/929552 ? I have no power to un-abandon it. | |
| 09:37:05 | sean-k-mooney | i can do that now | |
| 09:37:43 | sean-k-mooney | done | |
| 09:37:50 | sean-k-mooney | although it needs a rebase | |
| 09:37:56 | sean-k-mooney | will i do that now | |
| 09:38:05 | sean-k-mooney | and add 7.1.2? | |
| 09:39:03 | sean-k-mooney | sorry 7.1.1 | |
| 09:40:20 | gibi | yeah 7.1.1 is still broken | |
| 09:42:29 | sean-k-mooney | ok updated https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/929552 | |
| 09:43:59 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks | |
| 09:44:23 | gibi | I pinged the release channel as well | |
| 09:45:16 | sean-k-mooney | looking back at my orgial comment i linked to the code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/929236/comment/d39df785_1f261b9e/ to check the parmater was correct | |
| 09:45:33 | sean-k-mooney | and i misread admin_password as admin_pass | |
| 09:51:05 | bauzas | sorry, I was again off (I have a tech folk in my house for my optic fiber issue) | |
| 09:51:51 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: stephenfin: I'm really sorry about breaking the OSC7 version, but we can't wait for a new release for like 2 days | |
| 09:52:20 | bauzas | and given https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2081023 I'd prefer to have time for testing it | |
| 10:16:23 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [DNM] testing unreleased osc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/929757 | |
| 10:17:45 | sean-k-mooney | that shoudl pull osc master | |
| 10:18:07 | sean-k-mooney | im going to push another dnm to instead use the pinned version of osc | |
| 10:19:34 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [DNM] testing pinning osc to 6.6.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/929758 | |
| 11:30:03 | gibi | proposed osc 7.1.2 so that if the decision is to roll forward then we can have a place to roll to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/929765 | |
| 11:41:29 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: have you seen gibi's https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2081023 when testing evacuate with my patch ? | |
| 11:42:11 | sean-k-mooney | i saw it but didnt look at it in detail | |
| 11:42:13 | bauzas | gibi: I'm not super happy with the move forward now, when trying to understand how OSC was calling the SDK, I wasn't sure my patch was the right thing to do | |
| 11:42:39 | sean-k-mooney | the issue is the sdk renames all the api field internally | |
| 11:42:48 | sean-k-mooney | and that mapping is really easy to get wrong | |
| 11:43:17 | gibi | bauzas: I'm not advocationg to roll forward any more. I just preparing for the chance that the decision is to roll forward | |
| 11:43:30 | gibi | also 7.1.2 needed anyhow to get a working osc out to the users | |
| 11:44:01 | gibi | bauzas: also https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2081023 is not osc but nova | |
| 11:44:08 | bauzas | I think we need time to test OSC7 | |
| 11:44:10 | bauzas | that's the point | |
| 11:44:11 | gibi | and only cosmetic as far as I see | |
| 11:44:12 | sean-k-mooney | i have two sets of zuul jobs usin gnova gate with master osc and rolling back to 6.6.0 | |
| 11:44:16 | bauzas | while RC1 is now super urgent | |
| 11:44:42 | sean-k-mooney | and we have the patches to requireemtn repo to go either direction | |
| 11:44:44 | gibi | bauzas: 7.1.1 is out there as we released it, so having a fixed 7.1.2 out there helps | |
| 11:44:47 | gibi | the users | |
| 11:44:49 | sean-k-mooney | so we can use that to inform the decsion | |
| 11:45:52 | bauzas | gibi: well, I wouldn't say that #2081023 is cosmetic | |
| 11:46:29 | bauzas | as an admin, you either need to set older microversion or upgrade your computes in order to not get that failure, right? | |
| 11:48:27 | sean-k-mooney | are we sure this is a bug | |
| 11:48:29 | gibi | bauzas: it happens because all of the nodes are forced down in the deployment | |
| 11:48:41 | gibi | and that results in min service version to be 0 | |